SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Nguyen Van Trao

Publications and source records attributed to Nguyen Van Trao.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

On hyperbolicity and tautness modulo an analytic subset of Hartogs domains

Let $X$ be a complex space and $H$ a positive homogeneous plurisubharmonic function $H$ on $X\times\C^m$. Consider the Hartogs-type domain $Ω_{H}(X):=\{(z,w)\in X\times \C^m:H(z,w)<1 \}$. Let $S$ be an analytic subset of $X$. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for hyperbolicity and tautness modulo $S\times \C^m$ of $Ω_{H}(X)$, with the obvious corollaries for the special case of Hartogs domains.

math.CV

Green functions of the spectral ball and symmetrized polydisk

The Green function of the spectral ball is constant over the isospectral varieties, is never less than the pullback of its counterpart on the symmetrized polydisk, and is equal to it in the generic case where the pole is a cyclic (non-derogatory) matrix. When the pole is derogatory, the inequality is always strict, and the difference between the two functions depends on the order of nilpotence of the strictly upper triangular blocks that appear in the Jordan decomposition of the pole. In particular, the Green function of the spectral ball is not symmetric in its arguments. Additionally, some estimates are given for invariant functions in the symmetrized polydisc, e.g. (infinitesimal versions of) the Carathéodory distance and the Green function, that show that they are distinct in dimension greater or equal to $3$.

math.CV

Convergence and multiplicities for the Lempert function

Given a domain $Ω\subset \mathbb C$, the Lempert function is a functional on the space $Hol (\D,Ω)$ of analytic disks with values in $Ω$, depending on a set of poles in $Ω$. We generalize its definition to the case where poles have multiplicities given by local indicators (in the sense of Rashkovskii's work) to obtain a function which still dominates the corresponding Green function, behaves relatively well under limits, and is monotonic with respect to the indicators. In particular, this is an improvement over the previous generalization used by the same authors to find an example of a set of poles in the bidisk so that the (usual) Green and Lempert functions differ.

math.CV

Pluricomplex Green and Lempert functions for equally weighted poles

For $Ω$ a domain in $\mathbb C^n$, the pluricomplex Green function with poles $a_1, ...,a_N \in Ω$ is defined as $G(z):=\sup \{u(z): u\in PSH_-(Ω), u(x)\le \log \|x-a_j\|+C_j \text{when} x \to a_j, j=1,...,N \}$. When there is only one pole, or two poles in the unit ball, it turns out to be equal to the Lempert function defined from analytic disks into $Ω$ by $L_S (z) :=\inf \{\sum^N_{j=1}ν_j\log|ζ_j|: \exists ϕ\in \mathcal {O}(\mathbb D,Ω), ϕ(0)=z, ϕ(ζ_j)=a_j, j=1,...,N \}$. It is known that we always have $L_S (z) \ge G_S(z)$. In the more general case where we allow weighted poles, there is a counterexample to equality due to Carlehed and Wiegerinck, with $Ω$ equal to the bidisk. Here we exhibit a counterexample using only four distinct equally weighted poles in the bidisk. In order to do so, we first define a more general notion of Lempert function "with multiplicities", analogous to the generalized Green functions of Lelong and Rashkovskii, then we show how in some examples this can be realized as a limit of regular Lempert functions when the poles tend to each other. Finally, from an example where $L_S (z) > G_S(z)$ in the case of multiple poles, we deduce that distinct (but close enough) equally weighted poles will provide an example of the same inequality. Open questions are pointed out about the limits of Green and Lempert functions when poles tend to each other.

math.CV