Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Karl Bringmann

Publications and source records attributed to Karl Bringmann.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
arXiv2023

Faster Sublinear-Time Edit Distance

We study the fundamental problem of approximating the edit distance of two strings. After an extensive line of research led to the development of a constant-factor approximation algorithm in almost-linear time, recent years have witnessed a notable shift in focus towards sublinear-time algorithms. Here, the task is typically formalized as the $(k, K)$-gap edit distance problem: Distinguish whether the edit distance of two strings is at most $k$ or more than $K$. Surprisingly, it is still possible to compute meaningful approximations in this challenging regime. Nevertheless, in almost all previous work, truly sublinear running time of $O(n^{1-\varepsilon})$ (for a constant $\varepsilon > 0$) comes at the price of at least polynomial gap $K \ge k \cdot n^{Ω(\varepsilon)}$. Only recently, [Bringmann, Cassis, Fischer, and Nakos; STOC'22] broke through this barrier and solved the sub-polynomial $(k, k^{1+o(1)})$-gap edit distance problem in time $O(n/k + k^{4+o(1)})$, which is truly sublinear if $n^{Ω(1)} \le k \le n^{\frac14-Ω(1)}$.The $n/k$ term is inevitable (already for Hamming distance), but it remains an important task to optimize the $\mathrm{poly}(k)$ term and, in general, solve the $(k, k^{1+o(1)})$-gap edit distance problem in sublinear-time for larger values of $k$. In this work, we design an improved algorithm for the $(k, k^{1+o(1)})$-gap edit distance problem in sublinear time $O(n/k + k^{2+o(1)})$, yielding a significant quadratic speed-up over the previous $O(n/k + k^{4+o(1)})$-time algorithm. Notably, our algorithm is unconditionally almost-optimal (up to subpolynomial factors) in the regime where $k \leq n^{\frac13}$ and improves upon the state of the art for $k \leq n^{\frac12-o(1)}$.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2023

Dynamic Dynamic Time Warping

The Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) distance is a popular similarity measure for polygonal curves (i.e., sequences of points). It finds many theoretical and practical applications, especially for temporal data, and is known to be a robust, outlier-insensitive alternative to the \frechet distance. For static curves of at most $n$ points, the DTW distance can be computed in $O(n^2)$ time in constant dimension. This tightly matches a SETH-based lower bound, even for curves in $\mathbb{R}^1$. In this work, we study \emph{dynamic} algorithms for the DTW distance. Here, the goal is to design a data structure that can be efficiently updated to accommodate local changes to one or both curves, such as inserting or deleting vertices and, after each operation, reports the updated DTW distance. We give such a data structure with update and query time $O(n^{1.5} \log n)$, where $n$ is the maximum length of the curves. As our main result, we prove that our data structure is conditionally \emph{optimal}, up to subpolynomial factors. More precisely, we prove that, already for curves in $\mathbb{R}^1$, there is no dynamic algorithm to maintain the DTW distance with update and query time~\makebox{$O(n^{1.5 - δ})$} for any constant $δ> 0$, unless the Negative-$k$-Clique Hypothesis fails. In fact, we give matching upper and lower bounds for various trade-offs between update and query time, even in cases where the lengths of the curves differ.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2023

Stronger 3-SUM Lower Bounds for Approximate Distance Oracles via Additive Combinatorics

The "short cycle removal" technique was recently introduced by Abboud, Bringmann, Khoury and Zamir (STOC '22) to prove fine-grained hardness of approximation. Its main technical result is that listing all triangles in an $n^{1/2}$-regular graph is $n^{2-o(1)}$-hard under the 3-SUM conjecture even when the number of short cycles is small; namely, when the number of $k$-cycles is $O(n^{k/2+γ})$ for $γ<1/2$. Abboud et al. achieve $γ\geq 1/4$ by applying structure vs. randomness arguments on graphs. In this paper, we take a step back and apply conceptually similar arguments on the numbers of the 3-SUM problem. Consequently, we achieve the best possible $γ=0$ and the following lower bounds under the 3-SUM conjecture: * Approximate distance oracles: The seminal Thorup-Zwick distance oracles achieve stretch $2k\pm O(1)$ after preprocessing a graph in $O(m n^{1/k})$ time. For the same stretch, and assuming the query time is $n^{o(1)}$ Abboud et al. proved an $Ω(m^{1+\frac{1}{12.7552 \cdot k}})$ lower bound on the preprocessing time; we improve it to $Ω(m^{1+\frac1{2k}})$ which is only a factor 2 away from the upper bound. We also obtain tight bounds for stretch $2+o(1)$ and $3-ε$ and higher lower bounds for dynamic shortest paths. * Listing 4-cycles: Abboud et al. proved the first super-linear lower bound for listing all 4-cycles in a graph, ruling out $(m^{1.1927}+t)^{1+o(1)}$ time algorithms where $t$ is the number of 4-cycles. We settle the complexity of this basic problem by showing that the $\widetilde{O}(\min(m^{4/3},n^2) +t)$ upper bound is tight up to $n^{o(1)}$ factors. Our results exploit a rich tool set from additive combinatorics, most notably the Balog-Szemerédi-Gowers theorem and Rusza's covering lemma. A key ingredient that may be of independent interest is a subquadratic algorithm for 3-SUM if one of the sets has small doubling.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2023

Approximating Subset Sum Ratio faster than Subset Sum

Subset Sum Ratio is the following optimization problem: Given a set of $n$ positive numbers $I$, find disjoint subsets $X,Y \subseteq I$ minimizing the ratio $\max\{Σ(X)/Σ(Y),Σ(Y)/Σ(X)\}$, where $Σ(Z)$ denotes the sum of all elements of $Z$. Subset Sum Ratio is an optimization variant of the Equal Subset Sum problem. It was introduced by Woeginger and Yu in '92 and is known to admit an FPTAS [Bazgan, Santha, Tuza '98]. The best approximation schemes before this work had running time $O(n^4/\varepsilon)$ [Melissinos, Pagourtzis '18], $\tilde O(n^{2.3}/\varepsilon^{2.6})$ and $\tilde O(n^2/\varepsilon^3)$ [Alonistiotis et al. '22]. In this work, we present an improved approximation scheme for Subset Sum Ratio running in time $O(n / \varepsilon^{0.9386})$. Here we assume that the items are given in sorted order, otherwise we need an additional running time of $O(n \log n)$ for sorting. Our improved running time simultaneously improves the dependence on $n$ to linear and the dependence on $1/\varepsilon$ to sublinear. For comparison, the related Subset Sum problem admits an approximation scheme running in time $O(n/\varepsilon)$ [Gens, Levner '79]. If one would achieve an approximation scheme with running time $\tilde O(n / \varepsilon^{0.99})$ for Subset Sum, then one would falsify the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis [Abboud, Bringmann, Hermelin, Shabtay '19] as well as the Min-Plus-Convolution Hypothesis [Bringmann, Nakos '21]. We thus establish that Subset Sum Ratio admits faster approximation schemes than Subset Sum. This comes as a surprise, since at any point in time before this work the best known approximation scheme for Subset Sum Ratio had a worse running time than the best known approximation scheme for Subset Sum.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2023

The Time Complexity of Fully Sparse Matrix Multiplication

What is the time complexity of matrix multiplication of sparse integer matrices with $m_{in}$ nonzeros in the input and $m_{out}$ nonzeros in the output? This paper provides improved upper bounds for this question for almost any choice of $m_{in}$ vs. $m_{out}$, and provides evidence that these new bounds might be optimal up to further progress on fast matrix multiplication. Our main contribution is a new algorithm that reduces sparse matrix multiplication to dense (but smaller) rectangular matrix multiplication. Our running time thus depends on the optimal exponent $ω(a,b,c)$ of multiplying dense $n^a\times n^b$ by $n^b\times n^c$ matrices. We discover that when $m_{out}=Θ(m_{in}^r)$ the time complexity of sparse matrix multiplication is $O(m_{in}^{σ+ε})$, for all $ε> 0$, where $σ$ is the solution to the equation $ω(σ-1,2-σ,1+r-σ)=σ$. No matter what $ω(\cdot,\cdot,\cdot)$ turns out to be, and for all $r\in(0,2)$, the new bound beats the state of the art, and we provide evidence that it is optimal based on the complexity of the all-edge triangle problem. In particular, in terms of the input plus output size $m = m_{in} + m_{out}$ our algorithm runs in time $O(m^{1.3459})$. Even for Boolean matrices, this improves over the previous $m^{\frac{2ω}{ω+1}+ε}=O(m^{1.4071})$ bound [Amossen, Pagh; 2009], which was a natural barrier since it coincides with the longstanding bound of all-edge triangle in sparse graphs [Alon, Yuster, Zwick; 1994]. We find it interesting that matrix multiplication can be solved faster than triangle detection in this natural setting. In fact, we establish an equivalence to a special case of the all-edge triangle problem.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2023

Faster 0-1-Knapsack via Near-Convex Min-Plus-Convolution

We revisit the classic 0-1-Knapsack problem, in which we are given $n$ items with their weights and profits as well as a weight budget $W$, and the goal is to find a subset of items of total weight at most $W$ that maximizes the total profit. We study pseudopolynomial-time algorithms parameterized by the largest profit of any item $p_{\max}$, and the largest weight of any item $w_{\max}$. Our main result are algorithms for 0-1-Knapsack running in time $\tilde{O}(n\,w_\max\,p_\max^{2/3})$ and $\tilde{O}(n\,p_\max\,w_\max^{2/3})$, improving upon an algorithm in time $O(n\,p_\max\,w_\max)$ by Pisinger [J. Algorithms '99]. In the regime $p_\max \approx w_\max \approx n$ (and $W \approx \mathrm{OPT} \approx n^2$) our algorithms are the first to break the cubic barrier $n^3$. To obtain our result, we give an efficient algorithm to compute the min-plus convolution of near-convex functions. More precisely, we say that a function $f \colon [n] \mapsto \mathbf{Z}$ is $Δ$-near convex with $Δ\geq 1$, if there is a convex function $\breve{f}$ such that $\breve{f}(i) \leq f(i) \leq \breve{f}(i) + Δ$ for every $i$. We design an algorithm computing the min-plus convolution of two $Δ$-near convex functions in time $\tilde{O}(nΔ)$. This tool can replace the usage of the prediction technique of Bateni, Hajiaghayi, Seddighin and Stein [STOC '18] in all applications we are aware of, and we believe it has wider applicability.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2023

Top-k-Convolution and the Quest for Near-Linear Output-Sensitive Subset Sum

In the classical Subset Sum problem we are given a set $X$ and a target $t$, and the task is to decide whether there exists a subset of $X$ which sums to $t$. A recent line of research has resulted in $\tilde{O}(t)$-time algorithms, which are (near-)optimal under popular complexity-theoretic assumptions. On the other hand, the standard dynamic programming algorithm runs in time $O(n \cdot |\mathcal{S}(X,t)|)$, where $\mathcal{S}(X,t)$ is the set of all subset sums of $X$ that are smaller than $t$. Furthermore, all known pseudopolynomial algorithms actually solve a stronger task, since they actually compute the whole set $\mathcal{S}(X,t)$. As the aforementioned two running times are incomparable, in this paper we ask whether one can achieve the best of both worlds: running time $\tilde{O}(|\mathcal{S}(X,t)|)$. In particular, we ask whether $\mathcal{S}(X,t)$ can be computed in near-linear time in the output-size. Using a diverse toolkit containing techniques such as color coding, sparse recovery, and sumset estimates, we make considerable progress towards this question and design an algorithm running in time $\tilde{O}(|\mathcal{S}(X,t)|^{4/3})$. Central to our approach is the study of top-$k$-convolution, a natural problem of independent interest: given sparse polynomials with non-negative coefficients, compute the lowest $k$ non-zero monomials of their product. We design an algorithm running in time $\tilde{O}(k^{4/3})$, by a combination of sparse convolution and sumset estimates considered in Additive Combinatorics. Moreover, we provide evidence that going beyond some of the barriers we have faced requires either an algorithmic breakthrough or possibly new techniques from Additive Combinatorics on how to pass from information on restricted sumsets to information on unrestricted sumsets.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2023

Negative-Weight Single-Source Shortest Paths in Near-Linear Time: Now Faster!

In this work we revisit the fundamental Single-Source Shortest Paths (SSSP) problem with possibly negative edge weights. A recent breakthrough result by Bernstein, Nanongkai and Wulff-Nilsen established a near-linear $O(m \log^8(n) \log(W))$-time algorithm for negative-weight SSSP, where $W$ is an upper bound on the magnitude of the smallest negative-weight edge. In this work we improve the running time to $O(m \log^2(n) \log(nW) \log\log n)$, which is an improvement by nearly six log-factors. Some of these log-factors are easy to shave (e.g. replacing the priority queue used in Dijkstra's algorithm), while others are significantly more involved (e.g. to find negative cycles we design an algorithm reminiscent of noisy binary search and analyze it with drift analysis). As side results, we obtain an algorithm to compute the minimum cycle mean in the same running time as well as a new construction for computing Low-Diameter Decompositions in directed graphs.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2023

Almost-Optimal Sublinear-Time Edit Distance in the Low Distance Regime

We revisit the task of computing the edit distance in sublinear time. In the $(k,K)$-gap edit distance problem the task is to distinguish whether the edit distance of two strings is at most $k$ or at least $K$. It has been established by Goldenberg, Krauthgamer and Saha (FOCS '19), with improvements by Kociumaka and Saha (FOCS '20), that the $(k,k^2)$-gap problem can be solved in time $\widetilde O(n/k+\operatorname{poly}(k))$. One of the most natural questions in this line of research is whether the $(k,k^2)$-gap is best-possible for the running time $\widetilde O(n/k+\operatorname{poly}(k))$. In this work we answer this question by significantly improving the gap. Specifically, we show that in time $O(n/k+\operatorname{poly}(k))$ we can even solve the $(k,k^{1+o(1)})$-gap problem. This is the first algorithm that breaks the $(k,k^2)$-gap in this running time. Our algorithm is almost optimal in the following sense: In the low distance regime ($k\le n^{0.19}$) our running time becomes $O(n/k)$, which matches a known $n/k^{1+o(1)}$ lower bound for the $(k,k^{1+o(1)})$-gap problem up to lower order factors. Our result also reveals a surprising similarity of Hamming distance and edit distance in the low distance regime: For both, the $(k,k^{1+o(1)})$-gap problem has time complexity $n/k^{1\pm o(1)}$ for small $k$. In contrast to previous work, which employed a subsampled variant of the Landau-Vishkin algorithm, we instead build upon the algorithm of Andoni, Krauthgamer and Onak (FOCS '10). We first simplify their approach and then show how to to effectively prune their computation tree in order to obtain a sublinear-time algorithm in the given time bound. Towards that, we use a variety of structural insights on the (local and global) patterns that can emerge during this process and design appropriate property testers to effectively detect these patterns.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2023

Traversing the FFT Computation Tree for Dimension-Independent Sparse Fourier Transforms

We consider the well-studied Sparse Fourier transform problem, where one aims to quickly recover an approximately Fourier $k$-sparse vector $\widehat{x} \in \mathbb{C}^{n^d}$ from observing its time domain representation $x$. In the exact $k$-sparse case the best known dimension-independent algorithm runs in near cubic time in $k$ and it is unclear whether a faster algorithm like in low dimensions is possible. Beyond that, all known approaches either suffer from an exponential dependence on the dimension $d$ or can only tolerate a trivial amount of noise. This is in sharp contrast with the classical FFT of Cooley and Tukey, which is stable and completely insensitive to the dimension of the input vector: its runtime is $O(N\log N)$ in any dimension $d$ for $N=n^d$. Our work aims to address the above issues. First, we provide a translation/reduction of the exactly $k$-sparse FT problem to a concrete tree exploration task which asks to recover $k$ leaves in a full binary tree under certain exploration rules. Subsequently, we provide (a) an almost quadratic in $k$ time algorithm for this task, and (b) evidence that a strongly subquadratic time for Sparse FT via this approach is likely impossible. We achieve the latter by proving a conditional quadratic time lower bound on sparse polynomial multipoint evaluation (the classical non-equispaced sparse FT) which is a core routine in the aforementioned translation. Thus, our results combined can be viewed as an almost complete understanding of this approach, which is the only known approach that yields sublinear time dimension-independent Sparse FT algorithms. Subsequently, we provide a robustification of our algorithm, yielding a robust cubic time algorithm under bounded $\ell_2$ noise. This requires proving new structural properties of the recently introduced adaptive aliasing filters combined with a variety of new techniques and ideas.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2022

Hardness of Approximation in P via Short Cycle Removal: Cycle Detection, Distance Oracles, and Beyond

We present a new technique for efficiently removing almost all short cycles in a graph without unintentionally removing its triangles. Consequently, triangle finding problems do not become easy even in almost $k$-cycle free graphs, for any constant $k\geq 4$. Triangle finding is at the base of many conditional lower bounds in P, mainly for distance computation problems, and the existence of many $4$- or $5$-cycles in a worst-case instance had been the obstacle towards resolving major open questions. Hardness of approximation: Are there distance oracles with $m^{1+o(1)}$ preprocessing time and $m^{o(1)}$ query time that achieve a constant approximation? Existing algorithms with such desirable time bounds only achieve super-constant approximation factors, while only $3-ε$ factors were conditionally ruled out (Pătraşcu, Roditty, and Thorup; FOCS 2012). We prove that no $O(1)$ approximations are possible, assuming the $3$-SUM or APSP conjectures. In particular, we prove that $k$-approximations require $Ω(m^{1+1/ck})$ time, which is tight up to the constant $c$. The lower bound holds even for the offline version where we are given the queries in advance, and extends to other problems such as dynamic shortest paths. The $4$-Cycle problem: An infamous open question in fine-grained complexity is to establish any surprising consequences from a subquadratic or even linear-time algorithm for detecting a $4$-cycle in a graph. We prove that $Ω(m^{1.1194})$ time is needed for $k$-cycle detection for all $k\geq 4$, unless we can detect a triangle in $\sqrt{n}$-degree graphs in $O(n^{2-δ})$ time; a breakthrough that is not known to follow even from optimal matrix multiplication algorithms.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2022

Translating Hausdorff is Hard: Fine-Grained Lower Bounds for Hausdorff Distance Under Translation

Computing the similarity of two point sets is a ubiquitous task in medical imaging, geometric shape comparison, trajectory analysis, and many more settings. Arguably the most basic distance measure for this task is the Hausdorff distance, which assigns to each point from one set the closest point in the other set and then evaluates the maximum distance of any assigned pair. A drawback is that this distance measure is not translational invariant, that is, comparing two objects just according to their shape while disregarding their position in space is impossible. Fortunately, there is a canonical translational invariant version, the Hausdorff distance under translation, which minimizes the Hausdorff distance over all translations of one of the point sets. For point sets of size $n$ and $m$, the Hausdorff distance under translation can be computed in time $\tilde O(nm)$ for the $L_1$ and $L_\infty$ norm [Chew, Kedem SWAT'92] and $\tilde O(nm (n+m))$ for the $L_2$ norm [Huttenlocher, Kedem, Sharir DCG'93]. As these bounds have not been improved for over 25 years, in this paper we approach the Hausdorff distance under translation from the perspective of fine-grained complexity theory. We show (i) a matching lower bound of $(nm)^{1-o(1)}$ for $L_1$ and $L_\infty$ (and all other $L_p$ norms) assuming the Orthogonal Vectors Hypothesis and (ii) a matching lower bound of $n^{2-o(1)}$ for $L_2$ in the imbalanced case of $m = O(1)$ assuming the 3SUM Hypothesis.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2022

Faster Knapsack Algorithms via Bounded Monotone Min-Plus-Convolution

We present new exact and approximation algorithms for 0-1-Knapsack and Unbounded Knapsack: * Exact Algorithm for 0-1-Knapsack: 0-1-Knapsack has known algorithms running in time $\widetilde{O}(n + \min\{n OPT, n W, OPT^2, W^2\})$, where $n$ is the number of items, $W$ is the weight budget, and $OPT$ is the optimal profit. We present an algorithm running in time $\widetilde{O}(n + (W + OPT)^{1.5})$. This improves the running time in case $n,W,OPT$ are roughly equal. * Exact Algorithm for Unbounded Knapsack: Unbounded Knapsack has known algorithms running in time $\widetilde{O}(n + \min\{n \cdot p_{\max}, n \cdot w_{\max}, p_{\max}^2, w_{\max}^2\})$ [Axiotis, Tzamos '19, Jansen, Rohwedder '19, Chan, He '20], where $n$ is the number of items, $w_{\max}$ is the largest weight of any item, and $p_{\max}$ is the largest profit of any item. We present an algorithm running in time $\widetilde{O}(n + (p_{\max} + w_{\max})^{1.5})$, giving a similar improvement as for 0-1-Knapsack. * Approximating Unbounded Knapsack with Resource Augmentation: Unbounded Knapsack has a known FPTAS with running time $\widetilde{O}(\min\{n/\varepsilon, n + 1/\varepsilon^2\})$ [Jansen, Kraft '18]. We study weak approximation algorithms, which approximate the optimal profit but are allowed to overshoot the weight constraint. We present the first approximation scheme for Unbounded Knapsack in this setting, achieving running time $\widetilde{O}(n + 1/\varepsilon^{1.5})$. Our algorithms can be seen as reductions to Min-Plus-Convolution on monotone sequences with bounded entries. These structured instances of Min-Plus-Convolution can be solved in time $O(n^{1.5})$ [Chi,Duan,Xie,Zhang '22] (in contrast to the conjectured $n^{2-o(1)}$ lower bound for the general case).

cs.DS↗
arXiv2022

Unlabeled Multi-Robot Motion Planning with Tighter Separation Bounds

We consider the unlabeled motion-planning problem of $m$ unit-disc robots moving in a simple polygonal workspace of $n$ edges. The goal is to find a motion plan that moves the robots to a given set of $m$ target positions. For the unlabeled variant, it does not matter which robot reaches which target position as long as all target positions are occupied in the end. If the workspace has narrow passages such that the robots cannot fit through them, then the free configuration space, representing all possible unobstructed positions of the robots, will consist of multiple connected components. Even if in each component of the free space the number of targets matches the number of start positions, the motion-planning problem does not always have a solution when the robots and their targets are positioned very densely. In this paper, we prove tight bounds on how much separation between start and target positions is necessary to always guarantee a solution. Moreover, we describe an algorithm that always finds a solution in time $O(n \log n + mn + m^2)$ if the separation bounds are met. Specifically, we prove that the following separation is sufficient: any two start positions are at least distance $4$ apart, any two target positions are at least distance $4$ apart, and any pair of a start and a target positions is at least distance $3$ apart. We further show that when the free space consists of a single connected component, the separation between start and target positions is not necessary.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2022

Improved Sublinear-Time Edit Distance for Preprocessed Strings

We study the problem of approximating the edit distance of two strings in sublinear time, in a setting where one or both string(s) are preprocessed, as initiated by Goldenberg, Rubinstein, Saha (STOC '20). Specifically, in the $(k, K)$-gap edit distance problem, the goal is to distinguish whether the edit distance of two strings is at most $k$ or at least $K$. We obtain the following results: * After preprocessing one string in time $n^{1+o(1)}$, we can solve $(k, k \cdot n^{o(1)})$-gap edit distance in time $(n/k + k) \cdot n^{o(1)}$. * After preprocessing both strings separately in time $n^{1+o(1)}$, we can solve $(k, k \cdot n^{o(1)})$-gap edit distance in time $k \cdot n^{o(1)}$. Both results improve upon some previously best known result, with respect to either the gap or the query time or the preprocessing time. Our algorithms build on the framework by Andoni, Krauthgamer and Onak (FOCS '10) and the recent sublinear-time algorithm by Bringmann, Cassis, Fischer and Nakos (STOC '22). We replace many complicated parts in their algorithm by faster and simpler solutions which exploit the preprocessing.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2022

A Structural Investigation of the Approximability of Polynomial-Time Problems

We initiate the systematic study of a recently introduced polynomial-time analogue of MaxSNP, which includes a large number of well-studied problems (including Nearest and Furthest Neighbor in the Hamming metric, Maximum Inner Product, optimization variants of $k$-XOR and Maximum $k$-Cover). Specifically, MaxSP$_k$ denotes the class of $O(m^k)$-time problems of the form $\max_{x_1,\dots, x_k} \#\{y:ϕ(x_1,\dots,x_k,y)\}$ where $ϕ$ is a quantifier-free first-order property and $m$ denotes the size of the relational structure. Assuming central hypotheses about clique detection in hypergraphs and MAX3SAT, we show that for any MaxSP$_k$ problem definable by a quantifier-free $m$-edge graph formula $ϕ$, the best possible approximation guarantee in faster-than-exhaustive-search time $O(m^{k-δ})$ falls into one of four categories: * optimizable to exactness in time $O(m^{k-δ})$, * an (inefficient) approximation scheme, i.e., a $(1+ε)$-approximation in time $O(m^{k-f(ε)})$, * a (fixed) constant-factor approximation in time $O(m^{k-δ})$, or * an $m^ε$-approximation in time $O(m^{k-f(ε)})$. We obtain an almost complete characterization of these regimes, for MaxSP$_k$ as well as for an analogously defined minimization class MinSP$_k$. As our main technical contribution, we rule out approximation schemes for a large class of problems admitting constant-factor approximations, under the Sparse MAX3SAT hypothesis posed by (Alman, Vassilevska Williams'20). As general trends for the problems we consider, we find: (1) Exact optimizability has a simple algebraic characterization, (2) only few maximization problems do not admit a constant-factor approximation; these do not even have a subpolynomial-factor approximation, and (3) constant-factor approximation of minimization problems is equivalent to deciding whether the optimum is equal to 0.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2022

Dynamic Time Warping Under Translation: Approximation Guided by Space-Filling Curves

The Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) distance is a popular measure of similarity for a variety of sequence data. For comparing polygonal curves $π, σ$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, it provides a robust, outlier-insensitive alternative to the Fréchet distance. However, like the Fréchet distance, the DTW distance is not invariant under translations. Can we efficiently optimize the DTW distance of $π$ and $σ$ under arbitrary translations, to compare the curves' shape irrespective of their absolute location? There are surprisingly few works in this direction, which may be due to its computational intricacy: For the Euclidean norm, this problem contains as a special case the geometric median problem, which provably admits no exact algebraic algorithm (that is, no algorithm using only addition, multiplication, and $k$-th roots). We thus investigate exact algorithms for non-Euclidean norms as well as approximation algorithms for the Euclidean norm: - For the $L_1$ norm in $\mathbb{R}^d$, we provide an $\mathcal{O}(n^{2(d+1)})$-time algorithm, i.e., an exact polynomial-time algorithm for constant $d$. Here and below, $n$ bounds the curves' complexities. - For the Euclidean norm in $\mathbb{R}^2$, we show that a simple problem-specific insight leads to a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation in time $\mathcal{O}(n^3/\varepsilon^2)$. We then show how to obtain a subcubic $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^{2.5}/\varepsilon^2)$ time algorithm with significant new ideas; this time comes close to the well-known quadratic time barrier for computing DTW for fixed translations. Technically, the algorithm is obtained by speeding up repeated DTW distance estimations using a dynamic data structure for maintaining shortest paths in weighted planar digraphs. Crucially, we show how to traverse a candidate set of translations using space-filling curves in a way that incurs only few updates to the data structure.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2022

Towards Sub-Quadratic Diameter Computation in Geometric Intersection Graphs

We initiate the study of diameter computation in geometric intersection graphs from the fine-grained complexity perspective. A geometric intersection graph is a graph whose vertices correspond to some shapes in $d$-dimensional Euclidean space, such as balls, segments, or hypercubes, and whose edges correspond to pairs of intersecting shapes. The diameter of a graph is the largest distance realized by a pair of vertices in the graph. Computing the diameter in near-quadratic time is possible in several classes of intersection graphs [Chan and Skrepetos 2019], but it is not at all clear if these algorithms are optimal, especially since in the related class of planar graphs the diameter can be computed in $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^{5/3})$ time [Cabello 2019, Gawrychowski et al. 2021]. In this work we (conditionally) rule out sub-quadratic algorithms in several classes of intersection graphs, i.e., algorithms of running time $\mathcal{O}(n^{2-δ})$ for some $δ>0$. In particular, there are no sub-quadratic algorithms already for fat objects in small dimensions: unit balls in $\mathbb{R}^3$ or congruent equilateral triangles in $\mathbb{R}^2$. For unit segments and congruent equilateral triangles, we can even rule out strong sub-quadratic approximations already in $\mathbb{R}^2$. It seems that the hardness of approximation may also depend on dimensionality: for axis-parallel unit hypercubes in~$\mathbb{R}^{12}$, distinguishing between diameter 2 and 3 needs quadratic time (ruling out $(3/2-\varepsilon)$- approximations), whereas for axis-parallel unit squares, we give an algorithm that distinguishes between diameter $2$ and $3$ in near-linear time. Note that many of our lower bounds match the best known algorithms up to sub-polynomial factors.

cs.CG↗