Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

H. Andréka

Publications and source records attributed to H. Andréka.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
arXiv2013

Comparing theories: the dynamics of changing vocabulary. A case-study in relativity theory

There are several first-order logic (FOL) axiomatizations of special relativity theory in the literature, all looking essentially different but claiming to axiomatize the same physical theory. In this paper, we elaborate a comparison, in the framework of mathematical logic, between these FOL theories for special relativity. For this comparison, we use a version of mathematical definability theory in which new entities can also be defined besides new relations over already available entities. In particular, we build an interpretation of the reference-frame oriented theory SpecRel into the observationally oriented Signalling theory of James Ax. This interpretation provides SpecRel with an operational/experimental semantics. Then we make precise, "quantitative" comparisons between these two theories via using the notion of definitional equivalence. This is an application of logic to the philosophy of science and physics in the spirit of Johan van Benthem's work.

math.LO↗
arXiv2011

Formalizing set theory in weak logics, searching for the weakest logic with Gödel's incompleteness property

We show that first-order logic can be translated into a very simple and weak logic, and thus set theory can be formalized in this weak logic. This weak logical system is equivalent to the equational theory of Boolean algebras with three commuting complemented closure operators, i.e., that of diagonal-free 3-dimensional cylindric algebras (Df_3's). Equivalently, set theory can be formulated in propositional logic with 3 commuting S5 modalities (i.e., in the multi-modal logic [S5,S5,S5]). There are many consequences, e.g., free finitely generated Df_3's are not atomic and [S5,S5,S5] has Gödel's incompleteness property. The results reported here are strong improvements of the main result of the book: Tarski, A. and Givant, S. R., Formalizing Set Theory without variables, AMS, 1987.

math.LO↗
arXiv2011

Vienna Circle and Logical Analysis of Relativity Theory

In this paper we present some of our school's results in the area of building up relativity theory (RT) as a hierarchy of theories in the sense of logic. We use plain first-order logic (FOL) as in the foundation of mathematics (FOM) and we build on experience gained in FOM. The main aims of our school are the following: We want to base the theory on simple, unambiguous axioms with clear meanings. It should be absolutely understandable for any reader what the axioms say and the reader can decide about each axiom whether he likes it. The theory should be built up from these axioms in a straightforward, logical manner. We want to provide an analysis of the logical structure of the theory. We investigate which axioms are needed for which predictions of RT. We want to make RT more transparent logically, easier to understand, easier to change, modular, and easier to teach. We want to obtain deeper understanding of RT. Our work can be considered as a case-study showing that the Vienna Circle's (VC) approach to doing science is workable and fruitful when performed with using the insights and tools of mathematical logic acquired since its formation years at the very time of the VC activity. We think that logical positivism was based on the insight and anticipation of what mathematical logic is capable when elaborated to some depth. Logical positivism, in great part represented by VC, influenced and took part in the birth of modern mathematical logic. The members of VC were brave forerunners and pioneers.

math.LO↗