SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Oliver Goertsches

Publications and source records attributed to Oliver Goertsches.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

On orientability, Poincar\'e duality, and connectivity of GKM graphs

We investigate a combinatorial notion of orientability for abstract GKM graphs and its connections to graph cohomology in the sense of Guillemin--Zara. In particular, we prove that orientability of the GKM graph is equivalent to Poincar\'e duality of the rational (non-equivariant) graph cohomology algebra. As an application, we prove that orientable GKM graphs remain connected after removing any single vertex.

math.AT

Equivariant cohomology epimorphisms and face ring quotients for Hamiltonian and complexity one GKM$_4$ manifolds

Given a GKM$_3$ action of a torus $K$ on a manifold $M$ with GKM graph $Γ$, we show that for any extension of $Γ$ to an abstract GKM graph the corresponding restriction map in equivariant graph cohomology is surjective. While the corresponding statement for extensions of actions is well-known, we observe that this graph-theoretical statement is false in the GKM$_2$ setting. As a corollary, we obtain a description of the equivariant cohomology ring of Hamiltonian and complexity one GKM$_4$ actions in terms of generators and relations.

math.AT

Extensions of realizable Hamiltonian and complexity one GKM$_4$ graphs

We prove that the GKM graphs of GKM$_4$ manifolds that are either Hamiltonian or of complexity one extend to torus graphs. The arguments are based on a reformulation of the extension problem in terms of a natural representation of the fundamental group of the GKM graph, using a coordinate-free version of the axial function group of Kuroki, as well as on covers of GKM graphs and acyclicity results for orbit spaces of GKM manifolds.

math.AT

On torus equivariant $S^4$-bundles over $S^4$ and Petrie-type questions for GKM manifolds

We classify $T^2$-GKM fibrations in which both fiber and base are the GKM graph of $S^4$, with standard weights in the base. For each case in which the total space is orientable, we construct, by explicit clutching, a realization as a $T^2$-equivariant linear $S^4$-bundle over $S^4$. We determine which of the total spaces of these examples are non-equivariantly homotopy equivalent, homeomorphic or diffeomorphic, thereby finding many examples of a) pairs of homotopy equivalent, non-homeomorphic GKM manifolds with different first Pontryagin class, and b) pairs of GKM actions on the same smooth manifold whose GKM graphs do not agree as unlabeled graphs.

math.AT

On GKM fiber bundles and realizability with full flag fibers

We investigate under which conditions an equivariant fiber bundle whose base, total space and fiber are GKM manifolds induces a fibration or fiber bundle of the corresponding GKM graphs. In particular, we give several counterexamples. Concerning the converse direction, i.e., the realization problem for fiber bundles of GKM graphs, we restrict to the setting of fiberwise signed GKM fiber bundles over $n$-gons whose fiber is the GKM graph of a full flag manifold. While it was known that any such bundle is realizable for a $\mathbb{CP}^1$-fiber, we observe that new phenomena occur in higher dimensions where realizability depends on the twist automorphism of the GKM fiber bundle. We classify possible twist isomorphsims and show that realizability can be decided in terms of our classification.

math.AT

GKM actions on almost quaternionic manifolds

We introduce quaternionic structures on abstract GKM graphs, as the combinatorial counterpart of almost quaternionic structures left invariant by a torus action of GKM type. In the GKM$_3$ setting the 2-faces of the GKM graph can naturally be divided into quaternionic and complex 2-faces; it turns out that for GKM$_3$ actions on positive quaternion-Kähler manifolds the quaternionic 2-faces are biangles or triangles, and the complex 2-faces triangles or quadrangles. We show purely combinatorially that any abstract GKM$_3$ graph with quaternionic structure satisfying this restriction on the 2-faces of the GKM graph is that of a torus action on quaternionic projective space ${\mathbb{H}} P^n$ or the Grassmannian ${\mathrm{Gr}}_2({\mathbb{C}}^n)$ of complex 2-planes in ${\mathbb{C}}^n$.

math.DG

Reconstructing the orbit type stratification of a torus action from its equivariant cohomology

We investigate what information on the orbit type stratification of a torus action on a compact space is contained in its rational equivariant cohomology algebra. Regarding the (labelled) poset structure of the stratification we show that equivariant cohomology encodes the subposet of ramified elements. For equivariantly formal actions, we also examine what cohomological information of the stratification is encoded. In the smooth setting we show that under certain conditions -- which in particular hold for a compact orientable manifold with discrete fixed point set -- the equivariant cohomologies of the strata are encoded in the equivariant cohomology of the manifold.

math.AT

On the Stiefel-Whitney classes of GKM manifolds

We show that under standard assumptions on the isotropy groups of an integer GKM manifold, the equivariant Stiefel-Whitney classes of the action are determined by the GKM graph. This is achieved via a GKM-style description of the equivariant cohomology with coefficients in a finite field $\mathbb Z_{p}$ even though in this setting the restriction map to the fixed point set is not necessarily injective. This closes a gap in our argument why the GKM graph of a $6$-dimensional integer GKM manifold determines its nonequivariant diffeomorphism type. We introduce combinatorial Stiefel-Whitney classes of GKM graphs and use them to derive a nontrivial obstruction to realizability of GKM graphs in dimension $8$ and higher.

math.AT

The GKM correspondence in dimension 6

It follows from the GKM description of equivariant cohomology that the GKM graph of a GKM manifold has free equivariant graph cohomology, and satisfies a Poincaré duality condition. We prove that these conditions are sufficient for an abstract $3$-valent $T^2$-GKM graph to be realizable by a simply-connected $6$-dimensional GKM manifold. Our realization has the property that any closed stratum of a finite isotropy group contains a fixed point. Furthermore, we argue that in case there exists a fixed point in whose vicinity there occur at most two distinct finite nontrivial isotropy groups such a realization is unique up to equivariant homeomorphism, thus establishing a complexity one GKM correspondence in dimension $6$. We show that the statement on equivariant uniqueness is false without the two conditions on the finite isotropies by providing counterexamples in presence of a fixed point with three distinct neighbouring finite isotropy groups, as well as an example of a simply-connected integer GKM manifold with a closed stratum of a finite isotropy group which does not contain any fixed point.

math.AT

GKM actions on cohomogeneity one manifolds

We consider compact manifolds $M$ with a cohomogeneity one action of a compact Lie group $G$ such that the orbit space $M/G$ is a closed interval. For $T$ a maximal torus of $G$, we find necessary and sufficient conditions on the group diagram of $M$ such that the $T$-action on $M$ is of GKM type, and describe its GKM graph. The general results are illustrated on explicit examples.

math.DG

Low-dimensional GKM theory

GKM theory is a powerful tool in equivariant topology and geometry that can be used to generalize classical ideas from (quasi)toric manifolds to more general torus actions. After an introduction to the topic this survey focuses on recent results in low dimensions, where the interaction between geometry and combinatorics turns out to be particularly fruitful.

math.AT

On Degenerate $3$-$(α,δ)$-Sasakian Manifolds

We propose a new method to construct degenerate $3$-$(α,δ)$-Sasakian manifolds as fiber products of Boothby-Wang bundles over hyperkähler manifolds. Subsequently, we study homogeneous degenerate $3$-$(α, δ)$-Sasakian manifolds and prove that no non-trivial compact examples exist as well as that there is exactly one family of nilpotent Lie groups with this geometry, the quaternionic Heisenberg groups.

math.DG

Revisiting the Classification of Homogeneous 3-Sasakian and Quaternionic Kähler Manifolds

We provide a new, self-contained proof of the classification of homogeneous 3-Sasakian manifolds, which was originally obtained by Boyer, Galicki and Mann. In doing so, we construct an explicit one-to-one correspondence between simply connected homogeneous 3-Sasakian manifolds and simple complex Lie algebras via the theory of root systems. We also discuss why the real projective spaces are the only non-simply connected homogeneous 3-Sasakian manifolds and derive the famous classification of homogeneous positive quaternionic Kähler manifolds due to Wolf and Alekseevskii from our results.

math.DG

Non-negatively curved GKM orbifolds

In this paper we study non-negatively curved and rationally elliptic GKM$_4$ manifolds and orbifolds. We show that their rational cohomology rings are isomorphic to the rational cohomology of certain model orbifolds. These models are quotients of isometric actions of finite groups on non-negatively curved torus orbifolds. Moreover, we give a simplified proof of a characterisation of products of simplices among orbit spaces of locally standard torus manifolds. This characterisation was originally proved in [Wiemeler, Torus manifolds and non-negative curvature, arXiv:1401.0403] and was used there to obtain a classification of non-negatively curved torus manifolds.

math.DG

GKM manifolds are not rigid

We construct effective GKM $T^3$-actions with connected stabilizers on the total spaces of the two $S^2$-bundles over $S^6$ with identical GKM graphs. This shows that the GKM graph of a simply-connected integer GKM manifold with connected stabilizers does not determine its homotopy type. We complement this by a discussion of the minimality of this example: the homotopy type of integer GKM manifolds with connected stabilizers is indeed encoded in the GKM graph for smaller dimensions, lower complexity, or lower number of fixed points. Regarding geometric structures on the new example, we find an almost complex structure which is invariant under the action of a subtorus. In addition to the minimal example, we provide an analogous example where the torus actions are Hamiltonian, which disproves symplectic cohomological rigidity for Hamiltonian integer GKM manifolds.

math.AT