arXiv subjects

Heajun An

Publications and source records attributed to Heajun An.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

DeepSAGE: Stage-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Structured CBT Counseling Dialogue

Large Language Model (LLM)-based counseling agents can generate fluent and supportive responses, but they often lack the structured, goal-directed progression required to conduct a coherent therapeutic session. We present DeepSAGE (Strategic AI Guidance Engine), a hybrid LLM--Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) framework for stage-aware counseling dialogue grounded in the first session of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). DeepSAGE represents the session as eleven stages with explicit therapeutic objectives, with an external controller determines stage completion and the DRL model selects therapeutic intentions that guide LLM response generation. We evaluate DeepSAGE against six retrieval-, prompting-, stage-, and policy-based alternatives. DeepSAGE elicits higher simulated client engagement and openness and achieves the strongest balance of stage-goal completion and dialogue efficiency among stage-structured systems. Domain expert review further indicates that the generated conversations exhibit broadly plausible emotional trajectories and recognizable CBT processes. Because the evaluation relies primarily on simulated clients and model-based metrics, these findings demonstrate comparative dialogue-control improvements rather than clinical effectiveness. These results suggest that combining stage-structured dialogue with learned strategy selection is a promising approach for AI counseling, though clinical effectiveness, safety, and real-world utility require further human evaluation.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

CR4T: Rewrite-Based Guardrails for Adolescent LLM Safety

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in adolescent digital environments, mediating information seeking, advice, and emotionally sensitive interactions. Yet existing safety mechanisms remain largely grounded in adult-centric norms and operationalize safety through refusal-oriented suppression. While such approaches may reduce immediate policy violations, they can also create conversational dead-ends, limit constructive guidance, and fail to address the developmental vulnerabilities inherent in adolescent-AI interactions. We argue that adolescent LLM safety should be framed not solely as a filtering problem, but as a socio-technical, developmentally aligned transformation problem. To operationalize this perspective, we propose Critique-and-Revise-for-Teenagers (CR4T), a model-agnostic safeguarding framework that selectively reconstructs unsafe or refusal-style outputs into ageappropriate, guidance-oriented responses while preserving benign intent. CR4T combines lightweight risk detection with domain-conditioned rewriting to remove risk-amplifying content, reduce unnecessary conversational shutdown, and introduce developmentally appropriate guidance. Experimental results show that targeted rewriting substantially reduces unsafe and refusal-oriented outcomes while avoiding unnecessary intervention on acceptable interactions. These findings suggest that selective response reconstruction offers a more human-centered alternative to refusal-centric guardrails for adolescent-facing LLM systems.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Grounded but Misleading: Evaluating Semantic Alignment in AI-Generated Security Explanations

Online scams increasingly leverage fluent and context-aware social engineering strategies, creating growing demand for AI systems that explain why a message may be risky. However, explanations that cite detector-derived evidence may still semantically weaken or redirect the intended risk interpretation. We introduce VEXA: Verifying Semantic Explanation Alignment, a controlled testbed for studying the gap between lexical grounding and semantic risk alignment in AI-generated scam-risk explanations. VEXA generates ungrounded, risk-aligned, and risk-diluting explanations by independently controlling evidence grounding and semantic framing. Through LLM-as-a-judge and human evaluations, we show that explanations may continue to appear comparatively grounded even when their semantic interpretation weakens the detector's intended risk assessment. In human evaluation, risk-diluting XAI-grounded explanations retained comparatively elevated Perceived Evidence Grounding scores (3.66) despite lower Helpfulness (3.00) and Reasoning Support (3.14) scores. These findings provide controlled evidence of grounding illusion effects in AI-generated security explanations and suggest that trustworthy explanation evaluation must verify not only whether evidence is cited, but also how that evidence is interpreted.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

StagePilot: Stage-Level Planning for Long-Horizon Dialogue Simulation in Cybergrooming

Cybergrooming is an evolving threat to youth, requiring proactive educational interventions. We address this by modeling dialogue progression as a structured planning problem over stage-wise interactions. We propose StagePilot, a dialogue framework that separates stage-level planning from response generation, in which the model selects the next stage under constrained transitions and generates responses conditioned on it, enabling coherent and realistic progression. Reinforcement learning is used to learn stage-level policies from offline data, optimizing for both emotional alignment and goal-consistent progression. Our empirical experiments show that StagePilot generates more structured, coherent dialogue trajectories and reduces conversational stagnation compared to baselines; notably, the IQL+AWAC variant reaches the final stage more often while maintaining over 70% positive or neutral responses, yielding a 43% relative improvement.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

From Vulnerable to Resilient: Examining Parent and Teen Perceptions on How to Respond to Unwanted Cybergrooming Advances

Cybergrooming is a form of online abuse that threatens teens' mental health and physical safety. Yet, most prior work has focused on detecting perpetrators' behaviors, leaving a limited understanding of how teens might respond to such unwanted advances. To address this gap, we conducted an online survey with 74 participants -- 51 parents and 23 teens -- who responded to simulated cybergrooming scenarios in two ways: responses that they think would make teens more vulnerable or resilient to unwanted sexual advances. Through a mixed-methods analysis, we identified four types of vulnerable responses (encouraging escalation, accepting an advance, displaying vulnerability, and negating risk concern) and four types of protective strategies (setting boundaries, directly declining, signaling risk awareness, and leveraging avoidance techniques). As the cybergrooming risk escalated, both vulnerable responses and protective strategies showed a corresponding progression. This study contributes a teen-centered understanding of cybergrooming, a labeled dataset, and a stage-based taxonomy of perceived protective strategies, while offering implications for educational programs and sociotechnical interventions.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

LLM Can be a Dangerous Persuader: Empirical Study of Persuasion Safety in Large Language Models

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled them to approach human-level persuasion capabilities. However, such potential also raises concerns about the safety risks of LLM-driven persuasion, particularly their potential for unethical influence through manipulation, deception, exploitation of vulnerabilities, and many other harmful tactics. In this work, we present a systematic investigation of LLM persuasion safety through two critical aspects: (1) whether LLMs appropriately reject unethical persuasion tasks and avoid unethical strategies during execution, including cases where the initial persuasion goal appears ethically neutral, and (2) how influencing factors like personality traits and external pressures affect their behavior. To this end, we introduce PersuSafety, the first comprehensive framework for the assessment of persuasion safety which consists of three stages, i.e., persuasion scene creation, persuasive conversation simulation, and persuasion safety assessment. PersuSafety covers 6 diverse unethical persuasion topics and 15 common unethical strategies. Through extensive experiments across 8 widely used LLMs, we observe significant safety concerns in most LLMs, including failing to identify harmful persuasion tasks and leveraging various unethical persuasion strategies. Our study calls for more attention to improve safety alignment in progressive and goal-driven conversations such as persuasion.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Toward Integrated Solutions: A Systematic Interdisciplinary Review of Cybergrooming Research

Cybergrooming exploits minors through online trust-building, yet research remains fragmented, limiting holistic prevention. Social sciences focus on behavioral insights, while computational methods emphasize detection, but their integration remains insufficient. This review systematically synthesizes both fields using the PRISMA framework to enhance clarity, reproducibility, and cross-disciplinary collaboration. Findings show that qualitative methods offer deep insights but are resource-intensive, machine learning models depend on data quality, and standard metrics struggle with imbalance and cultural nuances. By bridging these gaps, this review advances interdisciplinary cybergrooming research, guiding future efforts toward more effective prevention and detection strategies.

cs.CY↗