arXiv subjects

Madhusudhan Reddy Pittu

Publications and source records attributed to Madhusudhan Reddy Pittu.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

A Better-than-2 Approximation for k-Median Part I: The Power of General Bids

The Greedy algorithm of Jain, Mahdian, Markakis, Saberi, and Vazirani was the best Lagrangian-multiplier-preserving (LMP) approximation algorithm for facility location, and thus the engine behind the best $k$-median guarantees, for over two decades. Its $2$-LMP guarantee was only recently broken by a small amount ($(2-η)$-LMP where $η\approx 2.25 \cdot 10^{-7}$) through local-search post-processing. That analysis relies on the structure of worst-case instances, and it appears difficult to obtain substantial further improvements along those lines. We take a different approach and change the algorithm itself: we introduce general bidding functions, replacing the classical linear bid with a richer family of rules and prove a polynomial-time $1.95$-LMP approximation, a large improvement over the long-standing factor of~$2$. We further show that these generalized bidding rules can be made smooth (log-adaptive), building on the recent framework developed for the classical Greedy algorithm by Cohen-Addad, Grandoni, Lee, Schwiegelshohn, and Svensson. This yields a polynomial-time $1.95$-approximation that opens $k+O_\varepsilon(\log n)$ centers. Combined with a $(1.89+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for stable instances in our companion work \cite{stableinstances}, we achieve a better-than-2 approximation for the $k$-median problem in polynomial-time.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A Better-than-$2$ Approximation for $k$-Median Part II: Stable Instances

We consider the $k$-median problem on general metric spaces, subject to the condition that the instances are $β$-stable (i.e., the optimal solution using $k-1$ centers has a cost at least $(1+β)$ times that of the optimal solution with $k$ centers). We give a $(1.89+ε)$-approximation algorithm for such instances running in time $\exp(1/(β\times \mathrm{poly}(ε)))\cdot \mathrm{poly}_ε(n)$. In particular, for $β=\mathrm{poly}(ε)/\log n$ and $ε$ a tiny constant, this is a polynomial-time algorithm. This improves on previous work showing a $(2 + ε)$-approximation algorithm with similar running time [CGL+25]. Combined with the pseudo-approximation algorithm in our companion work, this results in a better-than-$2$ approximation algorithm for general $k$-median instances. Our main technical contribution is a novel nuanced analysis of local search that allows us to isolate a subset of clients on which we lose essentially nothing compared to the optimal solution, while losing an approximation factor of $3$ on the rest of the clients. We complement this with an algorithm based on sampling and partial enumeration, achieving a better-than-$2$ approximation on the rest of the clients. Trading off these two algorithms yields our final approximation.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Combinatorial Optimization using Comparison Oracles

In linear combinatorial optimization, we aim to find $S^* = \arg\min_{S \in \mathcal{F}} \langle w,\mathbf{1}_S \rangle$ for a family $\mathcal{F} \subseteq 2^U$ over a ground set $U$ of $n$ elements. Traditionally, $w$ is known or accessible via a value oracle. Motivated by practical applications involving pairwise preferences, we study the weaker and more robust comparison oracle, which for any $S, T \in \mathcal{F}$ reveals only if $w(S) <, =, \text{ or } > w(T)$. We investigate the query complexity and computational efficiency of optimizing in this model. We present three main contributions. (1) Query Complexity: We establish that the query complexity over any arbitrary set system $\mathcal{F} \subseteq 2^U$ is $\tilde{O}(n^2)$. This demonstrates a fundamental separation between information and computational complexity, as the runtime may still be exponential for NP-hard problems. (2) Algorithmic Frameworks: We develop two general tools. First, a Dual Ellipsoid framework establishes an efficient reduction from optimization to certification. It shows that to optimize efficiently, it suffices to efficiently certify a candidate's optimality using only comparisons. Second, Global Subspace Learning (GSL) sorts all feasible sets using $O(nB \log(nB))$ queries for integer weights bounded by $B$. We efficiently implement GSL for linear matroids, yielding improved query complexities for problems like $k$-SUM, SUBSET-SUM, and $A+B$ sorting. (3) Combinatorial Applications: We give the first polynomial-time, low-query algorithms for classic problems, including minimum cuts, minimum weight spanning trees (and matroid bases), bipartite matching (and matroid intersection), and shortest $s$-$t$ paths. Our work provides the first general query complexity bounds and efficient algorithmic results for this fundamental model.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

An Algorithmic Upper Bound for Permanents via a Permanental Schur Inequality

Computing the permanent of a non-negative matrix is a computationally challenging, \#P-complete problem with wide-ranging applications. We introduce a novel permanental analogue of Schur's determinant formula, leveraging a newly defined \emph{permanental inverse}. Building on this, we introduce an iterative, deterministic procedure called the \emph{permanent process}, analogous to Gaussian elimination, which yields constructive and algorithmically computable upper bounds on the permanent. Our framework provides particularly strong guarantees for matrices exhibiting approximate diagonal dominance-like properties, thereby offering new theoretical and computational tools for analyzing and bounding permanents.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2025

Max-Cut with Multiple Cardinality Constraints

We study the classic Max-Cut problem under multiple cardinality constraints, which we refer to as the Constrained Max-Cut problem. Given a graph $G=(V, E)$, a partition of the vertices into $c$ disjoint parts $V_1, \ldots, V_c$, and cardinality parameters $k_1, \ldots, k_c$, the goal is to select a set $S \subseteq V$ such that $|S \cap V_i| = k_i$ for each $i \in [c]$, maximizing the total weight of edges crossing $S$ (i.e., edges with exactly one endpoint in $S$). By designing an approximate kernel for Constrained Max-Cut and building on the correlation rounding technique of Raghavendra and Tan (2012), we present a $(0.858 - \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for the problem when $c = O(1)$. The algorithm runs in time $O\left(\min\{k/\varepsilon, n\}^{\poly(c/\varepsilon)} + \poly(n)\right)$, where $k = \sum_{i \in [c]} k_i$ and $n=|V|$. This improves upon the $(\frac{1}{2} + \varepsilon_0)$-approximation of Feige and Langberg (2001) for $\maxcut_k$ (the special case when $c=1, k_1 = k$), and generalizes the $(0.858 - \varepsilon)$-approximation of Raghavendra and Tan (2012), which only applies when $\min\{k,n-k\}=Ω(n)$ and does not handle multiple constraints. We also establish that, for general values of $c$, it is NP-hard to determine whether a feasible solution exists that cuts all edges. Finally, we present a $1/2$-approximation algorithm for Max-Cut under an arbitrary matroid constraint.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Guessing Efficiently for Constrained Subspace Approximation

In this paper we study constrained subspace approximation problem. Given a set of $n$ points $\{a_1,\ldots,a_n\}$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, the goal of the {\em subspace approximation} problem is to find a $k$ dimensional subspace that best approximates the input points. More precisely, for a given $p\geq 1$, we aim to minimize the $p$th power of the $\ell_p$ norm of the error vector $(\|a_1-\bm{P}a_1\|,\ldots,\|a_n-\bm{P}a_n\|)$, where $\bm{P}$ denotes the projection matrix onto the subspace and the norms are Euclidean. In \emph{constrained} subspace approximation (CSA), we additionally have constraints on the projection matrix $\bm{P}$. In its most general form, we require $\bm{P}$ to belong to a given subset $\mathcal{S}$ that is described explicitly or implicitly. We introduce a general framework for constrained subspace approximation. Our approach, that we term coreset-guess-solve, yields either $(1+\varepsilon)$-multiplicative or $\varepsilon$-additive approximations for a variety of constraints. We show that it provides new algorithms for partition-constrained subspace approximation with applications to {\it fair} subspace approximation, $k$-means clustering, and projected non-negative matrix factorization, among others. Specifically, while we reconstruct the best known bounds for $k$-means clustering in Euclidean spaces, we improve the known results for the remainder of the problems.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Approximation Algorithms for the Weighted Nash Social Welfare via Convex and Non-Convex Programs

In an instance of the weighted Nash Social Welfare problem, we are given a set of $m$ indivisible items, $\mathscr{G}$, and $n$ agents, $\mathscr{A}$, where each agent $i \in \mathscr{A}$ has a valuation $v_{ij}\geq 0$ for each item $j\in \mathscr{G}$. In addition, every agent $i$ has a non-negative weight $w_i$ such that the weights collectively sum up to $1$. The goal is to find an assignment $σ:\mathscr{G}\rightarrow \mathscr{A}$ that maximizes $\prod_{i\in \mathscr{A}} \left(\sum_{j\in σ^{-1}(i)} v_{ij}\right)^{w_i}$, the product of the weighted valuations of the players. When all the weights equal $\frac1n$, the problem reduces to the classical Nash Social Welfare problem, which has recently received much attention. In this work, we present a $5\cdot\exp\left(2\cdot D_{\text{KL}}(\mathbf{w}\, ||\, \frac{\vec{\mathbf{1}}}{n})\right) = 5\cdot\exp\left(2\log{n} + 2\sum_{i=1}^n w_i \log{w_i}\right)$-approximation algorithm for the weighted Nash Social Welfare problem, where $D_{\text{KL}}(\mathbf{w}\, ||\, \frac{\vec{\mathbf{1}}}{n})$ denotes the KL-divergence between the distribution induced by $\mathbf{w}$ and the uniform distribution on $[n]$. We show a novel connection between the convex programming relaxations for the unweighted variant of Nash Social Welfare presented in \cite{cole2017convex, anari2017nash}, and generalize the programs to two different mathematical programs for the weighted case. The first program is convex and is necessary for computational efficiency, while the second program is a non-convex relaxation that can be rounded efficiently. The approximation factor derives from the difference in the objective values of the convex and non-convex relaxation.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

The Price of Explainability for Clustering

Given a set of points in $d$-dimensional space, an explainable clustering is one where the clusters are specified by a tree of axis-aligned threshold cuts. Dasgupta et al. (ICML 2020) posed the question of the price of explainability: the worst-case ratio between the cost of the best explainable clusterings to that of the best clusterings. We show that the price of explainability for $k$-medians is at most $1+H_{k-1}$; in fact, we show that the popular Random Thresholds algorithm has exactly this price of explanability, matching the known lower bound constructions. We complement our tight analysis of this particular algorithm by constructing instances where the price of explanability (using any algorithm) is at least $(1-o(1)) \ln k$, showing that our result is best possible, up to lower-order terms. We also improve the price of explanability for the $k$-means problem to $O(k \ln \ln k)$ from the previous $O(k \ln k)$, considerably closing the gap to the lower bounds of $Ω(k)$. Finally, we study the algorithmic question of finding the best explainable clustering: We show that explainable $k$-medians and $k$-means cannot be approximated better than $O(\ln k)$, under standard complexity-theoretic conjectures. This essentially settles the approximability of explainable $k$-medians and leaves open the intriguing possibility to get significantly better approximation algorithms for $k$-means than its price of explainability.

cs.DS↗