SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2012.04090

Almost Optimal Bounds for Sublinear-Time Sampling of $k$-Cliques: Sampling Cliques is Harder Than Counting

Abstract

In this work, we consider the problem of sampling a $k$-clique in a graph from an almost uniform distribution in sublinear time in the general graph query model. Specifically the algorithm should output each $k$-clique with probability $(1\pm \epsilon)/n_k$, where $n_k$ denotes the number of $k$-cliques in the graph and $\epsilon$ is a given approximation parameter. We prove that the query complexity of this problem is \[ \Theta^*\left(\max\left\{ \left(\frac{(n\alpha)^{k/2}}{ n_k}\right)^{\frac{1}{k-1}} ,\; \min\left\{n\alpha,\frac{n\alpha^{k-1}}{n_k} \right\}\right\}\right). \] where $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph, $\alpha$ is its arboricity, and $\Theta^*$ suppresses the dependence on $(\log n/\epsilon)^{O(k)}$. Interestingly, this establishes a separation between approximate counting and approximate uniform sampling in the sublinear regime. For example, if $k=3$, $\alpha = O(1)$, and $n_3$ (the number of triangles) is $\Theta(n)$, then we get a lower bound of $\Omega(n^{1/4})$ (for constant $\epsilon$), while under these conditions, a $(1\pm \epsilon)$-approximation of $n_3$ can be obtained by performing $\textrm{poly}(\log(n/\epsilon))$ queries (Eden, Ron and Seshadhri, SODA20). Our lower bound follows from a construction of a family of graphs with arboricity $\alpha$ such that in each graph there are $n_k$ cliques (of size $k$), where one of these cliques is "hidden" and hence hard to sample. Our upper bound is based on defining a special auxiliary graph $H_k$, such that sampling edges almost uniformly in $H_k$ translates to sampling $k$-cliques almost uniformly in the original graph $G$. We then build on a known edge-sampling algorithm (Eden, Ron and Rosenbaum, ICALP19) to sample edges in $H_k$, where the challenge is simulate queries to $H_k$ while being given access only to $G$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Talya Eden, Dana Ron, Will Rosenbaum. 2020-12-07. Almost Optimal Bounds for Sublinear-Time Sampling of $k$-Cliques: Sampling Cliques is Harder Than Counting. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.04090

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS