Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Hong Shen

Publications and source records attributed to Hong Shen.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Nuclear pasta in hot neutron-star matter and proto-neutron stars

We investigate nuclear pasta phases appearing in hot neutron-star matter based on the compressible liquid-drop model, where the matter consists of a dense liquid phase and a dilute gas phase separated by a sharp interface. The surface tension is calculated self-consistently from the Thomas-Fermi approximation, and it depends on temperature and isospin asymmetry. We employ relativistic mean-field models with different symmetry energy slopes to describe nuclear interactions. It is found that the TM1e model with a small symmetry energy slope of $L=40$ MeV predicts various pasta shapes at low temperatures, while the TM1 model with $L=110.8$ MeV yields only the droplet configuration up to the crust-core transition density. We examine the occurrence and influence of pasta phases in proto-neutron stars with a constant entropy per baryon. These pasta phases may occur in the inner crust with a thickness of about $1.2$ km, playing an important role in the thermal evolution of the star.

nucl-th↗

Impact of crust-core connection procedures on the tidal deformability of neutron stars

We study the impact of crust-core connection procedures on various neutron-star properties, especially on the tidal deformability. We consider three types of connection procedures to treat the discontinuity in a nonunified equation of state around the crust-core transition: (1) the direct connection procedure, (2) the crossover connection procedure, and (3) the segmented method. Our results indicate that the mass-radius relations of neutron stars are almost unaffected by the details of the connection procedure. However, the tidal deformabilities of neutron stars are sensitive to the crust-core connection procedures. The tidal deformability is closely related to gravitational-wave measurements. For a canonical 1.4$M_\odot$ neutron star, uncertainties in the tidal deformability $Λ_{1.4}$ from different connection procedures can exceed 20\%. We find that the direct connection procedure yields significantly larger uncertainties in the tidal deformability, while the segmented method and crossover connection procedure provide relatively stable results.

astro-ph.HE↗

Situated, Dynamic, and Subjective: Envisioning the Design of Theory-of-Mind-Enabled Everyday AI with Industry Practitioners

Theory of Mind (ToM) -- the ability to infer what others are thinking (e.g., intentions) from observable cues -- is traditionally considered fundamental to human social interactions. This has sparked growing efforts in building and benchmarking AI's ToM capability, yet little is known about how such capability could translate into the design and experience of everyday user-facing AI products and services. We conducted 13 co-design sessions with 26 U.S.-based AI practitioners to envision, reflect, and distill design recommendations for ToM-enabled everyday AI products and services that are both future-looking and grounded in the realities of AI design and development practices. Analysis revealed three interrelated design recommendations: ToM-enabled AI should 1) be situated in the social context that shape users' mental states, 2) be responsive to the dynamic nature of mental states, and 3) be attuned to subjective individual differences. We surface design tensions within each recommendation that reveal a broader gap between practitioners' envisioned futures of ToM-enabled AI and the realities of current AI design and development practices. These findings point toward the need to move beyond static, inference-driven approach to ToM and toward designing ToM as a pervasive capability that supports continuous human-AI interaction loops.

cs.HC↗

Navigating Uncertainties: How GenAI Developers Document Their Models on Open-Source Platforms

Model documentation plays a crucial role in promoting transparency and responsible development of AI systems. With the rise of Generative AI (GenAI), open-source platforms have increasingly become hubs for hosting and distributing these models, prompting platforms like Hugging Face to develop dedicated model documentation guidelines that align with responsible AI principles. Despite these growing efforts, there remains a lack of understanding of how developers document their GenAI models on open-source platforms. Through interviews with 13 GenAI developers active on open-source platforms, we provide empirical insights into their documentation practices and challenges. Our analysis reveals that despite existing resources, developers of GenAI models still face multiple layers of uncertainties in their model documentation: (1) uncertainties about what specific content should be included; (2) uncertainties about how to effectively report key components of their models; and (3) uncertainties in deciding who should take responsibilities for various aspects of model documentation. Based on our findings, we discuss the implications for policymakers, open-source platforms, and the research community to support meaningful, effective and actionable model documentation in the GenAI era, including cultivating better community norms, building robust evaluation infrastructures, and clarifying roles and responsibilities.

cs.HC↗

Large Language Models in Peer-Run Community Behavioral Health Services: Understanding Peer Specialists and Service Users' Perspectives on Opportunities, Risks, and Mitigation Strategies

Peer-run organizations (PROs) provide critical, recovery-based behavioral health support rooted in lived experience. As large language models (LLMs) enter this domain, their scale, conversationality, and opacity introduce new challenges for situatedness, trust, and autonomy. Partnering with Collaborative Support Programs of New Jersey (CSPNJ), a statewide PRO in the Northeastern United States, we used comicboarding, a co-design method, to conduct workshops with 16 peer specialists and 10 service users exploring perceptions of integrating an LLM-based recommendation system into peer support. Findings show that depending on how LLMs are introduced, constrained, and co-used, they can reconfigure in-room dynamics by sustaining, undermining, or amplifying the relational authority that grounds peer support. We identify opportunities, risks, and mitigation strategies across three tensions: bridging scale and locality, protecting trust and relational dynamics, and preserving peer autonomy amid efficiency gains. We contribute design implications that center lived-experience-in-the-loop, reframe trust as co-constructed, and position LLMs not as clinical tools but as relational collaborators in high-stakes, community-led care.

cs.HC↗

Do Teachers Dream of GenAI Widening Educational (In)equality? Envisioning the Future of K-12 GenAI Education from Global Teachers' Perspectives

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly entering K-12 classrooms worldwide, initiating urgent debates about its potential to either reduce or exacerbate educational inequalities. Drawing on interviews with 30 K-12 teachers across the United States, South Africa, and Taiwan, this study examines how teachers navigate this GenAI tension around educational equalities. We found teachers actively framed GenAI education as an equality-oriented practice: they used it to alleviate pre-existing inequalities while simultaneously working to prevent new inequalities from emerging. Despite these efforts, teachers confronted persistent systemic barriers, i.e., unequal infrastructure, insufficient professional training, and restrictive social norms, that individual initiative alone could not overcome. Teachers thus articulated normative visions for more inclusive GenAI education. By centering teachers' practices, constraints, and future envisions, this study contributes a global account of how GenAI education is being integrated into K-12 contexts and highlights what is required to make its adoption genuinely equal.

cs.HC↗

MM-SCALE: Grounded Multimodal Moral Reasoning via Scalar Judgment and Listwise Alignment

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) continue to struggle to make morally salient judgments in multimodal and socially ambiguous contexts. Prior works typically rely on binary or pairwise supervision, which often fail to capture the continuous and pluralistic nature of human moral reasoning. We present MM-SCALE (Multimodal Moral Scale), a large-scale dataset for aligning VLMs with human moral preferences through 5-point scalar ratings and explicit modality grounding. Each image-scenario pair is annotated with moral acceptability scores and grounded reasoning labels by humans using an interface we tailored for data collection, enabling listwise preference optimization over ranked scenario sets. By moving from discrete to scalar supervision, our framework provides richer alignment signals and finer calibration of multimodal moral reasoning. Experiments show that VLMs fine-tuned on MM-SCALE achieve higher ranking fidelity and more stable safety calibration than those trained with binary signals.

cs.CV↗

Constructing Algorithmic Authority: How Multi-Channel Networks (MCNs) Govern Live-Streaming Labor in China

This study examines the discursive construction of algorithms and its role in labor management in Chinese live-streaming industry by focusing on how intermediary organizations (Multi-Channel Networks, MCNs) actively construct, stabilize, and deploy particular interpretations of platform algorithms as instruments of labor management. Drawing on a nine-month ethnographic fieldwork and 44 interviews with live-streamers, former live-streamers, and MCN staff, we examine how MCNs produce and circulate structured interpretations of platform algorithms across organizational settings. We show that MCNs articulate two asymmetric yet interconnected forms of algorithmic interpretations. Internally, MCNs managers approach algorithms as volatile and uncertain systems and adopt probabilistic strategies to manage performance and risk. Externally, in interactions with streamers, MCNs circulate simplified and prescriptive algorithmic narratives that frame platform systems as transparent, fair, and responsive to individual effort. These organizationally produced algorithmic interpretations are embedded into training materials, live-streaming performance metrics, and everyday management practices. Through these mechanisms, streamers internalize responsibility for outcomes, intensify self-discipline, and increase investments in equipment, performing skills, and routines to maintain streamer-audience relationship, while accountability for unpredictable outcomes is increasingly shifted away from managers and platforms. This study contributes to CSCW and platform labor research by demonstrating how discursively constructed algorithmic knowledge can function as an intermediary infrastructure of soft control, shaping how platform labor is regulated, moralized, and governed in practice.

cs.HC↗

Properties of H particle-admixed compact star

We explore the potential manifestation of a hexaquark, the H particle, as a constituent within neutron stars. The H particle, characterized by a quark composition of $uuddss$, is constructed using the framework of Chromomagnetic Interaction (CMI). Specifically, we contemplate the flavor-singlet state H with $J^P=0^+$. Our computations indicate that the three-flavor hexaquark state, the H particle, possesses a lower mass of $2212.7~\rm{MeV}$ in comparison to the $d^*(2380)$, implying greater stability than the two-flavor $d^*(2380)$. The analysis involving the H particle is carried out using the relativistic mean-field (RMF) model. We investigate the influence of H particle couplings, a key factor in determining the system stability, and focus on the potential existence of H particle within neutron stars. We find that H particle could potentially endure as a stable constituent within neutron stars, and lead to a reduction of the maximum mass.

nucl-th↗

When Your Boss Is an AI Bot: Exploring Opportunities and Risks of Manager Clone Agents in the Future Workplace

As Generative AI (GenAI) becomes increasingly embedded in the workplace, managers are beginning to create Manager Clone Agents -- AI-powered digital surrogates trained on their work communications and decision patterns to perform managerial tasks on their behalf. To investigate this emerging phenomenon, we conducted six design fiction workshops (n = 23) with managers and workers, in which participants co-created speculative scenarios and discussed how Manager Clone Agents might transform collaborative work. We identified four potential roles that participants envisioned for Manager Clone Agents: proxy presence, informational conveyor, productivity engine, and leadership amplifier, while highlighting concerns spanning individual, interpersonal, and organizational levels. We provide design recommendations envisioned by both parties for integrating Manager Clone Agents responsibly into the future workplace, emphasizing the need to prioritize workers' perspectives and nurture interpersonal bonds while also anticipating alternative futures that may disrupt managerial hierarchies.

cs.HC↗

Can GenAI Move from Individual Use to Collaborative Work? Experiences, Challenges, and Opportunities of Coordinating GenAI into Collaborative Newswork

Generative AI (GenAI) is reshaping work, but adoption remains largely individual and experimental rather than coordinated into collaborative work. Whether GenAI can move from individual use to collaborative work is a critical question for future organizations. Journalism offers a compelling site to examine this shift: individual journalists have already been disrupted by GenAI tools; yet newswork is inherently collaborative relying on shared norms and coordinated workflows. We conducted 27 interviews with newsroom managers, editors and front-line journalists in China. We found that journalists frequently used GenAI to support daily tasks, but value alignment was safeguarded mainly through individual discretion. At the organizational level, GenAI use remained disconnected from team workflows, hindered by structural barriers and cultural reluctance to share practices. These findings underscore the gap between individual and collaborative work, pointing to the need to account for organizational structures, cultural norms, and workflow when coordinating GenAI for collaborative work.

cs.HC↗

A Survey on Human-Centered Evaluation of Explainable AI Methods in Clinical Decision Support Systems

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is essential for the transparency and clinical adoption of Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS). However, the real-world effectiveness of existing XAI methods remains limited and is inconsistently evaluated. This study conducts a systematic PRISMA-guided survey of 31 human-centered evaluations (HCE) of XAI applied to CDSS, classifying them by XAI methodology, evaluation design, and adoption barrier. Our findings reveal that most existing studies employ post-hoc, model-agnostic approaches such as SHAP and Grad-CAM, typically assessed through small-scale clinician studies. The results show that over 80% of the studies adopt post-hoc, model-agnostic approaches such as SHAP and Grad-CAM, and that clinician sample sizes remain below 25 participants. The findings indicate that explanations generally improve clinician trust and diagnostic confidence, but frequently increase cognitive load and exhibit misalignment with domain reasoning processes. To bridge these gaps, we propose a stakeholder-centric evaluation framework that integrates socio-technical principles and human-computer interaction to guide the future development of clinically viable and trustworthy XAI-based CDSS.

cs.LG↗

What Comes After Harm? Mapping Reparative Actions in AI through Justice Frameworks

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are integrated into more aspects of society, they offer new capabilities but also cause a range of harms that are drawing increasing scrutiny. A large body of work in the Responsible AI community has focused on identifying and auditing these harms. However, much less is understood about what happens after harm occurs: what constitutes reparation, who initiates it, and how effective these reparations are. In this paper, we develop a taxonomy of AI harm reparation based on a thematic analysis of real-world incidents. The taxonomy organizes reparative actions into four overarching goals: acknowledging harm, attributing responsibility, providing remedies, and enabling systemic change. We apply this framework to a dataset of 1,060 AI-related incidents, analyzing the prevalence of each action and the distribution of stakeholder involvement. Our findings show that reparation efforts are concentrated in early, symbolic stages, with limited actions toward accountability or structural reform. Drawing on theories of justice, we argue that existing responses fall short of delivering meaningful redress. This work contributes a foundation for advancing more accountable and reparative approaches to Responsible AI.

cs.HC↗

Can Online GenAI Discussion Serve as Bellwether for Labor Market Shifts?

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has generated considerable speculation regarding their transformative potential for labor markets. However, existing approaches to measuring AI exposure in the workforce predominantly rely on concurrent market conditions, offering limited predictive capacity for anticipating future disruptions. This paper presents a predictive study examining whether online discussions about LLMs can function as early indicators of labor market shifts. We employ four distinct analytical approaches to identify the domains and timeframes in which public discourse serves as a leading signal for employment changes, thereby demonstrating its predictive validity for labor market dynamics. Drawing on a comprehensive dataset that integrates the REALM corpus of LLM discussions, LinkedIn job postings, Indeed employment indices, and over 4 million LinkedIn user profiles, we analyze the relationship between discussion intensity across news media and Reddit forums and subsequent variations in job posting volumes, occupational net change ratios, job tenure patterns, unemployment duration, and transitions to GenAI-related roles across thirteen occupational categories. Our findings reveal that discussion intensity predicts employment changes 1-7 months in advance across multiple indicators, including job postings, net hiring rates, tenure patterns, and unemployment duration. These findings suggest that monitoring online discourse can provide actionable intelligence for workers making reskilling decisions and organizations anticipating skill requirements, offering a real-time complement to traditional labor statistics in navigating technological disruption.

cs.CY↗

PeerCoPilot: A Language Model-Powered Assistant for Behavioral Health Organizations

Behavioral health conditions, which include mental health and substance use disorders, are the leading disease burden in the United States. Peer-run behavioral health organizations (PROs) critically assist individuals facing these conditions by combining mental health services with assistance for needs such as income, employment, and housing. However, limited funds and staffing make it difficult for PROs to address all service user needs. To assist peer providers at PROs with their day-to-day tasks, we introduce PeerCoPilot, a large language model (LLM)-powered assistant that helps peer providers create wellness plans, construct step-by-step goals, and locate organizational resources to support these goals. PeerCoPilot ensures information reliability through a retrieval-augmented generation pipeline backed by a large database of over 1,300 vetted resources. We conducted human evaluations with 15 peer providers and 6 service users and found that over 90% of users supported using PeerCoPilot. Moreover, we demonstrated that PeerCoPilot provides more reliable and specific information than a baseline LLM. PeerCoPilot is now used by a group of 5-10 peer providers at CSPNJ, a large behavioral health organization serving over 10,000 service users, and we are actively expanding PeerCoPilot's use.

cs.CL↗

Resolving the spurious-state problem in Dirac equation by using the staggered-grid method

Discretizing the Dirac equation on a uniform grid with the central difference formula often generates spurious states. We propose a staggered-grid scheme in the framework of the finite-difference method that suppresses these spurious states without introducing Wilson terms or ad-hoc filtering. In this approach, the large and small components of the Dirac equation are placed on interlaced nodes, and the first-order derivatives are evaluated between staggered points, yielding a Hamiltonian that breaks the unitary transformation between $H_κ$ and $H_{-κ}$. Benchmarks with the nuclear Woods-Saxon potentials demonstrate one-to-one agreement with the eigenvalues obtained from shooting method and asymmetric finite-difference method, rapid convergence for weakly bound states, and reduced box-size sensitivity. The method retains the simplicity of central differences and standard matrix diagonalization, while naturally extending to higher-order and multi-dimension systems. It provides a compact and efficient tool for relativistic bound-state and scattering calculations.

nucl-th↗

"It Felt Real" Victim Perspectives on Platform Design and Longer-Running Scams

Longer-running scams, such as romance fraud and "pig-butchering" scams, exploit not only victims' emotions but also the design of digital platforms. Scammers commonly leverage features such as professional-looking profile verification, algorithmic recommendations that reinforce contact, integrated payment systems, and private chat affordances to gradually establish trust and dependency with victims. Prior work in HCI and criminology has examined online scams through the lenses of detection mechanisms, threat modeling, and user-level vulnerabilities. However, less attention has been paid to how platform design itself enables longer-running scams. To address this gap, we conducted in-depth interviews with 25 longer-running scam victims in China. Our findings show how scammers strategically use platform affordances to stage credibility, orchestrate intimacy, and sustain coercion with victims. By analyzing scams as socio-technical projects, we highlight how platform design can be exploited in longer-running scams, and point to redesigning future platforms to better protect users.

cs.HC↗

Exploring Opportunities to Support Novice Visual Artists' Inspiration and Ideation with Generative AI

Recent generative AI advances present new possibilities for supporting visual art creation, but how such promise might assist novice artists during early-stage processes requires investigation. How novices adopt or resist these tools can shift the relationship between the art community and generative systems. We interviewed 13 artists to uncover needs in key dimensions during early stages of creation: (1) quicker and better access to references, (2) visualizations of reference combinations, (3) external artistic feedback, and (4) personalized support to learn new techniques and styles. Mapping such needs to state-of-the-art open-sourced advances, we developed a set of six interactive prototypes to expose emerging capabilities to novice artists. Afterward, we conducted co-design workshops with 13 novice visual artists through which artists articulated requirements and tensions for artist-centered AI development. Our work reveals opportunities to design novice-targeted tools that foreground artists' needs, offering alternative visions for generative AI to serve visual creativity.

cs.HC↗