arXiv subjects

Jan Eube

Publications and source records attributed to Jan Eube.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Approximation Algorithms for the Traveling Thief Problem

The Traveling Thief Problem (TTP) combines the Traveling Salesperson Problem with the Knapsack Problem. In this problem, a finite metric space is given, and at each location an item with some profit and weight is placed. An agent seeks to collect a subset of the items. To do so, the agent must decide which items to collect and to determine a cyclic tour visiting the corresponding locations. While collecting an item yields its profit as a reward, the agent's speed decreases as more weight is picked up. The problem involves two competing objectives: maximizing the total profit of the collected items and minimizing the travel time of the tour. While many heuristics and exact algorithms (with a non-polynomial running time) have been developed, no approximation algorithms are known for any variant of the TTP. We aim at computing an $(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)$-approximate Pareto set that, for every solution, contains another solution collecting at least a $\frac{1}{\alpha_1}$ fraction of its profit while requiring at most $\alpha_2$ times its travel time. Our main result is an algorithm that calculates a $(9 + \epsilon,9 + \epsilon)$-approximate Pareto set in polynomial time. We also consider the setting in which the set of items to be collected is given in advance, so that the agent only has to compute a tour through the corresponding locations that minimizes the total travel time. This is the so-called Weighted TSP. For this setting, we present a $(2e + \epsilon)$-approximation algorithm.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Effective Traveling for Metric Instances of the Traveling Thief Problem

The Traveling Thief Problem (TTP) is a multi-component optimization problem that captures the interplay between routing and packing decisions by combining the classical Traveling Salesperson Problem (TSP) and the Knapsack Problem (KP). The TTP has gained significant attention in the evolutionary computation literature and a wide range of approaches have been developed over the last 10 years. Judging the performance of these algorithms in particular in terms of how close the get to optimal solutions is a very challenging task as effective exact methods are not available due to the highly challenging traveling component. In this paper, we study the tour-optimization component of TTP under a fixed packing plan. We formulate this task as a weighted variant of the TSP, where travel costs depend on the cumulative weight of collected items, and investigate how different distance metrics and cost functions affect computational complexity. We present an $(O(n^2))$-time dynamic programming algorithm for the path metric with general cost functions, prove that the problem is NP-hard even on a star metric, and develop constant-factor approximation algorithms for star metrics. Finally, we also develop an approximation algorithm for the problem under a general metric with a linear cost function. We complement our theoretical results with experimental evaluations on standard TTP instances adjusted to a path metric. Our experimental results demonstrate the practical effectiveness of our approaches by comparing it to solutions produced by popular iterative search algorithms. The results show that our methods are able to significantly improve the quality of solutions for some benchmark instances by optimizing the traveling part while pointing out the optimality of the travel component for other solutions obtained by iterative search methods.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

New Algorithms and Hardness Results for Connected Clustering

Connected clustering denotes a family of constrained clustering problems in which we are given a distance metric and an undirected connectivity graph $G$ that can be completely unrelated to the metric. The aim is to partition the $n$ vertices into a given number $k$ of clusters such that every cluster forms a connected subgraph of $G$ and a given clustering objective gets minimized. The constraint that the clusters are connected has applications in many different fields, like for example community detection and geodesy. So far, $k$-center and $k$-median have been studied in this setting. It has been shown that connected $k$-median is $\Omega(n^{1- \epsilon})$-hard to approximate which also carries over to the connected $k$-means problem, while for connected $k$-center it remained an open question whether one can find a constant approximation in polynomial time. We answer this question by providing an $\Omega(\log^*(k))$-hardness result for the problem. Given these hardness results, we study the problems on graphs with bounded treewidth. We provide exact algorithms that run in polynomial time if the treewidth $w$ is a constant. Furthermore, we obtain constant approximation algorithms that run in FPT time with respect to the parameter $\max(w,k)$. Additionally, we consider the min-sum-radii (MSR) and min-sum-diameter (MSD) objective. We prove that on general graphs connected MSR can be approximated with an approximation factor of $(3 + \epsilon)$ and connected MSD with an approximation factor of $(4 + \epsilon)$. The latter also directly improves the best known approximation guarantee for unconstrained MSD from $(6 + \epsilon)$ to $(4 + \epsilon)$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Connected k-Median with Disjoint and Non-disjoint Clusters

The connected $k$-median problem is a constrained clustering problem that combines distance-based $k$-clustering with connectivity information. The problem allows to input a metric space and an unweighted undirected connectivity graph that is completely unrelated to the metric space. The goal is to compute $k$ centers and corresponding clusters such that each cluster forms a connected subgraph of $G$, and such that the $k$-median cost is minimized. The problem has applications in very different fields like geodesy (particularly districting), social network analysis (especially community detection), or bioinformatics. We study a version with overlapping clusters where points can be part of multiple clusters which is natural for the use case of community detection. This problem variant is $\Omega(\log n)$-hard to approximate, and our main result is an $\mathcal{O}(k^2 \log n)$-approximation algorithm for the problem. We complement it with an $\Omega(n^{1-\epsilon})$-hardness result for the case of disjoint clusters without overlap with general connectivity graphs, as well as an exact algorithm in this setting if the connectivity graph is a tree.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Connected k-Center and k-Diameter Clustering

Motivated by an application from geodesy, we introduce a novel clustering problem which is a $k$-center (or k-diameter) problem with a side constraint. For the side constraint, we are given an undirected connectivity graph $G$ on the input points, and a clustering is now only feasible if every cluster induces a connected subgraph in $G$. We call the resulting problems the connected $k$-center problem and the connected $k$-diameter problem. We prove several results on the complexity and approximability of these problems. Our main result is an $O(\log^2{k})$-approximation algorithm for the connected $k$-center and the connected $k$-diameter problem. For Euclidean metrics and metrics with constant doubling dimension, the approximation factor of this algorithm improves to $O(1)$. We also consider the special cases that the connectivity graph is a line or a tree. For the line we give optimal polynomial-time algorithms and for the case that the connectivity graph is a tree, we either give an optimal polynomial-time algorithm or a $2$-approximation algorithm for all variants of our model. We complement our upper bounds by several lower bounds.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

Noisy, Greedy and Not So Greedy k-means++

The k-means++ algorithm due to Arthur and Vassilvitskii has become the most popular seeding method for Lloyd's algorithm. It samples the first center uniformly at random from the data set and the other $k-1$ centers iteratively according to $D^2$-sampling where the probability that a data point becomes the next center is proportional to its squared distance to the closest center chosen so far. k-means++ is known to achieve an approximation factor of $O(\log k)$ in expectation. Already in the original paper on k-means++, Arthur and Vassilvitskii suggested a variation called greedy k-means++ algorithm in which in each iteration multiple possible centers are sampled according to $D^2$-sampling and only the one that decreases the objective the most is chosen as a center for that iteration. It is stated as an open question whether this also leads to an $O(\log k)$-approximation (or even better). We show that this is not the case by presenting a family of instances on which greedy k-means++ yields only an $Ω(\ell\cdot \log k)$-approximation in expectation where $\ell$ is the number of possible centers that are sampled in each iteration. We also study a variation, which we call noisy k-means++ algorithm. In this variation only one center is sampled in every iteration but not exactly by $D^2$-sampling anymore. Instead in each iteration an adversary is allowed to change the probabilities arising from $D^2$-sampling individually for each point by a factor between $1-ε_1$ and $1+ε_2$ for parameters $ε_1 \in [0,1)$ and $ε_2 \ge 0$. We prove that noisy k-means++ compute an $O(\log^2 k)$-approximation in expectation. We also discuss some applications of this result.

cs.DS↗