arXiv subjects

Elena Grigorescu

Publications and source records attributed to Elena Grigorescu.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Space-Efficient Hierholzer for Undirected Graphs

We present a simple linear-time algorithm that outputs an Eulerian tour of an undirected multigraph with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, if one exists, in $O(m)$ time and using $O(n)$ words of working memory. The input is given as read-only adjacency lists, and the output is written to an append-only stream in traversal order. Our algorithm first finds a sparse spanning circuit (a skeleton), then traverses the circuit step-by-step, repeatedly outputting further circuits rooted at the current vertex. This solves a problem left open by Ismaili Alaoui, Plump, and Wild (SOSA 2026): their space-efficient variant of Hierholzer's algorithm handles general directed multigraphs, but it is unclear how to generalize it to general undirected multigraphs. Our result completes the picture in the read-only model for space-efficient output of Eulerian tours.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A Linear-Time Approximation Scheme for the Densest Subgraph Problem

In the undirected \emph{Densest Subgraph Problem (DSG)} the goal is to output a subset $S$ of vertices of a given graph $G$ that maximizes the quantity $|E(S)|/|S|$, where $E(S)$ is the set of edges in the subgraph induced by $S$. The problem is well studied in both theory and practice, and it admits natural efficient exact algorithms, as well as near-linear time algorithms with a $(1-\varepsilon)$ approximation ratio. However, all previously-known approximation schemes incur logarithmic factors in the size of the graph or other parameters of the graph. This raises the question of whether a linear time $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation can be obtained for all $\varepsilon>0$. We answer this question affirmatively by providing a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm running in time $O\left(\frac{n+m}{\varepsilon^3}\log \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)$, where $m$ and $n$ are respectively the number of edges and vertices of $G$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first truly linear-time approximation scheme for the problem (when $\varepsilon>0$ is a constant). Our algorithm uses assignments arising from a flow-based formulation together with a structural carving lemma. This lemma allows us to progressively carve "sparse" parts of the graph while nearly preserving the densest subgraph, allowing us to shift heavy computations to smaller instances, which eventually yields the mentioned runtime. Our framework also yields a $(1/2 -\varepsilon)$-approximation for the \emph{Densest At-Least-$k$ Subgraph Problem}, where in addition to maximizing the density, we require the subgraph to have at least $k$ vertices. Our algorithm runs in time $O\left( \frac{(n+m) \log^2 n \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon}}{\varepsilon} \right)$. This nearly matches the known $1/2$ approximation hardness while running in near-linear time.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Testing the Independent Set Property in Hypergraphs

The optimal sample complexity of testing if an $n$-vertex graph has an independent set of size $\rho n$, or is $\varepsilon$-far from having an independent set of size $\rho n$, was established to be $\widetilde{O}(\rho^3/\varepsilon^2)$, in a notable result by Blais and Seth (SICOMP 2025). In contrast, for $q$-uniform hypergraphs, there is a significant gap between the best known upper and lower bounds, and there has been no progress on the problem for the last two decades. In this work, we prove a new upper bound of $\widetilde{O}\!\left(\frac{q\rho^{2q-3}}{\varepsilon^2 (q-2)!^2}\right)$ on the sample complexity of testing the $\rho$-independent set property. The previous best known upper bound was $\widetilde{O}\!\left(\frac{2^q q! \rho^{2q}}{\varepsilon^3}\right)$, due to Langberg (RANDOM 2004). This establishes the optimal dependence on $\varepsilon$ and gives an exponential improvement in the dependence on $q$. We prove our result via a new application of the hypergraph container method.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Exponential Lower Bounds for 2-query Relaxed Locally Decodable Codes

Locally Decodable Codes (LDCs) are error-correcting codes $C\colon\Sigma^n\rightarrow \Sigma^m,$ encoding \emph{messages} in $\Sigma^n$ to \emph{codewords} in $\Sigma^m$, with super-fast decoding algorithms. They are important mathematical objects in many areas of theoretical computer science, yet the best constructions so far have codeword length $m$ that is super-polynomial in $n$, for codes with constant query complexity and constant alphabet size. In a very surprising result, Ben-Sasson, Goldreich, Harsha, Sudan, and Vadhan (SICOMP 2006) show how to construct a relaxed version of LDCs (RLDCs) with constant query complexity and almost linear codeword length over the binary alphabet, and used them to obtain significantly-improved constructions of Probabilistically Checkable Proofs. In this work, we study RLDCs in the standard Hamming-error setting. We prove an exponential lower bound on the length of Hamming RLDCs making $2$ queries (even adaptively) over the binary alphabet. This answers a question explicitly raised by Gur and Lachish (SICOMP 2021) and is the first exponential lower bound for RLDCs. Combined with the results of Ben-Sasson et al., our result exhibits a ``phase-transition''-type behavior on the codeword length for some constant-query complexity. We achieve these lower bounds via a transformation of RLDCs to standard Hamming LDCs, using a careful analysis of restrictions of message bits that fix codeword bits.

cs.IT↗

arXiv2025

Relaxed vs. Full Local Decodability with Few Queries: Equivalence and Separations for Linear Codes

A locally decodable code (LDC) $C \colon \{0,1\}^k \to \{0,1\}^n$ is an error-correcting code that allows one to recover any bit of the original message with good probability while only reading a small number of bits from a corrupted codeword. A relaxed locally decodable code (RLDC) is a weaker notion where the decoder is additionally allowed to abort and output a special symbol $\bot$ if it detects an error. For a large constant number of queries $q$, there is a large gap between the blocklength $n$ of the best $q$-query LDC and the best $q$-query RLDC. Existing constructions of RLDCs achieve polynomial length $n = k^{1 + O(1/q)}$, while the best-known $q$-LDCs only achieve subexponential length $n = 2^{k^{o(1)}}$. On the other hand, for $q = 2$, it is known that RLDCs and LDCs are equivalent. We thus ask the question: what is the smallest $q$ such that there exists a $q$-RLDC that is not a $q$-LDC? In this work, we show that any linear $3$-query RLDC is in fact a $3$-LDC, i.e., linear RLDCs and LDCs are equivalent at $3$ queries. More generally, we show for any constant $q$, there is a soundness error threshold $s(q)$ such that any linear $q$-RLDC with soundness error below this threshold must be a $q$-LDC. This implies that linear RLDCs cannot have "strong soundness" -- a stricter condition satisfied by linear LDCs that says the soundness error is proportional to the fraction of errors in the corrupted codeword -- unless they are simply LDCs. In addition, we give simple constructions of linear $15$-query RLDCs that are not $q$-LDCs for any constant $q$, showing that for $q = 15$, linear RLDCs and LDCs are not equivalent. We also prove nearly identical results for locally correctable codes and their corresponding relaxed counterpart.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Noisy-Syndrome Decoding of Hypergraph Product Codes

Hypergraph product codes are a prototypical family of quantum codes with state-of-the-art decodability properties. In this work we consider the "noisy" syndrome decoding problem and exact recovery problem for hypergraph product codes and show a reduction to the decoding and exact recovery of classical codes in the noisy syndrome setting. Our results hold for a broad class of codes admitting efficient syndrome decoding, including Sipser-Spielman codes and Reed-Solomon codes.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

On the Hardness of the One-Sided Code Sparsifier Problem

The notion of code sparsification was introduced by Khanna, Putterman and Sudan (arxiv.2311.00788), as an analogue to the the more established notion of cut sparsification in graphs and hypergraphs. In particular, for $\alpha\in (0,1)$ an (unweighted) one-sided $\alpha$-sparsifier for a linear code $\mathcal{C} \subseteq \mathbb{F}_2^n$ is a subset $S\subseteq [n]$ such that the weight of each codeword projected onto the coordinates in $S$ is preserved up to an $\alpha$ fraction. Recently, Gharan and Sahami (arxiv.2502.02799) show the existence of one-sided 1/2-sparsifiers of size $n/2+O(\sqrt{kn})$ for any linear code, where $k$ is the dimension of $\mathcal{C}$. In this paper, we consider the computational problem of finding a one-sided 1/2-sparsifier of minimal size, and show that it is NP-hard, via a reduction from the classical nearest codeword problem. We also show hardness of approximation results.

cs.IT↗

arXiv2025

On the hardness of approximating minimum distances of quantum codes

The problem of computing distances of error-correcting codes is fundamental in both the classical and quantum settings. While hardness for the classical version of these problems has been known for some time (in both the exact and approximate settings), it was only recently that Kapshikar and Kundu showed these problems are also hard in the quantum setting. As our first main result, we reprove this using arguably simpler arguments based on hypergraph product codes. In particular, we get a direct reduction to CSS codes, the most commonly used type of quantum code, from the minimum distance problem for classical linear codes. Our second set of results considers the distance of a graph state, which is a key parameter for quantum codes obtained via the codeword stabilized formalism. We show that it is NP-hard to compute/approximate the distance of a graph state when the adjacency matrix of the graph is the input. In fact, we show this is true even if we only consider X-type errors of a graph state. Our techniques moreover imply an interesting classical consequence: the hardness of computing or approximating the distance of classical codes with rate equal to 1/2. One of the main motivations of the present work is a question raised by Kapshikar and Kundu concerning the NP-hardness of approximation when there is an additive error proportional to a quantum code's length. We show that no such hardness can hold for hypergraph product codes. These observations suggest the possibility of a new kind of square root barrier.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2024

Routing-Controlled Spanners

Designing sparse directed spanners, which are subgraphs that approximately maintain distance constraints, has attracted sustained interest in TCS, especially due to their wide applicability, as well as the difficulty to obtain tight results. However, a significant drawback of the notion of spanners is that it does not capture a natural setting where demand pairs are subject to restrictions beyond a distance constraint. In this paper we initiate the study of **routing-controlled spanners**, where in addition to distance constraints, demand pairs are also subjected to routing constraints, which may require or forbid visiting specific vertices on feasible paths. The goal is to find a minimum-cost routing solution that satisfies the multiple constraints. Moreover, we introduce an even more general notion, which we call **packing-covering spanner**, where each demand pair is subjected to a number of packing and covering constraints, in addition to a distance constraint. Packing-covering spanners capture other natural network connectivity problems such as optimal hopsets and graph spanners for group Steiner distances. To the best of our knowledge, we obtain the first approximation algorithms for the packing-covering spanner problem, and thus for the routing-controlled spanners, under natural assumptions. Our results match the state-of-the-art approximation ratios in special cases of ours, such as Steiner Forests and Directed Spanners. Our results also imply approximation algorithms for optimal hopsets and graph spanners for group Steiner distances in the directed setting, and position packing-covering spanners as a natural abstraction unifying several well-studied problems in directed network design.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Learning-Augmented Algorithms for Online Concave Packing and Convex Covering Problems

Learning-augmented algorithms have been extensively studied across the computer science community in the recent years, driven by advances in machine learning predictors, which can provide additional information to augment classical algorithms. Such predictions are especially powerful in the context of online problems, where decisions have to be made without knowledge of the future, and which traditionally exhibits impossibility results bounding the performance of any online algorithm. The study of learning-augmented algorithms thus aims to use external advice prudently, to overcome classical impossibility results when the advice is accurate, and still perform comparably to the state-of-the-art online algorithms even when the advice is inaccurate. In this paper, we present learning-augmented algorithmic frameworks for two fundamental optimizations settings, extending and generalizing prior works. For online packing with concave objectives, we present a simple but overarching strategy that switches between the advice and the state-of-the-art online algorithm. For online covering with convex objectives, we greatly extend primal-dual methods for online convex covering programs by Azar et al. (FOCS 2016) and previous learning-augmented framework for online covering linear programs from the literature, to many new applications. We show that our algorithms break impossibility results when the advice is accurate, while maintaining comparable performance with state-of-the-art classical online algorithms even when the advice is erroneous.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Differential privacy and Sublinear time are incompatible sometimes

Differential privacy and sublinear algorithms are both rapidly emerging algorithmic themes in times of big data analysis. Although recent works have shown the existence of differentially private sublinear algorithms for many problems including graph parameter estimation and clustering, little is known regarding hardness results on these algorithms. In this paper, we initiate the study of lower bounds for problems that aim for both differentially-private and sublinear-time algorithms. Our main result is the incompatibility of both the desiderata in the general case. In particular, we prove that a simple problem based on one-way marginals yields both a differentially-private algorithm, as well as a sublinear-time algorithm, but does not admit a ``strictly'' sublinear-time algorithm that is also differentially private.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

A Simple Learning-Augmented Algorithm for Online Packing with Concave Objectives

Learning-augmented algorithms has been extensively studied recently in the computer-science community, due to the potential of using machine learning predictions in order to improve the performance of algorithms. Predictions are especially useful for online algorithms making irrevocable decisions without knowledge of the future. Such learning-augmented algorithms aim to overcome the limitations of classical online algorithms when the predictions are accurate, and still perform comparably when the predictions are inaccurate. A common approach is to adapt existing online algorithms to the particular advice notion employed, which often involves understanding previous sophisticated algorithms and their analyses. However, ideally, one would simply use previous online solutions in a black-box fashion, without much loss in the approximation guarantees. Such clean solutions that avoid opening up black-boxes are often rare, and may be even missed the first time around. For example, Grigorescu et al. (NeurIPS 22) proposed a learning-augmented algorithms for online covering linear programs, but it later turned out that their results can be subsumed by a natural approach that switches between the advice and an online algorithm given as a black-box, as noted in their paper. In this work, we introduce and analyze a simple learning-augmented algorithm for online packing problems with linear constraints and concave objectives. We exhibit several direct applications of our framework including online packing linear programming, knapsack, resource management benefit, throughput maximization, and network utility maximization. We further raise the problem of understanding necessary and sufficient conditions for when such simple black-box solutions may be optimal. We believe this is an important direction of research that would unify many ad-hoc approaches from the literature.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Directed Buy-at-Bulk Spanners

We present a framework that unifies directed buy-at-bulk network design and directed spanner problems, namely, buy-at-bulk spanners. The goal is to find a minimum-cost routing solution for network design problems that capture economies at scale, while satisfying demands and distance constraints for terminal pairs. A more restricted version of this problem was shown to be $O(2^{{\log^{1-\varepsilon} n}})$-hard to approximate, where $n$ is the number of vertices, under a standard complexity assumption, due to Elkin and Peleg (Theory of Computing Systems, 2007). To the best of our knowledge, our results are the first sublinear factor approximation algorithms for directed buy-at-bulk spanners. Furthermore, these results hold even when we allow the edge lengths to be negative, unlike the previous literature for spanners. Our approximation ratios match the state-of-the-art ratios in special cases, namely, buy-at-bulk network design by Antonakopoulos (WAOA, 2010) and weighted spanners by Grigorescu, Kumar, and Lin (APPROX 2023). Our results are based on new approximation algorithms for the following two problems that are of independent interest: minimum-density distance-constrained junction trees and resource-constrained shortest path with negative consumption.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

On k-Mer-Based and Maximum Likelihood Estimation Algorithms for Trace Reconstruction

The goal of the trace reconstruction problem is to recover a string $x\in\{0,1\}^n$ given many independent {\em traces} of $x$, where a trace is a subsequence obtained from deleting bits of $x$ independently with some given probability $p\in [0,1).$ A recent result of Chase (STOC 2021) shows how $x$ can be determined (in exponential time) from $\exp(\widetilde{O}(n^{1/5}))$ traces. This is the state-of-the-art result on the sample complexity of trace reconstruction. In this paper we consider two kinds of algorithms for the trace reconstruction problem. Our first, and technically more involved, result shows that any $k$-mer-based algorithm for trace reconstruction must use $\exp(Ω(n^{1/5}))$ traces, under the assumption that the estimator requires $poly(2^k, 1/\varepsilon)$ traces, thus establishing the optimality of this number of traces. The analysis of this result also shows that the analysis technique used by Chase (STOC 2021) is essentially tight, and hence new techniques are needed in order to improve the worst-case upper bound. Our second, simple, result considers the performance of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE), which specifically picks the source string that has the maximum likelihood to generate the samples (traces). We show that the MLE algorithm uses a nearly optimal number of traces, \ie, up to a factor of $n$ in the number of samples needed for an optimal algorithm, and show that this factor of $n$ loss may be necessary under general ``model estimation'' settings.

cs.IT↗

arXiv2023

How to Make Your Approximation Algorithm Private: A Black-Box Differentially-Private Transformation for Tunable Approximation Algorithms of Functions with Low Sensitivity

We develop a framework for efficiently transforming certain approximation algorithms into differentially-private variants, in a black-box manner. Specifically, our results focus on algorithms A that output an approximation to a function f of the form $(1-a)f(x)-k \leq A(x) \leq (1+a)f(x)+k$, where $k \in \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$ denotes additive error and $a \in [0,1)$ denotes multiplicative error can be``tuned" to small-enough values while incurring only a polynomial blowup in the running time/space. We show that such algorithms can be made DP without sacrificing accuracy, as long as the function f has small global sensitivity. We achieve these results by applying the smooth sensitivity framework developed by Nissim, Raskhodnikova, and Smith (STOC 2007). Our framework naturally applies to transform non-private FPRAS and FPTAS algorithms into $ε$-DP approximation algorithms where the former case requires an additional postprocessing step. We apply our framework in the context of sublinear-time and sublinear-space algorithms, while preserving the nature of the algorithm in meaningful ranges of the parameters. Our results include the first (to the best of our knowledge) $ε$-edge DP sublinear-time algorithm for estimating the number of triangles, the number of connected components, and the weight of a minimum spanning tree of a graph. In the area of streaming algorithms, our results include $ε$-DP algorithms for estimating Lp-norms, distinct elements, and weighted minimum spanning tree for both insertion-only and turnstile streams. Our transformation also provides a private version of the smooth histogram framework, which is commonly used for converting streaming algorithms into sliding window variants, and achieves a multiplicative approximation to many problems, such as estimating Lp-norms, distinct elements, and the length of the longest increasing subsequence.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

On computing Discretized Ricci curvatures of graphs: local algorithms and (localized) fine-grained reductions

Characterizing shapes of high-dimensional objects via Ricci curvatures plays a critical role in many research areas in mathematics and physics. However, even though several discretizations of Ricci curvatures for discrete combinatorial objects such as networks have been proposed and studied by mathematicians, the computational complexity aspects of these discretizations have escaped the attention of theoretical computer scientists to a large extent. In this paper, we study one such discretization, namely the Ollivier-Ricci curvature, from the perspective of efficient computation by fine-grained reductions and local query-based algorithms. Our main contributions are the following. (a) We relate our curvature computation problem to minimum weight perfect matching problem on complete bipartite graphs via fine-grained reduction. (b) We formalize the computational aspects of the curvature computation problems in suitable frameworks so that they can be studied by researchers in local algorithms. (c) We provide the first known lower and upper bounds on queries for query-based algorithms for the curvature computation problems in our local algorithms framework. En route, we also illustrate a localized version of our fine-grained reduction. We believe that our results bring forth an intriguing set of research questions, motivated both in theory and practice, regarding designing efficient algorithms for curvatures of objects.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Approximation Algorithms for Directed Weighted Spanners

In the pairwise weighted spanner problem, the input consists of an $n$-vertex-directed graph, where each edge is assigned a cost and a length. Given $k$ vertex pairs and a distance constraint for each pair, the goal is to find a minimum-cost subgraph in which the distance constraints are satisfied. This formulation captures many well-studied connectivity problems, including spanners, distance preservers, and Steiner forests. In the offline setting, we show: 1. An $\tilde{O}(n^{4/5 + ε})$-approximation algorithm for pairwise weighted spanners. When the edges have unit costs and lengths, the best previous algorithm gives an $\tilde{O}(n^{3/5 + ε})$-approximation, due to Chlamtáč, Dinitz, Kortsarz, and Laekhanukit (TALG, 2020). 2. An $\tilde{O}(n^{1/2+ε})$-approximation algorithm for all-pair weighted distance preservers. When the edges have unit costs and arbitrary lengths, the best previous algorithm gives an $\tilde{O}(n^{1/2})$-approximation for all-pair spanners, due to Berman, Bhattacharyya, Makarychev, Raskhodnikova, and Yaroslavtsev (Information and Computation, 2013). In the online setting, we show: 1. An $\tilde{O}(k^{1/2 + ε})$-competitive algorithm for pairwise weighted spanners. The state-of-the-art results are $\tilde{O}(n^{4/5})$-competitive when edges have unit costs and arbitrary lengths, and $\min\{\tilde{O}(k^{1/2 + ε}), \tilde{O}(n^{2/3 + ε})\}$-competitive when edges have unit costs and lengths, due to Grigorescu, Lin, and Quanrud (APPROX, 2021). 2. An $\tilde{O}(k^ε)$-competitive algorithm for single-source weighted spanners. Without distance constraints, this problem is equivalent to the directed Steiner tree problem. The best previous algorithm for online directed Steiner trees is $\tilde{O}(k^ε)$-competitive, due to Chakrabarty, Ene, Krishnaswamy, and Panigrahi (SICOMP, 2018).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Online Directed Spanners and Steiner Forests

We present online algorithms for directed spanners and Steiner forests. These problems fall under the unifying framework of online covering linear programming formulations, developed by Buchbinder and Naor (MOR, 34, 2009), based on primal-dual techniques. Our results include the following: For the pairwise spanner problem, in which the pairs of vertices to be spanned arrive online, we present an efficient randomized $\tilde{O}(n^{4/5})$-competitive algorithm for graphs with general lengths, where $n$ is the number of vertices. With uniform lengths, we give an efficient randomized $\tilde{O}(n^{2/3+ε})$-competitive algorithm, and an efficient deterministic $\tilde{O}(k^{1/2+ε})$-competitive algorithm, where $k$ is the number of terminal pairs. These are the first online algorithms for directed spanners. In the offline setting, the current best approximation ratio with uniform lengths is $\tilde{O}(n^{3/5 + ε})$, due to Chlamtac, Dinitz, Kortsarz, and Laekhanukit (TALG 2020). For the directed Steiner forest problem with uniform costs, in which the pairs of vertices to be connected arrive online, we present an efficient randomized $\tilde{O}(n^{2/3 + ε})$-competitive algorithm. The state-of-the-art online algorithm for general costs is due to Chakrabarty, Ene, Krishnaswamy, and Panigrahi (SICOMP 2018) and is $\tilde{O}(k^{1/2 + ε})$-competitive. In the offline version, the current best approximation ratio with uniform costs is $\tilde{O}(n^{4/7 + ε})$, due to Abboud and Bodwin (SODA 2018). A small modification of the online covering framework by Buchbinder and Naor implies a polynomial-time primal-dual approach with separation oracles, which a priori might perform exponentially many calls. We convert the online spanner problem and the online Steiner forest problem into online covering problems and round in a problem-specific fashion.

cs.DS↗