arXiv subjects

Mehmet Yavuz

Publications and source records attributed to Mehmet Yavuz.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Threshold Dynamics and Integrated Control of Cholera Transmission with Sanitation and Vaccination

Cholera transmission is sustained by interacting human and environmental pathways, making integrated control essential in settings with inadequate water, sanitation, and hygiene infrastructure. We develop and analyze a Susceptible--Infected--Recovered--Water (SIWR) model with Monod-type environmental transmission and three interventions: human sanitation, environmental sanitation, and vaccination. The control reproduction number decomposes as $\mathcal{R}_0=\mathcal{R}_0^{(h)}+\mathcal{R}_0^{(e)}$, separating direct and environmental transmission and yielding closed-form elasticity measures of pathway-specific contributions. We further quantify interactions between sanitation measures through an explicit Bliss independence synergy index. We establish local and global stability of the disease-free equilibrium and prove that the model undergoes a forward transcritical bifurcation at $\mathcal{R}_0=1$, excluding backward bifurcation. Global sensitivity analysis identifies direct transmission, the half-saturation constant, pathogen shedding, and human sanitation as major determinants of epidemic burden. Numerical simulations demonstrate that coordinated sanitation interventions can produce synergistic reductions in epidemic burden, providing a quantitative framework for evaluating integrated cholera control strategies.

math.DS↗

arXiv2026

Indoor Neutral-Host Networks Over Shared Spectrum and Shared Infrastructure: A Comparison Study of Real-World Deployments

Indoor high-capacity connectivity is frequently constrained by significant building penetration loss and the inherent uplink power limitations of a typical outdoor macro-cell deployment. While Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) must optimize spectrum across low-band (<1 GHz) and mid-band (1-7 GHz) frequencies, uplink performance remains disproportionately degraded due to link budget asymmetry. Neutral-host (NH) networking provides a scalable alternative by transparently offloading MNO subscribers via spectrum sharing and shared infrastructure. We present a multi-site measurement study comparing Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS)-enabled NH networks against public MNO 4G/5G macro deployments and Wi-Fi. Our results show: (i) significant building penetration loss with up to 15.5 dB in low-bands and 17.9 dB in mid-bands, resulting in a ~10 dB RSRP deficit for MNO mid-bands compared to low-bands; (ii) NH networks provide a 30 dB higher median indoor RSRP with indoor NH normalized downlink throughput matches MNO outdoor performance, while its uplink performance exceeds MNO levels in both indoor and outdoor settings; (iii) NH proximity enables superior uplink efficiency, utilizing 64-QAM for 56% of transmissions (versus <6% for MNOs) and reducing median UE transmit power by 5 dB; (iv) MNOs rely on low-band spectrum for indoor uplink transmissions, while the NH deployment maintains high-performance mid-band connectivity; and (v) NH outperforms MNOs in end-to-end throughput but trails Wi-Fi in uplink throughput and latency due to packet routing overhead to the MNO core.

cs.NI↗

arXiv2025

Indoor Sharing in the Mid-Band: A Performance Study of Neutral-Host, Cellular Macro, and Wi-Fi

Indoor environments present a significant challenge for wireless connectivity, as immense data demand strains traditional solutions. Public Mobile Network Operators (MNOs), utilizing outdoor macro base stations (BSs), suffer from poor signal penetration. Indoor Wi-Fi networks, on the other hand, may face reliability issues due to spectrum contention. Shared spectrum models, particularly the Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) utilized by private 4G/5G networks, have emerged as a promising alternative to provide reliable indoor service. Moreover, these private networks are equipped with the neutral-host (NH) model, seamlessly offloading indoor MNOs' traffic to the private CBRS network. This paper presents a comprehensive, in-situ performance evaluation of three co-located technologies utilizing mid-bands spectrum (1-6 GHz)--a CBRS-based NH network, public MNO macro networks, and a Wi-Fi 6 network--within a large, big-box retail store characterized by significant building loss. Our analysis demonstrates: (i) the NH network provides superior indoor coverage compared to MNO macro, requiring only six CBRS devices (CBSDs)--versus 65 Access Points (APs) for enterprise Wi-Fi--to achieve full coverage, with a median building loss of 26.6 dB ensuring interference-free coexistence with outdoor federal incumbents; (ii) the NH network achieves substantial indoor throughput gains, with per-channel normalized throughput improvements of 1.44x and 1.62x in downlink (DL), and 4.33x and 13x in uplink (UL), compared to 4G and 5G macro deployments, respectively; (iii) the NH deployment achieves a median indoor aggregated physical (PHY)-layer DL throughput gain of 2.08x over 5G macro deployments indoors, despite utilizing only 40 MHz of aggregated bandwidth compared to 225 MHz for 5G macro; and (iv) the NH deployment also outperforms Wi-Fi in application-layer HTTP DL performance by 5.05x.

cs.NI↗

arXiv2025

Neutral-Hosts In The Shared Mid-Bands: Addressing Indoor Cellular Performance

The 3.55 - 3.7 GHz Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) band in the U.S., shared with incumbent Navy radars, is witnessing increasing deployments both indoors and outdoors using a shared, licensed model. Among the many use-cases of such private networks is the indoor neutral-host, where cellular customers of Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) can be seamlessly served indoors over CBRS with improved performance, since building loss reduces the indoor signal strength of mid-band 5G cellular signals considerably. In this paper, we present the first detailed measurements and analyses of a real-world deployment of an indoor private network serving as a neutral-host in the CBRS band serving two MNOs. Our findings demonstrate significant advantages: (i) minimal outdoor interference from the CBRS network due to over 22 dB median penetration loss, ensuring compatibility with incumbent users; (ii) substantial indoor performance gains with up to 535$\times$ and 33$\times$ median downlink and uplink throughput improvements, respectively, compared to the worst-performing MNO; (iii) reduced uplink transmit power for user devices (median 12 dB reduction), increasing energy efficiency; and (iv) significant capacity offload from the MNO network (median 233 resource blocks/slot freed in 5G), allowing MNOs to better serve outdoor users. These results highlight the potential of low-power indoor CBRS deployments to improve performance, increase spectrum efficiency, and support coexistence with current and future incumbents, e.g., the 3.1 - 3.45 GHz band being considered for sharing with federal incumbents in the U.S.

cs.NI↗

arXiv2023

Roaming Performance Analysis and Comparison between Wi-Fi and Private Cellular Network

Private network deployment is gaining momentum in warehouses, retail, automation, health care, and many such use cases to guarantee mission-critical services with less latency. Guaranteeing the delay-sensitive application in Wi-Fi is always challenging due to the nature of unlicensed spectrum. As the device ecosystem keeps growing and expanding, all the current and future devices can support both Wi-Fi and Private Cellular Network (CBRS is the primary spectrum in the US for private network deployment). However, due to the existing infrastructure and huge investment in the dense Wi-Fi network, consumers prefer two deployment models. The first scenario is deploying the private network outdoors and using the existing Wi-Fi indoors. The second scenario is to use the existing Wi-Fi network as a backup for offloading the traffic indoors and parallely utilizes the private network deployment for less latency applications. Hence, we expect, in both scenarios, a roaming between two technologies \emph{i.e.,} Wi-Fi and Private Cellular Network. In this work, we would like to quantify the roaming performance or service interruption time when the device moves from Wi-Fi to Private Network (CBRS) and vice-versa.

cs.NI↗

arXiv2023

A Measurement Study of the Impact of Adjacent Channel Interference between C-band and CBRS

The 3.7 - 3.98 GHz frequency band (also known as C-band) was recently allocated in the US for the deployment of 5G cellular services. Prior to this, the lower adjacent band, 3.55 - 3.7 GHz, had been allocated to Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS), where the entire 150 MHz can be used for free by Tier 3 General Authorized Access (GAA) users, but access to the spectrum needs to be authorized by the Spectrum Access System (SAS). GAA users are allowed on a channel only when there are no Tier 1 Incumbents (Navy radars) or Tier 2 Priority Access License (PAL) users in the area. However, since there are no guard bands between GAA and C-band, and both systems employ Time Division Duplexing (TDD) where the uplink/downlink configurations are not synchronized, adjacent channel interference can potentially reduce the performance of both systems. In this paper, we quantify the effect of this mutual interference by performing experiments with a real-world deployment. We observe significant downlink throughput reductions on both systems when two devices are in close proximity to each other, and one is transmitting uplink while the other is transmitting downlink: 60% for 4G CBRS and 43% for 5G C-band. We believe that this is the first paper to demonstrate this in a real deployment. This throughput degradation was reduced when the CBSD changed its channel and operated 20 MHz away from C-band, essentially creating a guard band between the channels. We also demonstrate the improvement in latency under adjacent channel interference by implementing MicroSlicing at the CBSD. Our results indicate that addressing adjacent channel interference due to the lack of guard bands and TDD configuration mismatch is crucial to improving the performance of both CBRS and C-band systems.

cs.NI↗