arXiv subjects

Quentin Cappart

Publications and source records attributed to Quentin Cappart.

28 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2022

Peel-and-Bound: Generating Stronger Relaxed Bounds with Multivalued Decision Diagrams

Decision diagrams are an increasingly important tool in cutting-edge solvers for discrete optimization. However, the field of decision diagrams is relatively new, and is still incorporating the library of techniques that conventional solvers have had decades to build. We drew inspiration from the warm-start technique used in conventional solvers to address one of the major challenges faced by decision diagram based methods. Decision diagrams become more useful the wider they are allowed to be, but also become more costly to generate, especially with large numbers of variables. We present a method of peeling off a sub-graph of previously constructed diagrams and using it as the initial diagram for subsequent iterations that we call peel-and-bound. We test the method on the sequence ordering problem, and our results indicate that our peel-and-bound scheme generates stronger bounds than a branch-and-bound scheme using the same propagators, and at significantly less computational cost.

math.OC↗

arXiv2022

The Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization Competition (ML4CO): Results and Insights

Combinatorial optimization is a well-established area in operations research and computer science. Until recently, its methods have focused on solving problem instances in isolation, ignoring that they often stem from related data distributions in practice. However, recent years have seen a surge of interest in using machine learning as a new approach for solving combinatorial problems, either directly as solvers or by enhancing exact solvers. Based on this context, the ML4CO aims at improving state-of-the-art combinatorial optimization solvers by replacing key heuristic components. The competition featured three challenging tasks: finding the best feasible solution, producing the tightest optimality certificate, and giving an appropriate solver configuration. Three realistic datasets were considered: balanced item placement, workload apportionment, and maritime inventory routing. This last dataset was kept anonymous for the contestants.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

On Causal Inference for Data-free Structured Pruning

Neural networks (NNs) are making a large impact both on research and industry. Nevertheless, as NNs' accuracy increases, it is followed by an expansion in their size, required number of compute operations and energy consumption. Increase in resource consumption results in NNs' reduced adoption rate and real-world deployment impracticality. Therefore, NNs need to be compressed to make them available to a wider audience and at the same time decrease their runtime costs. In this work, we approach this challenge from a causal inference perspective, and we propose a scoring mechanism to facilitate structured pruning of NNs. The approach is based on measuring mutual information under a maximum entropy perturbation, sequentially propagated through the NN. We demonstrate the method's performance on two datasets and various NNs' sizes, and we show that our approach achieves competitive performance under challenging conditions.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

SeaPearl: A Constraint Programming Solver guided by Reinforcement Learning

The design of efficient and generic algorithms for solving combinatorial optimization problems has been an active field of research for many years. Standard exact solving approaches are based on a clever and complete enumeration of the solution set. A critical and non-trivial design choice with such methods is the branching strategy, directing how the search is performed. The last decade has shown an increasing interest in the design of machine learning-based heuristics to solve combinatorial optimization problems. The goal is to leverage knowledge from historical data to solve similar new instances of a problem. Used alone, such heuristics are only able to provide approximate solutions efficiently, but cannot prove optimality nor bounds on their solution. Recent works have shown that reinforcement learning can be successfully used for driving the search phase of constraint programming (CP) solvers. However, it has also been shown that this hybridization is challenging to build, as standard CP frameworks do not natively include machine learning mechanisms, leading to some sources of inefficiencies. This paper presents the proof of concept for SeaPearl, a new CP solver implemented in Julia, that supports machine learning routines in order to learn branching decisions using reinforcement learning. Support for modeling the learning component is also provided. We illustrate the modeling and solution performance of this new solver on two problems. Although not yet competitive with industrial solvers, SeaPearl aims to provide a flexible and open-source framework in order to facilitate future research in the hybridization of constraint programming and machine learning.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

Combining Reinforcement Learning and Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization

Combinatorial optimization has found applications in numerous fields, from aerospace to transportation planning and economics. The goal is to find an optimal solution among a finite set of possibilities. The well-known challenge one faces with combinatorial optimization is the state-space explosion problem: the number of possibilities grows exponentially with the problem size, which makes solving intractable for large problems. In the last years, deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has shown its promise for designing good heuristics dedicated to solve NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems. However, current approaches have two shortcomings: (1) they mainly focus on the standard travelling salesman problem and they cannot be easily extended to other problems, and (2) they only provide an approximate solution with no systematic ways to improve it or to prove optimality. In another context, constraint programming (CP) is a generic tool to solve combinatorial optimization problems. Based on a complete search procedure, it will always find the optimal solution if we allow an execution time large enough. A critical design choice, that makes CP non-trivial to use in practice, is the branching decision, directing how the search space is explored. In this work, we propose a general and hybrid approach, based on DRL and CP, for solving combinatorial optimization problems. The core of our approach is based on a dynamic programming formulation, that acts as a bridge between both techniques. We experimentally show that our solver is efficient to solve two challenging problems: the traveling salesman problem with time windows, and the 4-moments portfolio optimization problem. Results obtained show that the framework introduced outperforms the stand-alone RL and CP solutions, while being competitive with industrial solvers.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2019

How to Evaluate Machine Learning Approaches for Combinatorial Optimization: Application to the Travelling Salesman Problem

Combinatorial optimization is the field devoted to the study and practice of algorithms that solve NP-hard problems. As Machine Learning (ML) and deep learning have popularized, several research groups have started to use ML to solve combinatorial optimization problems, such as the well-known Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP). Based on deep (reinforcement) learning, new models and architecture for the TSP have been successively developed and have gained increasing performances. At the time of writing, state-of-the-art models provide solutions to TSP instances of 100 cities that are roughly 1.33% away from optimal solutions. However, despite these apparently positive results, the performances remain far from those that can be achieved using a specialized search procedure. In this paper, we address the limitations of ML approaches for solving the TSP and investigate two fundamental questions: (1) how can we measure the level of accuracy of the pure ML component of such methods; and (2) what is the impact of a search procedure plugged inside a ML model on the performances? To answer these questions, we propose a new metric, ratio of optimal decisions (ROD), based on a fair comparison with a parametrized oracle, mimicking a ML model with a controlled accuracy. All the experiments are carried out on four state-of-the-art ML approaches dedicated to solve the TSP. Finally, we made ROD open-source in order to ease future research in the field.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2019

Improving Optimization Bounds using Machine Learning: Decision Diagrams meet Deep Reinforcement Learning

Finding tight bounds on the optimal solution is a critical element of practical solution methods for discrete optimization problems. In the last decade, decision diagrams (DDs) have brought a new perspective on obtaining upper and lower bounds that can be significantly better than classical bounding mechanisms, such as linear relaxations. It is well known that the quality of the bounds achieved through this flexible bounding method is highly reliant on the ordering of variables chosen for building the diagram, and finding an ordering that optimizes standard metrics is an NP-hard problem. In this paper, we propose an innovative and generic approach based on deep reinforcement learning for obtaining an ordering for tightening the bounds obtained with relaxed and restricted DDs. We apply the approach to both the Maximum Independent Set Problem and the Maximum Cut Problem. Experimental results on synthetic instances show that the deep reinforcement learning approach, by achieving tighter objective function bounds, generally outperforms ordering methods commonly used in the literature when the distribution of instances is known. To the best knowledge of the authors, this is the first paper to apply machine learning to directly improve relaxation bounds obtained by general-purpose bounding mechanisms for combinatorial optimization problems.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2017

Verification of interlocking systems using statistical model checking

In the railway domain, an interlocking is the system ensuring safe train traffic inside a station by controlling its active elements such as the signals or points. Modern interlockings are configured using particular data, called application data, reflecting the track layout and defining the actions that the interlocking can take. The safety of the train traffic relies thereby on application data correctness, errors inside them can cause safety issues such as derailments or collisions. Given the high level of safety required by such a system, its verification is a critical concern. In addition to the safety, an interlocking must also ensure that availability properties, stating that no train would be stopped forever in a station, are satisfied. Most of the research dealing with this verification relies on model checking. However, due to the state space explosion problem, this approach does not scale for large stations. More recently, a discrete event simulation approach limiting the verification to a set of likely scenarios, was proposed. The simulation enables the verification of larger stations, but with no proof that all the interesting scenarios are covered by the simulation. In this paper, we apply an intermediate statistical model checking approach, offering both the advantages of model checking and simulation. Even if exhaustiveness is not obtained, statistical model checking evaluates with a parametrizable confidence the reliability and the availability of the entire system.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2016

Verification of railway interlocking - Compositional approach with OCRA

In the railway domain, an electronic interlocking is a computerised system that controls the railway signalling components (e.g. switches or signals) in order to allow a safe operation of the train traffic. Interlockings are controlled by a software logic that relies on a generic software and a set of application data particular to the station under control. The verification of the application data is time consuming and error prone as it is mostly performed by human testers. In the first stage of our research, we built a model of a small Belgian railway station and we performed the verification of the application data with the nusmv model checker. However, the verification of larger stations fails due to the state space explosion problem. The intuition is that large stations can be split into smaller components that can be verified separately. This concept is known as compositional verification. This article explains how we used the ocra tool in order to model a medium size station and how we verified safety properties by mean of contracts. We also took advantage of new algorithms (k-liveness and ic3) recently implemented in nuxmv in order to verify LTL properties on our model.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2015

Verification of railway interlocking systems

In the railway domain, an interlocking is a computerised system that controls the railway signalling objects in order to allow a safe operation of the train traffic. Each interlocking makes use of particular data, called application data, that reflects the track layout of the station under control. The verification and validation of the application data are performed manually and is thus error-prone and costly. In this paper, we explain how we built an executable model in NuSMV of a railway interlocking based on the application data. We also detail the tool that we have developed in order to translate the application data into our model automatically. Finally we show how we could verify a realistic set of safety properties on a real-size station model by customizing the existing model-checking algorithm with PyNuSMV a Python library based on NuSMV.

cs.SE↗