arXiv subjects

Dana Ron

Publications and source records attributed to Dana Ron.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Characterizing and Testing Configuration Stability in Two-Dimensional Threshold Cellular Automata

We consider the problems of characterizing and testing the stability of cellular automata configurations that evolve on a two-dimensional torus according to threshold rules with respect to the von-Neumann neighborhood. While stable configurations for Threshold-1 (OR) and Threshold-5 (AND) are trivial (and hence easily testable), the other threshold rules exhibit much more diverse behaviors. We first characterize the structure of stable configurations with respect to the Threshold-2 (similarly, Threshold-4) and Threshold-3 (Majority) rules. We then design and analyze a testing algorithm that distinguishes between configurations that are stable with respect to the Threshold-2 rule, and those that are $\epsilon$-far from any stable configuration, where the query complexity of the algorithm is independent of the size of the configuration and depends quadratically on $1/\epsilon$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Approximately Counting and Sampling Hamiltonian Motifs in Sublinear Time

Counting small subgraphs, referred to as motifs, in large graphs is a fundamental task in graph analysis, extensively studied across various contexts and computational models. In the sublinear-time regime, the relaxed problem of approximate counting has been explored within two prominent query frameworks: the standard model, which permits degree, neighbor, and pair queries, and the strictly more powerful augmented model, which additionally allows for uniform edge sampling. Currently, in the standard model, (optimal) results have been established only for approximately counting edges, stars, and cliques, all of which have a radius of one. This contrasts sharply with the state of affairs in the augmented model, where algorithmic results (some of which are optimal) are known for any input motif, leading to a disparity which we term the ``scope gap" between the two models. In this work, we make significant progress in bridging this gap. Our approach draws inspiration from recent advancements in the augmented model and utilizes a framework centered on counting by uniform sampling, thus allowing us to establish new results in the standard model and simplify on previous results. In particular, our first, and main, contribution is a new algorithm in the standard model for approximately counting any Hamiltonian motif in sublinear time. Our second contribution is a variant of our algorithm that enables nearly uniform sampling of these motifs, a capability previously limited in the standard model to edges and cliques. Our third contribution is to introduce even simpler algorithms for stars and cliques by exploiting their radius-one property. As a result, we simplify all previously known algorithms in the standard model for stars (Gonen, Ron, Shavitt (SODA 2010)), triangles (Eden, Levi, Ron Seshadhri (FOCS 2015)) and cliques (Eden, Ron, Seshadri (STOC 2018)).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Testing $C_k$-freeness in bounded-arboricity graphs

We study the problem of testing $C_k$-freeness ($k$-cycle-freeness) for fixed constant $k > 3$ in graphs with bounded arboricity (but unbounded degrees). In particular, we are interested in one-sided error algorithms, so that they must detect a copy of $C_k$ with high constant probability when the graph is $\epsilon$-far from $C_k$-free. We next state our results for constant arboricity and constant $\epsilon$ with a focus on the dependence on the number of graph vertices, $n$. The query complexity of all our algorithms grows polynomially with $1/\epsilon$. (1) As opposed to the case of $k=3$, where the complexity of testing $C_3$-freeness grows with the arboricity of the graph but not with the size of the graph (Levi, ICALP 2021) this is no longer the case already for $k=4$. We show that $\Omega(n^{1/4})$ queries are necessary for testing $C_4$-freeness, and that $\widetilde{O}(n^{1/4})$ are sufficient. The same bounds hold for $C_5$. (2) For every fixed $k \geq 6$, any one-sided error algorithm for testing $C_k$-freeness must perform $\Omega(n^{1/3})$ queries. (3) For $k=6$ we give a testing algorithm whose query complexity is $\widetilde{O}(n^{1/2})$. (4) For any fixed $k$, the query complexity of testing $C_k$-freeness is upper bounded by ${O}(n^{1-1/\lfloor k/2\rfloor})$. Our $\Omega(n^{1/4})$ lower bound for testing $C_4$-freeness in constant arboricity graphs provides a negative answer to an open problem posed by (Goldreich, 2021).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Sample-based distance-approximation for subsequence-freeness

In this work, we study the problem of approximating the distance to subsequence-freeness in the sample-based distribution-free model. For a given subsequence (word) $w = w_1 \dots w_k$, a sequence (text) $T = t_1 \dots t_n$ is said to contain $w$ if there exist indices $1 \leq i_1 < \dots < i_k \leq n$ such that $t_{i_{j}} = w_j$ for every $1 \leq j \leq k$. Otherwise, $T$ is $w$-free. Ron and Rosin (ACM TOCT 2022) showed that the number of samples both necessary and sufficient for one-sided error testing of subsequence-freeness in the sample-based distribution-free model is $\Theta(k/\epsilon)$. Denoting by $\Delta(T,w,p)$ the distance of $T$ to $w$-freeness under a distribution $p :[n]\to [0,1]$, we are interested in obtaining an estimate $\widehat{\Delta}$, such that $|\widehat{\Delta} - \Delta(T,w,p)| \leq \delta$ with probability at least $2/3$, for a given distance parameter $\delta$. Our main result is an algorithm whose sample complexity is $\tilde{O}(k^2/\delta^2)$. We first present an algorithm that works when the underlying distribution $p$ is uniform, and then show how it can be modified to work for any (unknown) distribution $p$. We also show that a quadratic dependence on $1/\delta$ is necessary.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Testing Distributions of Huge Objects

We initiate a study of a new model of property testing that is a hybrid of testing properties of distributions and testing properties of strings. Specifically, the new model refers to testing properties of distributions, but these are distributions over huge objects (i.e., very long strings). Accordingly, the model accounts for the total number of local probes into these objects (resp., queries to the strings) as well as for the distance between objects (resp., strings), and the distance between distributions is defined as the earth mover's distance with respect to the relative Hamming distance between strings. We study the query complexity of testing in this new model, focusing on three directions. First, we try to relate the query complexity of testing properties in the new model to the sample complexity of testing these properties in the standard distribution testing model. Second, we consider the complexity of testing properties that arise naturally in the new model (e.g., distributions that capture random variations of fixed strings). Third, we consider the complexity of testing properties that were extensively studied in the standard distribution testing model: Two such cases are uniform distributions and pairs of identical distributions.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

The Structure of Configurations in One-Dimensional Majority Cellular Automata: From Cell Stability to Configuration Periodicity

We study the dynamics of (synchronous) one-dimensional cellular automata with cyclical boundary conditions that evolve according to the majority rule with radius $ r $. We introduce a notion that we term cell stability with which we express the structure of the possible configurations that could emerge in this setting. Our main finding is that apart from the configurations of the form $ (0^{r+1}0^* + 1^{r+1}1^*)^* $, which are always fixed-points, the other configurations that the automata could possibly converge to, which are known to be either fixed-points or 2-cycles, have a particular spatially periodic structure. Namely, each of these configurations is of the form $ s^* $ where $ s $ consists of $ O(r^2) $ consecutive sequences of cells with the same state, each such sequence is of length at most $ r $, and the total length of $ s $ is $ O(r^2) $ as well. We show that an analogous result also holds for the minority rule.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2021

Approximating the Arboricity in Sublinear Time

We consider the problem of approximating the arboricity of a graph $G= (V,E)$, which we denote by $\mathsf{arb}(G)$, in sublinear time, where the arboricity of a graph is the minimal number of forests required to cover its edges. An algorithm for this problem may perform degree and neighbor queries, and is allowed a small error probability. We design an algorithm that outputs an estimate $\hatα$, such that with probability $1-1/\textrm{poly}(n)$, $\mathsf{arb}(G)/c\log^2 n \leq \hatα \leq \mathsf{arb}(G)$, where $n=|V|$ and $c$ is a constant. The expected query complexity and running time of the algorithm are $O(n/\mathsf{arb}(G))\cdot \textrm{poly}(\log n)$, and this upper bound also holds with high probability. %($\widetilde{O}(\cdot)$ is used to suppress $\textrm{poly}(\log n)$ dependencies). This bound is optimal for such an approximation up to a $\textrm{poly}(\log n)$ factor.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Testing Dynamic Environments: Back to Basics

We continue the line of work initiated by Goldreich and Ron (Journal of the ACM, 2017) on testing dynamic environments and propose to pursue a systematic study of the complexity of testing basic dynamic environments and local rules. As a first step, in this work we focus on dynamic environments that correspond to elementary cellular automata that evolve according to threshold rules. Our main result is the identification of a set of conditions on local rules, and a meta-algorithm that tests evolution according to local rules that satisfy the conditions. The meta-algorithm has query complexity poly$ (1/ε) $, is non-adaptive and has one-sided error. We show that all the threshold rules satisfy the set of conditions, and therefore are poly$ (1/ε) $-testable. We believe that this is a rich area of research and suggest a variety of open problems and natural research directions that may extend and expand our results.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Local Algorithms for Sparse Spanning Graphs

Constructing a spanning tree of a graph is one of the most basic tasks in graph theory. We consider a relaxed version of this problem in the setting of local algorithms. The relaxation is that the constructed subgraph is a sparse spanning subgraph containing at most $(1+ε)n$ edges (where $n$ is the number of vertices and $ε$ is a given approximation/sparsity parameter). In the local setting, the goal is to quickly determine whether a given edge $e$ belongs to such a subgraph, without constructing the whole subgraph, but rather by inspecting (querying) the local neighborhood of $e$. The challenge is to maintain consistency. That is, to provide answers concerning different edges according to the same spanning subgraph. We first show that for general bounded-degree graphs, the query complexity of any such algorithm must be $Ω(\sqrt{n})$. This lower bound holds for constant-degree graphs that have high expansion. Next we design an algorithm for (bounded-degree) graphs with high expansion, obtaining a result that roughly matches the lower bound. We then turn to study graphs that exclude a fixed minor (and are hence non-expanding). We design an algorithm for such graphs, which may have an unbounded maximum degree. The query complexity of this algorithm is $poly(1/ε, h)$ (independent of $n$ and the maximum degree), where $h$ is the number of vertices in the excluded minor. Though our two algorithms are designed for very different types of graphs (and have very different complexities), on a high-level there are several similarities, and we highlight both the similarities and the differences.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Testing bounded arboricity

In this paper we consider the problem of testing whether a graph has bounded arboricity. The family of graphs with bounded arboricity includes, among others, bounded-degree graphs, all minor-closed graph classes (e.g. planar graphs, graphs with bounded treewidth) and randomly generated preferential attachment graphs. Graphs with bounded arboricity have been studied extensively in the past, in particular since for many problems they allow for much more efficient algorithms and/or better approximation ratios. We present a tolerant tester in the sparse-graphs model. The sparse-graphs model allows access to degree queries and neighbor queries, and the distance is defined with respect to the actual number of edges. More specifically, our algorithm distinguishes between graphs that are $ε$-close to having arboricity $α$ and graphs that $c \cdot ε$-far from having arboricity $3α$, where $c$ is an absolute small constant. The query complexity and running time of the algorithm are $\tilde{O}\left(\frac{n}{\sqrt{m}}\cdot \frac{\log(1/ε)}ε + \frac{n\cdot α}{m} \cdot \left(\frac{1}ε\right)^{O(\log(1/ε))}\right)$ where $n$ denotes the number of vertices and $m$ denotes the number of edges. In terms of the dependence on $n$ and $m$ this bound is optimal up to poly-logarithmic factors since $Ω(n/\sqrt{m})$ queries are necessary (and $α= O(\sqrt{m}))$. We leave it as an open question whether the dependence on $1/ε$ can be improved from quasi-polynomial to polynomial. Our techniques include an efficient local simulation for approximating the outcome of a global (almost) forest-decomposition algorithm as well as a tailored procedure of edge sampling.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Almost Optimal Bounds for Sublinear-Time Sampling of $k$-Cliques: Sampling Cliques is Harder Than Counting

In this work, we consider the problem of sampling a $k$-clique in a graph from an almost uniform distribution in sublinear time in the general graph query model. Specifically the algorithm should output each $k$-clique with probability $(1\pm ε)/n_k$, where $n_k$ denotes the number of $k$-cliques in the graph and $ε$ is a given approximation parameter. We prove that the query complexity of this problem is \[ Θ^*\left(\max\left\{ \left(\frac{(nα)^{k/2}}{ n_k}\right)^{\frac{1}{k-1}} ,\; \min\left\{nα,\frac{nα^{k-1}}{n_k} \right\}\right\}\right). \] where $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph, $α$ is its arboricity, and $Θ^*$ suppresses the dependence on $(\log n/ε)^{O(k)}$. Interestingly, this establishes a separation between approximate counting and approximate uniform sampling in the sublinear regime. For example, if $k=3$, $α= O(1)$, and $n_3$ (the number of triangles) is $Θ(n)$, then we get a lower bound of $Ω(n^{1/4})$ (for constant $ε$), while under these conditions, a $(1\pm ε)$-approximation of $n_3$ can be obtained by performing $\textrm{poly}(\log(n/ε))$ queries (Eden, Ron and Seshadhri, SODA20). Our lower bound follows from a construction of a family of graphs with arboricity $α$ such that in each graph there are $n_k$ cliques (of size $k$), where one of these cliques is "hidden" and hence hard to sample. Our upper bound is based on defining a special auxiliary graph $H_k$, such that sampling edges almost uniformly in $H_k$ translates to sampling $k$-cliques almost uniformly in the original graph $G$. We then build on a known edge-sampling algorithm (Eden, Ron and Rosenbaum, ICALP19) to sample edges in $H_k$, where the challenge is simulate queries to $H_k$ while being given access only to $G$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

On Efficient Distance Approximation for Graph Properties

A distance-approximation algorithm for a graph property $\mathcal{P}$ in the adjacency-matrix model is given an approximation parameter $ε\in (0,1)$ and query access to the adjacency matrix of a graph $G=(V,E)$. It is required to output an estimate of the \emph{distance} between $G$ and the closest graph $G'=(V,E')$ that satisfies $\mathcal{P}$, where the distance between graphs is the size of the symmetric difference between their edge sets, normalized by $|V|^2$. In this work we introduce property covers, as a framework for using distance-approximation algorithms for "simple" properties to design distance-approximation. Applying this framework we present distance-approximation algorithms with $poly(1/ε)$ query complexity for induced $P_3$-freeness, induced $P_4$-freeness, and Chordality. For induced $C_4$-freeness our algorithm has query complexity $exp(poly(1/ε))$. These complexities essentially match the corresponding known results for testing these properties and provide an exponential improvement on previously known results.

math.CO↗

arXiv2019

Property testing of the Boolean and binary rank

We present algorithms for testing if a $(0,1)$-matrix $M$ has Boolean/binary rank at most $d$, or is $ε$-far from Boolean/binary rank $d$ (i.e., at least an $ε$-fraction of the entries in $M$ must be modified so that it has rank at most $d$). The query complexity of our testing algorithm for the Boolean rank is $\tilde{O}\left(d^4/ ε^6\right)$. For the binary rank we present a testing algorithm whose query complexity is $O(2^{2d}/ε)$. Both algorithms are $1$-sided error algorithms that always accept $M$ if it has Boolean/binary rank at most $d$, and reject with probability at least $2/3$ if $M$ is $ε$-far from Boolean/binary rank $d$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

Property Testing of Planarity in the CONGEST model

We give a distributed algorithm in the {\sf CONGEST} model for property testing of planarity with one-sided error in general (unbounded-degree) graphs. Following Censor-Hillel et al. (DISC 2016), who recently initiated the study of property testing in the distributed setting, our algorithm gives the following guarantee: For a graph $G = (V,E)$ and a distance parameter $ε$, if $G$ is planar, then every node outputs {\sf accept\/}, and if $G$ is $ε$-far from being planar (i.e., more than $ε\cdot |E|$ edges need to be removed in order to make $G$ planar), then with probability $1-1/{\rm poly}(n)$ at least one node outputs {\sf reject}. The algorithm runs in $O(\log|V|\cdot{\rm poly}(1/ε))$ rounds, and we show that this result is tight in terms of the dependence on $|V|$. Our algorithm combines several techniques of graph partitioning and local verification of planar embeddings. Furthermore, we show how a main subroutine in our algorithm can be applied to derive additional results for property testing of cycle-freeness and bipartiteness, as well as the construction of spanners, in minor-free (unweighted) graphs.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2019

The Arboricity Captures the Complexity of Sampling Edges

In this paper, we revisit the problem of sampling edges in an unknown graph $G = (V, E)$ from a distribution that is (pointwise) almost uniform over $E$. We consider the case where there is some a priori upper bound on the arboriciy of $G$. Given query access to a graph $G$ over $n$ vertices and of average degree $d$ and arboricity at most $α$, we design an algorithm that performs $O\!\left(\fracα{d} \cdot \frac{\log^3 n}{\varepsilon}\right)$ queries in expectation and returns an edge in the graph such that every edge $e \in E$ is sampled with probability $(1 \pm \varepsilon)/m$. The algorithm performs two types of queries: degree queries and neighbor queries. We show that the upper bound is tight (up to poly-logarithmic factors and the dependence in $\varepsilon$), as $Ω\!\left(\fracα{d} \right)$ queries are necessary for the easier task of sampling edges from any distribution over $E$ that is close to uniform in total variational distance. We also prove that even if $G$ is a tree (i.e., $α= 1$ so that $\fracα{d}=Θ(1)$), $Ω\left(\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}\right)$ queries are necessary to sample an edge from any distribution that is pointwise close to uniform, thus establishing that a $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ factor is necessary for constant $α$. Finally we show how our algorithm can be applied to obtain a new result on approximately counting subgraphs, based on the recent work of Assadi, Kapralov, and Khanna (ITCS, 2019).

cs.CC↗

arXiv2018

Faster sublinear approximations of $k$-cliques for low arboricity graphs

Given query access to an undirected graph $G$, we consider the problem of computing a $(1\pmε)$-approximation of the number of $k$-cliques in $G$. The standard query model for general graphs allows for degree queries, neighbor queries, and pair queries. Let $n$ be the number of vertices, $m$ be the number of edges, and $n_k$ be the number of $k$-cliques. Previous work by Eden, Ron and Seshadhri (STOC 2018) gives an $O^*(\frac{n}{n^{1/k}_k} + \frac{m^{k/2}}{n_k})$-time algorithm for this problem (we use $O^*(\cdot)$ to suppress $\poly(\log n, 1/ε, k^k)$ dependencies). Moreover, this bound is nearly optimal when the expression is sublinear in the size of the graph. Our motivation is to circumvent this lower bound, by parameterizing the complexity in terms of \emph{graph arboricity}. The arboricity of $G$ is a measure for the graph density "everywhere". We design an algorithm for the class of graphs with arboricity at most $α$, whose running time is $O^*(\min\{\frac{nα^{k-1}}{n_k},\, \frac{n}{n_k^{1/k}}+\frac{m α^{k-2}}{n_k} \})$. We also prove a nearly matching lower bound. For all graphs, the arboricity is $O(\sqrt m)$, so this bound subsumes all previous results on sublinear clique approximation. As a special case of interest, consider minor-closed families of graphs, which have constant arboricity. Our result implies that for any minor-closed family of graphs, there is a $(1\pmε)$-approximation algorithm for $n_k$ that has running time $O^*(\frac{n}{n_k})$. Such a bound was not known even for the special (classic) case of triangle counting in planar graphs.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

Provable and practical approximations for the degree distribution using sublinear graph samples

The degree distribution is one of the most fundamental properties used in the analysis of massive graphs. There is a large literature on graph sampling, where the goal is to estimate properties (especially the degree distribution) of a large graph through a small, random sample. The degree distribution estimation poses a significant challenge, due to its heavy-tailed nature and the large variance in degrees. We design a new algorithm, SADDLES, for this problem, using recent mathematical techniques from the field of sublinear algorithms. The SADDLES algorithm gives provably accurate outputs for all values of the degree distribution. For the analysis, we define two fatness measures of the degree distribution, called the $h$-index and the $z$-index. We prove that SADDLES is sublinear in the graph size when these indices are large. A corollary of this result is a provably sublinear algorithm for any degree distribution bounded below by a power law. We deploy our new algorithm on a variety of real datasets and demonstrate its excellent empirical behavior. In all instances, we get extremely accurate approximations for all values in the degree distribution by observing at most $1\%$ of the vertices. This is a major improvement over the state-of-the-art sampling algorithms, which typically sample more than $10\%$ of the vertices to give comparable results. We also observe that the $h$ and $z$-indices of real graphs are large, validating our theoretical analysis.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2018

On Approximating the Number of $k$-cliques in Sublinear Time

We study the problem of approximating the number of $k$-cliques in a graph when given query access to the graph. We consider the standard query model for general graphs via (1) degree queries, (2) neighbor queries and (3) pair queries. Let $n$ denote the number of vertices in the graph, $m$ the number of edges, and $C_k$ the number of $k$-cliques. We design an algorithm that outputs a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation (with high probability) for $C_k$, whose expected query complexity and running time are $O\left(\frac{n}{C_k^{1/k}}+\frac{m^{k/2}}{C_k}\right)\poly(\log n,1/\varepsilon,k)$. Hence, the complexity of the algorithm is sublinear in the size of the graph for $C_k = ω(m^{k/2-1})$. Furthermore, we prove a lower bound showing that the query complexity of our algorithm is essentially optimal (up to the dependence on $\log n$, $1/\varepsilon$ and $k$). The previous results in this vein are by Feige (SICOMP 06) and by Goldreich and Ron (RSA 08) for edge counting ($k=2$) and by Eden et al. (FOCS 2015) for triangle counting ($k=3$). Our result matches the complexities of these results. The previous result by Eden et al. hinges on a certain amortization technique that works only for triangle counting, and does not generalize for larger cliques. We obtain a general algorithm that works for any $k\geq 3$ by designing a procedure that samples each $k$-clique incident to a given set $S$ of vertices with approximately equal probability. The primary difficulty is in finding cliques incident to purely high-degree vertices, since random sampling within neighbors has a low success probability. This is achieved by an algorithm that samples uniform random high degree vertices and a careful tradeoff between estimating cliques incident purely to high-degree vertices and those that include a low-degree vertex.

cs.DS↗