SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2504.20883

Guessing Efficiently for Constrained Subspace Approximation

Abstract

In this paper we study constrained subspace approximation problem. Given a set of $n$ points $\{a_1,\ldots,a_n\}$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, the goal of the {\em subspace approximation} problem is to find a $k$ dimensional subspace that best approximates the input points. More precisely, for a given $p\geq 1$, we aim to minimize the $p$th power of the $\ell_p$ norm of the error vector $(\|a_1-\bm{P}a_1\|,\ldots,\|a_n-\bm{P}a_n\|)$, where $\bm{P}$ denotes the projection matrix onto the subspace and the norms are Euclidean. In \emph{constrained} subspace approximation (CSA), we additionally have constraints on the projection matrix $\bm{P}$. In its most general form, we require $\bm{P}$ to belong to a given subset $\mathcal{S}$ that is described explicitly or implicitly. We introduce a general framework for constrained subspace approximation. Our approach, that we term coreset-guess-solve, yields either $(1+\varepsilon)$-multiplicative or $\varepsilon$-additive approximations for a variety of constraints. We show that it provides new algorithms for partition-constrained subspace approximation with applications to {\it fair} subspace approximation, $k$-means clustering, and projected non-negative matrix factorization, among others. Specifically, while we reconstruct the best known bounds for $k$-means clustering in Euclidean spaces, we improve the known results for the remainder of the problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Aditya Bhaskara, Sepideh Mahabadi, Madhusudhan Reddy Pittu, Ali Vakilian, David P. Woodruff. 2025-04-29. Guessing Efficiently for Constrained Subspace Approximation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20883

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS