Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Rafet Sifa

Publications and source records attributed to Rafet Sifa.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

On the Impact of Anonymization on the Performance of Large Language Models

As large language models are increasingly deployed in sensitive domains, anonymizing input data to protect personally identifiable information has become a critical practice. However, the impact of this anonymization on model utility is not well understood. This paper presents a systematic empirical study of the trade-off between privacy and performance. We evaluate five prominent language models across eleven diverse benchmarks, comparing their performance on original versus pseudonymized inputs. Our results reveal that while anonymization generally degrades performance, the effect is highly nuanced. We find that more capable models, such as Qwen2.5-72B and GPT-4o mini, suffer the largest performance drops, suggesting a stronger reliance on specific entity information. The impact is also task-dependent: performance on TruthfulQA improves with anonymization, while retrieval-focused tasks like RGB experience a catastrophic decline. Further experiments show that reversible anonymization techniques that preserve entity uniqueness significantly outperform irreversible ones like redaction, and that explicitly prompting models about anonymization offers no discernible benefit. We conclude that anonymization is not a one-size-fits-all solution and must be co-designed with the model and task in mind to balance privacy and utility effectively. Our findings provide a crucial baseline for developing more robust, privacy-aware AI systems.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Accuracy is Not Enough: A Divergence-Based Approach to Evaluate Fidelity Loss in Quantized LLMs

Deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) on memory-constrained edge devices relies heavily on aggressive post-training quantization. However, evaluating these models is largely based on zero-shot task accuracy, which depends solely on argmax predictions and is insensitive to changes in the underlying predictive distribution. Consequently, accuracy can exhibit unstable, non-monotonic behavior under progressive quantization, masking substantial fidelity loss relative to the BFloat16 (BF16) uncompressed base model and providing misleading deployment signals. We introduce a distribution-sensitive evaluation framework quantifying information loss in quantized LLMs as the divergence between full-vocabulary predictive distributions at the token decision boundary. We compute statistical distances, including Jensen-Shannon Divergence and Total Variation Distance, between outputs of full-precision and quantized models, enabling a fine-grained analysis of distributional shift. Using this framework, we quantify probability mass displacement and distributional drift relative to the BF16 reference, capturing predictive distribution changes not reflected in top-1 accuracy. We conduct a 120-run experimental matrix across five foundation architectures and four reasoning benchmarks under progressive quantization regimes, from uncompressed BF16 to Q2_K, providing a systematic fidelity analysis. Our results show divergence metrics generally increase under stronger quantization, complementing task accuracy with a fidelity signal. Across tested llama-cpp schemes, mixed-precision Q4_K generally yields lower divergence than uniform Q4_0 at similar memory footprints. These findings motivate distribution-aware evaluation as a practical diagnostic complement to task accuracy; they do not directly establish correctness, calibration, safety, or user-perceived quality.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Leveraging Transfer Learning with Class-Specific Decoders for Laparoscopic Segmentation

Effective multi-organ segmentation in surgical data requires learning the intricate anatomical features and alleviating the challenge of class imbalance, which results from relatively lower proportions of small and limitedly exposed structures. Recent works on laparoscopic multi-organ segmentation focus on learning structure-specific features through class-specific decoder architectures and report favorable results. This work extends the decoder-focused architectures to investigate knowledge sharing in the cross-surgical domain. We utilize two datasets representing different surgical domains, rectal and cholecystectomy surgeries, to explore how surgical conceptual knowledge transfers under partially common anatomical representations. Additionally, we compare the feature adaptation for the encoder and decoder at different training stages to analyse the knowledge adaptation and retention in the network. Our results corroborate previous findings on decoder-specific architectures and demonstrate that the organ-specific decoder model (CEMD), fully fine-tuned after cross-domain pre-training, achieves the highest segmentation performance (62.4\% dice) while converging substantially faster than training from scratch. However, we also find that class imbalance in surgical data remains a persistent challenge that transfer learning does not fully resolve for underrepresented anatomical structures.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

First Investigation of Deep Learning for Intraoperative Gauze Segmentation in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgery

Surgical gauze is an essential part of surgical procedures, primarily used for controlling bleeding and absorbing bodily fluids. The post-surgical retention of gauze can lead to serious complications and necessitate additional surgery for its removal. Despite the clinical significance, research on gauze segmentation using real-world surgical data remains underexplored, owing in part to the scarcity of annotated datasets. In this work, we investigate the use of deep learning methods for gauze segmentation in robot-assisted minimally invasive abdominal surgeries, utilizing an in-house surgical dataset prepared at a university hospital. The training data reflects realistic surgical settings and captures extensive diversity in spatial, morphological, and visual attributes across three different gauze categories. We evaluate several widely used segmentation architectures, including CNN-based, transformer-based, and hybrid architectures, to establish a proof-of-concept for gauze segmentation in a realistic clinical setting. In addition, we investigate the influence of sub-optimally annotated, auto-tracked segmentation masks as a strategy to address data scarcity and improve performance. Our results demonstrate the efficacy of real-world training data in countering the main challenge reported by prior works, the trade-off between blood presence and gauze detection. The incorporation of auto-tracked annotations yields performance enhancements, particularly in generic surgical scenarios. The integration of effective segmentation approaches can benefit robot-guided surgical procedures and various downstream applications by providing precise delineation of foreign objects, thereby enhancing patient safety and surgical outcomes.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

The Illusion of Equivalency: Statistical Characterization of Quantization Effects in LLMs

Post-Training Quantization has become widely used to compress large language models to make them deployable on resource-constrained devices. However, the evaluation of quantization methods mainly uses accuracy and perplexity, which cannot capture the behavioral changes in the quantized variants. In this work, we propose Correctness Agreement, a decision-level metric that can measure the intersection of correct predictions between the base model and its quantized variant. We use this metric across multiple models and quantization bit levels (8-bit to 2-bit), and we find that the base and quantized variants usually have a shift in behavior even when accuracy and perplexity are preserved. In order to explain this effect, we study the effect of quantization on the structure of the attention weights using statistical and distributional measures. The results reveal a breakpoint at low bit widths and show that query and key projections are more sensitive to quantization than the value and output projections. These results prove the illusion of equivalency between the base and quantized models and inspire behavioral evaluation beyond perplexity and accuracy for quantization methods.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Hybrid Deep Learning for Traceability and Classification of Industrial Slate Tiles

Applying deep learning to instance-aware reidentification of slate tiles and extraction site classification can improve production efficiency and quality control in the slate tile industry. These tasks are particularly important for handling natural materials where visual variability can make manual inspection costly and error-prone. We present a lightweight, hybrid deep learning approach that combines image matching and classification within a single framework. The system integrates a feature-matching branch based on XFeat with a MobileNetV3- based classification branch. The XFeat branch, combined with a LightGlue matching head, improves instance matching performance by +15.4% AUC. For classification, features from both backbones are shared and fused, resulting in a +10.9% accuracy improvement over a standard MobileNetV3 model. Our approach is evaluated on a newly created industrial dataset consisting of 2,610 slate tile images from six extraction sites. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach for object re-identification and classification in an industrial setting.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Knowing When Not to Predict: Self Supervised Learning and Abstention for Safer DR Screening

Self-supervised learning (SSL) is now a standard way to pretrain medical image models, but performance is still mostly judged by downstream accuracy. For safety-critical screening tasks such as diabetic retinopathy grading, this is not enough: a model must also know when its predictions are unreliable and defer uncertain cases for clinical review. In this work, we examine how the length of SSL pretraining influences calibrated confidence and confidence-based abstention. We evaluate multiple SSL checkpoints under a fixed fine-tuning protocol and assess calibrated confidence, coverage, selective accuracy, and selective macro-F1. Across datasets and data regimes, SSL pretraining improves selective prediction compared to training from scratch. Unlike prior SSL studies that primarily evaluate downstream accuracy or AUROC, we analyze how SSL pretraining duration influences confidence behavior under calibrated confidence-based abstention. However, once accuracy saturates, selective performance can still change markedly across checkpoints, and longer pretraining does not consistently improve reliability. These results underscore the importance of abstention-aware evaluation and suggest that pretraining length should be treated as an important reliability-related design choice rather than only a computational detail. Code is available at GitHub.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Is continuous CoT better suited for multi-lingual reasoning?

We investigate whether performing reasoning in a continuous latent space leads to more robust multilingual capabilities. We compare Continuous Chain-of-Thought (using the CODI framework) against standard supervised fine-tuning across five typologically diverse languages: English, Chinese, German, French, and Urdu. Our experiments on GSM8k and CommonsenseQA demonstrate that continuous reasoning significantly outperforms explicit reasoning on low-resource languages, particularly in zero-shot settings where the target language was not seen during training. Additionally, this approach achieves extreme efficiency, compressing reasoning traces by approximately $29\times$ to $50\times$. These findings indicate that continuous latent representations naturally exhibit greater language invariance, offering a scalable solution for cross-lingual reasoning.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Towards Reliable Machine Translation: Scaling LLMs for Critical Error Detection and Safety

Machine Translation (MT) plays a pivotal role in cross-lingual information access, public policy communication, and equitable knowledge dissemination. However, critical meaning errors, such as factual distortions, intent reversals, or biased translations, can undermine the reliability, fairness, and safety of multilingual systems. In this work, we explore the capacity of instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) to detect such critical errors, evaluating models across a range of parameters using the publicly accessible data sets. Our findings show that model scaling and adaptation strategies (zero-shot, few-shot, fine-tuning) yield consistent improvements, outperforming encoder-only baselines like XLM-R and ModernBERT. We argue that improving critical error detection in MT contributes to safer, more trustworthy, and socially accountable information systems by reducing the risk of disinformation, miscommunication, and linguistic harm, especially in high-stakes or underrepresented contexts. This work positions error detection not merely as a technical challenge, but as a necessary safeguard in the pursuit of just and responsible multilingual AI. The code will be made available at GitHub.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Modalities, a PyTorch-native Framework For Large-scale LLM Training and Research

Today's LLM (pre-) training and research workflows typically allocate a significant amount of compute to large-scale ablation studies. Despite the substantial compute costs of these ablations, existing open-source frameworks provide limited tooling for these experiments, often forcing researchers to write their own wrappers and scripts. We propose Modalities, an end-to-end PyTorch-native framework that integrates data-driven LLM research with large-scale model training from two angles. Firstly, by integrating state-of-the-art parallelization strategies, it enables both efficient pretraining and systematic ablations at trillion-token and billion-parameter scale. Secondly, Modalities adopts modular design with declarative, self-contained configuration, enabling reproducibility and extensibility levels that are difficult to achieve out-of-the-box with existing LLM training frameworks.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Generalizing Abstention for Noise-Robust Learning in Medical Image Segmentation

Label noise is a critical problem in medical image segmentation, often arising from the inherent difficulty of manual annotation. Models trained on noisy data are prone to overfitting, which degrades their generalization performance. While a number of methods and strategies have been proposed to mitigate noisy labels in the segmentation domain, this area remains largely under-explored. The abstention mechanism has proven effective in classification tasks by enhancing the capabilities of Cross Entropy, yet its potential in segmentation remains unverified. In this paper, we address this gap by introducing a universal and modular abstention framework capable of enhancing the noise-robustness of a diverse range of loss functions. Our framework improves upon prior work with two key components: an informed regularization term to guide abstention behaviour, and a more flexible power-law-based auto-tuning algorithm for the abstention penalty. We demonstrate the framework's versatility by systematically integrating it with three distinct loss functions to create three novel, noise-robust variants: GAC, SAC, and ADS. Experiments on the CaDIS and DSAD medical datasets show our methods consistently and significantly outperform their non-abstaining baselines, especially under high noise levels. This work establishes that enabling models to selectively ignore corrupted samples is a powerful and generalizable strategy for building more reliable segmentation models. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/wemous/abstention-for-segmentation.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Domain-Adaptation through Synthetic Data: Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for German Law

Large language models (LLMs) often struggle in specialized domains such as legal reasoning due to limited expert knowledge, resulting in factually incorrect outputs or hallucinations. This paper presents an effective method for adapting advanced LLMs to German legal question answering through a novel synthetic data generation approach. In contrast to costly human-annotated resources or unreliable synthetic alternatives, our approach systematically produces high-quality, diverse, and legally accurate question-answer pairs directly from authoritative German statutes. Using rigorous automated filtering methods and parameter-efficient fine-tuning techniques, we demonstrate that LLMs adapted with our synthetic dataset significantly outperform their baseline counterparts on German legal question answering tasks. Our results highlight the feasibility of using carefully designed synthetic data as a robust alternative to manual annotation in high-stakes, knowledge-intensive domains.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2025

Benchmark Success, Clinical Failure: When Reinforcement Learning Optimizes for Benchmarks, Not Patients

Recent Reinforcement Learning (RL) advances for Large Language Models (LLMs) have improved reasoning tasks, yet their resource-constrained application to medical imaging remains underexplored. We introduce ChexReason, a vision-language model trained via R1-style methodology (SFT followed by GRPO) using only 2,000 SFT samples, 1,000 RL samples, and a single A100 GPU. Evaluations on CheXpert and NIH benchmarks reveal a fundamental tension: GRPO recovers in-distribution performance (23% improvement on CheXpert, macro-F1 = 0.346) but degrades cross-dataset transferability (19% drop on NIH). This mirrors high-resource models like NV-Reason-CXR-3B, suggesting the issue stems from the RL paradigm rather than scale. We identify a generalization paradox where the SFT checkpoint uniquely improves on NIH before optimization, indicating teacher-guided reasoning captures more institution-agnostic features. Furthermore, cross-model comparisons show structured reasoning scaffolds benefit general-purpose VLMs but offer minimal gain for medically pre-trained models. Consequently, curated supervised fine-tuning may outperform aggressive RL for clinical deployment requiring robustness across diverse populations.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2025

From Retinal Pixels to Patients: Evolution of Deep Learning Research in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening

Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) remains a leading cause of preventable blindness, with early detection critical for reducing vision loss worldwide. Over the past decade, deep learning has transformed DR screening, progressing from early convolutional neural networks trained on private datasets to advanced pipelines addressing class imbalance, label scarcity, domain shift, and interpretability. This survey provides the first systematic synthesis of DR research spanning 2016-2025, consolidating results from 50+ studies and over 20 datasets. We critically examine methodological advances, including self- and semi-supervised learning, domain generalization, federated training, and hybrid neuro-symbolic models, alongside evaluation protocols, reporting standards, and reproducibility challenges. Benchmark tables contextualize performance across datasets, while discussion highlights open gaps in multi-center validation and clinical trust. By linking technical progress with translational barriers, this work outlines a practical agenda for reproducible, privacy-preserving, and clinically deployable DR AI. Beyond DR, many of the surveyed innovations extend broadly to medical imaging at scale.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2025

How Small Can You Go? Compact Language Models for On-Device Critical Error Detection in Machine Translation

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at evaluating machine translation (MT), but their scale and cost hinder deployment on edge devices and in privacy-sensitive workflows. We ask: how small can you get while still detecting meaning-altering translation errors? Focusing on English->German Critical Error Detection (CED), we benchmark sub-2B models (LFM2-350M, Qwen-3-0.6B/1.7B, Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct, Gemma-3-1B) across WMT21, WMT22, and SynCED-EnDe-2025. Our framework standardizes prompts, applies lightweight logit-bias calibration and majority voting, and reports both semantic quality (MCC, F1-ERR/F1-NOT) and compute metrics (VRAM, latency, throughput). Results reveal a clear sweet spot around one billion parameters: Gemma-3-1B provides the best quality-efficiency trade-off, reaching MCC=0.77 with F1-ERR=0.98 on SynCED-EnDe-2025 after merged-weights fine-tuning, while maintaining 400 ms single-sample latency on a MacBook Pro M4 Pro (24 GB). At larger scale, Qwen-3-1.7B attains the highest absolute MCC (+0.11 over Gemma) but with higher compute cost. In contrast, ultra-small models (0.6B) remain usable with few-shot calibration yet under-detect entity and number errors. Overall, compact, instruction-tuned LLMs augmented with lightweight calibration and small-sample supervision can deliver trustworthy, on-device CED for MT, enabling private, low-cost error screening in real-world translation pipelines. All datasets, prompts, and scripts are publicly available at our GitHub repository.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2025

History Rhymes: Macro-Contextual Retrieval for Robust Financial Forecasting

Financial markets are inherently non-stationary: structural breaks and macroeconomic regime shifts often cause forecasting models to fail when deployed out of distribution (OOD). Conventional multimodal approaches that simply fuse numerical indicators and textual sentiment rarely adapt to such shifts. We introduce macro-contextual retrieval, a retrieval-augmented forecasting framework that grounds each prediction in historically analogous macroeconomic regimes. The method jointly embeds macro indicators (e.g., CPI, unemployment, yield spread, GDP growth) and financial news sentiment in a shared similarity space, enabling causal retrieval of precedent periods during inference without retraining. Trained on seventeen years of S&P 500 data (2007-2023) and evaluated OOD on AAPL (2024) and XOM (2024), the framework consistently narrows the CV to OOD performance gap. Macro-conditioned retrieval achieves the only positive out-of-sample trading outcomes (AAPL: PF=1.18, Sharpe=0.95; XOM: PF=1.16, Sharpe=0.61), while static numeric, text-only, and naive multimodal baselines collapse under regime shifts. Beyond metric gains, retrieved neighbors form interpretable evidence chains that correspond to recognizable macro contexts, such as inflationary or yield-curve inversion phases, supporting causal interpretability and transparency. By operationalizing the principle that "financial history may not repeat, but it often rhymes," this work demonstrates that macro-aware retrieval yields robust, explainable forecasts under distributional change. All datasets, models, and source code are publicly available.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2025

SynCED-EnDe 2025: A Synthetic and Curated English - German Dataset for Critical Error Detection in Machine Translation

Critical Error Detection (CED) in machine translation aims to determine whether a translation is safe to use or contains unacceptable deviations in meaning. While the WMT21 English-German CED dataset provided the first benchmark, it is limited in scale, label balance, domain coverage, and temporal freshness. We present SynCED-EnDe, a new resource consisting of 1,000 gold-labeled and 8,000 silver-labeled sentence pairs, balanced 50/50 between error and non-error cases. SynCED-EnDe draws from diverse 2024-2025 sources (StackExchange, GOV.UK) and introduces explicit error subclasses, structured trigger flags, and fine-grained auxiliary judgments (obviousness, severity, localization complexity, contextual dependency, adequacy deviation). These enrichments enable systematic analyses of error risk and intricacy beyond binary detection. The dataset is permanently hosted on GitHub and Hugging Face, accompanied by documentation, annotation guidelines, and baseline scripts. Benchmark experiments with XLM-R and related encoders show substantial performance gains over WMT21 due to balanced labels and refined annotations. We envision SynCED-EnDe as a community resource to advance safe deployment of MT in information retrieval and conversational assistants, particularly in emerging contexts such as wearable AI devices.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2025

Multi-Modal Vision vs. Text-Based Parsing: Benchmarking LLM Strategies for Invoice Processing

This paper benchmarks eight multi-modal large language models from three families (GPT-5, Gemini 2.5, and open-source Gemma 3) on three diverse openly available invoice document datasets using zero-shot prompting. We compare two processing strategies: direct image processing using multi-modal capabilities and a structured parsing approach converting documents to markdown first. Results show native image processing generally outperforms structured approaches, with performance varying across model types and document characteristics. This benchmark provides insights for selecting appropriate models and processing strategies for automated document systems. Our code is available online.

cs.CL↗