arXiv subjects

Devansh Srivastav

Publications and source records attributed to Devansh Srivastav.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

No More, No Less: Task Alignment in Terminal Agents

Terminal agents are increasingly capable of executing complex, long-horizon tasks autonomously from a single user prompt. To do so, they must interpret instructions encountered in the environment (e.g., README files, code comments, stack traces) and determine their relevance to the task. This creates a fundamental challenge: relevant cues must be followed to complete a task, whereas irrelevant or misleading ones must be ignored. Existing benchmarks do not capture this ability. An agent may appear capable by blindly following all instructions, or appear robust by ignoring them altogether. We introduce TAB (Task Alignment Benchmark), a suite of 89 terminal tasks derived from Terminal-Bench 2.1. Each task is intentionally underspecified, with missing information provided as a necessary cue embedded in a natural environmental artifact, alongside a plausible but irrelevant distractor. Solving these tasks requires selectively using the cue while ignoring the distractor. Applying TAB to ten frontier agents reveals a systematic gap between task capability and task alignment. The strongest Terminal-Bench agent achieves high task completion but low task alignment on TAB. Evaluating six prompt-injection defenses further shows that suppressing distractor execution also suppresses the cues required for task completion. These results demonstrate that task-aligned agents require selective use of environmental instructions rather than blanket acceptance or rejection.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Unknown Unknowns: Do Hidden Intentions in LLMs Evade Detection?

LLMs expand accessibility and provide wide-reaching access to information. Yet these interactions also create opportunities to embed subtle, goal-oriented behaviours that shape what users think and how they behave, a concern reflected in governance frameworks that prohibit manipulative AI. We refer to these behaviours as hidden intentions: covert agendas embedded in a model's outputs that can manipulate users' beliefs and actions. In this work, we examine whether hidden intentions can be identified and characterised, and assess whether detection can serve as a mitigation strategy. To operationalise this, we introduce a social-science-grounded set of ten hidden intention categories and show that they are trivially inducible. A case study further confirms that all ten categories manifest in deployed LLMs. We then evaluate static classifiers and LLM judges on these categories, providing the first systematic analysis of why hidden intentions are difficult to detect. Our stress tests show that, unless false-positive rates are vanishingly small, auditing is dominated by precision-prevalence trade-offs. Capability scaling and reasoning models do not close this gap, suggesting a fundamental challenge for open-world detection. These findings expose a core gap of current AI governance: without new auditing paradigms for open-world, low-prevalence risks, bans on manipulative AI remain difficult to enforce.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Chasing Shadows: Pitfalls in LLM Security Research

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly prevalent in security research. Their unique characteristics, however, introduce challenges that undermine established paradigms of reproducibility, rigor, and evaluation. Prior work has identified common pitfalls in traditional machine learning research, but these studies predate the advent of LLMs. In this paper, we identify nine common pitfalls that have become (more) relevant with the emergence of LLMs and that can compromise the validity of research involving them. These pitfalls span the entire computation process, from data collection, pre-training, and fine-tuning to prompting and evaluation. We assess the prevalence of these pitfalls across all 72 peer-reviewed papers published at leading Security and Software Engineering venues between 2023 and 2024. We find that every paper contains at least one pitfall, and each pitfall appears in multiple papers. Yet only 15.7% of the present pitfalls were explicitly discussed, suggesting that the majority remain unrecognized. To understand their practical impact, we conduct four empirical case studies showing how individual pitfalls can mislead evaluation, inflate performance, or impair reproducibility. Based on our findings, we offer actionable guidelines to support the community in future work.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

CBM-RAG: Demonstrating Enhanced Interpretability in Radiology Report Generation with Multi-Agent RAG and Concept Bottleneck Models

Advancements in generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold great promise for automating radiology workflows, yet challenges in interpretability and reliability hinder clinical adoption. This paper presents an automated radiology report generation framework that combines Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) with a Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system to bridge AI performance with clinical explainability. CBMs map chest X-ray features to human-understandable clinical concepts, enabling transparent disease classification. Meanwhile, the RAG system integrates multi-agent collaboration and external knowledge to produce contextually rich, evidence-based reports. Our demonstration showcases the system's ability to deliver interpretable predictions, mitigate hallucinations, and generate high-quality, tailored reports with an interactive interface addressing accuracy, trust, and usability challenges. This framework provides a pathway to improving diagnostic consistency and empowering radiologists with actionable insights.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Enhancing Online Learning Efficiency Through Heterogeneous Resource Integration with a Multi-Agent RAG System

Efficient online learning requires seamless access to diverse resources such as videos, code repositories, documentation, and general web content. This poster paper introduces early-stage work on a Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) System designed to enhance learning efficiency by integrating these heterogeneous resources. Using specialized agents tailored for specific resource types (e.g., YouTube tutorials, GitHub repositories, documentation websites, and search engines), the system automates the retrieval and synthesis of relevant information. By streamlining the process of finding and combining knowledge, this approach reduces manual effort and enhances the learning experience. A preliminary user study confirmed the system's strong usability and moderate-high utility, demonstrating its potential to improve the efficiency of knowledge acquisition.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Deep Learning for Ophthalmology: The State-of-the-Art and Future Trends

The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL), has marked a new era in the realm of ophthalmology, offering transformative potential for the diagnosis and treatment of posterior segment eye diseases. This review explores the cutting-edge applications of DL across a range of ocular conditions, including diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, and retinal vessel segmentation. We provide a comprehensive overview of foundational ML techniques and advanced DL architectures, such as CNNs, attention mechanisms, and transformer-based models, highlighting the evolving role of AI in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, optimizing treatment strategies, and improving overall patient care. Additionally, we present key challenges in integrating AI solutions into clinical practice, including ensuring data diversity, improving algorithm transparency, and effectively leveraging multimodal data. This review emphasizes AI's potential to improve disease diagnosis and enhance patient care while stressing the importance of collaborative efforts to overcome these barriers and fully harness AI's impact in advancing eye care.

eess.IV↗

arXiv2024

Towards Interpretable Radiology Report Generation via Concept Bottlenecks using a Multi-Agentic RAG

Deep learning has advanced medical image classification, but interpretability challenges hinder its clinical adoption. This study enhances interpretability in Chest X-ray (CXR) classification by using concept bottleneck models (CBMs) and a multi-agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system for report generation. By modeling relationships between visual features and clinical concepts, we create interpretable concept vectors that guide a multi-agent RAG system to generate radiology reports, enhancing clinical relevance, explainability, and transparency. Evaluation of the generated reports using an LLM-as-a-judge confirmed the interpretability and clinical utility of our model's outputs. On the COVID-QU dataset, our model achieved 81% classification accuracy and demonstrated robust report generation performance, with five key metrics ranging between 84% and 90%. This interpretable multi-agent framework bridges the gap between high-performance AI and the explainability required for reliable AI-driven CXR analysis in clinical settings. Our code is available at https://github.com/tifat58/IRR-with-CBM-RAG.git.

cs.IR↗