Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Hatice Gunes

Publications and source records attributed to Hatice Gunes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

HiBRIDGE: A Hierarchical Bayesian Neural Network Framework for Interpretable Dialogue Management in Group-Robot Interaction

In multi-party human-robot interaction, a robot must continuously decide whom to address and what to say to participate effectively in the conversation. In real-world interactions, this is challenging because several behaviours may be plausible at the same time: a robot might continue a topic with one participant, involve another through a question, or address the whole group, with the appropriate choice depending on both whom it addresses and the interaction context. Current approaches remain limited in representing uncertainty when several behaviours are plausible and in structuring decisions into semantically meaningful intermediate steps that make robot decisions easier to interpret. Addressing these, we present HiBRIDGE, a hierarchical Bayesian neural network framework for group-robot dialogue management. Its Bayesian formulation enables uncertainty-aware prediction and robust learning from limited interaction data, while the hierarchical approach formulates behaviour selection as a structured, multi-stage decision process. We further use decision-tree surrogates to investigate whether this structure can support more interpretable explanations. Across three offline group-HRI datasets, our findings show that Bayesian formulations outperform their deterministic counterparts and several state-of-the-art baselines. Next, through an online study (N=20), we show that explanations derived from the hierarchical model are rated as more helpful for understanding robot behaviour and are preferred over those derived from the flat model. Finally, through our in-person study (N=12), we demonstrate the feasibility of HiBRIDGE for autonomous real-time group interaction, with both hierarchical and flat Bayesian variants positively perceived. Overall, HiBRIDGE combines strong predictive performance with a structured decision process that supports more interpretable explanations of robot behaviour.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Benevolent Bias in Multi-Turn Human-Agent Dialogue

Bias in human-agent interaction can manifest not only through hostile language but also as benevolent bias, whereby unequal treatment hides behind a warm, positive tone. To make it detectable, we operationalise benevolent bias along two dimensions, tone and treatment, yielding three classes: neutral support, overt bias, and benevolent bias. Building on these definitions, we construct BENEVDIAL, a class-balanced corpus of 362,880 multi-turn support dialogues spanning user and agent demographics, roles, and generators, to support controlled evaluation. We then test two detector families on it: off-the-shelf safety detectors and prompted large language model (LLM) judges. Our results reveal a detection gap: off-the-shelf detectors reliably flag overt bias yet largely miss benevolent bias, while LLM judges catch more under more explicit detection criteria but increasingly misclassify neutral support as benevolent bias, and demographic context amplifies the false alarms. These findings suggest that fair monitoring of human-agent dialogue must look beyond surface cues to whether the agent's treatment is disparate.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Evaluating Human and LLM-Generated Thematic Analysis in HRI for Vulnerable Populations: A Comparative and Ethical Analysis

Thematic analysis (TA) has long been regarded as an inherently human, reflexive, and interpretive process. However, the extent to which LLM-generated TA is appropriate for Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) research involving vulnerable populations remains largely unexamined and raises critical questions about validity and ethics, particularly in sensitive research contexts. This paper presents a comparative study of human- and LLM-generated TA in an HRI context with a focus on vulnerable populations. We evaluate both objective and semantic agreement between human- and LLMgenerated themes, and examine whether observed divergences reflect systematic interpretive patterns with ethical significance. Our analysis investigates whether LLM-generated TA risks marginalising or misrepresenting the experiences of vulnerable participants, with implications for researchers employing LLM-assisted TA in HRI.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Mind the Context: Continual Learning of Socially Appropriate Robot Actions via Environmental-Social Disentanglement

Social robots are expected to operate across diverse environments, where similar arrangements can imply different socially appropriate actions, e.g., starting a conversation may be acceptable in a crowded home but disruptive in an office meeting. Because such norms and environments cannot all be anticipated in advance, robots require continual learning (CL) to adapt from sequential experience while retaining previously acquired knowledge. Prior work has studied CL for generating socially appropriate robot actions, but it has not addressed domain-incremental settings in which the robot incrementally encounters diverse contexts (e.g., living room, meeting room, office, hallway), where both environmental (e.g., whether the space is open or cluttered with furniture) and social cues (e.g., how people or other agents are positioned around the robot) jointly shape the appropriateness of robot actions. We address this gap with the Explicit Disentanglement Dual-Branch (EDD) framework. EDD explicitly separates environmental and social-agent related knowledge and uses replay-based rehearsal to mitigate forgetting while learning the appropriateness of robot actions (e.g., cleaning, serving, starting a conversation) across several indoor domains. Experiments show that EDD outperforms several state-of-the-art baselines, and ablation studies further evaluate different disentanglement strategies and the sensitivity to domain ordering. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/Cambridge-AFAR/Mind-the-Context.git.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

How Should I Pick a Foundation Model for My Robot? In Favor of a Community Evaluation Framework for Social Robots

Researchers who seek to build social robot applications on foundation models are faced with a difficult question: how should we pick a model? Public leaderboards offer little guidance: the demands of real-time, embodied social interaction lie largely outside their focus. And direct evaluation is impractical at scale: each embodied study requires scarce participant, robot, and experimenter time. In this paper, we identify five evaluation dimensions for foundation models in social robots: (i) conversational competence, (ii) user safety, (iii) embodied character, (iv) target scene effectiveness, and (v) audience appropriateness. To make model selection cheaper and better informed, we propose a three-tiered evaluation funnel paradigm that first filters with general metrics, then extends to simulated interactions, and terminates in more expensive, robot-specific evaluation. We map all five dimensions across all three tiers, chart where applicable evaluation methods exist and are missing, and close with a call to action: let's build the evaluation framework together as a community.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Designing Social Robots for Inclusive Child Wellbeing Assessment: Insights from Communities Supporting Developmental Language Disorder and Forced Migration

Assessing children's wellbeing and mental health can be particularly challenging for children experiencing communication barriers, such as children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) and children with forced migration backgrounds. During the assessment process, traditional self-report questionnaires place substantial demands on language comprehension and verbal expression. In this context, social robots have emerged as a promising tool for supporting wellbeing assessment without solely relying on self-report questionnaires, yet limited research has examined how such interactions can be designed to be inclusive, appropriate, and ethically acceptable for children with diverse communication needs. To address this gap, we created candidate child--robot interaction activities as design probes and conducted focus groups with parents and professionals supporting children with DLD and children with forced migration backgrounds. Through thematic analysis, we identified considerations relating to robot role and capabilities, interactional dynamics, individual differences, and child agency, alongside population-specific considerations shaped by children's communication needs and lived experiences. Based on these findings, we derive a set of ethical and inclusive design recommendations for robot-mediated wellbeing assessment. By foregrounding these considerations and recommendations, this work contributes design guidance for inclusive robot-mediated wellbeing assessments for children with diverse communication needs.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

StARS: Socially Appropriate Robot Actions via a Recommender System-Driven Approach

Social appropriateness in human-robot interaction (HRI) is not universal: different people can judge the same robot action differently in the same situation. To capture this inter-subject variability, we reformulate socially appropriate action generation as a preference modelling problem inspired by recommender systems, treating annotators as users, contexts/scenes as items, and appropriateness scores over a set of candidate robot actions as targets. We propose StARS, a novel model-agnostic framework that integrates collaborative filtering with learnable scene representations to generate user-specific appropriateness scores over candidate robot actions. StARS is model-agnostic: it can be integrated with various scene encoders and backbones, enabling personalisation without redesigning the underlying model. We evaluate StARS on two socially aware robotics datasets, MannersDB+ and SocNav1, and analyse robustness under sparse preference feedback. Across datasets and backbones, StARS consistently improves performance and agreement with annotators, supporting personalised action selection aligned with user norms. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/Cambridge-AFAR/StARS.git.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ERR@HRI 3.0 Challenge: Multimodal Detection of Errors and Anticipation in Human-Robot Interactions

As robots become increasingly integrated into human environments, their ability to detect and respond to errors remains critical for maintaining user trust and interaction quality. While recent advances in machine learning have improved error detection capabilities, most approaches are limited to specific contexts, controlled settings, or pre-extracted features, limiting their generalizability and applicability to real-world conditions. To address this challenge, the third edition of the ERR@HRI Challenge (ERR@HRI 3.0) provided researchers with two complementary datasets that enable end-to-end innovation in methods for both detecting and preventing errors in human-robot interaction. The challenge offered raw, non-anonymized video data from naturalistic settings: (1) the Bystander Affect Detection (BAD) dataset, containing webcam recordings of 45 participants' spontaneous reactions to robot and human failure scenarios; and (2) the Bad Idea dataset, featuring 29 participants' anticipatory facial responses while predicting action outcomes before failures occur. Both datasets were collected via crowdsourcing, capturing the inherent variability of real-world conditions. This naturalistic variability, while challenging, provides an authentic testbed for developing robust error detection systems. Participants developed multimodal machine learning models for bystander reaction detection (Track 1) and anticipatory outcome prediction (Track 2), with an optional cross-dataset generalization track (Track 3). Three teams submitted valid models, all of which surpassed our convolutional neural network baselines. This paper describes the datasets, tasks, baselines, and results of ERR@HRI 3.0, and discusses implications for building generalizable, context-aware, and anticipatory error detection systems for human-robot interaction.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Toward Personalized Social Robots for Child Well-being: Data Requirement Principles from a Recommender-System Perspective

Social robots are increasingly deployed in clinical settings to support the well-being of children, where effective support must be personalized to each child. Personalization, choosing the robot action best suited to each child, can be framed as a recommendation problem, and a recently proposed recommender-system framework for social robots offers a principled approach through user profiling, ranking, and responsible computing. Instantiating it, however, is blocked not by the model but by the data, which is hard to gather. A child's state shifts within and across visits, so no fixed description of the user holds. Within a session, the few signals of whether the robot's actions helped are weak and indirect. Across sessions, children are rarely seen more than once, and anonymization breaks the identity needed to link visits. Because care cannot be randomized, existing data is observational, biased toward whatever was already done. Each is a familiar recommender-system problem, and we propose four data principles in response: an integrated profile, effectiveness signals, linkable coverage, and an exposure record logged at collection time. We identify which of these principles each capability requires, and frame them as concrete guidelines for data collection.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

REACT 2026: The Fourth Multiple Appropriate Facial Reaction Generation Challenge: Personalised MAFRG and Appropriate EEG Reaction Prediction

In dyadic interactions, various human facial reactions could be appropriate for responding to each human speaker behaviour. Following the successful organisation of the REACT 2023, 2024 and 2025 challenge series, a body of generative deep learning (DL) models have been developed for the problem of multiple appropriate facial reaction generation (MAFRG). This year, we propose the REACT 2026 challenge encouraging the development and benchmarking of Machine Learning (ML) models that can generate multiple personalised, appropriate, diverse, realistic and synchronised human-style facial reactions expressed by a specific human listener for responding to each given speaker behaviour. As a key of the challenge, we continuously provide challenge participants with MARS dataset introduced by REACT 2025 but additionally provide individual-level Big-Five personality labels and EEG recordings. This introduces a new one-to-many personalised facial reaction generation setting combining human expressive behavioural, affective and neurophysiological signals, which remains largely unexplored in current dyadic interaction modelling. This paper also presents the challenge guidelines and new baselines on the four proposed sub-challenges: Offline generic and personalised MAFRG as well as Online generic and personalised MAFRG, respectively, which are publicly available at https://github.com/reactmultimodalchallenge/baseline_react2026.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

FAIR_XAI: Improving Multimodal Foundation Model Fairness via Explainability for Wellbeing Assessment

In recent years, the integration of multimodal machine learning in wellbeing assessment has offered transformative potential for monitoring mental health. However, with the rapid advancement of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), their deployment in clinical settings has raised concerns due to their lack of transparency and potential for bias. While previous research has explored the intersection of fairness and Explainable AI (XAI), its application to VLMs for wellbeing assessment and depression prediction remains under-explored. This work investigates VLM performance across laboratory (AFAR-BSFT) and naturalistic (E-DAIC) datasets, focusing on diagnostic reliability and demographic fairness. Performance varied substantially across environments and architectures; Phi3.5-Vision achieved 80.4% accuracy on E-DAIC, while Qwen2-VL struggled at 33.9%. Additionally, both models demonstrated a tendency to over-predict depression on AFAR-BSFT. Although bias existed across both architectures, Qwen2-VL showed higher gender disparities, while Phi-3.5-Vision exhibited more racial bias. Our XAI intervention framework yielded mixed results; fairness prompting achieved perfect equal opportunity for Qwen2-VL at a severe accuracy cost on E-DAIC. On AFAR-BSFT, explainability-based interventions improved procedural consistency but did not guarantee outcome fairness, sometimes amplifying racial bias. These results highlight a persistent gap between procedural transparency and equitable outcomes. We analyse these findings and consolidate concrete recommendations for addressing them, emphasising that future fairness interventions must jointly optimise predictive accuracy, demographic parity, and cross-domain generalisation.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Beyond Explainable AI (XAI): An Overdue Paradigm Shift and Post-XAI Research Directions

This study provides a cross-disciplinary examination of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches-focusing on deep neural networks (DNNs) and large language models (LLMs)-and identifies empirical and conceptual limitations in current XAI. We discuss critical symptoms that stem from deeper root causes (i.e., two paradoxes, two conceptual confusions, and five false assumptions). These fundamental problems within the current XAI research field reveal three insights: experimentally, XAI exhibits significant flaws; conceptually, it is paradoxical; and pragmatically, further attempts to reform the paradoxical XAI might exacerbate its confusion-demanding fundamental shifts and new research directions. To move beyond XAI's limitations, we propose a four-pronged synthesized paradigm shift toward reliable and certified AI development. These four components include: verification-focused Interactive AI (IAI) to establish scientific community protocols for certifying AI system performance rather than attempting post-hoc explanations, AI Epistemology for rigorous scientific foundations, User-Sensible AI to create context-aware systems tailored to specific user communities, and Model-Centered Interpretability for faithful technical analysis-together offering comprehensive post-XAI research directions.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Designing Social Robots with Ethical, User-Adaptive Explainability in the Era of Foundation Models

Foundation models are increasingly embedded in social robots, mediating not only what they say and do but also how they adapt to users over time. This shift renders traditional ``one-size-fits-all'' explanation strategies especially problematic: generic justifications are now wrapped around behaviour produced by models trained on vast, heterogeneous, and opaque datasets. We argue that ethical, user-adapted explainability must be treated as a core design objective for foundation-model-driven social robotics. We first identify open challenges around explainability and ethical concerns that arise when both adaptation and explanation are delegated to foundation models. Building on this analysis, we propose four recommendations for moving towards user-adapted, modality-aware, and co-designed explanation strategies grounded in smaller, fairer datasets. An illustrative use case of an LLM-driven socially assistive robot demonstrates how these recommendations might be instantiated in a sensitive, real-world domain.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Investigating Associational Biases in Inter-Model Communication of Large Generative Models

Social bias in generative AI can manifest not only as performance disparities but also as associational bias, whereby models learn and reproduce stereotypical associations between concepts and demographic groups, even in the absence of explicit demographic information (e.g., associating doctors with men). These associations can persist, propagate, and potentially amplify across repeated exchanges in inter-model communication pipelines, where one generative model's output becomes another's input. This is especially salient for human-centred perception tasks, such as human activity recognition and affect prediction, where inferences about behaviour and internal states can lead to errors or stereotypical associations that propagate into unequal treatment. In this work, focusing on human activity and affective expression, we study how such associations evolve within an inter-model communication pipeline that alternates between image generation and image description. Using the RAF-DB and PHASE datasets, we quantify demographic distribution drift induced by model-to-model information exchange and assess whether these drifts are systematic using an explainability pipeline. Our results reveal demographic drifts toward younger representations for both actions and emotions, as well as toward more female-presenting representations, primarily for emotions. We further find evidence that some predictions are supported by spurious visual regions (e.g., background or hair) rather than concept-relevant cues (e.g., body or face). We also examine whether these demographic drifts translate into measurable differences in downstream behaviour, i.e., while predicting activity and emotion labels. Finally, we outline mitigation strategies spanning data-centric, training and deployment interventions, and emphasise the need for careful safeguards when deploying interconnected models in human-centred AI systems.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Reimagining Social Robots as Recommender Systems: Foundations, Framework, and Applications

Personalization in social robots refers to the ability of the robot to meet the needs and/or preferences of an individual user. Existing approaches typically rely on large language models (LLMs) to generate context-aware responses based on user metadata and historical interactions or on adaptive methods such as reinforcement learning (RL) to learn from users' immediate reactions in real time. However, these approaches fall short of comprehensively capturing user preferences-including long-term, short-term, and fine-grained aspects-, and of using them to rank and select actions, proactively personalize interactions, and ensure ethically responsible adaptations. To address the limitations, we propose drawing on recommender systems (RSs), which specialize in modeling user preferences and providing personalized recommendations. To ensure the integration of RS techniques is well-grounded and seamless throughout the social robot pipeline, we (i) align the paradigms underlying social robots and RSs, (ii) identify key techniques that can enhance personalization in social robots, and (iii) design them as modular, plug-and-play components. This work not only establishes a framework for integrating RS techniques into social robots but also opens a pathway for deep collaboration between the RS and HRI communities, accelerating innovation in both fields.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2025

Social Robotics for Disabled Students: An Empirical Investigation of Embodiment, Roles and Interaction

Institutional and social barriers in higher education often prevent students with disabilities from effectively accessing support, including lengthy procedures, insufficient information, and high social-emotional demands. This study empirically explores how disabled students perceive robot-based support, comparing two interaction roles, one information based (signposting) and one disclosure based (sounding board), and two embodiment types (physical robot/disembodied voice agent). Participants assessed these systems across five dimensions: perceived understanding, social energy demands, information access/clarity, task difficulty, and data privacy concerns. The main findings of the study reveal that the physical robot was perceived as more understanding than the voice-only agent, with embodiment significantly shaping perceptions of sociability, animacy, and privacy. We also analyse differences between disability types. These results provide critical insights into the potential of social robots to mitigate accessibility barriers in higher education, while highlighting ethical, social and technical challenges.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2025

Who Owns The Robot?: Four Ethical and Socio-technical Questions about Wellbeing Robots in the Real World through Community Engagement

Recent studies indicate that robotic coaches can play a crucial role in promoting wellbeing. However, the real-world deployment of wellbeing robots raises numerous ethical and socio-technical questions and concerns. To explore these questions, we undertake a community-centered investigation to examine three different communities' perspectives on using robotic wellbeing coaches in real-world environments. We frame our work as an anticipatory ethical investigation, which we undertake to better inform the development of robotic technologies with communities' opinions, with the ultimate goal of aligning robot development with public interest. We conducted workshops with three communities who are under-represented in robotics development: 1) members of the public at a science festival, 2) women computer scientists at a conference, and 3) humanities researchers interested in history and philosophy of science. In the workshops, we collected qualitative data using the Social Robot Co-Design Canvas on Ethics. We analysed the collected qualitative data with Thematic Analysis, informed by notes taken during workshops. Through our analysis, we identify four themes regarding key ethical and socio-technical questions about the real-world use of wellbeing robots. We group participants' insights and discussions around these broad thematic questions, discuss them in light of state-of-the-art literature, and highlight areas for future investigation. Finally, we provide the four questions as a broad framework that roboticists can and should use during robotic development and deployment, in order to reflect on the ethics and socio-technical dimensions of their robotic applications, and to engage in dialogue with communities of robot users. The four questions are: 1) Is the robot safe and how can we know that?, 2) Who is the robot built for and with?, 3) Who owns the robot and the data?, and 4) Why a robot?.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2025

FAIRWELL: Fair Multimodal Self-Supervised Learning for Wellbeing Prediction

Early efforts on leveraging self-supervised learning (SSL) to improve machine learning (ML) fairness has proven promising. However, such an approach has yet to be explored within a multimodal context. Prior work has shown that, within a multimodal setting, different modalities contain modality-unique information that can complement information of other modalities. Leveraging on this, we propose a novel subject-level loss function to learn fairer representations via the following three mechanisms, adapting the variance-invariance-covariance regularization (VICReg) method: (i) the variance term, which reduces reliance on the protected attribute as a trivial solution; (ii) the invariance term, which ensures consistent predictions for similar individuals; and (iii) the covariance term, which minimizes correlational dependence on the protected attribute. Consequently, our loss function, coined as FAIRWELL, aims to obtain subject-independent representations, enforcing fairness in multimodal prediction tasks. We evaluate our method on three challenging real-world heterogeneous healthcare datasets (i.e. D-Vlog, MIMIC and MODMA) which contain different modalities of varying length and different prediction tasks. Our findings indicate that our framework improves overall fairness performance with minimal reduction in classification performance and significantly improves on the performance-fairness Pareto frontier.

cs.LG↗