arXiv subjects

Danil Sagunov

Publications and source records attributed to Danil Sagunov.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Subexponential Algorithm for High Multiplicity Fair Division of Mixed Instances via Stereometry

We study the problem of computing an envy-free (EF) allocation of $m$ indivisible items among $n$ agents when items come in three distinct types. Each agent holds additive valuations over item types that may be positive (goods), negative (chores), or mixed. We present the first subexponential-time algorithm with running time time $(n \cdot m)^{O(\sqrt{n})}$ that finds an EF allocation whenever one exists, or correctly reports that none exists. Our approach exploits a geometric representation of EF allocations as convex polyhedra in $\mathbb{R}^3$ and applies Miller's planar cycle-separator theorem to recursively decompose the agent set into balanced subgroups. We further extend the algorithm to handle agents whose allocations are fixed in advance, preserving envy-freeness across all agents.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Exploiting Spanning Trees for Directed Acyclicity

We study the weighted case of the \textsc{Maximum Acyclic Subgraph (MAS)} problem, where each edge of a given directed graph has a positive weight assigned, and the task is to find a maximum-weight acyclic edge set. The famous and well-studied random ordering lower bound guarantees the existence of an acyclic set that gives at least the half of the total edge weight. The maximum spanning tree (MaxST) guarantee, which is the weight of a maximum-weight acyclic subgraph of the underlying undirected graph of $G$, is another natural lower bound for the weight of an acyclic subgraph. A solution of this weight dominates the random ordering solution on instances where MaxST spans the most of the total edge weight. Our main contribution are two parameterized algorithms that find acyclic subgraphs of total weight larger than the weight of the MaxST of $G$. Both our algorithms find a solution of total weight at least $MaxST(G)+k$, for a given integer $k\ge 0$, or report that it does not exist, and first of our algorithms runs in time $2^{k^{\mathcal{O}(1)}}\cdot \mathcal{I}^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ and works when all weights are integers; our second algorithm handles rational weights not less than $1$, and its running time is upper-bounded by $n^{k^{\mathcal{O}(1)}}\cdot \mathcal{I}^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. This positive result is rather surprising since solving \textsc{MAS} above the random ordering lower bound is \classNP-hard in the same rational weights scenario, when $k=1$. Our findings unravel intricate connections between structure of MaxSTs and directed cycles, use perfect graph theorem to tackle rational weights, and raise graph-theoretic questions that are interesting on their own. Of another importance, this is one of the few examples of positive ``above guarantee'' results for a weighted problem on directed graphs, especially for rational weights.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Learning Augmented Exact Exponential Algorithms

The field of learning-augmented algorithms has demonstrated that machine-learned predictions can bypass worst-case lower bounds across a wide range of problems. So far, however, the focus has been almost exclusively on polynomial-time algorithms, where predictions improve competitive ratios, approximation guarantees, or running times. In this paper, we raise the question of whether predictions can push the frontier of exact exponential-time algorithms for NP-hard problems. We answer this question affirmatively by proposing a general approach that augments an entire family of state-of-the-art exact algorithms for a variety of subset selection problems. We show that a noisy predictor that is only marginally better than random guessing suffices to provably reduce the search space, and that the resulting runtime speedup scales smoothly with the prediction quality. Importantly, our algorithms require only pairwise independence of predictions or, alternatively, do not require the knowledge of the predictor's accuracy - both strictly weaker and more realistic settings than typically assumed.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Path Cover, Hamiltonicity, and Independence Number: An FPT Perspective

The classic theorem of Gallai and Milgram (1960) generalizes several fundamental results in Graph Theory, such as Dilworth's theorem on posets and Kőnig's theorem on matchings in bipartite graphs. The theorem asserts that for every graph G, the vertex set of G can be partitioned into at most α(G) vertex-disjoint paths, where α(G) is the maximum size of an independent set in G. The proof of the Gallai-Milgram theorem is constructive and yields a polynomial-time algorithm that computes a covering of G by at most α(G) vertex-disjoint paths. While the Gallai-Milgram theorem is tight, it was not known prior to our work whether deciding if a graph G could be covered by fewer than α(G) vertex-disjoint paths can be done in polynomial time. We resolve this question by proving the following algorithmic extension of the Gallai-Milgram theorem for undirected graphs: There is an algorithm that, for an n-vertex graph G and an integer parameter k \ge 1, runs in time 2^{2^{O(k^4\log{k})}} \cdot n^{O(1)} and outputs a path cover P of G together with - a correct conclusion that P is a minimum-size path cover, or - an independent set of size |P|+k, certifying that P contains at most α(G) - k paths. The proof of our algorithmic extension of the Gallai-Milgram theorem is non-trivial and builds on several novel algorithmic ideas. One of the key subroutines in our algorithm is an FPT algorithm, parameterized by α(G), for deciding whether G contains a Hamiltonian path. This result is of independent interest - prior to our work no polynomial-time algorithm for deciding Hamiltonicity was known even for graphs with independence number at most three. Moreover, the algorithmic techniques we develop apply to a wide array of problems in undirected graphs, including Hamiltonian Cycle, Path Cover, Largest Linkage, and Topological Minor Containment.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Structural Approach to Guiding a Present-Biased Agent

Time-inconsistent behavior, such as procrastination or abandonment of long-term goals, arises when agents evaluate immediate outcomes disproportionately higher than future ones. This leads to globally suboptimal behavior, where plans are frequently revised or abandoned entirely. In the influential model of Kleinberg and Oren (2014) such behavior is modeled by a present-biased agent navigating a task graph toward a goal, making locally optimal decisions at each step based on discounted future costs. As a result, the agent may repeatedly deviate from initial plans. Recent work by Belova et al. (2024) introduced a two-agent extension of this model, where a fully-aware principal attempts to guide the present-biased agent through a specific set of critical tasks without causing abandonment. This captures a rich class of principal-agent dynamics in behavioral settings. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive algorithmic characterization of this problem. We analyze its computational complexity through the framework of parameterized algorithms, focusing on graph parameters that naturally emerge in this setting, such as treewidth, vertex cover, and feedback vertex set. Our main result is a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm when parameterized by the treewidth of the task graph and the number of distinct (v,t)-path costs. Our algorithm encaptures several input settings, such as bounded edge costs and restricted task graph structure. We demonstrate that our main result yields efficient algorithms for a number of such configurations. We complement this with tight hardness results, that highlight the extreme difficulty of the problem even on simplest graphs with bounded number of nodes and constant parameter values, and motivate our choice of parameters. We delineate tractable and intractable regions of the problem landscape, which include answers to open questions of Belova et al. (2024).

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

EFX and PO Allocation Exists for Two Types of Goods

We study the problem of fairly and efficiently allocating indivisible goods among agents with additive valuations. We focus on envy-freeness up to any good (EFX) -- an important fairness notion in fair division of indivisible goods. A central open question in this field is whether EFX allocations always exist for any number of agents. While prior work has established EFX existence for settings with at most three distinct valuations (Prakash HV et al. 2025) and for two types of goods (Gorantla, Marwaha, and Velusamy 2023), the general case remains unresolved. In this paper, we extend the existent knowledge by proving that EFX allocations satisfying Pareto optimality (PO) always exist and can be computed in quasiliniear time when there are two types of goods, given that the valuations are positive. This result strengthens the existing work of (Gorantla, Marwaha, and Velusamy 2023), which only guarantees the existence of EFX allocations without ensuring Pareto optimality. Our findings demonstrate a fairly simple and efficient algorithm constructing an EFX+PO allocation.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Discounted Cuts: A Stackelberg Approach to Network Disruption

We study a Stackelberg variant of the classical Most Vital Links problem, modeled as a one-round adversarial game between an attacker and a defender. The attacker strategically removes up to $k$ edges from a flow network to maximally disrupt flow between a source $s$ and a sink $t$, after which the defender optimally reroutes the remaining flow. To capture this attacker--defender interaction, we introduce a new mathematical model of discounted cuts, in which the cost of a cut is evaluated by excluding its $k$ most expensive edges. This model generalizes the Most Vital Links problem and uncovers novel algorithmic and complexity-theoretic properties. We develop a unified algorithmic framework for analyzing various forms of discounted cut problems, including minimizing or maximizing the cost of a cut under discount mechanisms that exclude either the $k$ most expensive or the $k$ cheapest edges. While most variants are NP-complete on general graphs, our main result establishes polynomial-time solvability for all discounted cut problems in our framework when the input is restricted to bounded-genus graphs, a relevant class that includes many real-world networks such as transportation and infrastructure networks. With this work, we aim to open collaborative bridges between artificial intelligence, algorithmic game theory, and operations research.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Edge Clique Partition and Cover Beyond Independence

Covering and partitioning the edges of a graph into cliques are classical problems at the intersection of combinatorial optimization and graph theory, having been studied through a range of algorithmic and complexity-theoretic lenses. Despite the well-known fixed-parameter tractability of these problems when parameterized by the total number of cliques, such a parameterization often fails to be meaningful for sparse graphs. In many real-world instances, on the other hand, the minimum number of cliques in an edge cover or partition can be very close to the size of a maximum independent set α(G). Motivated by this observation, we investigate above αparameterizations of the edge clique cover and partition problems. Concretely, we introduce and study Edge Clique Cover Above Independent Set (ECC/α) and Edge Clique Partition Above Independent Set (ECP/α), where the goal is to cover or partition all edges of a graph using at most α(G) + k cliques, and k is the parameter. Our main results reveal a distinct complexity landscape for the two variants. We show that ECP/αis fixed-parameter tractable, whereas ECC/αis NP-complete for all k \geq 2, yet can be solved in polynomial time for k \in {0,1}. These findings highlight intriguing differences between the two problems when viewed through the lens of parameterization above a natural lower bound. Finally, we demonstrate that ECC/αbecomes fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by k + ω(G), where ω(G) is the size of a maximum clique of the graph G. This result is particularly relevant for sparse graphs, in which ωis typically small. For H-minor free graphs, we design a subexponential algorithm of running time f(H)^{\sqrt{k}}n^{O(1)}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Algorithmic Extensions of Dirac's Theorem

In 1952, Dirac proved the following theorem about long cycles in graphs with large minimum vertex degrees: Every $n$-vertex $2$-connected graph $G$ with minimum vertex degree $δ\geq 2$ contains a cycle with at least $\min\{2δ,n\}$ vertices. In particular, if $δ\geq n/2$, then $G$ is Hamiltonian. The proof of Dirac's theorem is constructive, and it yields an algorithm computing the corresponding cycle in polynomial time. The combinatorial bound of Dirac's theorem is tight in the following sense. There are 2-connected graphs that do not contain cycles of length more than $2δ+1$. Also, there are non-Hamiltonian graphs with all vertices but one of degree at least $n/2$. This prompts naturally to the following algorithmic questions. For $k\geq 1$, (A) How difficult is to decide whether a 2-connected graph contains a cycle of length at least $\min\{2δ+k,n\}$? (B) How difficult is to decide whether a graph $G$ is Hamiltonian, when at least $n - k$ vertices of $G$ are of degrees at least $n/2-k$? The first question was asked by Fomin, Golovach, Lokshtanov, Panolan, Saurabh, and Zehavi. The second question is due to Jansen, Kozma, and Nederlof. Even for a very special case of $k=1$, the existence of a polynomial-time algorithm deciding whether $G$ contains a cycle of length at least $\min\{2δ+1,n\}$ was open. We resolve both questions by proving the following algorithmic generalization of Dirac's theorem: If all but $k$ vertices of a $2$-connected graph $G$ are of degree at least $δ$, then deciding whether $G$ has a cycle of length at least $\min\{2δ+k, n\}$ can be done in time $2^{\mathcal{O}(k)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. The proof of the algorithmic generalization of Dirac's theorem builds on new graph-theoretical results that are interesting on their own.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Tree Containment Above Minimum Degree is FPT

According to the classic Chv{á}tal's Lemma from 1977, a graph of minimum degree $δ(G)$ contains every tree on $δ(G)+1$ vertices. Our main result is the following algorithmic "extension" of Chvátal's Lemma: For any $n$-vertex graph $G$, integer $k$, and a tree $T$ on at most $δ(G)+k$ vertices, deciding whether $G$ contains a subgraph isomorphic to $T$, can be done in time $f(k)\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ for some function $f$ of $k$ only. The proof of our main result is based on an interplay between extremal graph theory and parameterized algorithms.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Turán's Theorem Through Algorithmic Lens

The fundamental theorem of Turán from Extremal Graph Theory determines the exact bound on the number of edges $t_r(n)$ in an $n$-vertex graph that does not contain a clique of size $r+1$. We establish an interesting link between Extremal Graph Theory and Algorithms by providing a simple compression algorithm that in linear time reduces the problem of finding a clique of size $\ell$ in an $n$-vertex graph $G$ with $m \ge t_r(n)-k$ edges, where $\ell\leq r+1$, to the problem of finding a maximum clique in a graph on at most $5k$ vertices. This also gives us an algorithm deciding in time $2.49^{k}\cdot(n + m)$ whether $G$ has a clique of size $\ell$. As a byproduct of the new compression algorithm, we give an algorithm that in time $2^{\mathcal{O}(td^2)} \cdot n^2$ decides whether a graph contains an independent set of size at least $n/(d+1) + t$. Here $d$ is the average vertex degree of the graph $G$. The multivariate complexity analysis based on ETH indicates that the asymptotical dependence on several parameters in the running times of our algorithms is tight.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Approximating Long Cycle Above Dirac's Guarantee

Parameterization above (or below) a guarantee is a successful concept in parameterized algorithms. The idea is that many computational problems admit ``natural'' guarantees bringing to algorithmic questions whether a better solution (above the guarantee) could be obtained efficiently. The above guarantee paradigm has led to several exciting discoveries in the areas of parameterized algorithms and kernelization. We argue that this paradigm could bring forth fresh perspectives on well-studied problems in approximation algorithms. Our example is the longest cycle problem. One of the oldest results in extremal combinatorics is the celebrated Dirac's theorem from 1952. Dirac's theorem provides the following guarantee on the length of the longest cycle: for every 2-connected n-vertex graph G with minimum degree δ(G)\leq n/2, the length of a longest cycle L is at least 2δ(G). Thus, the ``essential'' part in finding the longest cycle is in approximating the ``offset'' k = L - 2 δ(G). The main result of this paper is the above-guarantee approximation theorem for k. Informally, the theorem says that approximating the offset k is not harder than approximating the total length L of a cycle. In other words, for any (reasonably well-behaved) function f, a polynomial time algorithm constructing a cycle of length f(L) in an undirected graph with a cycle of length L, yields a polynomial time algorithm constructing a cycle of length 2δ(G)+Ω(f(k)).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Longest Cycle above Erdős-Gallai Bound

In 1959, Erdős and Gallai proved that every graph G with average vertex degree ad(G)\geq 2 contains a cycle of length at least ad(G). We provide an algorithm that for k\geq 0 in time 2^{O(k)} n^{O(1)} decides whether a 2-connected n-vertex graph G contains a cycle of length at least ad(G)+k. This resolves an open problem explicitly mentioned in several papers. The main ingredients of our algorithm are new graph-theoretical results interesting on their own.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Detours in Directed Graphs

We study two "above guarantee" versions of the classical Longest Path problem on undirected and directed graphs and obtain the following results. In the first variant of Longest Path that we study, called Longest Detour, the task is to decide whether a graph has an (s,t)-path of length at least dist_G(s,t)+k (where dist_G(s,t) denotes the length of a shortest path from s to t). Bezáková et al. proved that on undirected graphs the problem is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) by providing an algorithm of running time 2^{O (k)} n. Further, they left the parameterized complexity of the problem on directed graphs open. Our first main result establishes a connection between Longest Detour on directed graphs and 3-Disjoint Paths on directed graphs. Using these new insights, we design a 2^{O(k)} n^{O(1)} time algorithm for the problem on directed planar graphs. Further, the new approach yields a significantly faster FPT algorithm on undirected graphs. In the second variant of Longest Path, namely Longest Path Above Diameter, the task is to decide whether the graph has a path of length at least diam(G)+k (diam(G) denotes the length of a longest shortest path in a graph G). We obtain dichotomy results about Longest Path Above Diameter on undirected and directed graphs. For (un)directed graphs, Longest Path Above Diameter is NP-complete even for k=1. However, if the input undirected graph is 2-connected, then the problem is FPT. On the other hand, for 2-connected directed graphs, we show that Longest Path Above Diameter is solvable in polynomial time for each k\in{1,\dots, 4} and is NP-complete for every k\geq 5. The parameterized complexity of Longest Path Above Diameter on general directed graphs remains an interesting open problem.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Diverse Pairs of Matchings

We initiate the study of the Diverse Pair of (Maximum/ Perfect) Matchings problems which given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, ask whether $G$ has two (maximum/perfect) matchings whose symmetric difference is at least $k$. Diverse Pair of Matchings (asking for two not necessarily maximum or perfect matchings) is NP-complete on general graphs if $k$ is part of the input, and we consider two restricted variants. First, we show that on bipartite graphs, the problem is polynomial-time solvable, and second we show that Diverse Pair of Maximum Matchings is FPT parameterized by $k$. We round off the work by showing that Diverse Pair of Matchings has a kernel on $\mathcal{O}(k^2)$ vertices.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Building large k-cores from sparse graphs

A popular model to measure network stability is the $k$-core, that is the maximal induced subgraph in which every vertex has degree at least $k$. For example, $k$-cores are commonly used to model the unraveling phenomena in social networks. In this model, users having less than $k$ connections within the network leave it, so the remaining users form exactly the $k$-core. In this paper we study the question whether it is possible to make the network more robust by spending only a limited amount of resources on new connections. A mathematical model for the $k$-core construction problem is the following Edge $k$-Core optimization problem. We are given a graph $G$ and integers $k$, $b$ and $p$. The task is to ensure that the $k$-core of $G$ has at least $p$ vertices by adding at most $b$ edges. The previous studies on Edge $k$-Core demonstrate that the problem is computationally challenging. In particular, it is NP-hard when $k=3$, W[1]-hard being parameterized by $k+b+p$ (Chitnis and Talmon, 2018), and APX-hard (Zhou et al, 2019). Nevertheless, we show that there are efficient algorithms with provable guarantee when the $k$-core has to be constructed from a sparse graph with some additional structural properties. Our results are 1) When the input graph is a forest, Edge $k$-Core is solvable in polynomial time; 2) Edge $k$-Core is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) being parameterized by the minimum size of a vertex cover in the input graph. On the other hand, with such parameterization, the problem does not admit a polynomial kernel subject to a widely-believed assumption from complexity theory; 3) Edge $k$-Core is FPT parameterized by $\mathrm{tw}+k$. This improves upon a result of Chitnis and Talmon by not requiring $b$ to be small. Each of our algorithms is built upon a new graph-theoretical result interesting in its own.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Maximizing Happiness in Graphs of Bounded Clique-Width

Clique-width is one of the most important parameters that describes structural complexity of a graph. Probably, only treewidth is more studied graph width parameter. In this paper we study how clique-width influences the complexity of the Maximum Happy Vertices (MHV) and Maximum Happy Edges (MHE) problems. We answer a question of Choudhari and Reddy '18 about parameterization by the distance to threshold graphs by showing that MHE is NP-complete on threshold graphs. Hence, it is not even in XP when parameterized by clique-width, since threshold graphs have clique-width at most two. As a complement for this result we provide a $n^{\mathcal{O}(\ell \cdot \operatorname{cw})}$ algorithm for MHE, where $\ell$ is the number of colors and $\operatorname{cw}$ is the clique-width of the input graph. We also construct an FPT algorithm for MHV with running time $\mathcal{O}^*((\ell+1)^{\mathcal{O}(\operatorname{cw})})$, where $\ell$ is the number of colors in the input. Additionally, we show $\mathcal{O}(\ell n^2)$ algorithm for MHV on interval graphs.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

On Happy Colorings, Cuts, and Structural Parameterizations

We study the Maximum Happy Vertices and Maximum Happy Edges problems. The former problem is a variant of clusterization, where some vertices have already been assigned to clusters. The second problem gives a natural generalization of Multiway Uncut, which is the complement of the classical Multiway Cut problem. Due to their fundamental role in theory and practice, clusterization and cut problems has always attracted a lot of attention. We establish a new connection between these two classes of problems by providing a reduction between Maximum Happy Vertices and Node Multiway Cut. Moreover, we study structural and distance to triviality parameterizations of Maximum Happy Vertices and Maximum Happy Edges. Obtained results in these directions answer questions explicitly asked in four works: Agrawal '17, Aravind et al. '16, Choudhari and Reddy '18, Misra and Reddy '17.

cs.DS↗