Lin Li | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

BiMTokenizer: Preserving Semantic-Acoustic Balance in Low-Bitrate Speech Tokenization via Bidirectional State-Space Modeling

Speech codecs serve as bridges between continuous speech signals and large language models, yet face an inherent conflict between acoustic fidelity and semantic preservation. To mitigate this conflict, recent works increasingly adopt dual-tower architectures to decouple semantic and acoustic modeling with separate encoders. However, these dual-tower designs incur substantial architectural overhead. To avoid such complexity, we revisit the single-tower paradigm and propose BiMTokenizer, a low-bitrate speech codec (around 1.1 kbps) combining a bidirectional state-space backbone with Residual Spherical Leech Quantization (RSLQ). The bidirectional backbone strengthens temporal modeling, while RSLQ offers a fixed, well-separated lattice bottleneck for robust semantic and acoustic tokenization without learned-codebook collapse. Experiments show that BiMTokenizer achieves superior acoustic reconstruction and the lowest WER among low-bitrate codec baselines across both clean and noisy environments, while using less than half the parameters of recent dual-tower baselines. Furthermore, its robust semantic representations yield strong performance on downstream speech understanding tasks, confirming that a well-designed single-tower codec can preserve the semantic-acoustic balance at low bitrates. The code and model weights are available at https://github.com/ZhangXinWhut/BiMTokenizer.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

Conformalized Large Language Models under Configuration Shift

Conformal prediction (CP) is a distribution-free framework for uncertainty quantification that has recently been adapted to large language models (LLMs), providing prediction sets with finite-sample coverage guarantees under exchangeability. Yet for LLMs, nonconformity scores are often induced by an inference pipeline, not just a fixed model, making them depend not only on the data distribution but also on configurable factors such as the prompt template, decoding parameters, and deployment setting. Since such configurations are routinely modified in practice but rarely treated as a source of shift, their impact on CP validity remains poorly understood. We call this \emph{configuration shift} and study it systematically along three axes: prompt template, decoding temperature, and weight quantization. In a broad empirical study spanning $9$ LLMs, $4$ datasets, and $4$ nonconformity scores, we find that configuration shift consistently erodes CP validity, often driving empirical coverage below the target. By contrast, efficiency is largely preserved: valid prediction sets remain close in size to the i.i.d. baseline. We derive coverage lower bounds that attribute this loss to a discrepancy between calibration and test score distributions, and use their finite-sample plug-in versions as empirical diagnostics of shift severity. We further show that these findings lead to practical mitigations: bound-inspired recalibration is effective with limited test examples, while fragility-aware calibration ensembling recovers much of the lost coverage without test data.

cs.LG↗