arXiv subjects

Euiwoong Lee

Publications and source records attributed to Euiwoong Lee.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2025

1.64-Approximation for Chromatic Correlation Clustering via Chromatic Cluster LP

Chromatic Correlation Clustering (CCC) generalizes Correlation Clustering by assigning multiple categorical relationships (colors) to edges and imposing chromatic constraints on the clusters. Unlike traditional Correlation Clustering, which only deals with binary $(+/-)$ relationships, CCC captures richer relational structures. Despite its importance, improving the approximation for CCC has been difficult due to the limitations of standard LP relaxations. We present a randomized $1.64$-approximation algorithm to the CCC problem, significantly improving the previous factor of $2.15$. Our approach extends the cluster LP framework to the chromatic setting by introducing a chromatic cluster LP relaxation and an rounding algorithm that utilizes both a cluster-based and a greedy pivot-based strategy. The analysis bypasses the integrality gap of $2$ for the CCC version of standard LP and highlights the potential of the cluster LP framework to address other variants of clustering problems.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Matroid-Based TSP Rounding for Half-Integral Solutions

We show how to round any half-integral solution to the subtour-elimination relaxation for the TSP, while losing a less-than-1.5 factor. Such a rounding algorithm was recently given by Karlin, Klein, and Oveis Gharan based on sampling from max-entropy distributions. We build on an approach of Haddadan and Newman to show how sampling from the matroid intersection polytope, and a new use of max-entropy sampling, can give better guarantees.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Approximating Maximum Cut on Interval Graphs and Split Graphs beyond Goemans-Williamson

We present a polynomial-time $(α_{GW} + \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for the Maximum Cut problem on interval graphs and split graphs, where $α_{GW} \approx 0.878$ is the approximation guarantee of the Goemans-Williamson algorithm and $\varepsilon > 10^{-34}$ is a fixed constant. To attain this, we give an improved analysis of a slight modification of the Goemans-Williamson algorithm for graphs in which triangles can be packed into a constant fraction of their edges. We then pair this analysis with structural results showing that both interval graphs and split graphs either have such a triangle packing or have maximum cut close to their number of edges. We also show that, subject to the Small Set Expansion Hypothesis, there exists a constant $c > 0$ such that there is no polyomial-time $(1 - c)$-approximation for Maximum Cut on split graphs.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

On the Constant-Factor Approximability of Minimum Cost Constraint Satisfaction Problems

We study minimum cost constraint satisfaction problems (MinCostCSP) through the algebraic lens. We show that for any constraint language $Γ$ which has the dual discriminator operation as a polymorphism, there exists a $|D|$-approximation algorithm for MinCostCSP$(Γ)$ where $D$ is the domain. Complementing our algorithmic result, we show that any constraint language $Γ$ where MinCostCSP$(Γ)$ admits a constant-factor approximation must have a \emph{near-unanimity} (NU) polymorphism unless P = NP, extending a similar result by Dalmau et al. on MinCSPs. These results imply a dichotomy of constant-factor approximability for constraint languages that contain all permutation relations (a natural generalization for Boolean CSPs that allow variable negation): either MinCostCSP$(Γ)$ has an NU polymorphism and is $|D|$-approximable, or it does not have any NU polymorphism and is NP-hard to approximate within any constant factor. Finally, we present a constraint language which has a majority polymorphism, but is nonetheless NP-hard to approximate within any constant factor assuming the Unique Games Conjecture, showing that the condition of having an NU polymorphism is in general not sufficient unless UGC fails.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Inapproximability of Finding Sparse Vectors in Codes, Subspaces, and Lattices

Finding sparse vectors is a fundamental problem that arises in several contexts including codes, subspaces, and lattices. In this work, we prove strong inapproximability results for all these variants using a novel approach that even bypasses the PCP theorem. Our main result is that it is NP-hard (under randomized reductions) to approximate the sparsest vector in a real subspace within any constant factor; the gap can be further amplified using tensoring. Our reduction has the property that there is a Boolean solution in the completeness case. As a corollary, this immediately recovers the state-of-the-art inapproximability factors for the shortest vector problem (SVP) on lattices. Our proof extends the range of $\ell_p$ (quasi) norms for which hardness was previously known, from $p\geq 1$ to all $p\geq 0$, answering a question raised by [Khot05]. Previous hardness results for SVP, and the related minimum distance problem (MDP) for error-correcting codes, all use lattice/coding gadgets that have an abundance of codewords in a ball of radius smaller than the minimum distance. In contrast, our reduction only needs many codewords in a ball of radius slightly larger than the minimum distance. This enables an easy derandomization of our reduction for finite fields, giving a new elementary proof of deterministic hardness for MDP. We believe this weaker density requirement might offer a promising approach to showing deterministic hardness of SVP, a long elusive goal. The key technical ingredient underlying our result for real subspaces is a proof that in the kernel of a random Rademacher matrix, the support of any two linearly independent vectors have very little overlap. A broader motivation behind this work is the development of inapproximability techniques for problems over the reals. We hope that the approach we develop could enable progress on analytic variants of sparsest vector.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

All-Subsets Important Separators with Applications to Sample Sets, Balanced Separators and Vertex Sparsifiers in Directed Graphs

Given a directed graph $G$ with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, a parameter $k$ and two disjoint subsets $S,T \subseteq V(G)$, we show that the number of all-subsets important separators, which is the number of $A$-$B$ important vertex separators of size at most $k$ over all $A \subseteq S$ and $B \subseteq T$, is at most $β(|S|, |T|, k) = 4^k {|S| \choose \leq k} {|T| \choose \leq 2k}$, where ${x \choose \leq c} = \sum_{i = 1}^c {x \choose i}$, and that they can be enumerated in time $O(β(|S|,|T|,k)k^2(m+n))$. This is a generalization of the folklore result stating that the number of $A$-$B$ important separators for two fixed sets $A$ and $B$ is at most $4^k$ (first implicitly shown by Chen, Liu and Lu Algorithmica '09). From this result, we obtain the following applications: We give a construction for detection sets and sample sets in directed graphs, generalizing the results of Kleinberg (Internet Mathematics' 03) and Feige and Mahdian (STOC' 06) to directed graphs. Via our new sample sets, we give the first FPT algorithm for finding balanced separators in directed graphs parameterized by $k$, the size of the separator. Our algorithm runs in time $2^{O(k)} (m + n)$. We also give a $O({\sqrt{\log k}})$ approximation algorithm for the same problem. Finally, we present new results on vertex sparsifiers for preserving small cuts.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Min-CSPs on Complete Instances II: Polylogarithmic Approximation for Min-NAE-3-SAT

This paper studies complete $k$-Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs), where an $n$-variable instance has exactly one nontrivial constraint for each subset of $k$ variables, i.e., it has $\binom{n}{k}$ constraints. A recent work started a systematic study of complete $k$-CSPs [Anand, Lee, Sharma, SODA'25], and showed a quasi-polynomial time algorithm that decides if there is an assignment satisfying all the constraints of any complete Boolean-alphabet $k$-CSP, algorithmically separating complete instances from dense instances. The tractability of this decision problem is necessary for any nontrivial (multiplicative) approximation for the minimization version, whose goal is to minimize the number of violated constraints. The same paper raised the question of whether it is possible to obtain nontrivial approximation algorithms for complete Min-$k$-CSPs with $k \geq 3$. In this work, we make progress in this direction and show a quasi-polynomial time $\text{polylog}(n)$-approximation to Min-NAE-3-SAT on complete instances, which asks to minimize the number of $3$-clauses where all the three literals equal the same bit. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first known example of a CSP whose decision version is NP-Hard in general (and dense) instances while admitting a $\text{polylog}(n)$-approximation in complete instances. Our algorithm presents a new iterative framework for rounding a solution from the Sherali-Adams hierarchy, where each iteration interleaves the two well-known rounding tools: the conditioning procedure, in order to almost fix many variables, and the thresholding procedure, in order to completely fix them. Finally, we improve the running time of the decision algorithms of Anand, Lee, and Sharma and show a simple algorithm that decides any complete Boolean-alphabet $k$-CSP in polynomial time.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

On Approximability of $\ell_2^2$ Min-Sum Clustering

The $\ell_2^2$ min-sum $k$-clustering problem is to partition an input set into clusters $C_1,\ldots,C_k$ to minimize $\sum_{i=1}^k\sum_{p,q\in C_i}\|p-q\|_2^2$. Although $\ell_2^2$ min-sum $k$-clustering is NP-hard, it is not known whether it is NP-hard to approximate $\ell_2^2$ min-sum $k$-clustering beyond a certain factor. In this paper, we give the first hardness-of-approximation result for the $\ell_2^2$ min-sum $k$-clustering problem. We show that it is NP-hard to approximate the objective to a factor better than $1.056$ and moreover, assuming a balanced variant of the Johnson Coverage Hypothesis, it is NP-hard to approximate the objective to a factor better than 1.327. We then complement our hardness result by giving a nearly linear time parameterized PTAS for $\ell_2^2$ min-sum $k$-clustering running in time $O\left(n^{1+o(1)}d\cdot \exp((k\cdot\varepsilon^{-1})^{O(1)})\right)$, where $d$ is the underlying dimension of the input dataset. Finally, we consider a learning-augmented setting, where the algorithm has access to an oracle that outputs a label $i\in[k]$ for input point, thereby implicitly partitioning the input dataset into $k$ clusters that induce an approximately optimal solution, up to some amount of adversarial error $α\in\left[0,\frac{1}{2}\right)$. We give a polynomial-time algorithm that outputs a $\frac{1+γα}{(1-α)^2}$-approximation to $\ell_2^2$ min-sum $k$-clustering, for a fixed constant $γ>0$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Facility Location on High-dimensional Euclidean Spaces

Recent years have seen great progress in the approximability of fundamental clustering and facility location problems on high-dimensional Euclidean spaces, including $k$-Means and $k$-Median. While they admit strictly better approximation ratios than their general metric versions, their approximation ratios are still higher than the hardness ratios for general metrics, leaving the possibility that the ultimate optimal approximation ratios will be the same between Euclidean and general metrics. Moreover, such an improved algorithm for Euclidean spaces is not known for Uncapaciated Facility Location (UFL), another fundamental problem in the area. In this paper, we prove that for any $γ\geq 1.6774$ there exists $\varepsilon > 0$ such that Euclidean UFL admits a $(γ, 1 + 2e^{-γ} - \varepsilon)$-bifactor approximation algorithm, improving the result of Byrka and Aardal. Together with the $(γ, 1 + 2e^{-γ})$ NP-hardness in general metrics, it shows the first separation between general and Euclidean metrics for the aforementioned basic problems. We also present an $(α_{Li} - \varepsilon)$-(unifactor) approximation algorithm for UFL for some $\varepsilon > 0$ in Euclidean spaces, where $α_{Li} \approx 1.488$ is the best-known approximation ratio for UFL by Li.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

A Constant-factor Approximation for Weighted Bond Cover

The Weighted $\mathcal{F}$-Vertex Deletion for a class ${\cal F}$ of graphs asks, weighted graph $G$, for a minimum weight vertex set $S$ such that $G-S\in{\cal F}.$ The case when ${\cal F}$ is minor-closed and excludes some graph as a minor has received particular attention but a constant-factor approximation remained elusive for Weighted $\mathcal{F}$-Vertex Deletion. Only three cases of minor-closed ${\cal F}$ are known to admit constant-factor approximations, namely Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set and Diamond Hitting Set. We study the problem for the class ${\cal F}$ of $θ_c$-minor-free graphs, under the equivalent setting of the Weighted $c$-Bond Cover problem, and present a constant-factor approximation algorithm using the primal-dual method. For this, we leverage a structure theorem implicit in [Joret, Paul, Sau, Saurabh, and Thomassé, SIDMA'14] which states the following: any graph $G$ containing a $θ_c$-minor-model either contains a large two-terminal protrusion, or contains a constant-size $θ_c$-minor-model, or a collection of pairwise disjoint constant-sized connected sets that can be contracted simultaneously to yield a dense graph. In the first case, we tame the graph by replacing the protrusion with a special-purpose weighted gadget. For the second and third case, we provide a weighting scheme which guarantees a local approximation ratio. Besides making an important step in the quest of (dis)proving a constant-factor approximation for Weighted $\mathcal{F}$-Vertex Deletion, our result may be useful as a template for algorithms for other minor-closed families.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Min-CSPs on Complete Instances

Given a fixed arity $k \geq 2$, Min-$k$-CSP on complete instances involves a set of $n$ variables $V$ and one nontrivial constraint for every $k$-subset of variables (so there are $\binom{n}{k}$ constraints). The goal is to find an assignment that minimizes unsatisfied constraints. Unlike Max-$k$-CSP that admits a PTAS on dense or expanding instances, the approximability of Min-$k$-CSP is less understood. For some CSPs like Min-$k$-SAT, there's an approximation-preserving reduction from general to dense instances, making complete instances unique for potential new techniques. This paper initiates a study of Min-$k$-CSPs on complete instances. We present an $O(1)$-approximation algorithm for Min-2-SAT on complete instances, the minimization version of Max-2-SAT. Since $O(1)$-approximation on dense or expanding instances refutes the Unique Games Conjecture, it shows a strict separation between complete and dense/expanding instances. Then we study the decision versions of CSPs, aiming to satisfy all constraints; which is necessary for any nontrivial approximation. Our second main result is a quasi-polynomial time algorithm for every Boolean $k$-CSP on complete instances, including $k$-SAT. We provide additional algorithmic and hardness results for CSPs with larger alphabets, characterizing (arity, alphabet size) pairs that admit a quasi-polynomial time algorithm on complete instances.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Asymptotically Optimal Hardness for $k$-Set Packing and $k$-Matroid Intersection

For any $\varepsilon > 0$, we prove that $k$-Dimensional Matching is hard to approximate within a factor of $k/(12 + \varepsilon)$ for large $k$ unless $\textsf{NP} \subseteq \textsf{BPP}$. Listed in Karp's 21 $\textsf{NP}$-complete problems, $k$-Dimensional Matching is a benchmark computational complexity problem which we find as a special case of many constrained optimization problems over independence systems including: $k$-Set Packing, $k$-Matroid Intersection, and Matroid $k$-Parity. For all the aforementioned problems, the best known lower bound was a $Ω(k /\log(k))$-hardness by Hazan, Safra, and Schwartz. In contrast, state-of-the-art algorithms achieved an approximation of $O(k)$. Our result narrows down this gap to a constant and thus provides a rationale for the observed algorithmic difficulties. The crux of our result hinges on a novel approximation preserving gadget from $R$-degree bounded $k$-CSPs over alphabet size $R$ to $kR$-Dimensional Matching. Along the way, we prove that $R$-degree bounded $k$-CSPs over alphabet size $R$ are hard to approximate within a factor $Ω_k(R)$ using known randomised sparsification methods for CSPs.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Unbreakable Decomposition in Close-to-Linear Time

Unbreakable decomposition, introduced by Cygan et al. (SICOMP'19) and Cygan et al. (TALG'20), has proven to be one of the most powerful tools for parameterized graph cut problems in recent years. Unfortunately, all known constructions require at least $Ω_k\left(mn^2\right)$ time, given an undirected graph with $n$ vertices, $m$ edges, and cut-size parameter $k$. In this work, we show the first close-to-linear time parameterized algorithm that computes an unbreakable decomposition. More precisely, for any $0<ε\leq 1$, our algorithm runs in time $2^{O(\frac{k}ε \log \frac{k}ε)}m^{1 + ε}$ and computes a $(O(k/ε), k)$ unbreakable tree decomposition of $G$, where each bag has adhesion at most $O(k/ε)$. This immediately opens up possibilities for obtaining close-to-linear time algorithms for numerous problems whose only known solution is based on unbreakable decomposition.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

On Equivalence of Parameterized Inapproximability of k-Median, k-Max-Coverage, and 2-CSP

Parameterized Inapproximability Hypothesis (PIH) is a central question in the field of parameterized complexity. PIH asserts that given as input a 2-CSP on $k$ variables and alphabet size $n$, it is W[1]-hard parameterized by $k$ to distinguish if the input is perfectly satisfiable or if every assignment to the input violates 1% of the constraints. An important implication of PIH is that it yields the tight parameterized inapproximability of the $k$-maxcoverage problem. In the $k$-maxcoverage problem, we are given as input a set system, a threshold $τ>0$, and a parameter $k$ and the goal is to determine if there exist $k$ sets in the input whose union is at least $τ$ fraction of the entire universe. PIH is known to imply that it is W[1]-hard parameterized by $k$ to distinguish if there are $k$ input sets whose union is at least $τ$ fraction of the universe or if the union of every $k$ input sets is not much larger than $τ\cdot (1-\frac{1}{e})$ fraction of the universe. In this work we present a gap preserving FPT reduction (in the reverse direction) from the $k$-maxcoverage problem to the aforementioned 2-CSP problem, thus showing that the assertion that approximating the $k$-maxcoverage problem to some constant factor is W[1]-hard implies PIH. In addition, we present a gap preserving FPT reduction from the $k$-median problem (in general metrics) to the $k$-maxcoverage problem, further highlighting the power of gap preserving FPT reductions over classical gap preserving polynomial time reductions.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Approximating Small Sparse Cuts

We study polynomial-time approximation algorithms for (edge/vertex) Sparsest Cut and Small Set Expansion in terms of $k$, the number of edges or vertices cut in the optimal solution. Our main results are $\mathcal{O}(\text{polylog}\, k)$-approximation algorithms for various versions in this setting. Our techniques involve an extension of the notion of sample sets (Feige and Mahdian STOC'06), originally developed for small balanced cuts, to sparse cuts in general. We then show how to combine this notion of sample sets with two algorithms, one based on an existing framework of LP rounding and another new algorithm based on the cut-matching game, to get such approximation algorithms. Our cut-matching game algorithm can be viewed as a local version of the cut-matching game by Khandekar, Khot, Orecchia and Vishnoi and certifies an expansion of every vertex set of size $s$ in $\mathcal{O}(\log s)$ rounds. These techniques may be of independent interest. As corollaries of our results, we also obtain an $\mathcal{O}(\log opt)$-approximation for min-max graph partitioning, where $opt$ is the min-max value of the optimal cut, and improve the bound on the size of multicut mimicking networks computable in polynomial time.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Max-Cut with $ε$-Accurate Predictions

We study the approximability of the MaxCut problem in the presence of predictions. Specifically, we consider two models: in the noisy predictions model, for each vertex we are given its correct label in $\{-1,+1\}$ with some unknown probability $1/2 + ε$, and the other (incorrect) label otherwise. In the more-informative partial predictions model, for each vertex we are given its correct label with probability $ε$ and no label otherwise. We assume only pairwise independence between vertices in both models. We show how these predictions can be used to improve on the worst-case approximation ratios for this problem. Specifically, we give an algorithm that achieves an $α+ \widetildeΩ(ε^4)$-approximation for the noisy predictions model, where $α\approx 0.878$ is the MaxCut threshold. While this result also holds for the partial predictions model, we can also give a $β+ Ω(ε)$-approximation, where $β\approx 0.858$ is the approximation ratio for MaxBisection given by Raghavendra and Tan. This answers a question posed by Ola Svensson in his plenary session talk at SODA'23.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Separating $k$-Median from the Supplier Version

Given a metric space $(V, d)$ along with an integer $k$, the $k$-Median problem asks to open $k$ centers $C \subseteq V$ to minimize $\sum_{v \in V} d(v, C)$, where $d(v, C) := \min_{c \in C} d(v, c)$. While the best-known approximation ratio of $2.613$ holds for the more general supplier version where an additional set $F \subseteq V$ is given with the restriction $C \subseteq F$, the best known hardness for these two versions are $1+1/e \approx 1.36$ and $1+2/e \approx 1.73$ respectively, using the same reduction from Max $k$-Coverage. We prove the following two results separating them. First, we show a $1.546$-parameterized approximation algorithm that runs in time $f(k) n^{O(1)}$. Since $1+2/e$ is proved to be the optimal approximation ratio for the supplier version in the parameterized setting, this result separates the original $k$-Median from the supplier version. Next, we prove a $1.416$-hardness for polynomial-time algorithms assuming the Unique Games Conjecture. This is achieved via a new fine-grained hardness of Max-$k$-Coverage for small set sizes. Our upper bound and lower bound are derived from almost the same expression, with the only difference coming from the well-known separation between the powers of LP and SDP on (hypergraph) vertex cover.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

A PTAS for $\ell_0$-Low Rank Approximation: Solving Dense CSPs over Reals

We consider the Low Rank Approximation problem, where the input consists of a matrix $A \in \mathbb{R}^{n_R \times n_C}$ and an integer $k$, and the goal is to find a matrix $B$ of rank at most $k$ that minimizes $\| A - B \|_0$, which is the number of entries where $A$ and $B$ differ. For any constant $k$ and $\varepsilon > 0$, we present a polynomial time $(1 + \varepsilon)$-approximation time for this problem, which significantly improves the previous best $poly(k)$-approximation. Our algorithm is obtained by viewing the problem as a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) where each row and column becomes a variable that can have a value from $\mathbb{R}^k$. In this view, we have a constraint between each row and column, which results in a {\em dense} CSP, a well-studied topic in approximation algorithms. While most of previous algorithms focus on finite-size (or constant-size) domains and involve an exhaustive enumeration over the entire domain, we present a new framework that bypasses such an enumeration in $\mathbb{R}^k$. We also use tools from the rich literature of Low Rank Approximation in different objectives (e.g., $\ell_p$ with $p \in (0, \infty)$) or domains (e.g., finite fields/generalized Boolean). We believe that our techniques might be useful to study other real-valued CSPs and matrix optimization problems. On the hardness side, when $k$ is part of the input, we prove that Low Rank Approximation is NP-hard to approximate within a factor of $Ω(\log n)$. This is the first superconstant NP-hardness of approximation for any $p \in [0, \infty]$ that does not rely on stronger conjectures (e.g., the Small Set Expansion Hypothesis).

cs.DS↗