arXiv subjects

Karl Bringmann

Publications and source records attributed to Karl Bringmann.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

arXiv2021

Tight Bounds for Approximate Near Neighbor Searching for Time Series under the Fréchet Distance

We study the $c$-approximate near neighbor problem under the continuous Fréchet distance: Given a set of $n$ polygonal curves with $m$ vertices, a radius $δ> 0$, and a parameter $k \leq m$, we want to preprocess the curves into a data structure that, given a query curve $q$ with $k$ vertices, either returns an input curve with Fréchet distance at most $c\cdot δ$ to $q$, or returns that there exists no input curve with Fréchet distance at most $δ$ to $q$. We focus on the case where the input and the queries are one-dimensional polygonal curves -- also called time series -- and we give a comprehensive analysis for this case. We obtain new upper bounds that provide different tradeoffs between approximation factor, preprocessing time, and query time. Our data structures improve upon the state of the art in several ways. We show that for any $0 < \varepsilon \leq 1$ an approximation factor of $(1+\varepsilon)$ can be achieved within the same asymptotic time bounds as the previously best result for $(2+\varepsilon)$. Moreover, we show that an approximation factor of $(2+\varepsilon)$ can be obtained by using preprocessing time and space $O(nm)$, which is linear in the input size, and query time in $O(\frac{1}{\varepsilon})^{k+2}$, where the previously best result used preprocessing time in $n \cdot O(\frac{m}{\varepsilon k})^k$ and query time in $O(1)^k$. We complement our upper bounds with matching conditional lower bounds based on the Orthogonal Vectors Hypothesis. Interestingly, some of our lower bounds already hold for any super-constant value of $k$. This is achieved by proving hardness of a one-sided sparse version of the Orthogonal Vectors problem as an intermediate problem, which we believe to be of independent interest.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2021

Fine-Grained Complexity Theory: Conditional Lower Bounds for Computational Geometry

Fine-grained complexity theory is the area of theoretical computer science that proves conditional lower bounds based on the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis and similar conjectures. This area has been thriving in the last decade, leading to conditionally best-possible algorithms for a wide variety of problems on graphs, strings, numbers etc. This article is an introduction to fine-grained lower bounds in computational geometry, with a focus on lower bounds for polynomial-time problems based on the Orthogonal Vectors Hypothesis. Specifically, we discuss conditional lower bounds for nearest neighbor search under the Euclidean distance and Fréchet distance.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2021

Fréchet Distance Under Translation: Conditional Hardness and an Algorithm via Offline Dynamic Grid Reachability

The discrete Fréchet distance is a popular measure for comparing polygonal curves. An important variant is the discrete Fréchet distance under translation, which enables detection of similar movement patterns in different spatial domains. For polygonal curves of length $n$ in the plane, the fastest known algorithm runs in time $\tilde{\cal O}(n^{5})$ [Ben Avraham, Kaplan, Sharir '15]. This is achieved by constructing an arrangement of disks of size ${\cal O}(n^{4})$, and then traversing its faces while updating reachability in a directed grid graph of size $N := {\cal O}(n^2)$, which can be done in time $\tilde{\cal O}(\sqrt{N})$ per update [Diks, Sankowski '07]. The contribution of this paper is two-fold. First, although it is an open problem to solve dynamic reachability in directed grid graphs faster than $\tilde{\cal O}(\sqrt{N})$, we improve this part of the algorithm: We observe that an offline variant of dynamic $s$-$t$-reachability in directed grid graphs suffices, and we solve this variant in amortized time $\tilde{\cal O}(N^{1/3})$ per update, resulting in an improved running time of $\tilde{\cal O}(n^{4.66...})$ for the discrete Fréchet distance under translation. Second, we provide evidence that constructing the arrangement of size ${\cal O}(n^{4})$ is necessary in the worst case, by proving a conditional lower bound of $n^{4 - o(1)}$ on the running time for the discrete Fréchet distance under translation, assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Deterministic and Las Vegas Algorithms for Sparse Nonnegative Convolution

Computing the convolution $A\star B$ of two length-$n$ integer vectors $A,B$ is a core problem in several disciplines. It frequently comes up in algorithms for Knapsack, $k$-SUM, All-Pairs Shortest Paths, and string pattern matching problems. For these applications it typically suffices to compute convolutions of nonnegative vectors. This problem can be classically solved in time $O(n\log n)$ using the Fast Fourier Transform. However, often the involved vectors are sparse and hence one could hope for output-sensitive algorithms to compute nonnegative convolutions. This question was raised by Muthukrishnan and solved by Cole and Hariharan (STOC '02) by a randomized algorithm running in near-linear time in the (unknown) output-size $t$. Chan and Lewenstein (STOC '15) presented a deterministic algorithm with a $2^{O(\sqrt{\log t\cdot\log\log n})}$ overhead in running time and the additional assumption that a small superset of the output is given; this assumption was later removed by Bringmann and Nakos (ICALP '21). In this paper we present the first deterministic near-linear-time algorithm for computing sparse nonnegative convolutions. This immediately gives improved deterministic algorithms for the state-of-the-art of output-sensitive Subset Sum, block-mass pattern matching, $N$-fold Boolean convolution, and others, matching up to log-factors the fastest known randomized algorithms for these problems. Our algorithm is a blend of algebraic and combinatorial ideas and techniques. Additionally, we provide two fast Las Vegas algorithms for computing sparse nonnegative convolutions. In particular, we present a simple $O(t\log^2t)$ time algorithm, which is an accessible alternative to Cole and Hariharan's algorithm. We further refine this new algorithm to run in Las Vegas time $O(t\log t\cdot\log\log t)$, matching the running time of the dense case apart from the $\log\log t$ factor.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Fine-Grained Completeness for Optimization in P

We initiate the study of fine-grained completeness theorems for exact and approximate optimization in the polynomial-time regime. Inspired by the first completeness results for decision problems in P (Gao, Impagliazzo, Kolokolova, Williams, TALG 2019) as well as the classic class MaxSNP and MaxSNP-completeness for NP optimization problems (Papadimitriou, Yannakakis, JCSS 1991), we define polynomial-time analogues MaxSP and MinSP, which contain a number of natural optimization problems in P, including Maximum Inner Product, general forms of nearest neighbor search and optimization variants of the $k$-XOR problem. Specifically, we define MaxSP as the class of problems definable as $\max_{x_1,\dots,x_k} \#\{ (y_1,\dots,y_\ell) : ϕ(x_1,\dots,x_k, y_1,\dots,y_\ell) \}$, where $ϕ$ is a quantifier-free first-order property over a given relational structure (with MinSP defined analogously). On $m$-sized structures, we can solve each such problem in time $O(m^{k+\ell-1})$. Our results are: - We determine (a sparse variant of) the Maximum/Minimum Inner Product problem as complete under *deterministic* fine-grained reductions: A strongly subquadratic algorithm for Maximum/Minimum Inner Product would beat the baseline running time of $O(m^{k+\ell-1})$ for *all* problems in MaxSP/MinSP by a polynomial factor. - This completeness transfers to approximation: Maximum/Minimum Inner Product is also complete in the sense that a strongly subquadratic $c$-approximation would give a $(c+\varepsilon)$-approximation for all MaxSP/MinSP problems in time $O(m^{k+\ell-1-δ})$, where $\varepsilon > 0$ can be chosen arbitrarily small. Combining our completeness with~(Chen, Williams, SODA 2019), we obtain the perhaps surprising consequence that refuting the OV Hypothesis is *equivalent* to giving a $O(1)$-approximation for all MinSP problems in faster-than-$O(m^{k+\ell-1})$ time.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

A Linear-Time $n^{0.4}$-Approximation for Longest Common Subsequence

We consider the classic problem of computing the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) of two strings of length $n$. While a simple quadratic algorithm has been known for the problem for more than 40 years, no faster algorithm has been found despite an extensive effort. The lack of progress on the problem has recently been explained by Abboud, Backurs, and Vassilevska Williams [FOCS'15] and Bringmann and Künnemann [FOCS'15] who proved that there is no subquadratic algorithm unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. This has led the community to look for subquadratic approximation algorithms for the problem. Yet, unlike the edit distance problem for which a constant-factor approximation in almost-linear time is known, very little progress has been made on LCS, making it a notoriously difficult problem also in the realm of approximation. For the general setting, only a naive $O(n^{\varepsilon/2})$-approximation algorithm with running time $\tilde{O}(n^{2-\varepsilon})$ has been known, for any constant $0 < \varepsilon \le 1$. Recently, a breakthrough result by Hajiaghayi, Seddighin, Seddighin, and Sun [SODA'19] provided a linear-time algorithm that yields a $O(n^{0.497956})$-approximation in expectation; improving upon the naive $O(\sqrt{n})$-approximation for the first time. In this paper, we provide an algorithm that in time $O(n^{2-\varepsilon})$ computes an $\tilde{O}(n^{2\varepsilon/5})$-approximation with high probability, for any $0 < \varepsilon \le 1$. Our result (1) gives an $\tilde{O}(n^{0.4})$-approximation in linear time, improving upon the bound of Hajiaghayi, Seddighin, Seddighin, and Sun, (2) provides an algorithm whose approximation scales with any subquadratic running time $O(n^{2-\varepsilon})$, improving upon the naive bound of $O(n^{\varepsilon/2})$ for any $\varepsilon$, and (3) instead of only in expectation, succeeds with high probability.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Sparse Nonnegative Convolution Is Equivalent to Dense Nonnegative Convolution

Computing the convolution $A\star B$ of two length-$n$ vectors $A,B$ is an ubiquitous computational primitive. Applications range from string problems to Knapsack-type problems, and from 3SUM to All-Pairs Shortest Paths. These applications often come in the form of nonnegative convolution, where the entries of $A,B$ are nonnegative integers. The classical algorithm to compute $A\star B$ uses the Fast Fourier Transform and runs in time $O(n\log n)$. However, often $A$ and $B$ satisfy sparsity conditions, and hence one could hope for significant improvements. The ideal goal is an $O(k\log k)$-time algorithm, where $k$ is the number of non-zero elements in the output, i.e., the size of the support of $A\star B$. This problem is referred to as sparse nonnegative convolution, and has received considerable attention in the literature; the fastest algorithms to date run in time $O(k\log^2 n)$. The main result of this paper is the first $O(k\log k)$-time algorithm for sparse nonnegative convolution. Our algorithm is randomized and assumes that the length $n$ and the largest entry of $A$ and $B$ are subexponential in $k$. Surprisingly, we can phrase our algorithm as a reduction from the sparse case to the dense case of nonnegative convolution, showing that, under some mild assumptions, sparse nonnegative convolution is equivalent to dense nonnegative convolution for constant-error randomized algorithms. Specifically, if $D(n)$ is the time to convolve two nonnegative length-$n$ vectors with success probability $2/3$, and $S(k)$ is the time to convolve two nonnegative vectors with output size $k$ with success probability $2/3$, then $S(k)=O(D(k)+k(\log\log k)^2)$. Our approach uses a variety of new techniques in combination with some old machinery from linear sketching and structured linear algebra, as well as new insights on linear hashing, the most classical hash function.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Current Algorithms for Detecting Subgraphs of Bounded Treewidth are Probably Optimal

The Subgraph Isomorphism problem is of considerable importance in computer science. We examine the problem when the pattern graph H is of bounded treewidth, as occurs in a variety of applications. This problem has a well-known algorithm via color-coding that runs in time $O(n^{tw(H)+1})$ [Alon, Yuster, Zwick'95], where $n$ is the number of vertices of the host graph $G$. While there are pattern graphs known for which Subgraph Isomorphism can be solved in an improved running time of $O(n^{tw(H)+1-\varepsilon})$ or even faster (e.g. for $k$-cliques), it is not known whether such improvements are possible for all patterns. The only known lower bound rules out time $n^{o(tw(H) / \log(tw(H)))}$ for any class of patterns of unbounded treewidth assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis [Marx'07]. In this paper, we demonstrate the existence of maximally hard pattern graphs $H$ that require time $n^{tw(H)+1-o(1)}$. Specifically, under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH), a standard assumption from fine-grained complexity theory, we prove the following asymptotic statement for large treewidth $t$: For any $\varepsilon > 0$ there exists $t \ge 3$ and a pattern graph $H$ of treewidth $t$ such that Subgraph Isomorphism on pattern $H$ has no algorithm running in time $O(n^{t+1-\varepsilon})$. Under the more recent 3-uniform Hyperclique hypothesis, we even obtain tight lower bounds for each specific treewidth $t \ge 3$: For any $t \ge 3$ there exists a pattern graph $H$ of treewidth $t$ such that for any $\varepsilon>0$ Subgraph Isomorphism on pattern $H$ has no algorithm running in time $O(n^{t+1-\varepsilon})$. In addition to these main results, we explore (1) colored and uncolored problem variants (and why they are equivalent for most cases), (2) Subgraph Isomorphism for $tw < 3$, (3) Subgraph Isomorphism parameterized by pathwidth, and (4) a weighted problem variant.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Fast $n$-fold Boolean Convolution via Additive Combinatorics

We consider the problem of computing the Boolean convolution (with wraparound) of $n$~vectors of dimension $m$, or, equivalently, the problem of computing the sumset $A_1+A_2+\ldots+A_n$ for $A_1,\ldots,A_n \subseteq \mathbb{Z}_m$. Boolean convolution formalizes the frequent task of combining two subproblems, where the whole problem has a solution of size $k$ if for some $i$ the first subproblem has a solution of size~$i$ and the second subproblem has a solution of size $k-i$. Our problem formalizes a natural generalization, namely combining solutions of $n$ subproblems subject to a modular constraint. This simultaneously generalises Modular Subset Sum and Boolean Convolution (Sumset Computation). Although nearly optimal algorithms are known for special cases of this problem, not even tiny improvements are known for the general case. We almost resolve the computational complexity of this problem, shaving essentially a factor of $n$ from the running time of previous algorithms. Specifically, we present a \emph{deterministic} algorithm running in \emph{almost} linear time with respect to the input plus output size $k$. We also present a \emph{Las Vegas} algorithm running in \emph{nearly} linear expected time with respect to the input plus output size $k$. Previously, no deterministic or randomized $o(nk)$ algorithm was known. At the heart of our approach lies a careful usage of Kneser's theorem from Additive Combinatorics, and a new deterministic almost linear output-sensitive algorithm for non-negative sparse convolution. In total, our work builds a solid toolbox that could be of independent interest.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

SETH-Based Lower Bounds for Subset Sum and Bicriteria Path

Subset-Sum and k-SAT are two of the most extensively studied problems in computer science, and conjectures about their hardness are among the cornerstones of fine-grained complexity. One of the most intriguing open problems in this area is to base the hardness of one of these problems on the other. Our main result is a tight reduction from k-SAT to Subset-Sum on dense instances, proving that Bellman's 1962 pseudo-polynomial $O^{*}(T)$-time algorithm for Subset-Sum on $n$ numbers and target $T$ cannot be improved to time $T^{1-\varepsilon}\cdot 2^{o(n)}$ for any $\varepsilon>0$, unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) fails. This is one of the strongest known connections between any two of the core problems of fine-grained complexity. As a corollary, we prove a "Direct-OR" theorem for Subset-Sum under SETH, offering a new tool for proving conditional lower bounds: It is now possible to assume that deciding whether one out of $N$ given instances of Subset-Sum is a YES instance requires time $(N T)^{1-o(1)}$. As an application of this corollary, we prove a tight SETH-based lower bound for the classical Bicriteria s,t-Path problem, which is extensively studied in Operations Research. We separate its complexity from that of Subset-Sum: On graphs with $m$ edges and edge lengths bounded by $L$, we show that the $O(Lm)$ pseudo-polynomial time algorithm by Joksch from 1966 cannot be improved to $\tilde{O}(L+m)$, in contrast to a recent improvement for Subset Sum (Bringmann, SODA 2017).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

A PTAS for $\ell_p$-Low Rank Approximation

A number of recent works have studied algorithms for entrywise $\ell_p$-low rank approximation, namely, algorithms which given an $n \times d$ matrix $A$ (with $n \geq d$), output a rank-$k$ matrix $B$ minimizing $\|A-B\|_p^p=\sum_{i,j}|A_{i,j}-B_{i,j}|^p$ when $p > 0$; and $\|A-B\|_0=\sum_{i,j}[A_{i,j}\neq B_{i,j}]$ for $p=0$. On the algorithmic side, for $p \in (0,2)$, we give the first $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm running in time $n^{\text{poly}(k/ε)}$. Further, for $p = 0$, we give the first almost-linear time approximation scheme for what we call the Generalized Binary $\ell_0$-Rank-$k$ problem. Our algorithm computes $(1+ε)$-approximation in time $(1/ε)^{2^{O(k)}/ε^{2}} \cdot nd^{1+o(1)}$. On the hardness of approximation side, for $p \in (1,2)$, assuming the Small Set Expansion Hypothesis and the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), we show that there exists $δ:= δ(α) > 0$ such that the entrywise $\ell_p$-Rank-$k$ problem has no $α$-approximation algorithm running in time $2^{k^δ}$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Fast and Simple Modular Subset Sum

We revisit the Subset Sum problem over the finite cyclic group $\mathbb{Z}_m$ for some given integer $m$. A series of recent works has provided near-optimal algorithms for this problem under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. Koiliaris and Xu (SODA'17, TALG'19) gave a deterministic algorithm running in time $\tilde{O}(m^{5/4})$, which was later improved to $O(m \log^7 m)$ randomized time by Axiotis et al. (SODA'19). In this work, we present two simple algorithms for the Modular Subset Sum problem running in near-linear time in $m$, both efficiently implementing Bellman's iteration over $\mathbb{Z}_m$. The first one is a randomized algorithm running in time $O(m \log^2 m)$, that is based solely on rolling hash and an elementary data-structure for prefix sums; to illustrate its simplicity we provide a short and efficient implementation of the algorithm in Python. Our second solution is a deterministic algorithm running in time $O(m\ \mathrm{polylog}\ m)$, that uses dynamic data structures for string manipulation. We further show that the techniques developed in this work can also lead to simple algorithms for the All Pairs Non-Decreasing Paths Problem (APNP) on undirected graphs, matching the near-optimal running time of $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ provided in the recent work of Duan et al. (ICALP'19).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Impossibility Results for Grammar-Compressed Linear Algebra

To handle vast amounts of data, it is natural and popular to compress vectors and matrices. When we compress a vector from size $N$ down to size $n \ll N$, it certainly makes it easier to store and transmit efficiently, but does it also make it easier to process? In this paper we consider lossless compression schemes, and ask if we can run our computations on the compressed data as efficiently as if the original data was that small. That is, if an operation has time complexity $T(\rm{inputsize})$, can we perform it on the compressed representation in time $T(n)$ rather than $T(N)$? We consider the most basic linear algebra operations: inner product, matrix-vector multiplication, and matrix multiplication. In particular, given two compressed vectors, can we compute their inner product in time $O(n)$? Or perhaps we must decompress first and then multiply, spending $Ω(N)$ time? The answer depends on the compression scheme. While for simple ones such as Run-Length-Encoding (RLE) the inner product can be done in $O(n)$ time, we prove that this is impossible for compressions from a richer class: essentially $n^2$ or even larger runtimes are needed in the worst case (under complexity assumptions). This is the class of grammar-compressions containing most popular methods such as the Lempel-Ziv family. These schemes are more compressing than the simple RLE, but alas, we prove that performing computations on them is much harder.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2020

A Fine-Grained Perspective on Approximating Subset Sum and Partition

Approximating Subset Sum is a classic and fundamental problem in computer science and mathematical optimization. The state-of-the-art approximation scheme for Subset Sum computes a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation in time $\tilde{O}(\min\{n/\varepsilon, n+1/\varepsilon^2\})$ [Gens, Levner'78, Kellerer et al.'97]. In particular, a $(1-1/n)$-approximation can be computed in time $O(n^2)$. We establish a connection to Min-Plus-Convolution, a problem that is of particular interest in fine-grained complexity theory and can be solved naively in time $O(n^2)$. Our main result is that computing a $(1-1/n)$-approximation for Subset Sum is subquadratically equivalent to Min-Plus-Convolution. Thus, assuming the Min-Plus-Convolution conjecture from fine-grained complexity theory, there is no approximation scheme for Subset Sum with strongly subquadratic dependence on $n$ and $1/\varepsilon$. In the other direction, our reduction allows us to transfer known lower order improvements from Min-Plus-Convolution to Subset Sum, which yields a mildly subquadratic randomized approximation scheme. This adds the first approximation problem to the list of problems that are equivalent to Min-Plus-Convolution. For the related Partition problem, an important special case of Subset Sum, the state of the art is a randomized approximation scheme running in time $\tilde{O}(n+1/\varepsilon^{5/3})$ [Mucha~et~al.'19]. We adapt our reduction from Subset Sum to Min-Plus-Convolution to obtain a related reduction from Partition to Min-Plus-Convolution. This yields an improved approximation scheme for Partition running in time $\tilde{O}(n + 1/\varepsilon^{3/2})$. Our algorithm is the first deterministic approximation scheme for Partition that breaks the quadratic barrier.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

On Near-Linear-Time Algorithms for Dense Subset Sum

In the Subset Sum problem we are given a set of $n$ positive integers $X$ and a target $t$ and are asked whether some subset of $X$ sums to $t$. Natural parameters for this problem that have been studied in the literature are $n$ and $t$ as well as the maximum input number $\rm{mx}_X$ and the sum of all input numbers $Σ_X$. In this paper we study the dense case of Subset Sum, where all these parameters are polynomial in $n$. In this regime, standard pseudo-polynomial algorithms solve Subset Sum in polynomial time $n^{O(1)}$. Our main question is: When can dense Subset Sum be solved in near-linear time $\tilde{O}(n)$? We provide an essentially complete dichotomy by designing improved algorithms and proving conditional lower bounds, thereby determining essentially all settings of the parameters $n,t,\rm{mx}_X,Σ_X$ for which dense Subset Sum is in time $\tilde{O}(n)$. For notational convenience we assume without loss of generality that $t \ge \rm{mx}_X$ (as larger numbers can be ignored) and $t \le Σ_X/2$ (using symmetry). Then our dichotomy reads as follows: - By reviving and improving an additive-combinatorics-based approach by Galil and Margalit [SICOMP'91], we show that Subset Sum is in near-linear time $\tilde{O}(n)$ if $t \gg \rm{mx}_X Σ_X/n^2$. - We prove a matching conditional lower bound: If Subset Sum is in near-linear time for any setting with $t \ll \rm{mx}_X Σ_X/n^2$, then the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis and the Strong k-Sum Hypothesis fail. We also generalize our algorithm from sets to multi-sets, albeit with non-matching upper and lower bounds.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

When Lipschitz Walks Your Dog: Algorithm Engineering of the Discrete Fréchet Distance under Translation

Consider the natural question of how to measure the similarity of curves in the plane by a quantity that is invariant under translations of the curves. Such a measure is justified whenever we aim to quantify the similarity of the curves' shapes rather than their positioning in the plane, e.g., to compare the similarity of handwritten characters. Perhaps the most natural such notion is the (discrete) Fréchet distance under translation. Unfortunately, the algorithmic literature on this problem yields a very pessimistic view: On polygonal curves with $n$ vertices, the fastest algorithm runs in time $O(n^{4.667})$ and cannot be improved below $n^{4-o(1)}$ unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. Can we still obtain an implementation that is efficient on realistic datasets? Spurred by the surprising performance of recent implementations for the Fréchet distance, we perform algorithm engineering for the Fréchet distance under translation. Our solution combines fast, but inexact tools from continuous optimization (specifically, branch-and-bound algorithms for global Lipschitz optimization) with exact, but expensive algorithms from computational geometry (specifically, problem-specific algorithms based on an arrangement construction). We combine these two ingredients to obtain an exact decision algorithm for the Fréchet distance under translation. For the related task of computing the distance value up to a desired precision, we engineer and compare different methods. On a benchmark set involving handwritten characters and route trajectories, our implementation answers a typical query for either task in the range of a few milliseconds up to a second on standard desktop hardware. We believe that our implementation will enable the use of the Fréchet distance under translation in applications, whereas previous approaches would have been computationally infeasible.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2020

Scheduling Lower Bounds via AND Subset Sum

Given $N$ instances $(X_1,t_1),\ldots,(X_N,t_N)$ of Subset Sum, the AND Subset Sum problem asks to determine whether all of these instances are yes-instances; that is, whether each set of integers $X_i$ has a subset that sums up to the target integer $t_i$. We prove that this problem cannot be solved in time $\tilde{O}((N \cdot t_{max})^{1-ε})$, for $t_{max}=\max_i t_i$ and any $ε> 0$, assuming the $\forall \exists$ Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis ($\forall \exists$-SETH). We then use this result to exclude $\tilde{O}(n+P_{max} \cdot n^{1-ε})$-time algorithms for several scheduling problems on $n$ jobs with maximum processing time $P_{max}$, based on $\forall \exists$-SETH. These include classical problems such as $1||\sum w_jU_j$, the problem of minimizing the total weight of tardy jobs on a single machine, and $P_2||\sum U_j$, the problem of minimizing the number of tardy jobs on two identical parallel machines.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Faster Minimization of Tardy Processing Time on a Single Machine

This paper is concerned with the $1||\sum p_jU_j$ problem, the problem of minimizing the total processing time of tardy jobs on a single machine. This is not only a fundamental scheduling problem, but also a very important problem from a theoretical point of view as it generalizes the Subset Sum problem and is closely related to the 0/1-Knapsack problem. The problem is well-known to be NP-hard, but only in a weak sense, meaning it admits pseudo-polynomial time algorithms. The fastest known pseudo-polynomial time algorithm for the problem is the famous Lawler and Moore algorithm which runs in $O(P \cdot n)$ time, where $P$ is the total processing time of all $n$ jobs in the input. This algorithm has been developed in the late 60s, and has yet to be improved to date. In this paper we develop two new algorithms for $1||\sum p_jU_j$, each improving on Lawler and Moore's algorithm in a different scenario. Both algorithms rely on basic primitive operations between sets of integers and vectors of integers for the speedup in their running times. The second algorithm relies on fast polynomial multiplication as its main engine, while for the first algorithm we define a new "skewed" version of $(\max,\min)$-convolution which is interesting in its own right.

cs.DS↗