arXiv subjects

Mohammad Roghani

Publications and source records attributed to Mohammad Roghani.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2022

Sequential importance sampling for estimating expectations over the space of perfect matchings

This paper makes three contributions to estimating the number of perfect matching in bipartite graphs. First, we prove that the popular sequential importance sampling algorithm works in polynomial time for dense bipartite graphs. More carefully, our algorithm gives a $(1\pmε)$-approximation for the number of perfect matchings of a $λ$-dense bipartite graph, using $O(n^{\frac{1-2λ}λε^{-2}})$ samples. With size $n$ on each side and for $\frac{1}{2}>λ>0$, a $λ$-dense bipartite graph has all degrees greater than $(λ+\frac{1}{2})n$. Second, practical applications of the algorithm require many calls to matching algorithms. A novel preprocessing step is provided which makes significant improvements. Third, three applications are provided. The first is for counting Latin squares, the second is a practical way of computing the greedy algorithm for a card-guessing game with feedback, and the third is for stochastic block models. In all three examples, sequential importance sampling allows treating practical problems of reasonably large sizes.

math.PR↗

arXiv2022

Beating Greedy Matching in Sublinear Time

We study sublinear time algorithms for estimating the size of maximum matching in graphs. Our main result is a $(\frac{1}{2}+Ω(1))$-approximation algorithm which can be implemented in $O(n^{1+ε})$ time, where $n$ is the number of vertices and the constant $ε> 0$ can be made arbitrarily small. The best known lower bound for the problem is $Ω(n)$, which holds for any constant approximation. Existing algorithms either obtain the greedy bound of $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation [Behnezhad FOCS'21], or require some assumption on the maximum degree to run in $o(n^2)$-time [Yoshida, Yamamoto, and Ito STOC'09]. We improve over these by designing a less "adaptive" augmentation algorithm for maximum matching that might be of independent interest.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Improved Online Contention Resolution for Matchings and Applications to the Gig Economy

Motivated by applications in the gig economy, we study approximation algorithms for a \emph{sequential pricing problem}. The input is a bipartite graph $G=(I,J,E)$ between individuals $I$ and jobs $J$. The platform has a value of $v_j$ for matching job $j$ to an individual worker. In order to find a matching, the platform can consider the edges $(i j) \in E$ in any order and make a one-time take-it-or-leave-it offer of a price $π_{ij} = w$ of its choosing to $i$ for completing $j$. The worker accepts the offer with a known probability $ p_{ijw} $; in this case the job and the worker are irrevocably matched. What is the best way to make offers to maximize revenue and/or social welfare? The optimal algorithm is known to be NP-hard to compute (even if there is only a single job). With this in mind, we design efficient approximations to the optimal policy via a new Random-Order Online Contention Resolution Scheme (RO-OCRS) for matching. Our main result is a 0.456-balanced RO-OCRS in bipartite graphs and a 0.45-balanced RO-OCRS in general graphs. These algorithms improve on the recent bound of $\frac{1}{2}(1-e^{-2})\approx 0.432$ of [BGMS21], and improve on the best known lower bounds for the correlation gap of matching, despite applying to a significantly more restrictive setting. As a consequence of our OCRS results, we obtain a $0.456$-approximate algorithm for the sequential pricing problem. We further extend our results to settings where workers can only be contacted a limited number of times, and show how to achieve improved results for this problem, via improved algorithms for the well-studied stochastic probing problem.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Beating the Folklore Algorithm for Dynamic Matching

The maximum matching problem in dynamic graphs subject to edge updates (insertions and deletions) has received much attention over the last few years; a multitude of approximation/time tradeoffs were obtained, improving upon the folklore algorithm, which maintains a maximal (and hence $2$-approximate) matching in $O(n)$ worst-case update time in $n$-node graphs. We present the first deterministic algorithm which outperforms the folklore algorithm in terms of {\em both} approximation ratio and worst-case update time. Specifically, we give a $(2-Ω(1))$-approximate algorithm with $O(m^{3/8})=O(n^{3/4})$ worst-case update time in $n$-node, $m$-edge graphs. For sufficiently small constant $ε>0$, no deterministic $(2+ε)$-approximate algorithm with worst-case update time $O(n^{0.99})$ was known. Our second result is the first deterministic $(2+ε)$-approximate weighted matching algorithm with $O_ε(1)\cdot O(\sqrt[4]{m}) = O_ε(1)\cdot O(\sqrt{n})$ worst-case update time. Our main technical contributions are threefold: first, we characterize the tight cases for \emph{kernels}, which are the well-studied matching sparsifiers underlying much of the $(2+ε)$-approximate dynamic matching literature. This characterization, together with multiple ideas -- old and new -- underlies our result for breaking the approximation barrier of $2$. Our second technical contribution is the first example of a dynamic matching algorithm whose running time is improved due to improving the \emph{recourse} of other dynamic matching algorithms. Finally, we show how to use dynamic bipartite matching algorithms as black-box subroutines for dynamic matching in general graphs without incurring the natural $\frac{3}{2}$ factor in the approximation ratio which such approaches naturally incur.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Complexity of Computing the Anti-Ramsey Numbers for Paths

The anti-Ramsey numbers are a fundamental notion in graph theory, introduced in 1978, by Erd\" os, Simonovits and S\' os. For given graphs $G$ and $H$ the \emph{anti-Ramsey number} $\textrm{ar}(G,H)$ is defined to be the maximum number $k$ such that there exists an assignment of $k$ colors to the edges of $G$ in which every copy of $H$ in $G$ has at least two edges with the same color. There are works on the computational complexity of the problem when $H$ is a star. Along this line of research, we study the complexity of computing the anti-Ramsey number $\textrm{ar}(G,P_k)$, where $P_k$ is a path of length $k$. First, we observe that when $k = Ω(n)$, the problem is hard; hence, the challenging part is the computational complexity of the problem when $k$ is a fixed constant. We provide a characterization of the problem for paths of constant length. Our first main contribution is to prove that computing $\textrm{ar}(G,P_k)$ for every integer $k>2$ is NP-hard. We obtain this by providing several structural properties of such coloring in graphs. We investigate further and show that approximating $\textrm{ar}(G,P_3)$ to a factor of $n^{-1/2 - ε}$ is hard already in $3$-partite graphs, unless P=NP. We also study the exact complexity of the precolored version and show that there is no subexponential algorithm for the problem unless ETH fails for any fixed constant $k$. Given the hardness of approximation and parametrization of the problem, it is natural to study the problem on restricted graph families. We introduce the notion of color connected coloring and employing this structural property. We obtain a linear time algorithm to compute $\textrm{ar}(G,P_k)$, for every integer $k$, when the host graph, $G$, is a tree.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2019

Some Results on Dominating Induced Matchings

Let $G$ be a graph, a dominating induced matching (DIM) of $G$ is an induced matching that dominates every edge of $G$. In this paper we show that if a graph $G$ has a DIM, then $χ(G) \leqslant 3$. Also, it is shown that if $G$ is a connected graph whose all edges can be partitioned into DIM, then $G$ is either a regular graph or a biregular graph and indeed we characterize all graphs whose edge set can be partitioned into DIM. Also, we prove that if $G$ is an $r$-regular graph of order $n$ whose edges can be partitioned into DIM, then $n$ is divisible by $\binom{2r - 1}{r - 1}$ and $n = \binom{2r - 1}{r - 1}$ if and only if $G$ is the Kneser graph with parameters $r-1$, $2r-1$.

cs.DM↗