arXiv subjects

Dániel Marx

Publications and source records attributed to Dániel Marx.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2024

List homomorphisms by deleting edges and vertices: tight complexity bounds for bounded-treewidth graphs

The goal of this paper is to investigate a family of optimization problems arising from list homomorphisms, and to understand what the best possible algorithms are if we restrict the problem to bounded-treewidth graphs. For a fixed $H$, the input of the optimization problem LHomVD($H$) is a graph $G$ with lists $L(v)$, and the task is to find a set $X$ of vertices having minimum size such that $(G-X,L)$ has a list homomorphism to $H$. We define analogously the edge-deletion variant LHomED($H$). This expressive family of problems includes members that are essentially equivalent to fundamental problems such as Vertex Cover, Max Cut, Odd Cycle Transversal, and Edge/Vertex Multiway Cut. For both variants, we first characterize those graphs $H$ that make the problem polynomial-time solvable and show that the problem is NP-hard for every other fixed $H$. Second, as our main result, we determine for every graph $H$ for which the problem is NP-hard, the smallest possible constant $c_H$ such that the problem can be solved in time $c^t_H\cdot n^{O(1)}$ if a tree decomposition of $G$ having width $t$ is given in the input.Let $i(H)$ be the maximum size of a set of vertices in $H$ that have pairwise incomparable neighborhoods. For the vertex-deletion variant LHomVD($H$), we show that the smallest possible constant is $i(H)+1$ for every $H$. The situation is more complex for the edge-deletion version. For every $H$, one can solve LHomED($H$) in time $i(H)^t\cdot n^{O(1)}$ if a tree decomposition of width $t$ is given. However, the existence of a specific type of decomposition of $H$ shows that there are graphs $H$ where LHomED($H$) can be solved significantly more efficiently and the best possible constant can be arbitrarily smaller than $i(H)$. Nevertheless, we determine this best possible constant and (assuming the SETH) prove tight bounds for every fixed $H$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2023

Counting Small Induced Subgraphs with Edge-monotone Properties

We study the parameterized complexity of #IndSub($Φ$), where given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, the task is to count the number of induced subgraphs on $k$ vertices that satisfy the graph property $Φ$. Focke and Roth [STOC 2022] completely characterized the complexity for each $Φ$ that is a hereditary property (that is, closed under vertex deletions): #IndSub($Φ$) is #W[1]-hard except in the degenerate cases when every graph satisfies $Φ$ or only finitely many graphs satisfy $Φ$. We complement this result with a classification for each $Φ$ that is edge monotone (that is, closed under edge deletions): #IndSub($Φ$) is #W[1]-hard except in the degenerate case when there are only finitely many integers $k$ such that $Φ$ is nontrivial on $k$-vertex graphs. Our result generalizes earlier results for specific properties $Φ$ that are related to the connectivity or density of the graph. Further, we extend the #W[1]-hardness result by a lower bound which shows that #IndSub($Φ$) cannot be solved in time $f(k) \cdot |V(G)|^{o(\sqrt{\log k/\log\log k})}$ for any function $f$, unless the Exponential-Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. For many natural properties, we obtain even a tight bound $f(k) \cdot |V(G)|^{o(k)}$; for example, this is the case for every property $Φ$ that is nontrivial on $k$-vertex graphs for each $k$ greater than some $k_0$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2023

Optimally Repurposing Existing Algorithms to Obtain Exponential-Time Approximations

The goal of this paper is to understand how exponential-time approximation algorithms can be obtained from existing polynomial-time approximation algorithms, existing parameterized exact algorithms, and existing parameterized approximation algorithms. More formally, we consider a monotone subset minimization problem over a universe of size $n$ (e.g., Vertex Cover or Feedback Vertex Set). We have access to an algorithm that finds an $α$-approximate solution in time $c^k \cdot n^{O(1)}$ if a solution of size $k$ exists (and more generally, an extension algorithm that can approximate in a similar way if a set can be extended to a solution with $k$ further elements). Our goal is to obtain a $d^n \cdot n^{O(1)}$ time $β$-approximation algorithm for the problem with $d$ as small as possible. That is, for every fixed $α,c,β\geq 1$, we would like to determine the smallest possible $d$ that can be achieved in a model where our problem-specific knowledge is limited to checking the feasibility of a solution and invoking the $α$-approximate extension algorithm. Our results completely resolve this question: (1) For every fixed $α,c,β\geq 1$, a simple algorithm (``approximate monotone local search'') achieves the optimum value of $d$. (2) Given $α,c,β\geq 1$, we can efficiently compute the optimum $d$ up to any precision $\varepsilon > 0$. Earlier work presented algorithms (but no lower bounds) for the special case $α= β= 1$ [Fomin et al., J. ACM 2019] and for the special case $α= β> 1$ [Esmer et al., ESA 2022]. Our work generalizes these results and in particular confirms that the earlier algorithms are optimal in these special cases.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Tight Complexity Bounds for Counting Generalized Dominating Sets in Bounded-Treewidth Graphs Part II: Hardness Results

For a well-studied family of domination-type problems, in bounded-treewidth graphs, we investigate whether it is possible to find faster algorithms. For sets $σ,ρ$ of non-negative integers, a $(σ,ρ)$-set of a graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices such that $|N(u)\cap S|\in σ$ for every $u\in S$, and $|N(v)\cap S|\in ρ$ for every $v\not\in S$. The problem of finding a $(σ,ρ)$-set (of a certain size) unifies common problems like $\text{Independent Set}$, $\text{Dominating Set}$, $\text{Independent Dominating Set}$, and many others. In an accompanying paper, it is proven that, for all pairs of finite or cofinite sets $(σ,ρ)$, there is an algorithm that counts $(σ,ρ)$-sets in time $(c_{σ,ρ})^{\text{tw}}\cdot n^{O(1)}$ (if a tree decomposition of width $\text{tw}$ is given in the input). Here, $c_{σ,ρ}$ is a constant with an intricate dependency on $σ$ and $ρ$. Despite this intricacy, we show that the algorithms in the accompanying paper are most likely optimal, i.e., for any pair $(σ, ρ)$ of finite or cofinite sets where the problem is non-trivial, and any $\varepsilon>0$, a $(c_{σ,ρ}-\varepsilon)^{\text{tw}}\cdot n^{O(1)}$-algorithm counting the number of $(σ,ρ)$-sets would violate the Counting Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis ($\#$SETH). For finite sets $σ$ and $ρ$, our lower bounds also extend to the decision version, showing that those algorithms are optimal in this setting as well.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2023

Parameterized Approximation Schemes for Clustering with General Norm Objectives

This paper considers the well-studied algorithmic regime of designing a $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm for a $k$-clustering problem that runs in time $f(k,ε)poly(n)$ (sometimes called an efficient parameterized approximation scheme or EPAS for short). Notable results of this kind include EPASes in the high-dimensional Euclidean setting for $k$-center [Badŏiu, Har-Peled, Indyk; STOC'02] as well as $k$-median, and $k$-means [Kumar, Sabharwal, Sen; J. ACM 2010]. However, existing EPASes handle only basic objectives (such as $k$-center, $k$-median, and $k$-means) and are tailored to the specific objective and metric space. Our main contribution is a clean and simple EPAS that settles more than ten clustering problems (across multiple well-studied objectives as well as metric spaces) and unifies well-known EPASes. Our algorithm gives EPASes for a large variety of clustering objectives (for example, $k$-means, $k$-center, $k$-median, priority $k$-center, $\ell$-centrum, ordered $k$-median, socially fair $k$-median aka robust $k$-median, or more generally monotone norm $k$-clustering) and metric spaces (for example, continuous high-dimensional Euclidean spaces, metrics of bounded doubling dimension, bounded treewidth metrics, and planar metrics). Key to our approach is a new concept that we call bounded $ε$-scatter dimension--an intrinsic complexity measure of a metric space that is a relaxation of the standard notion of bounded doubling dimension. Our main technical result shows that two conditions are essentially sufficient for our algorithm to yield an EPAS on the input metric $M$ for any clustering objective: (i) The objective is described by a monotone (not necessarily symmetric!) norm, and (ii) the $ε$-scatter dimension of $M$ is upper bounded by a function of $ε$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Anti-Factor is FPT Parameterized by Treewidth and List Size (but Counting is Hard)

In the general AntiFactor problem, a graph $G$ is given with a set $X_v\subseteq \mathbb{N}$ of forbidden degrees for every vertex $v$ and the task is to find a set $S$ of edges such that the degree of $v$ in $S$ is not in the set $X_v$. Standard techniques (dynamic programming + fast convolution) can be used to show that if $M$ is the largest forbidden degree, then the problem can be solved in time $(M+2)^k\cdot n^{O(1)}$ if a tree decomposition of width $k$ is given. However, significantly faster algorithms are possible if the sets $X_v$ are sparse: our main algorithmic result shows that if every vertex has at most $x$ forbidden degrees (we call this special case AntiFactor$_x$), then the problem can be solved in time $(x+1)^{O(k)}\cdot n^{O(1)}$. That is, the AntiFactor$_x$ is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by treewidth $k$ and the maximum number $x$ of excluded degrees. Our algorithm uses the technique of representative sets, which can be generalized to the optimization version, but (as expected) not to the counting version of the problem. In fact, we show that #AntiFactor$_1$ is already #W[1]-hard parameterized by the width of the given decomposition. Moreover, we show that, unlike for the decision version, the standard dynamic programming algorithm is essentially optimal for the counting version. Formally, for a fixed nonempty set $X$, we denote by $X$-AntiFactor the special case where every vertex $v$ has the same set $X_v=X$ of forbidden degrees. We show the following lower bound for every fixed set $X$: if there is an $ε>0$ such that #$X$-AntiFactor can be solved in time $(\max X+2-ε)^k\cdot n^{O(1)}$ on a tree decomposition of width $k$, then the Counting Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (#SETH) fails.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2023

Computing Generalized Convolutions Faster Than Brute Force

In this paper, we consider a general notion of convolution. Let $D$ be a finite domain and let $D^n$ be the set of $n$-length vectors (tuples) of $D$. Let $f : D \times D \to D$ be a function and let $\oplus_f$ be a coordinate-wise application of $f$. The $f$-Convolution of two functions $g,h : D^n \to \{-M,\ldots,M\}$ is $$(g \otimes_f h)(\textbf{v}) := \sum_{\substack{\textbf{v}_g,\textbf{v}_h \in D^n\\ \text{s.t. } \textbf{v}_g \oplus_f \textbf{v}_h}} g(\textbf{v}_g) \cdot h(\textbf{v}_h)$$ for every $\textbf{v} \in D^n$. This problem generalizes many fundamental convolutions such as Subset Convolution, XOR Product, Covering Product or Packing Product, etc. For arbitrary function $f$ and domain $D$ we can compute $f$-Convolution via brute-force enumeration in $\widetilde{O}(|D|^{2n}\mathrm{polylog}(M))$ time. Our main result is an improvement over this naive algorithm. We show that $f$-Convolution can be computed exactly in $\widetilde{O}((c \cdot |D|^2)^{n}\mathrm{polylog}(M))$ for constant $c := 3/4$ when $D$ has even cardinality. Our main observation is that a \emph{cyclic partition} of a function $f : D \times D \to D$ can be used to speed up the computation of $f$-Convolution, and we show that an appropriate cyclic partition exists for every $f$. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a single entry of the $f$-Convolution can be computed more efficiently. In this variant, we are given two functions $g,h : D^n \to \{-M,\ldots,M\}$ alongside with a vector $\textbf{v} \in D^n$ and the task of the $f$-Query problem is to compute integer $(g \otimes_f h)(\textbf{v})$. This is a generalization of the well-known Orthogonal Vectors problem. We show that $f$-Query can be computed in $\widetilde{O}(|D|^{\fracω{2} n}\mathrm{polylog}(M))$ time, where $ω\in [2,2.372)$ is the exponent of currently fastest matrix multiplication algorithm.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Computing Square Colorings on Bounded-Treewidth and Planar Graphs

A square coloring of a graph $G$ is a coloring of the square $G^2$ of $G$, that is, a coloring of the vertices of $G$ such that any two vertices that are at distance at most $2$ in $G$ receive different colors. We investigate the complexity of finding a square coloring with a given number of $q$ colors. We show that the problem is polynomial-time solvable on graphs of bounded treewidth by presenting an algorithm with running time $n^{2^{\operatorname{tw} + 4}+O(1)}$ for graphs of treewidth at most $\operatorname{tw}$. The somewhat unusual exponent $2^{\operatorname{tw}}$ in the running time is essentially optimal: we show that for any $ε>0$, there is no algorithm with running time $f(\operatorname{tw})n^{(2-ε)^{\operatorname{tw}}}$ unless the Exponential-Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. We also show that the square coloring problem is NP-hard on planar graphs for any fixed number $q \ge 4$ of colors. Our main algorithmic result is showing that the problem (when the number of colors $q$ is part of the input) can be solved in subexponential time $2^{O(n^{2/3}\log n)}$ on planar graphs. The result follows from the combination of two algorithms. If the number $q$ of colors is small ($\le n^{1/3}$), then we can exploit a treewidth bound on the square of the graph to solve the problem in time $2^{O(\sqrt{qn}\log n)}$. If the number of colors is large ($\ge n^{1/3}$), then an algorithm based on protrusion decompositions and building on our result for the bounded-treewidth case solves the problem in time $2^{O(n\log n/q)}$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

A subexponential parameterized algorithm for Directed Subset Traveling Salesman Problem on planar graphs

There are numerous examples of the so-called ``square root phenomenon'' in the field of parameterized algorithms: many of the most fundamental graph problems, parameterized by some natural parameter $k$, become significantly simpler when restricted to planar graphs and in particular the best possible running time is exponential in $O(\sqrt{k})$ instead of $O(k)$ (modulo standard complexity assumptions). We consider a classic optimization problem Subset Traveling Salesman, where we are asked to visit all the terminals $T$ by a minimum-weight closed walk. We investigate the parameterized complexity of this problem in planar graphs, where the number $k=|T|$ of terminals is regarded as the parameter. We show that Subset TSP can be solved in time $2^{O(\sqrt{k}\log k)}\cdot n^{O(1)}$ even on edge-weighted directed planar graphs. This improves upon the algorithm of Klein and Marx [SODA 2014] with the same running time that worked only on undirected planar graphs with polynomially large integer weights.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Parameterized Complexity of Weighted Multicut in Trees

The Edge Multicut problem is a classical cut problem where given an undirected graph $G$, a set of pairs of vertices $\mathcal{P}$, and a budget $k$, the goal is to determine if there is a set $S$ of at most $k$ edges such that for each $(s,t) \in \mathcal{P}$, $G-S$ has no path from $s$ to $t$. Edge Multicut has been relatively recently shown to be fixed-parameter tractable (FPT), parameterized by $k$, by Marx and Razgon [SICOMP 2014], and independently by Bousquet et al. [SICOMP 2018]. In the weighted version of the problem, called Weighted Edge Multicut one is additionally given a weight function $\mathtt{wt} : E(G) \to \mathbb{N}$ and a weight bound $w$, and the goal is to determine if there is a solution of size at most $k$ and weight at most $w$. Both the FPT algorithms for Edge Multicut by Marx et al. and Bousquet et al. fail to generalize to the weighted setting. In fact, the weighted problem is non-trivial even on trees and determining whether Weighted Edge Multicut on trees is FPT was explicitly posed as an open problem by Bousquet et al. [STACS 2009]. In this article, we answer this question positively by designing an algorithm which uses a very recent result by Kim et al. [STOC 2022] about directed flow augmentation as subroutine. We also study a variant of this problem where there is no bound on the size of the solution, but the parameter is a structural property of the input, for example, the number of leaves of the tree. We strengthen our results by stating them for the more general vertex deletion version.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Dynamic Time Warping Under Translation: Approximation Guided by Space-Filling Curves

The Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) distance is a popular measure of similarity for a variety of sequence data. For comparing polygonal curves $π, σ$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, it provides a robust, outlier-insensitive alternative to the Fréchet distance. However, like the Fréchet distance, the DTW distance is not invariant under translations. Can we efficiently optimize the DTW distance of $π$ and $σ$ under arbitrary translations, to compare the curves' shape irrespective of their absolute location? There are surprisingly few works in this direction, which may be due to its computational intricacy: For the Euclidean norm, this problem contains as a special case the geometric median problem, which provably admits no exact algebraic algorithm (that is, no algorithm using only addition, multiplication, and $k$-th roots). We thus investigate exact algorithms for non-Euclidean norms as well as approximation algorithms for the Euclidean norm: - For the $L_1$ norm in $\mathbb{R}^d$, we provide an $\mathcal{O}(n^{2(d+1)})$-time algorithm, i.e., an exact polynomial-time algorithm for constant $d$. Here and below, $n$ bounds the curves' complexities. - For the Euclidean norm in $\mathbb{R}^2$, we show that a simple problem-specific insight leads to a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation in time $\mathcal{O}(n^3/\varepsilon^2)$. We then show how to obtain a subcubic $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^{2.5}/\varepsilon^2)$ time algorithm with significant new ideas; this time comes close to the well-known quadratic time barrier for computing DTW for fixed translations. Technically, the algorithm is obtained by speeding up repeated DTW distance estimations using a dynamic data structure for maintaining shortest paths in weighted planar digraphs. Crucially, we show how to traverse a candidate set of translations using space-filling curves in a way that incurs only few updates to the data structure.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2022

Modern Lower Bound Techniques in Database Theory and Constraint Satisfaction

Conditional lower bounds based on $P\neq NP$, the Exponential-Time Hypothesis (ETH), or similar complexity assumptions can provide very useful information about what type of algorithms are likely to be possible. Ideally, such lower bounds would be able to demonstrate that the best known algorithms are essentially optimal and cannot be improved further. In this tutorial, we overview different types of lower bounds, and see how they can be applied to problems in database theory and constraint satisfaction.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2021

Counting list homomorphisms from graphs of bounded treewidth: tight complexity bounds

The goal of this work is to give precise bounds on the counting complexity of a family of generalized coloring problems (list homomorphisms) on bounded-treewidth graphs. Given graphs $G$, $H$, and lists $L(v)\subseteq V(H)$ for every $v\in V(G)$, a {\em list homomorphism} is a function $f:V(G)\to V(H)$ that preserves the edges (i.e., $uv\in E(G)$ implies $f(u)f(v)\in E(H)$) and respects the lists (i.e., $f(v)\in L(v))$. Standard techniques show that if $G$ is given with a tree decomposition of width $t$, then the number of list homomorphisms can be counted in time $|V(H)|^t\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. Our main result is determining, for every fixed graph $H$, how much the base $|V(H)|$ in the running time can be improved. For a connected graph $H$ we define $\operatorname{irr}(H)$ the following way: if $H$ has a loop or is nonbipartite, then $\operatorname{irr}(H)$ is the maximum size of a set $S\subseteq V(H)$ where any two vertices have different neighborhoods; if $H$ is bipartite, then $\operatorname{irr}(H)$ is the maximum size of such a set that is fully in one of the bipartition classes. For disconnected $H$, we define $\operatorname{irr}(H)$ as the maximum of $\operatorname{irr}(C)$ over every connected component $C$ of $H$. We show that, for every fixed graph $H$, the number of list homomorphisms from $(G,L)$ to $H$ * can be counted in time $\operatorname{irr}(H)^t\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ if a tree decomposition of $G$ having width at most $t$ is given in the input, and * cannot be counted in time $(\operatorname{irr}(H)-ε)^t\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ for any $ε>0$, even if a tree decomposition of $G$ having width at most $t$ is given in the input, unless the #SETH fails. Thereby we give a precise and complete complexity classification featuring matching upper and lower bounds for all target graphs with or without loops.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2021

A Framework for Parameterized Subexponential Algorithms for Generalized Cycle Hitting Problems on Planar Graphs

Subexponential parameterized algorithms are known for a wide range of natural problems on planar graphs, but the techniques are usually highly problem specific. The goal of this paper is to introduce a framework for obtaining $n^{O(\sqrt{k})}$ time algorithms for a family of graph modification problems that includes problems that can be seen as generalized cycle hitting problems. Our starting point is the Node Unique Label Cover problem (that is, given a CSP instance where each constraint is a permutation of values on two variables, the task is to delete $k$ variables to make the instance satisfiable). We introduce a variant of the problem where $k$ vertices have to be deleted such that every 2-connected component of the remaining instance is satisfiable. Then we extend the problem with cardinality constraints that restrict the number of times a certain value can be used (globally or within a 2-connected component of the solution). We show that there is an $n^{O(\sqrt{k})}$ time algorithm on planar graphs for any problem that can be formulated this way, which includes a large number of well-studied problems, for example, Odd Cycle Transversal, Subset Feedback Vertex Set, Group Feedback Vertex Set, Subset Group Feedback Vertex Set, Vertex Multiway Cut, and Component Order Connectivity. For those problems that admit appropriate (quasi)polynomial kernels (that increase the parameter only linearly and preserve planarity), our results immediately imply $2^{O(\sqrt{k}\cdot\operatorname{polylog}(k))}n^{O(1)}$ time parameterized algorithms on planar graphs. In particular, we use or adapt known kernelization results to obtain $2^{O(\sqrt{k}\cdot \operatorname{polylog}(k))} n^{O(1)}$ time (randomized) algorithms for Vertex Multiway Cut, Group Feedback Vertex Set, and Subset Feedback Vertex Set.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Incompressibility of H-free edge modification problems: Towards a dichotomy

Given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, the $H$-free Edge Editing problem is to find whether there exists at most $k$ pairs of vertices in $G$ such that changing the adjacency of the pairs in $G$ results in a graph without any induced copy of $H$. The existence of polynomial kernels for $H$-free Edge Editing received significant attention in the parameterized complexity literature. Nontrivial polynomial kernels are known to exist for some graphs $H$ with at most 4 vertices, but starting from 5 vertices, polynomial kernels are known only if $H$ is either complete or empty. This suggests the conjecture that there is no other $H$ with at least 5 vertices were $H$-free Edge Editing admits a polynomial kernel. Towards this goal, we obtain a set $\mathcal{H}$ of nine 5-vertex graphs such that if for every $H\in\mathcal{H}$, $H$-free Edge Editing is incompressible and the complexity assumption $NP \not\subseteq coNP/poly$ holds, then $H$-free Edge Editing is incompressible for every graph $H$ with at least five vertices that is neither complete nor empty. That is, proving incompressibility for these nine graphs would give a complete classification of the kernelization complexity of $H$-free Edge Editing for every $H$ with at least 5 vertices. We obtain similar result also for $H$-free Edge Deletion. Here the picture is more complicated due to the existence of another infinite family of graphs $H$ where the problem is trivial (graphs with exactly one edge). We obtain a larger set $\mathcal{H}$ of nineteen graphs whose incompressibility would give a complete classification of the kernelization complexity of $H$-free Edge Deletion for every graph $H$ with at least 5 vertices. Analogous results follow also for the $H$-free Edge Completion problem by simple complementation.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Degrees and Gaps: Tight Complexity Results of General Factor Problems Parameterized by Treewidth and Cutwidth

For the General Factor problem we are given an undirected graph $G$ and for each vertex $v\in V(G)$ a finite set $B_v$ of non-negative integers. The task is to decide if there is a subset $S\subseteq E(G)$ such that $deg_S(v)\in B_v$ for all vertices $v$ of $G$. The maxgap of a finite integer set $B$ is the largest $d\ge 0$ such that there is an $a\ge 0$ with $[a,a+d+1]\cap B=\{a,a+d+1\}$. Cornuéjols (1988) showed that if the maxgap of all sets $B_v$ is at most 1, then the decision version of General Factor is poly-time solvable. Dudycz and Paluch (2018) extended this result for the minimization and maximization versions. Using convolution techniques from van Rooij (2020), we improve upon the previous algorithm by Arulselvan et al. (2018) and present an algorithm counting the number of solutions of a certain size in time $O^*((M+1)^k)$, given a tree decomposition of width $k$, where $M=\max_v \max B_v$. We prove that this algorithm is essentially optimal for all cases that are not polynomial time solvable for the decision, minimization or maximization versions. We prove that such improvements are not possible even for $B$-Factor, which is General Factor on graphs where all sets $B_v$ agree with the fixed set $B$. We show that for every fixed $B$ where the problem is NP-hard, our new algorithm cannot be significantly improved: assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH), no algorithm can solve $B$-Factor in time $O^*((\max B+1-ε)^k)$ for any $ε>0$. We extend this bound to the counting version of $B$-Factor for arbitrary, non-trivial sets $B$, assuming #SETH. We also investigate the parameterization of the problem by cutwidth. Unlike for treewidth, a larger set $B$ does not make the problem harder: Given a linear layout of width $k$ we give a $O^*(2^k)$ algorithm for any $B$ and provide a matching lower bound that this is optimal for the NP-hard cases.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2020

A Framework for ETH-Tight Algorithms and Lower Bounds in Geometric Intersection Graphs

We give an algorithmic and lower-bound framework that facilitates the construction of subexponential algorithms and matching conditional complexity bounds. It can be applied to intersection graphs of similarly-sized fat objects, yielding algorithms with running time $2^{O(n^{1-1/d})}$ for any fixed dimension $d \geq 2$ for many well known graph problems, including Independent Set, $r$-Dominating Set for constant $r$, and Steiner Tree. For most problems, we get improved running times compared to prior work; in some cases, we give the first known subexponential algorithm in geometric intersection graphs. Additionally, most of the obtained algorithms are representation-agnostic, i.e., they work on the graph itself and do not require the geometric representation. Our algorithmic framework is based on a weighted separator theorem and various treewidth techniques. The lower bound framework is based on a constructive embedding of graphs into d-dimensional grids, and it allows us to derive matching $2^{Ω(n^{1-1/d})}$ lower bounds under the Exponential Time Hypothesis even in the much more restricted class of $d$-dimensional induced grid graphs.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2020

On the computational tractability of a geographic clustering problem arising in redistricting

Redistricting is the problem of dividing a state into a number $k$ of regions, called districts. Voters in each district elect a representative. The primary criteria are: each district is connected, district populations are equal (or nearly equal), and districts are "compact". There are multiple competing definitions of compactness, usually minimizing some quantity. One measure that has been recently promoted by Duchin and others is number of cut edges. In redistricting, one is given atomic regions out of which each district must be built. The populations of the atomic regions are given. Consider the graph with one vertex per atomic region (with weight equal to the region's population) and an edge between atomic regions that share a boundary. A districting plan is a partition of vertices into $k$ parts, each connnected, of nearly equal weight. The districts are considered compact to the extent that the plan minimizes the number of edges crossing between different parts. Consider two problems: find the most compact districting plan, and sample districting plans under a compactness constraint uniformly at random. Both problems are NP-hard so we restrict the input graph to have branchwidth at most $w$. (A planar graph's branchwidth is bounded by its diameter.) If both $k$ and $w$ are bounded by constants, the problems are solvable in polynomial time. Assume vertices have weight~1. One would like algorithms whose running times are of the form $O(f(k,w) n^c)$ for some constant $c$ independent of $k$ and $w$, in which case the problems are said to be fixed-parameter tractable with respect to $k$ and $w$). We show that, under a complexity-theoretic assumption, no such algorithms exist. However, we do give algorithms with running time $O(c^wn^{k+1})$. Thus if the diameter of the graph is moderately small and the number of districts is very small, our algorithm is useable.

cs.DS↗