Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

László Csató

Publications and source records attributed to László Csató.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

On the fairness of single round-robin tournaments: Evidence from European football

Single round-robin tournaments are widely regarded as unfair because of their home-away imbalance: some competitors play more home games than the others. Therefore, most sports leagues are played in a double round-robin format. However, some European football leagues contain a single round-robin (sub)tournament. To test whether empirical data can validate their unfairness, we construct a unique database and develop a strength of schedule metric based on Elo ratings with favourable theoretical properties. In contrast to the robust impact of relative team strength, the strength of schedule is found to have no significant effect on the number of points scored under the assumption of a league-specific home advantage. Consequently, the theoretical unfairness is not a serious issue in practice, or the standard approach of modelling home advantage in Elo ratings might need to be reconsidered.

econ.EM↗

Encouraging offensive play: A hidden benefit of incomplete round-robin tournaments

The Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) fundamentally reformed its club competitions from the 2024/25 season onward. The traditional group stage has been replaced by an incomplete round-robin league phase, in which all teams are ranked in a single table based on matches played against a subset of the other teams. Early evidence from the first two seasons of the UEFA Champions League in the new format indicates a marked decline in the proportion of drawn matches compared to the old format. Inspired by this observation, our paper examines how tournament design shapes the incentives to play offensively. We develop a simulation framework to compare the marginal gain from scoring a goal and loss from conceding a goal in terms of the probability of reaching critical ranking thresholds, using the initial scoreline of 0-0 as the reference point. We find robustly stronger incentives for offensive play in the new Champions League design. Roughly half of the increase is attributable to the modified thresholds, but the other half stems directly from replacing the group stage with an incomplete round-robin league. Our study is the first demonstration in the literature that the tournament format can materially affect team behaviour on the field.

econ.GN↗

The efficacy-competitiveness frontier in the Swiss system

An ideal tournament is both efficacious and attractive: it selects the best player as the winner, but only at the end of the tournament in order to maintain suspense as long as possible. We identify and explore the trade-off between these criteria in Swiss-system chess team tournaments via simulations. Organising more rounds is shown to improve efficacy but increase the probability of a stakeless last round. The 2008 reform in the Chess Olympiad ranking is found to be a questionable move, as the previous rule based on board points determines the efficacy-competitiveness frontier, regardless of whether two or three points are awarded for winning a match. Combining board points and match points is better than using match points only. Our results can help optimise the design of the Swiss system, which, besides chess, is also widely used in e-sports.

physics.soc-ph↗

Match forecasts in UEFA club competitions: Elo ratings versus Transfermarkt valuations

The pre-season strengths of European football clubs are usually measured by two proxies in the literature. Football Club Elo Ratings provide strictly performance-based Elo ratings from the early days of the European Cups, while Transfermarkt valuations are crowd-based estimates of squad market values. This paper compares them by evaluating their ability to forecast the results of matches played in the UEFA Champions League and the UEFA Europa League between the seasons 2020/21 and 2024/25. The two indicators yield almost identical out-of-sample accuracy when used separately. Combining the two measures leads to a modest improvement, but the best aggregation procedure is sensitive to the forecast target. Our results suggest that seeding based on Elo ratings would be (closely) optimal.

econ.EM↗

A probabilistic match classification model for low-scoring sports

All existing match classification models in the tournament design literature suffer from two major limitations: a contestant is considered indifferent only if uncertain future results do never affect its prize, and competitive matches are not distinguished with respect to the incentives of the contestants. We propose a probabilistic framework to address both issues. For each match, our approach relies on simulating all other matches played simultaneously or later to compute the qualifying probabilities for the three main outcomes (win, draw, loss), thereby classifying each match into six categories. The suggested model is applied to the last round of the previous group stage and the new incomplete round-robin league, introduced in the 2024/25 season of UEFA club competitions. The incomplete round-robin tournament is found to contain fewer unimportant matches with two indifferent teams, and substantially more matches where both teams should play offensively. However, the robustly higher proportion of potentially collusive matches can threaten with serious scandals.

physics.soc-ph↗

Theoretical properties of the eigenvector method

A classical proposal to derive weights from a pairwise comparison matrix is the right eigenvector. The literature has identified some potential weaknesses of this method in previous decades. This chapter discusses five of these issues. First, right-left asymmetry emerges because of the difference between the right and inverse left eigenvectors. Second, group incoherence for choice means that, in group decision-making problems, the ranking given by the aggregated individual weight vectors is not guaranteed to coincide with the ranking derived from the aggregated pairwise comparison matrix. Third, the ranking based on the right eigenvector may depend on the intensity of the preferences, represented by taking a positive power of all comparisons. Fourth, both the ranking position and the normalised weight of an object might change counter-intuitively after modifying a particular comparison. Fifth, the right eigenvector is not necessarily Pareto efficient: a dominating weight vector that approximates each pairwise comparison at least as well, with an improvement in at least one position, could exist. All violations of the theoretical properties are highlighted by illustrative examples. We also present several open questions in order to inspire future research.

math.OC↗

Incomplete pairwise comparison matrices and their applications

Incomplete pairwise comparison matrices are increasingly employed to save resources and reduce cognitive load by collecting only a subset of all possible pairwise comparisons. We present their graph representation and some completion algorithms, including the incomplete eigenvector and incomplete logarithmic least squares methods, as well as a lexicographical minimisation of triad inconsistencies. The issue of ordinal violations is discussed for matrices generated by directed acyclic graphs and the best--worst method. We also show a reasonable approach to generalise the inconsistency threshold based on the dominant eigenvalue to the incomplete case, and state recent results on the optimal order of obtaining pairwise comparisons. The benefits of using incomplete pairwise comparisons are highlighted by several applications.

math.OC↗

Ranking-based competitive balance measures in Formula One

Competitiveness in racing sports can be measured by comparing the start and finish rankings within races, as well as the start and finish rankings across races in a season. Since the importance of position changes is non-uniform and variance at the top of the ranking is more interesting than at the bottom of the ranking, we propose using weighted distances for this purpose. Therefore, two weighting schemes are applied and compared to the standard Kemeny distance to analyse the Formula One between 1950 and 2024. The evolution of competitive balance is unexpectedly robust to the weights, but competition is more intense if one focuses on the top positions. Competitive balance has been more unfavourable in the last two decades than ever before. Statistical tests uncover three structural breaks in competitive balance that are closely related to regulatory changes, highlighting the role of decision-makers in the evolution of competitiveness.

econ.GN↗

Swiss-system chess tournaments and unfairness

The Swiss system is an increasingly popular competition format as it provides a favourable trade-off between the number of matches and ranking accuracy. However, there is no empirical study on the potential unfairness of Swiss-system chess tournaments if an odd number of rounds is played. To analyse this issue, our paper compares the number of points scored in the tournament between players who played one game more with the white pieces and players who played one game fewer with the white pieces. Using data from 28 highly prestigious competitions, we find that players with an extra white game score significantly more points. In particular, the advantage exceeds the value of a draw in the four Grand Swiss tournaments. A potential solution to this unfairness could be organising Swiss-system chess tournaments with an even number of rounds, and guaranteeing a balanced colour assignment for all players using a recently proposed pairing mechanism.

econ.GN↗

The uncertainty of a tournament draw: Insights from the Champions League

The group draw of major sports tournaments implies some uncertainty, with lucky teams often enjoying a substantial unfair advantage. First in the literature, we propose a technique to quantify this draw uncertainty, which, arguably, has an optimal level of zero. Our simulation-based approach requires generating a representative set of random draws to compute the variance of qualifying probabilities for each team. The method is applied to compare draw uncertainty in the former group stage and the current incomplete round-robin league phase of the UEFA Champions League, under both accurate and inaccurate seedings. We also break down the impact of the 2024/25 reform into various components. The new format is found to decrease draw uncertainty, but the reduction is mainly attributable to the inaccurate seeding system used by UEFA. Consequently, the primary benefit of an incomplete round-robin tournament compared to the standard group stage lies in the robustness of its draw uncertainty to the seeding of the teams.

stat.AP↗

Match classification in the last round of four-team round-robin tournaments

Classification of matches played in the last rounds of sports competitions is a well-established tool for evaluating tournament designs. Both deterministic and probabilistic approaches are available for this purpose. Our paper offers the first comparison of them by analysing the most prominent example of four-team round-robin competitions, the group stage of the FIFA World Cup. We show that both methods are highly relevant in practice: all (four) deterministic and (six) probabilistic match types occurred in the 2014 and 2018 FIFA World Cups, respectively. The probabilistic model, which accounts for the relative benefits of attacking and defending, provides deeper insights; for instance, the competitive matches from the deterministic approach can be of any of the six probabilistic types. Finally, the probabilistic framework is used to quantify and decompose the impact of the main reforms introduced for the 2026 FIFA World Cup: the expansion to 48 teams, as well as the modified qualification and tie-breaking rules.

physics.soc-ph↗

Reducing the non-uniformity of the group draw in sports tournaments

The group draw of a sports tournament requires assigning teams to groups of (almost) the same size. The most important criteria for a draw procedure are balance, randomness, and transparency, which could not be satisfied simultaneously if draw constraints exist. Organisers usually use the so-called Skip mechanism, a method based on a random sequential draw of the teams from pots, in order to ensure balance and transparency. However, the Skip mechanism is non-uniformly distributed: the valid assignments are not necessarily equally likely. We quantify this distortion if a group can contain at most two teams from a given set S, which poses a serious challenge for the Skip mechanism. Our study provides exact results for an arbitrary number of teams when there are three pots and two pots contain only one team from the set S, as well as complete enumeration for small problems with three pots and at most five teams per pot. We also analyse three real-world case studies from basketball and football. It turns out that the optimal design considers the pots in decreasing order according to the number of teams in the set S. These results can be used to identify the least distorted transparent draw procedure, and decide whether the extent of non-uniformity calls for further actions.

physics.soc-ph↗

Refined thresholds for inconsistency: The effect of the graph associated with incomplete pairwise comparisons

The inconsistency of pairwise comparisons remains difficult to interpret in the absence of acceptability thresholds. The popular 10% cut-off rule proposed by Saaty has recently been applied to incomplete pairwise comparison matrices, which contain some unknown comparisons. This paper refines these inconsistency thresholds: we uncover that they depend not only on the size of the matrix and the number of missing entries, but also on the undirected graph whose edges represent the known pairwise comparisons. Therefore, using our exact thresholds is especially important if the filling in patterns coincide for a large number of matrices, as has been recommended in the literature. The strong association between the new threshold values and the spectral radius of the representing graph is also demonstrated. Our results can be integrated into software to continuously monitor inconsistency during the collection of pairwise comparisons and immediately detect potential errors.

stat.ME↗

How to optimise tournament draws: The case of the FIFA World Cup

The organisers of major sports competitions use different policies with respect to constraints in the group draw. Our paper aims to rationalise these choices by analysing the trade-off between attractiveness (the number of games played by teams from the same geographic zone) and fairness (the departure of the draw mechanism from a uniform distribution). A parametric optimisation model is formulated and applied to the 2018 and 2022 FIFA World Cup draws. A flaw of the draw procedure is identified: the pre-assignment of the host to a group unnecessarily increases the distortions. All Pareto efficient sets of draw constraints are determined via simulations. The proposed framework can be used to find the optimal draw rules and justify the non-uniformity of the draw procedure for the stakeholders.

math.OC↗

Are penalty shootouts better than a coin toss? Evidence from international club football in Europe

Penalty shootouts play a crucial role in the knockout stage of major football tournaments. Their importance has substantially increased from the 2021/22 season, when the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) scrapped the away goals rule. Our paper examines whether the outcome of a penalty shootout can be predicted in UEFA club competitions. Based on all shootouts between 2000 and 2025, no evidence is found for the effect of the kicking order, the field of the match, or psychological momentum. In contrast to previous results, we do not detect any relationship between shootout success and relative team strength, quantified by differences in Elo ratings and the implied winning probability. Thus, the hypothesis that penalty shootouts are close to a coin toss in international competitions for European football clubs cannot be rejected.

econ.GN↗

On the non-uniformity of the 2026 FIFA World Cup draw

The group stage of a sports tournament is often made more appealing by introducing additional constraints in the group draw that promote an attractive and balanced group composition. For example, the number of intra-regional group matches is minimised in several World Cups. However, under such constraints, the traditional draw procedure may become non-uniform, meaning that the feasible allocations of the teams into groups are not equally likely to occur. Our paper quantifies this non-uniformity of the 2026 FIFA World Cup draw for the official draw procedure, as well as for 47 reasonable alternatives implied by all permutations of the four pots and two group labelling policies. We show why simulating with a recursive backtracking algorithm is intractable, and propose a workable implementation using integer programming. The official draw mechanism is found to be optimal based on four measures of non-uniformity. Nonetheless, non-uniformity can be more than halved if the organiser aims to treat the best teams drawn from the first pot equally.

stat.AP↗

Voting power in the Council of the European Union: A comprehensive sensitivity analysis

The Council of the European Union (EU) is one of the main decision-making bodies of the EU. A number of decisions require a qualified majority, the support of 55% of the member states (currently 15) that represent at least 65% of the total population. We investigate how the power distribution based on the Shapley--Shubik index and the proportion of winning coalitions change if these criteria are modified within reasonable bounds. The power of the two countries, with approximately 4% of the total population each, is found to be almost flat. The decisiveness index decreases if the population criterion is above 68\% or the states criterion is at least 17. Some quota combinations contradict the principles of double majority. The proportion of winning coalitions can be increased from 13.2% to 20.8% (30.1%) such that the maximal relative change in the Shapley--Shubik indices remains below 3.5% (5.5%). Our results are indispensable for evaluating any proposal to reform the qualified majority voting system.

physics.soc-ph↗

Increasing competitiveness by imbalanced groups: The example of the 48-team FIFA World Cup

A match played in a sports tournament can be called stakeless if at least one team is indifferent to its outcome because it already has qualified or has been eliminated. Such a game threatens fairness since teams may not exert full effort without incentives. This paper suggests a novel classification for stakeless matches based on their expected outcome: they are more costly if the indifferent team is more likely to win by playing honestly. Our approach is illustrated with the 2026 FIFA World Cup, the first edition of the competition with 48 teams. We propose a novel format based on imbalanced groups, which substantially reduces the probability of stakeless matches played by the strongest teams according to Monte Carlo simulations. The new design also increases the uncertainty of match outcomes and requires fewer matches. Governing bodies in sports are encouraged to consider our innovative idea in order to enhance the competitiveness of their tournaments.

math.OC↗