SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

James Ayieko

Publications and source records attributed to James Ayieko.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

A causal framework for evaluating the total effect of strategies aiming to expand screening and to improve outcomes

For many health conditions, there are highly efficacious treatment and prevention products. Maximizing their impact requires strategies that improve the reach of health screening in order to establish who could benefit. For example, HIV prevention strategies aim to expand risk screening and to improve uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among those experiencing risk. Often, these strategies induce changes at the group-level (e.g., health clinics or communities) and are evaluated through cluster randomized trials. This scenario creates a complex, multilevel-mediation-missing data problem for the following reasons. First, the strategy is delivered at the cluster-level, while health screening and outcomes are at the individual-level. Second, the strategy improves health outcomes directly and indirectly through improved health screening. Third, everyone has an underlying status, which is only observed among those screened. To formally define the total effect in such settings, we use Counterfactual Strata Effects: causal estimands where the outcome is only relevant for a group whose membership is subject to missingness and/ or impacted by the exposure of interest. To identify and estimate the corresponding statistical estimand, we propose a novel extension of Two-Stage targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE). Simulations demonstrate the practical performance of our approach as well as the limitations of existing approaches.

stat.ME

Two-Stage TMLE to Reduce Bias and Improve Efficiency in Cluster Randomized Trials

Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) randomly assign an intervention to groups of individuals (e.g., clinics or communities) and measure outcomes on individuals in those groups. While offering many advantages, this experimental design introduces challenges that are only partially addressed by existing analytic approaches. First, outcomes are often missing for some individuals within clusters. Failing to appropriately adjust for differential outcome measurement can result in biased estimates and inference. Second, CRTs often randomize limited numbers of clusters, resulting in chance imbalances on baseline outcome predictors between arms. Failing to adaptively adjust for these imbalances and other predictive covariates can result in efficiency losses. To address these methodological gaps, we propose and evaluate a novel two-stage targeted minimum loss-based estimator (TMLE) to adjust for baseline covariates in a manner that optimizes precision, after controlling for baseline and post-baseline causes of missing outcomes. Finite sample simulations illustrate that our approach can nearly eliminate bias due to differential outcome measurement, while existing CRT estimators yield misleading results and inferences. Application to real data from the SEARCH community randomized trial demonstrates the gains in efficiency afforded through adaptive adjustment for baseline covariates, after controlling for missingness on individual-level outcomes.

stat.ME

Semi-Supervised Record Linkage for Construction of Large-Scale Sociocentric Networks in Resource-limited Settings: An application to the SEARCH Study in Rural Uganda and Kenya

This paper presents a novel semi-supervised algorithmic approach to creating large scale sociocentric networks in rural East Africa. We describe the construction of 32 large-scale sociocentric social networks in rural Sub-Saharan Africa. Networks were constructed by applying a semi-supervised record-linkage algorithm to data from census-enumerated residents of the 32 communities included in the SEARCH study (NCT01864603), a community-cluster randomized HIV prevention trial in Uganda and Kenya. Contacts were solicited using a five question name generator in the domains of emotional support, food sharing, free time, health issues and money issues. The fully constructed networks include 170; 028 nodes and 362; 965 edges aggregated across communities (ranging from 4449 to 6829 nodes and from 2349 to 31,779 edges per community). Our algorithm matched on average 30% of named contacts in Kenyan communities and 50% of named contacts in Ugandan communities to residents named in census enumeration. Assortative mixing measures for eight different covariates reveal that residents in the network have a very strong tendency to associate with others who are similar to them in age, sex, and especially village. The networks in the SEARCH Study will provide a platform for improved understanding of health outcomes in rural East Africa. The network construction algorithm we present may facilitate future social network research in resource-limited settings.

stat.AP