arXiv subjects

Kathryn Newman

Publications and source records attributed to Kathryn Newman.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

WP-MIP: An Artificial Intelligence, Hybrid, and Physically Based Model Intercomparison Project for Weather Prediction

Rapid progress in the field of machine-learning for weather prediction has led to the emergence of algorithms whose forecasting skill can exceed that of traditional physically based models. This development represents an opportunity to improve the quality of forecasting services provided by operational centers, particularly given the speed at which machine-learning based models generate predictions. Despite the clear promise of these systems, questions remain about the ability of the current generation of machine-learning models to generate physically consistent predictions of the full suite of required forecast fields under all conditions. Answering these questions will require careful comparisons between the well-understood physically based models, current state-of-the-art machine-learning models, and the hybrid models that combine elements of these two archetypes. The Weather Prediction Model Intercomparison Project (WP-MIP) is a World Meteorological Organization-supported initiative whose initial goal is to create a centralized database of physically based, machine-learning, and hybrid model forecasts to enable a distributed assessment and evaluation effort. The first instance of WP-MIP focuses on global deterministic predictions using both center-specific and common initializations to facilitate sensitivity studies. Forecasts contributed by institutions across six continents will be used to develop AI-ready verification techniques that highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each class of prediction system, with the goal of establishing best-practice guidance to model developers and national weather centers. The broad engagement of the operational and forecast-evaluation communities in WP-MIP will ensure that the project results are highly relevant to the development and deployment of next-generation weather prediction systems.

physics.ao-ph↗

arXiv2026

AI-Based Regional Emulation for Kilometer-Scale Dynamical Downscaling

An AI-based Limited-Area Model (LAM) is developed for dynamical downscaling over the Southern Great Plains and the southeastern United States, with strong generalization abilities under diverse boundary conditions. The model is trained using 0.25-degree, 3-hourly ERA5 as forcings and CONUS404 as targets in 1980--2019, producing 4-km, hourly dynamical downscaling outputs; it is also connected to a post-processing model to derive additional diagnostic variables. The model is evaluated across multiple forcing datasets, time periods, and climate regimes. For present-day downscaling in the 2021--2024 water years, the model produces stable multi-year simulations with no unrealistic drift; its deterministic verification scores are comparable to other weather-forecasting-oriented AI models. The model also generalizes robustly to a 1.0-degree, 6-hourly non-ERA5 forcing dataset, yielding only minor performance changes. Frontal cyclone and hurricane case studies further demonstrate that the model reconstructs realistic, interpretable weather-scale dynamical and thermodynamic structure from coarse boundary information. The AI-based LAM is further tested by downscaling 30-year global climate model runs in 1980--2010 and 2070--2100, and climate model ensembles in 2025-2027. In this application, the model remains stable at hourly downscaling frequencies for all 30 years and effectively captures future climate-change signals, indicating meaningful generalization across different climate regimes. When downscaling ensembles, the model produces well-posed ensemble distributions without collapsing the ensemble spread. Overall, the AI-based LAM of this study offers good downscaling performance and generalization abilities. It provides a practical and transferable example of adapting AI weather prediction models for regional climate applications.

physics.ao-ph↗

arXiv2026

How different are deterministic physics suites when coupled to fixed model dynamics and why?

It is often difficult to attribute uncertainty and errors in atmospheric models to designated model components. This is because sub-grid parameterised processes interact strongly with the large-scale transport represented by the explicit model dynamics. We carry out experiments with prescribed large-scale dynamics and different sub-grid physics suites. This dataset has been constructed for the Model Uncertainty Model Intercomparison Project (MUMIP), in which each suite forecasts sub-grid tendencies at a 22km grid. The common dynamics is derived from a convection-permitting benchmark: an ICON DYAMOND experiment (2.5km grid). We compare four different physics suites for atmospheric models in an Indian Ocean experiment. We analyse their joint PDFs of precipitation and associated physics tendencies for a full month. Precipitation is selected because it is a dominant uncertainty in the models that redistributes large amounts of heat. We find that all physics suites produce very similar precipitation amounts, with very high correlations between models, which exceed 0.95 at the native grid. However, the convection-permitting benchmark is more dissimilar from each of the physics suites, with correlations of $\approx$0.80. Similarly, we show that the vertically averaged physics tendencies in the free-troposphere are highly similar between the four physics suites, yet different if reconstructed for the benchmark. The water vapour sink is very closely linked with precipitation in the four physics suites. This suggests that the coarse-grid models are overconfident. We hypothese is that variation in unresolved convective structures can lead to variation in the dynamics, following a given amount of latent heating at fine grids, but not in our physics suites. The abstract length limit of ArXiv requires you to proceed in the PDF.

physics.ao-ph↗