Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Euiwoong Lee

Publications and source records attributed to Euiwoong Lee.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

LP-branching algorithms based on biased graphs

We give a combinatorial condition for the existence of efficient, LP-based FPT algorithms for a broad class of graph-theoretical optimisation problems. Our condition is based on the notion of biased graphs known from matroid theory. Specifically, we show that given a biased graph $Ψ=(G,\mathcal{B})$, where $\mathcal{B}$ is a class of balanced cycles in $G$, the problem of finding a set $X$ of at most $k$ vertices in $G$ which intersects every unbalanced cycle in $G$ admits an FPT algorithm using an LP-branching approach, similar to those previously seen for VCSP problems (Wahlström, SODA 2014). This framework captures many of the problems previously solved via the VCSP approach to LP-branching, as well as new generalisations, such as Group Feedback Vertex Set for infinite groups (e.g., for graphs whose edges are labelled by matrices). A major advantage compared to previous work is that it is immediate to check the applicability of the result for a given problem, whereas testing applicability of the VCSP approach for a specific VCSP requires determining the existence of an embedding language with certain algebraically defined properties, which is not known to be decidable in general. Additionally, we study the approximation question, and show that every problem of this category admits an $O(\log \text{OPT})$-approximation.

cs.DS↗

Bisect and Conquer: Hierarchical Clustering via Max-Uncut Bisection

Hierarchical Clustering is an unsupervised data analysis method which has been widely used for decades. Despite its popularity, it had an underdeveloped analytical foundation and to address this, Dasgupta recently introduced an optimization viewpoint of hierarchical clustering with pairwise similarity information that spurred a line of work shedding light on old algorithms (e.g., Average-Linkage), but also designing new algorithms. Here, for the maximization dual of Dasgupta's objective (introduced by Moseley-Wang), we present polynomial-time .4246 approximation algorithms that use Max-Uncut Bisection as a subroutine. The previous best worst-case approximation factor in polynomial time was .336, improving only slightly over Average-Linkage which achieves 1/3. Finally, we complement our positive results by providing APX-hardness (even for 0-1 similarities), under the Small Set Expansion hypothesis.

cs.DS↗

The Karger-Stein Algorithm is Optimal for $k$-cut

In the $k$-cut problem, we are given an edge-weighted graph and want to find the least-weight set of edges whose deletion breaks the graph into $k$ connected components. Algorithms due to Karger-Stein and Thorup showed how to find such a minimum $k$-cut in time approximately $O(n^{2k-2})$. The best lower bounds come from conjectures about the solvability of the $k$-clique problem and a reduction from $k$-clique to $k$-cut, and show that solving $k$-cut is likely to require time $Ω(n^k)$. Our recent results have given special-purpose algorithms that solve the problem in time $n^{1.98k + O(1)}$, and ones that have better performance for special classes of graphs (e.g., for small integer weights). In this work, we resolve the problem for general graphs, by showing that for any fixed $k \geq 2$, the Karger-Stein algorithm outputs any fixed minimum $k$-cut with probability at least $\hat{O}(n^{-k})$, where $\hat{O}(\cdot)$ hides a $2^{O(\ln \ln n)^2}$ factor. This also gives an extremal bound of $\hat{O}(n^k)$ on the number of minimum $k$-cuts in an $n$-vertex graph and an algorithm to compute a minimum $k$-cut in similar runtime. Both are tight up to $\hat{O}(1)$ factors. The first main ingredient in our result is a fine-grained analysis of how the graph shrinks---and how the average degree evolves---under the Karger-Stein process. The second ingredient is an extremal result bounding the number of cuts of size at most $(2-δ) OPT/k$, using the Sunflower lemma.

cs.DS↗

Approximating Operator Norms via Generalized Krivine Rounding

We consider the $(\ell_p,\ell_r)$-Grothendieck problem, which seeks to maximize the bilinear form $y^T A x$ for an input matrix $A$ over vectors $x,y$ with $\|x\|_p=\|y\|_r=1$. The problem is equivalent to computing the $p \to r^*$ operator norm of $A$. The case $p=r=\infty$ corresponds to the classical Grothendieck problem. Our main result is an algorithm for arbitrary $p,r \ge 2$ with approximation ratio $(1+ε_0)/(\sinh^{-1}(1)\cdot γ_{p^*} \,γ_{r^*})$ for some fixed $ε_0 \le 0.00863$. Comparing this with Krivine's approximation ratio of $(π/2)/\sinh^{-1}(1)$ for the original Grothendieck problem, our guarantee is off from the best known hardness factor of $(γ_{p^*} γ_{r^*})^{-1}$ for the problem by a factor similar to Krivine's defect. Our approximation follows by bounding the value of the natural vector relaxation for the problem which is convex when $p,r \ge 2$. We give a generalization of random hyperplane rounding and relate the performance of this rounding to certain hypergeometric functions, which prescribe necessary transformations to the vector solution before the rounding is applied. Unlike Krivine's Rounding where the relevant hypergeometric function was $\arcsin$, we have to study a family of hypergeometric functions. The bulk of our technical work then involves methods from complex analysis to gain detailed information about the Taylor series coefficients of the inverses of these hypergeometric functions, which then dictate our approximation factor. Our result also implies improved bounds for "factorization through $\ell_{2}^{\,n}$" of operators from $\ell_{p}^{\,n}$ to $\ell_{q}^{\,m}$ (when $p\geq 2 \geq q$)--- such bounds are of significant interest in functional analysis and our work provides modest supplementary evidence for an intriguing parallel between factorizability, and constant-factor approximability.

cs.DS↗

The Number of Minimum $k$-Cuts: Improving the Karger-Stein Bound

Given an edge-weighted graph, how many minimum $k$-cuts can it have? This is a fundamental question in the intersection of algorithms, extremal combinatorics, and graph theory. It is particularly interesting in that the best known bounds are algorithmic: they stem from algorithms that compute the minimum $k$-cut. In 1994, Karger and Stein obtained a randomized contraction algorithm that finds a minimum $k$-cut in $O(n^{(2-o(1))k})$ time. It can also enumerate all such $k$-cuts in the same running time, establishing a corresponding extremal bound of $O(n^{(2-o(1))k})$. Since then, the algorithmic side of the minimum $k$-cut problem has seen much progress, leading to a deterministic algorithm based on a tree packing result of Thorup, which enumerates all minimum $k$-cuts in the same asymptotic running time, and gives an alternate proof of the $O(n^{(2-o(1))k})$ bound. However, beating the Karger--Stein bound, even for computing a single minimum $k$-cut, has remained out of reach. In this paper, we give an algorithm to enumerate all minimum $k$-cuts in $O(n^{(1.981+o(1))k})$ time, breaking the algorithmic and extremal barriers for enumerating minimum $k$-cuts. To obtain our result, we combine ideas from both the Karger--Stein and Thorup results, and draw a novel connection between minimum $k$-cut and extremal set theory. In particular, we give and use tighter bounds on the size of set systems with bounded dual VC-dimension, which may be of independent interest.

cs.DS↗

Tight FPT Approximations for $k$-Median and $k$-Means

We investigate the fine-grained complexity of approximating the classical $k$-median / $k$-means clustering problems in general metric spaces. We show how to improve the approximation factors to $(1+2/e+\varepsilon)$ and $(1+8/e+\varepsilon)$ respectively, using algorithms that run in fixed-parameter time. Moreover, we show that we cannot do better in FPT time, modulo recent complexity-theoretic conjectures.

cs.DS↗

Faster Exact and Approximate Algorithms for $k$-Cut

In the $k$-cut problem, we are given an edge-weighted graph $G$ and an integer $k$, and have to remove a set of edges with minimum total weight so that $G$ has at least $k$ connected components. The current best algorithms are an $O(n^{(2-o(1))k})$ randomized algorithm due to Karger and Stein, and an $\smash{\tilde{O}}(n^{2k})$ deterministic algorithm due to Thorup. Moreover, several $2$-approximation algorithms are known for the problem (due to Saran and Vazirani, Naor and Rabani, and Ravi and Sinha). It has remained an open problem to (a) improve the runtime of exact algorithms, and (b) to get better approximation algorithms. In this paper we show an $O(k^{O(k)} \, n^{(2ω/3 + o(1))k})$-time algorithm for $k$-cut. Moreover, we show an $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm that runs in time $O((k/ε)^{O(k)} \,n^{k + O(1)})$, and a $1.81$-approximation in fixed-parameter time $O(2^{O(k^2)}\,\text{poly}(n))$.

cs.DS↗

Losing Treewidth by Separating Subsets

We study the problem of deleting the smallest set $S$ of vertices (resp. edges) from a given graph $G$ such that the induced subgraph (resp. subgraph) $G \setminus S$ belongs to some class $\mathcal{H}$. We consider the case where graphs in $\mathcal{H}$ have treewidth bounded by $t$, and give a general framework to obtain approximation algorithms for both vertex and edge-deletion settings from approximation algorithms for certain natural graph partitioning problems called $k$-Subset Vertex Separator and $k$-Subset Edge Separator, respectively. For the vertex deletion setting, our framework combined with the current best result for $k$-Subset Vertex Separator, yields a significant improvement in the approximation ratios for basic problems such as $k$-Treewidth Vertex Deletion and Planar-$F$ Vertex Deletion. Our algorithms are simpler than previous works and give the first uniform approximation algorithms under the natural parameterization. For the edge deletion setting, we give improved approximation algorithms for $k$-Subset Edge Separator combining ideas from LP relaxations and important separators. We present their applications in bounded-degree graphs, and also give an APX-hardness result for the edge deletion problems.

cs.DS↗

Inapproximability of Matrix $p\rightarrow q$ Norms

We study the problem of computing the $p\rightarrow q$ norm of a matrix $A \in R^{m \times n}$, defined as \[ \|A\|_{p\rightarrow q} ~:=~ \max_{x \,\in\, R^n \setminus \{0\}} \frac{\|Ax\|_q}{\|x\|_p} \] This problem generalizes the spectral norm of a matrix ($p=q=2$) and the Grothendieck problem ($p=\infty$, $q=1$), and has been widely studied in various regimes. When $p \geq q$, the problem exhibits a dichotomy: constant factor approximation algorithms are known if $2 \in [q,p]$, and the problem is hard to approximate within almost polynomial factors when $2 \notin [q,p]$. The regime when $p < q$, known as \emph{hypercontractive norms}, is particularly significant for various applications but much less well understood. The case with $p = 2$ and $q > 2$ was studied by [Barak et al, STOC'12] who gave sub-exponential algorithms for a promise version of the problem (which captures small-set expansion) and also proved hardness of approximation results based on the Exponential Time Hypothesis. However, no NP-hardness of approximation is known for these problems for any $p < q$. We study the hardness of approximating matrix norms in both the above cases and prove the following results: - We show that for any $1< p < q < \infty$ with $2 \notin [p,q]$, $\|A\|_{p\rightarrow q}$ is hard to approximate within $2^{O(\log^{1-ε}\!n)}$ assuming $NP \not\subseteq BPTIME(2^{\log^{O(1)}\!n})$. This suggests that, similar to the case of $p \geq q$, the hypercontractive setting may be qualitatively different when $2$ does not lie between $p$ and $q$. - For all $p \geq q$ with $2 \in [q,p]$, we show $\|A\|_{p\rightarrow q}$ is hard to approximate within any factor than $1/(γ_{p^*} \cdot γ_q)$, where for any $r$, $γ_r$ denotes the $r^{th}$ norm of a gaussian, and $p^*$ is the dual norm of $p$.

cs.CC↗

Optimal Online Contention Resolution Schemes via Ex-Ante Prophet Inequalities

Online contention resolution schemes (OCRSs) were proposed by Feldman, Svensson, and Zenklusen as a generic technique to round a fractional solution in the matroid polytope in an online fashion. It has found applications in several stochastic combinatorial problems where there is a commitment constraint: on seeing the value of a stochastic element, the algorithm has to immediately and irrevocably decide whether to select it while always maintaining an independent set in the matroid. Although OCRSs immediately lead to prophet inequalities, these prophet inequalities are not optimal. Can we instead use prophet inequalities to design optimal OCRSs? We design the first optimal $1/2$-OCRS for matroids by reducing the problem to designing a matroid prophet inequality where we compare to the stronger benchmark of an ex-ante relaxation. We also introduce and design optimal $(1-1/e)$-random order CRSs for matroids, which are similar to OCRSs but the arrival is chosen uniformly at random.

cs.DS↗

An FPT Algorithm Beating 2-Approximation for $k$-Cut

In the $k$-Cut problem, we are given an edge-weighted graph $G$ and an integer $k$, and have to remove a set of edges with minimum total weight so that $G$ has at least $k$ connected components. Prior work on this problem gives, for all $h \in [2,k]$, a $(2-h/k)$-approximation algorithm for $k$-cut that runs in time $n^{O(h)}$. Hence to get a $(2 - \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for some absolute constant $\varepsilon$, the best runtime using prior techniques is $n^{O(k\varepsilon)}$. Moreover, it was recently shown that getting a $(2 - \varepsilon)$-approximation for general $k$ is NP-hard, assuming the Small Set Expansion Hypothesis. If we use the size of the cut as the parameter, an FPT algorithm to find the exact $k$-Cut is known, but solving the $k$-Cut problem exactly is $W[1]$-hard if we parameterize only by the natural parameter of $k$. An immediate question is: \emph{can we approximate $k$-Cut better in FPT-time, using $k$ as the parameter?} We answer this question positively. We show that for some absolute constant $\varepsilon > 0$, there exists a $(2 - \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm that runs in time $2^{O(k^6)} \cdot \widetilde{O} (n^4)$. This is the first FPT algorithm that is parameterized only by $k$ and strictly improves the $2$-approximation.

cs.DS↗

Understanding the Correlation Gap for Matchings

Given a set of vertices $V$ with $|V| = n$, a weight vector $w \in (\mathbb{R}^+ \cup \{ 0 \})^{\binom{V}{2}}$, and a probability vector $x \in [0, 1]^{\binom{V}{2}}$ in the matching polytope, we study the quantity $\frac{E_{G}[ ν_w(G)]}{\sum_{(u, v) \in \binom{V}{2}} w_{u, v} x_{u, v}}$ where $G$ is a random graph where each edge $e$ with weight $w_e$ appears with probability $x_e$ independently, and let $ν_w(G)$ denotes the weight of the maximum matching of $G$. This quantity is closely related to correlation gap and contention resolution schemes, which are important tools in the design of approximation algorithms, algorithmic game theory, and stochastic optimization. We provide lower bounds for the above quantity for general and bipartite graphs, and for weighted and unweighted settings. he best known upper bound is $0.54$ by Karp and Sipser, and the best lower bound is $0.4$. We show that it is at least $0.47$ for unweighted bipartite graphs, at least $0.45$ for weighted bipartite graphs, and at lea st $0.43$ for weighted general graphs. To achieve our results, we construct local distribution schemes on the dual which may be of independent interest.

cs.DS↗

Global and fixed-terminal cuts in digraphs

The computational complexity of multicut-like problems may vary significantly depending on whether the terminals are fixed or not. In this work we present a comprehensive study of this phenomenon in two types of cut problems in directed graphs: double cut and bicut. 1. The fixed-terminal edge-weighted double cut is known to be solvable efficiently. We show a tight approximability factor of $2$ for the fixed-terminal node-weighted double cut. We show that the global node-weighted double cut cannot be approximated to a factor smaller than $3/2$ under the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC). 2. The fixed-terminal edge-weighted bicut is known to have a tight approximability factor of $2$. We show that the global edge-weighted bicut is approximable to a factor strictly better than $2$, and that the global node-weighted bicut cannot be approximated to a factor smaller than $3/2$ under UGC. 3. In relation to these investigations, we also prove two results on undirected graphs which are of independent interest. First, we show NP-completeness and a tight inapproximability bound of $4/3$ for the node-weighted $3$-cut problem. Second, we show that for constant $k$, there exists an efficient algorithm to solve the minimum $\{s,t\}$-separating $k$-cut problem. Our techniques for the algorithms are combinatorial, based on LPs and based on enumeration of approximate min-cuts. Our hardness results are based on combinatorial reductions and integrality gap instances.

cs.DS↗

Sum-of-Squares Certificates for Maxima of Random Tensors on the Sphere

For an $n$-variate order-$d$ tensor $A$, define $ A_{\max} := \sup_{\| x \|_2 = 1} \langle A , x^{\otimes d} \rangle$ to be the maximum value taken by the tensor on the unit sphere. It is known that for a random tensor with i.i.d $\pm 1$ entries, $A_{\max} \lesssim \sqrt{n\cdot d\cdot\log d}$ w.h.p. We study the problem of efficiently certifying upper bounds on $A_{\max}$ via the natural relaxation from the Sum of Squares (SoS) hierarchy. Our results include: - When $A$ is a random order-$q$ tensor, we prove that $q$ levels of SoS certifies an upper bound $B$ on $A_{\max}$ that satisfies \[ B ~~~~\leq~~ A_{\max} \cdot \biggl(\frac{n}{q^{\,1-o(1)}}\biggr)^{q/4-1/2} \quad \text{w.h.p.} \] Our upper bound improves a result of Montanari and Richard (NIPS 2014) when $q$ is large. - We show the above bound is the best possible up to lower order terms, namely the optimum of the level-$q$ SoS relaxation is at least \[ A_{\max} \cdot \biggl(\frac{n}{q^{\,1+o(1)}}\biggr)^{q/4-1/2} \ . \] - When $A$ is a random order-$d$ tensor, we prove that $q$ levels of SoS certifies an upper bound $B$ on $A_{\max}$ that satisfies \[ B ~~\leq ~~ A_{\max} \cdot \biggl(\frac{\widetilde{O}(n)}{q}\biggr)^{d/4 - 1/2} \quad \text{w.h.p.} \] For growing $q$, this improves upon the bound certified by constant levels of SoS. This answers in part, a question posed by Hopkins, Shi, and Steurer (COLT 2015), who established the tight characterization for constant levels of SoS.

cs.CC↗

Why You Should Charge Your Friends for Borrowing Your Stuff

We consider goods that can be shared with k-hop neighbors (i.e., the set of nodes within k hops from an owner) on a social network. We examine incentives to buy such a good by devising game-theoretic models where each node decides whether to buy the good or free ride. First, we find that social inefficiency, specifically excessive purchase of the good, occurs in Nash equilibria. Second, the social inefficiency decreases as k increases and thus a good can be shared with more nodes. Third, and most importantly, the social inefficiency can also be significantly reduced by charging free riders an access cost and paying it to owners, leading to the conclusion that organizations and system designers should impose such a cost. These findings are supported by our theoretical analysis in terms of the price of anarchy and the price of stability; and by simulations based on synthetic and real social networks.

cs.AI↗

Weak Decoupling, Polynomial Folds, and Approximate Optimization over the Sphere

We consider the following basic problem: given an $n$-variate degree-$d$ homogeneous polynomial $f$ with real coefficients, compute a unit vector $x \in \mathbb{R}^n$ that maximizes $|f(x)|$. Besides its fundamental nature, this problem arises in diverse contexts ranging from tensor and operator norms to graph expansion to quantum information theory. The homogeneous degree $2$ case is efficiently solvable as it corresponds to computing the spectral norm of an associated matrix, but the higher degree case is NP-hard. We give approximation algorithms for this problem that offer a trade-off between the approximation ratio and running time: in $n^{O(q)}$ time, we get an approximation within factor $O_d((n/q)^{d/2-1})$ for arbitrary polynomials, $O_d((n/q)^{d/4-1/2})$ for polynomials with non-negative coefficients, and $O_d(\sqrt{m/q})$ for sparse polynomials with $m$ monomials. The approximation guarantees are with respect to the optimum of the level-$q$ sum-of-squares (SoS) SDP relaxation of the problem. Known polynomial time algorithms for this problem rely on "decoupling lemmas." Such tools are not capable of offering a trade-off like our results as they blow up the number of variables by a factor equal to the degree. We develop new decoupling tools that are more efficient in the number of variables at the expense of less structure in the output polynomials. This enables us to harness the benefits of higher level SoS relaxations. We complement our algorithmic results with some polynomially large integrality gaps, albeit for a slightly weaker (but still very natural) relaxation. Toward this, we give a method to lift a level-$4$ solution matrix $M$ to a higher level solution, under a mild technical condition on $M$.

cs.DS↗

Partitioning a Graph into Small Pieces with Applications to Path Transversal

Given a graph $G = (V, E)$ and an integer $k$, we study $k$-Vertex Seperator (resp. $k$-Edge Separator), where the goal is to remove the minimum number of vertices (resp. edges) such that each connected component in the resulting graph has at most $k$ vertices. Our primary focus is on the case where $k$ is either a constant or a slowly growing function of $n$ (e.g. $O(\log n)$ or $n^{o(1)}$). Our problems can be interpreted as a special case of three general classes of problems that have been studied separately (balanced graph partitioning, Hypergraph Vertex Cover (HVC), and fixed parameter tractability (FPT)). Our main result is an $O(\log k)$-approximation algorithm for $k$-Vertex Seperator that runs in time $2^{O(k)} n^{O(1)}$, and an $O(\log k)$-approximation algorithm for $k$-Edge Separator that runs in time $n^{O(1)}$. Our result on $k$-Edge Seperator improves the best previous graph partitioning algorithm for small $k$. Our result on $k$-Vertex Seperator improves the simple $(k+1)$-approximation from HVC. When $OPT > k$, the running time $2^{O(k)} n^{O(1)}$ is faster than the lower bound $k^{Ω(OPT)} n^{Ω(1)}$ for exact algorithms assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis. While the running time of $2^{O(k)} n^{O(1)}$ for $k$-Vertex Separator seems unsatisfactory, we show that the superpolynomial dependence on $k$ may be needed to achieve a polylogarithmic approximation ratio, based on hardness of Densest $k$-Subgraph. We also study $k$-Path Transversal, where the goal is to remove the minimum number of vertices such that there is no simple path of length $k$. With additional ideas from FPT algorithms and graph theory, we present an $O(\log k)$-approximation algorithm for $k$-Path Transversal that runs in time $2^{O(k^3 \log k)} n^{O(1)}$. Previously, the existence of even $(1 - δ)k$-approximation algorithm for fixed $δ> 0$ was open.

cs.DS↗

Improved Hardness for Cut, Interdiction, and Firefighter Problems

We study variants of the classic $s$-$t$ cut problem and prove the following improved hardness results assuming the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC). - For any constant $k \geq 2$ and $ε> 0$, we show that Directed Multicut with $k$ source-sink pairs is hard to approximate within a factor $k - ε$. This matches the trivial $k$-approximation algorithm. By a simple reduction, our result for $k = 2$ implies that Directed Multiway Cut with two terminals (also known as $s$-$t$ Bicut) is hard to approximate within a factor $2 - ε$, matching the trivial $2$-approximation algorithm. Previously, the best hardness factor for these problems (for constant $k$) was $1.5 - ε$ under the UGC. - For Length-Bounded Cut and Shortest Path Interdiction, we show that both problems are hard to approximate within any constant factor, even if we allow bicriteria approximation. If we want to cut vertices or the graph is directed, our hardness factor for Length-Bounded Cut matches the best approximation ratio up to a constant. Previously, the best hardness factor was $1.1377$ for Length-Bounded Cut and $2$ for Shortest Path Interdiction. - Assuming a variant of the UGC (implied by another variant of Bansal and Khot), we prove that it is hard to approximate Resource Minimization Fire Containment within any constant factor. Previously, the best hardness factor was $2$. Our results are based on a general method of converting an integrality gap instance to a length-control dictatorship test for variants of the $s$-$t$ cut problem, which may be useful for other problems.

cs.CC↗