arXiv subjects

Huai Wang

Publications and source records attributed to Huai Wang.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Unlocking Embodied Probabilistic Computational Features in Motor Drives

Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven fault diagnosis in motor drives often requires significant computational efforts and time for re-training, in addition to the limited knowledge behind the model and suitability of training and learning mechanisms. This work bridges this gap by proposing a structured mechanism of transforming untapped labeled fault data into AI parameters to leverage probabilistic data-driven learning. This novel AI reservoir modeling framework for power electronics not only eliminates exogenous efforts behind learning data patterns and its optimization, but also provides intuitive guidelines for power electronics engineers behind sizing of AI models. This alignment between data and system physics makes the proposed model transparent and interpretable, bridging practical understanding with data-driven learning. Its computational efficiency is demonstrated using experimental data that structured, physics-aware reservoirs achieve higher diagnostic accuracy and clearer explanations than conventional black-box AI methods.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2026

Quantized Probabilistic AI for Gear Fault Diagnosis in Motor Drives

Deploying large artificial intelligence (AI) models in power electronics often demands high computational resources. Driven by the quantization paradigm, this digest proposes a quantization-aware training (QAT) principle to substantially minimize the number of bits required and simultaneously maximize the accuracy of computations in pre-trained AI models. Considering a pre-trained probabilistic Bayesian Neural Network (BNN) for gear fault diagnosis in motor drives as an example, we quantize its weights and activation functions from floating-point FP32 to low-precision INT8 values, which enhances the computational efficiency by a significant margin of 30-45% (for different model versions) without any compromise in the accuracy and uncertainty estimates. This substantiates a sustainable mechanism of deploying most quantized light-weight AI models into low-cost edge processors for power electronic applications.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2024

Uncertainty-Aware Artificial Intelligence for Gear Fault Diagnosis in Motor Drives

This paper introduces a novel approach to quantify the uncertainties in fault diagnosis of motor drives using Bayesian neural networks (BNN). Conventional data-driven approaches used for fault diagnosis often rely on point-estimate neural networks, which merely provide deterministic outputs and fail to capture the uncertainty associated with the inference process. In contrast, BNNs offer a principled framework to model uncertainty by treating network weights as probability distributions rather than fixed values. It offers several advantages: (a) improved robustness to noisy data, (b) enhanced interpretability of model predictions, and (c) the ability to quantify uncertainty in the decision-making processes. To test the robustness of the proposed BNN, it has been tested under a conservative dataset of gear fault data from an experimental prototype of three fault types at first, and is then incrementally trained on new fault classes and datasets to explore its uncertainty quantification features and model interpretability under noisy data and unseen fault scenarios.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2022

AutoPINN: When AutoML Meets Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have recently been proposed to solve scientific and engineering problems, where physical laws are introduced into neural networks as prior knowledge. With the embedded physical laws, PINNs enable the estimation of critical parameters, which are unobservable via physical tools, through observable variables. For example, Power Electronic Converters (PECs) are essential building blocks for the green energy transition. PINNs have been applied to estimate the capacitance, which is unobservable during PEC operations, using current and voltage, which can be observed easily during operations. The estimated capacitance facilitates self-diagnostics of PECs. Existing PINNs are often manually designed, which is time-consuming and may lead to suboptimal performance due to a large number of design choices for neural network architectures and hyperparameters. In addition, PINNs are often deployed on different physical devices, e.g., PECs, with limited and varying resources. Therefore, it requires designing different PINN models under different resource constraints, making it an even more challenging task for manual design. To contend with the challenges, we propose Automated Physics-Informed Neural Networks (AutoPINN), a framework that enables the automated design of PINNs by combining AutoML and PINNs. Specifically, we first tailor a search space that allows finding high-accuracy PINNs for PEC internal parameter estimation. We then propose a resource-aware search strategy to explore the search space to find the best PINN model under different resource constraints. We experimentally demonstrate that AutoPINN is able to find more accurate PINN models than human-designed, state-of-the-art PINN models using fewer resources.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2022

Impact of Loss Model Selection on Power Semiconductor Lifetime Prediction in Electric Vehicles

Power loss estimation is an indispensable procedure to conduct lifetime prediction for power semiconductor device. The previous studies successfully perform steady-state power loss estimation for different applications, but which may be limited for the electric vehicles (EVs) with high dynamics. Based on two EV standard driving cycle profiles, this paper gives a comparative study of power loss estimation models with two different time resolutions, i.e., the output period average and the switching period average. The correspondingly estimated power losses, thermal profiles, and lifetime clearly pointed out that the widely applied power loss model with the output period average is limited for EV applications, in particular for the highly dynamic driving cycle. The difference in the predicted lifetime can be up to 300 times due to the unreasonable choice the loss model, which calls for the industry attention on the differences of the EVs and the importance of loss model selection in lifetime prediction.

eess.SY↗