arXiv subjects

Saket Saurabh

Publications and source records attributed to Saket Saurabh.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

arXiv2022

Detours in Directed Graphs

We study two "above guarantee" versions of the classical Longest Path problem on undirected and directed graphs and obtain the following results. In the first variant of Longest Path that we study, called Longest Detour, the task is to decide whether a graph has an (s,t)-path of length at least dist_G(s,t)+k (where dist_G(s,t) denotes the length of a shortest path from s to t). Bezáková et al. proved that on undirected graphs the problem is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) by providing an algorithm of running time 2^{O (k)} n. Further, they left the parameterized complexity of the problem on directed graphs open. Our first main result establishes a connection between Longest Detour on directed graphs and 3-Disjoint Paths on directed graphs. Using these new insights, we design a 2^{O(k)} n^{O(1)} time algorithm for the problem on directed planar graphs. Further, the new approach yields a significantly faster FPT algorithm on undirected graphs. In the second variant of Longest Path, namely Longest Path Above Diameter, the task is to decide whether the graph has a path of length at least diam(G)+k (diam(G) denotes the length of a longest shortest path in a graph G). We obtain dichotomy results about Longest Path Above Diameter on undirected and directed graphs. For (un)directed graphs, Longest Path Above Diameter is NP-complete even for k=1. However, if the input undirected graph is 2-connected, then the problem is FPT. On the other hand, for 2-connected directed graphs, we show that Longest Path Above Diameter is solvable in polynomial time for each k\in{1,\dots, 4} and is NP-complete for every k\geq 5. The parameterized complexity of Longest Path Above Diameter on general directed graphs remains an interesting open problem.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Deleting, Eliminating and Decomposing to Hereditary Classes Are All FPT-Equivalent

For a graph class ${\cal H}$, the graph parameters elimination distance to ${\cal H}$ (denoted by ${\bf ed}_{\cal H}$) [Bulian and Dawar, Algorithmica, 2016], and ${\cal H}$-treewidth (denoted by ${\bf tw}_{\cal H}$) [Eiben et al. JCSS, 2021] aim to minimize the treedepth and treewidth, respectively, of the "torso" of the graph induced on a modulator to the graph class ${\cal H}$. Here, the torso of a vertex set $S$ in a graph $G$ is the graph with vertex set $S$ and an edge between two vertices $u, v \in S$ if there is a path between $u$ and $v$ in $G$ whose internal vertices all lie outside $S$. In this paper, we show that from the perspective of (non-uniform) fixed-parameter tractability (FPT), the three parameters described above give equally powerful parameterizations for every hereditary graph class ${\cal H}$ that satisfies mild additional conditions. In fact, we show that for every hereditary graph class ${\cal H}$ satisfying mild additional conditions, with the exception of ${\bf tw}_{\cal H}$ parameterized by ${\bf ed}_{\cal H}$, for every pair of these parameters, computing one parameterized by itself or any of the others is FPT-equivalent to the standard vertex-deletion (to ${\cal H}$) problem. As an example, we prove that an FPT algorithm for the vertex-deletion problem implies a non-uniform FPT algorithm for computing ${\bf ed}_{\cal H}$ and ${\bf tw}_{\cal H}$. The conclusions of non-uniform FPT algorithms being somewhat unsatisfactory, we essentially prove that if ${\cal H}$ is hereditary, union-closed, CMSO-definable, and (a) the canonical equivalence relation (or any refinement thereof) for membership in the class can be efficiently computed, or (b) the class admits a "strong irrelevant vertex rule", then there exists a uniform FPT algorithm for ${\bf ed}_{\cal H}$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Space-Efficient FPT Algorithms

We prove algorithmic results showing that a number of natural parameterized problems are in the restricted-space parameterized classes Para-L and FPT+XL. The first class comprises problems solvable in f(k) n^{O(1)} time using g(k) + O(log n)) bits of space (k is the parameter and n is the input size; f and g are computable functions). The second class comprises problems solvable under the same time bound, but using g(k) log n bits of space instead. Earlier work on these classes has focused largely on their structural aspects and their relationships with various other classes. We complement this with Para-L and FPT+XL algorithms for a restriction of Hitting Set, some graph deletion problems where the target class has an infinite forbidden set characterization, a number of problems parameterized by vertex cover number, and Feedback Vertex Set.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

ETH Tight Algorithms for Geometric Intersection Graphs: Now in Polynomial Space

De Berg et al. in [SICOMP 2020] gave an algorithmic framework for subexponential algorithms on geometric graphs with tight (up to ETH) running times. This framework is based on dynamic programming on graphs of weighted treewidth resulting in algorithms that use super-polynomial space. We introduce the notion of weighted treedepth and use it to refine the framework of de Berg et al. for obtaining polynomial space (with tight running times) on geometric graphs. As a result, we prove that for any fixed dimension $d \ge 2$ on intersection graphs of similarly-sized fat objects many well-known graph problems including Independent Set, $r$-Dominating Set for constant $r$, Cycle Cover, Hamiltonian Cycle, Hamiltonian Path, Steiner Tree, Connected Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set, and (Connected) Odd Cycle Transversal are solvable in time $2^{O(n^{1-1/d})}$ and within polynomial space.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

$α$-approximate Reductions: a Novel Source of Heuristics for Better Approximation Algorithms

Lokshtanov et al.~[STOC 2017] introduced \emph{lossy kernelization} as a mathematical framework for quantifying the effectiveness of preprocessing algorithms in preserving approximation ratios. \emph{$α$-approximate reduction rules} are a central notion of this framework. We propose that carefully crafted $α$-approximate reduction rules can yield improved approximation ratios in practice, while being easy to implement as well. This is distinctly different from the (theoretical) purpose for which Lokshtanov et al. designed $α$-approximate Reduction Rules. As evidence in support of this proposal we present a new 2-approximate reduction rule for the \textsc{Dominating Set} problem. This rule, when combined with an approximation algorithm for \textsc{Dominating Set}, yields significantly better approximation ratios on a variety of benchmark instances as compared to the latter algorithm alone. The central thesis of this work is that $α$-approximate reduction rules can be used as a tool for designing approximation algorithms which perform better in practice. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first exploration of the use of $α$-approximate reduction rules as a design technique for practical approximation algorithms. We believe that this technique could be useful in coming up with improved approximation algorithms for other optimization problems as well.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Gerrymandering on graphs: Computational complexity and parameterized algorithms

Partitioning a region into districts to favor a particular candidate or a party is commonly known as gerrymandering. In this paper, we investigate the gerrymandering problem in graph theoretic setting as proposed by Cohen-Zemach et al. [AAMAS 2018]. Our contributions in this article are two-fold, conceptual and computational. We first resolve the open question posed by Ito et al. [AAMAS 2019] about the computational complexity of the problem when the input graph is a path. Next, we propose a generalization of their model, where the input consists of a graph on $n$ vertices representing the set of voters, a set of $m$ candidates $\mathcal{C}$, a weight function $w_v: \mathcal{C}\rightarrow {\mathbb Z}^+$ for each voter $v\in V(G)$ representing the preference of the voter over the candidates, a distinguished candidate $p\in \mathcal{C}$, and a positive integer $k$. The objective is to decide if one can partition the vertex set into $k$ pairwise disjoint connected sets (districts) s.t $p$ wins more districts than any other candidate. The problem is known to be NPC even if $k=2$, $m=2$, and $G$ is either a complete bipartite graph (in fact $K_{2,n}$) or a complete graph. This means that in search for FPT algorithms we need to either focus on the parameter $n$, or subclasses of forest. Circumventing these intractable results, we give a deterministic and a randomized algorithms for the problem on paths running in times $2.619^{k}(n+m)^{O(1)}$ and $2^{k}(n+m)^{O(1)}$, respectively. Additionally, we prove that the problem on general graphs is solvable in time $2^n (n+m)^{O(1)}$. Our algorithmic results use sophisticated technical tools such as representative set family and Fast Fourier transform based polynomial multiplication, and their (possibly first) application to problems arising in social choice theory and/or game theory may be of independent interest to the community.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

An Exponential Time Parameterized Algorithm for Planar Disjoint Paths

In the Disjoint Paths problem, the input is an undirected graph $G$ on $n$ vertices and a set of $k$ vertex pairs, $\{s_i,t_i\}_{i=1}^k$, and the task is to find $k$ pairwise vertex-disjoint paths connecting $s_i$ to $t_i$. The problem was shown to have an $f(k)n^3$ algorithm by Robertson and Seymour. In modern terminology, this means that Disjoint Paths is fixed parameter tractable (FPT), parameterized by the number of vertex pairs. This algorithm is the cornerstone of the entire graph minor theory, and a vital ingredient in the $g(k)n^3$ algorithm for Minor Testing (given two undirected graphs, $G$ and $H$ on $n$ and $k$ vertices, respectively, the objective is to check whether $G$ contains $H$ as a minor). All we know about $f$ and $g$ is that these are computable functions. Thus, a challenging open problem in graph algorithms is to devise an algorithm for Disjoint Paths where $f$ is single exponential. That is, $f$ is of the form $2^{{\sf poly}(k)}$. The algorithm of Robertson and Seymour relies on topology and essentially reduces the problem to surface-embedded graphs. Thus, the first major obstacle that has to be overcome in order to get an algorithm with a single exponential running time for Disjoint Paths and {\sf Minor Testing} on general graphs is to solve Disjoint Paths in single exponential time on surface-embedded graphs and in particular on planar graphs. Even when the inputs to Disjoint Paths are restricted to planar graphs, a case called the Planar Disjoint Paths problem, the best known algorithm has running time $2^{2^{O(k)}}n^2$. In this paper, we make the first step towards our quest for designing a single exponential time algorithm for Disjoint Paths by giving a $2^{O(k^2)}n^{O(1)}$-time algorithm for Planar Disjoint Paths.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Approximation in (Poly-) Logarithmic Space

We develop new approximation algorithms for classical graph and set problems in the RAM model under space constraints. As one of our main results, we devise an algorithm for d-Hitting Set that runs in time n^{O(d^2 + d/ε})}, uses O((d^2 + d/ε) log n) bits of space, and achieves an approximation ratio of O((d/ε) n^ε) for any positive ε\leq 1 and any natural number d. In particular, this yields a factor-O(log n) approximation algorithm which runs in time n^{O(log n)} and uses O(log^2 n) bits of space (for constant d). As a corollary, we obtain similar bounds for Vertex Cover and several graph deletion problems. For bounded-multiplicity problem instances, one can do better. We devise a factor-2 approximation algorithm for Vertex Cover on graphs with maximum degree Δ, and an algorithm for computing maximal independent sets which both run in time n^{O(Δ)} and use O(Δlog n) bits of space. For the more general d-Hitting Set problem, we devise a factor-d approximation algorithm which runs in time n^{O(d δ^2)} and uses O(d δ^2 log n) bits of space on set families where each element appears in at most δsets. For Independent Set restricted to graphs with average degree d, we give a factor-(2d) approximation algorithm which runs in polynomial time and uses O(log n) bits of space. We also devise a factor-O(d^2) approximation algorithm for Dominating Set on d-degenerate graphs which runs in time n^{O(log n)} and uses O(log^2 n) bits of space. For d-regular graphs, we show how a known randomized factor-O(log d) approximation algorithm can be derandomized to run in time n^{O(1)} and use O(log n) bits of space. Our results use a combination of ideas from the theory of kernelization, distributed algorithms and randomized algorithms.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Diverse Collections in Matroids and Graphs

We investigate the parameterized complexity of finding diverse sets of solutions to three fundamental combinatorial problems, two from the theory of matroids and the third from graph theory. The input to the Weighted Diverse Bases problem consists of a matroid $M$, a weight function $ω:E(M)\to\mathbb{N}$, and integers $k\geq 1, d\geq 0$. The task is to decide if there is a collection of $k$ bases $B_{1}, \dotsc, B_{k}$ of $M$ such that the weight of the symmetric difference of any pair of these bases is at least $d$. This is a diverse variant of the classical matroid base packing problem. The input to the Weighted Diverse Common Independent Sets problem consists of two matroids $M_{1},M_{2}$ defined on the same ground set $E$, a weight function $ω:E\to\mathbb{N}$, and integers $k\geq 1, d\geq 0$. The task is to decide if there is a collection of $k$ common independent sets $I_{1}, \dotsc, I_{k}$ of $M_{1}$ and $M_{2}$ such that the weight of the symmetric difference of any pair of these sets is at least $d$. This is motivated by the classical weighted matroid intersection problem. The input to the Diverse Perfect Matchings problem consists of a graph $G$ and integers $k\geq 1, d\geq 0$. The task is to decide if $G$ contains $k$ perfect matchings $M_{1},\dotsc,M_{k}$ such that the symmetric difference of any two of these matchings is at least $d$. We show that Weighted Diverse Bases and Weighted Diverse Common Independent Sets are both NP-hard, and derive fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms for all three problems with $(k,d)$ as the parameter.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

A Constant Factor Approximation for Navigating Through Connected Obstacles in the Plane

Given two points s and t in the plane and a set of obstacles defined by closed curves, what is the minimum number of obstacles touched by a path connecting s and t? This is a fundamental and well-studied problem arising naturally in computational geometry, graph theory (under the names Min-Color Path and Minimum Label Path), wireless sensor networks (Barrier Resilience) and motion planning (Minimum Constraint Removal). It remains NP-hard even for very simple-shaped obstacles such as unit-length line segments. In this paper we give the first constant factor approximation algorithm for this problem, resolving an open problem of [Chan and Kirkpatrick, TCS, 2014] and [Bandyapadhyay et al., CGTA, 2020]. We also obtain a constant factor approximation for the Minimum Color Prize Collecting Steiner Forest where the goal is to connect multiple request pairs (s1, t1), . . . ,(sk, tk) while minimizing the number of obstacles touched by any (si, ti) path plus a fixed cost of wi for each pair (si, ti) left disconnected. This generalizes the classic Steiner Forest and Prize-Collecting Steiner Forest problems on planar graphs, for which intricate PTASes are known. In contrast, no PTAS is possible for Min-Color Path even on planar graphs since the problem is known to be APXhard [Eiben and Kanj, TALG, 2020]. Additionally, we show that generalizations of the problem to disconnected obstacles

cs.CG↗

arXiv2020

Planar F-Deletion: Approximation, Kernelization and Optimal FPT Algorithms

Let F be a finite set of graphs. In the F-Deletion problem, we are given an n-vertex graph G and an integer k as input, and asked whether at most k vertices can be deleted from G such that the resulting graph does not contain a graph from F as a minor. F-Deletion is a generic problem and by selecting different sets of forbidden minors F, one can obtain various fundamental problems such as Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set or Treewidth t-Deletion. In this paper we obtain a number of generic algorithmic results about Planar F-Deletion, when F contains at least one planar graph. The highlights of our work are - A constant factor approximation algorithm for the optimization version of Planar F-Deletion. - A randomized linear time and single exponential parameterized algorithm, that is, an algorithm running in time O(2^{O(k)} n), for the parameterized version of Planar F-deletion where all graphs in F are connected. The algorithm can be made deterministic at the cost of making the polynomial factor in the running time n*log^2 n rather than linear. - A polynomial kernel for parameterized Planar F-deletion These algorithms unify, generalize, and improve a multitude of results in the literature. Our main results have several direct applications, but also the methods we develop on the way have applicability beyond the scope of this paper. Our results -- constant factor approximation, polynomial kernelization and FPT algorithms -- are stringed together by a common theme of polynomial time preprocessing.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Randomized contractions meet lean decompositions

We show an algorithm that, given an $n$-vertex graph $G$ and a parameter $k$, in time $2^{O(k \log k)} n^{O(1)}$ finds a tree decomposition of $G$ with the following properties: * every adhesion of the tree decomposition is of size at most $k$, and * every bag of the tree decomposition is $(i,i)$-unbreakable in $G$ for every $1 \leq i \leq k$. Here, a set $X \subseteq V(G)$ is $(a,b)$-unbreakable in $G$ if for every separation $(A,B)$ of order at most $b$ in $G$, we have $|A \cap X| \leq a$ or $|B \cap X| \leq a$. The resulting tree decomposition has arguably best possible adhesion size boundsand unbreakability guarantees. Furthermore, the parametric factor in the running time bound is significantly smaller than in previous similar constructions. These improvements allow us to present parameterized algorithms for Minimum Bisection, Steiner Cut, and Steiner Multicut with improved parameteric factor in the running time bound. The main technical insight is to adapt the notion of lean decompositions of Thomas and the subsequent construction algorithm of Bellenbaum and Diestel to the parameterized setting.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Improved FPT Algorithms for Deletion to Forest-like Structures

The Feedback Vertex Set problem is undoubtedly one of the most well-studied problems in Parameterized Complexity. In this problem, given an undirected graph $G$ and a non-negative integer $k$, the objective is to test whether there exists a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ of size at most $k$ such that $G-S$ is a forest. After a long line of improvement, recently, Li and Nederlof [SODA, 2020] designed a randomized algorithm for the problem running in time $\mathcal{O}^{\star}(2.7^k)$. In the Parameterized Complexity literature, several problems around Feedback Vertex Set have been studied. Some of these include Independent Feedback Vertex Set (where the set $S$ should be an independent set in $G$), Almost Forest Deletion and Pseudoforest Deletion. In Pseudoforest Deletion, each connected component in $G-S$ has at most one cycle in it. However, in Almost Forest Deletion, the input is a graph $G$ and non-negative integers $k,\ell \in \mathbb{N}$, and the objective is to test whether there exists a vertex subset $S$ of size at most $k$, such that $G-S$ is $\ell$ edges away from a forest. In this paper, using the methodology of Li and Nederlof [SODA, 2020], we obtain the current fastest algorithms for all these problems. In particular we obtain following randomized algorithms. 1) Independent Feedback Vertex Set can be solved in time $\mathcal{O}^{\star}(2.7^k)$. 2) Pseudo Forest Deletion can be solved in time $\mathcal{O}^{\star}(2.85^k)$. 3) Almost Forest Deletion can be solved in $\mathcal{O}^{\star}(\min\{2.85^k \cdot 8.54^\ell,2.7^k \cdot 36.61^\ell,3^k \cdot 1.78^\ell\})$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

On the Parameterized Complexity of \textsc{Maximum Degree Contraction} Problem

In the \textsc{Maximum Degree Contraction} problem, input is a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, and integers $k, d$, and the objective is to check whether $G$ can be transformed into a graph of maximum degree at most $d$, using at most $k$ edge contractions. A simple brute-force algorithm that checks all possible sets of edges for a solution runs in time $n^{\mathcal{O}(k)}$. As our first result, we prove that this algorithm is asymptotically optimal, upto constants in the exponents, under Exponential Time Hypothesis (Ð). Belmonte, Golovach, van't Hof, and Paulusma studied the problem in the realm of Parameterized Complexity and proved, among other things, that it admits an \FPT\ algorithm running in time $(d + k)^{2k} \cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)} = 2^{\mathcal{O}(k \log (k+d) )} \cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, and remains \NP-hard for every constant $d \ge 2$ (Acta Informatica $(2014)$). We present a different \FPT\ algorithm that runs in time $2^{\mathcal{O}(dk)} \cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. In particular, our algorithm runs in time $2^{\mathcal{O}(k)} \cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, for every fixed $d$. In the same article, the authors asked whether the problem admits a polynomial kernel, when parameterized by $k + d$. We answer this question in the negative and prove that it does not admit a polynomial compression unless $\NP \subseteq \coNP/poly$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

A Parameterized Approximation Scheme for Min $k$-Cut

In the Min $k$-Cut problem, input is an edge weighted graph $G$ and an integer $k$, and the task is to partition the vertex set into $k$ non-empty sets, such that the total weight of the edges with endpoints in different parts is minimized. When $k$ is part of the input, the problem is NP-complete and hard to approximate within any factor less than $2$. Recently, the problem has received significant attention from the perspective of parameterized approximation. Gupta et al.~[SODA 2018] initiated the study of FPT-approximation for the Min $k$-Cut problem and gave an $1.9997$-approximation algorithm running in time $2^{\mathcal{O}(k^6)}n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. Later, the same set of authors~[FOCS 2018] designed an $(1 +ε)$-approximation algorithm that runs in time $(k/ε)^{\mathcal{O}(k)}n^{k+\mathcal{O}(1)}$, and a $1.81$-approximation algorithm running in time $2^{\mathcal{O}(k^2)}n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. More, recently, Kawarabayashi and Lin~[SODA 2020] gave a $(5/3 + ε)$-approximation for Min $k$-Cut running in time $2^{\mathcal{O}(k^2 \log k)}n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. In this paper we give a parameterized approximation algorithm with best possible approximation guarantee, and best possible running time dependence on said guarantee (up to Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) and constants in the exponent). In particular, for every $ε> 0$, the algorithm obtains a $(1 +ε)$-approximate solution in time $(k/ε)^{\mathcal{O}(k)}n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. The main ingredients of our algorithm are: a simple sparsification procedure, a new polynomial time algorithm for decomposing a graph into highly connected parts, and a new exact algorithm with running time $s^{\mathcal{O}(k)}n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ on unweighted (multi-) graphs. Here, $s$ denotes the number of edges in a minimum $k$-cut. The latter two are of independent interest.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Bidimensionality and Kernels

Bidimensionality Theory was introduced by [E.D. Demaine, F.V. Fomin, M.Hajiaghayi, and D.M. Thilikos. Subexponential parameterized algorithms on graphs of bounded genus and H-minor-free graphs, J. ACM, 52 (2005), pp.866--893] as a tool to obtain sub-exponential time parameterized algorithms on H-minor-free graphs. In [E.D. Demaine and M.Hajiaghayi, Bidimensionality: new connections between FPT algorithms and PTASs, in Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), SIAM, 2005, pp.590--601] this theory was extended in order to obtain polynomial time approximation schemes (PTASs) for bidimensional problems. In this work, we establish a third meta-algorithmic direction for bidimensionality theory by relating it to the existence of linear kernels for parameterized problems. In particular, we prove that every minor (respectively contraction) bidimensional problem that satisfies a separation property and is expressible in Countable Monadic Second Order Logic (CMSO), admits a linear kernel for classes of graphs that exclude a fixed graph (respectively an apex graph) H as a minor. Our results imply that a multitude of bidimensional problems g graph classes. For most of these problems no polynomial kernels on H-minor-free graphs were known prior to our work.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

On the Parameterized Complexity of Deletion to $\mathcal{H}$-free Strong Components

{\sc Directed Feedback Vertex Set (DFVS)} is a fundamental computational problem that has received extensive attention in parameterized complexity. In this paper, we initiate the study of a wide generalization, the {\sc ${\cal H}$-free SCC Deletion} problem. Here, one is given a digraph $D$, an integer $k$ and the objective is to decide whether there is a vertex set of size at most $k$ whose deletion leaves a digraph where every strong component excludes graphs in the fixed finite family ${\cal H}$ as (not necessarily induced) subgraphs. When ${\cal H}$ comprises only the digraph with a single arc, then this problem is precisely DFVS. Our main result is a proof that this problem is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the size of the deletion set if ${\cal H}$ only contains rooted graphs or if ${\cal H}$ contains at least one directed path. Along with generalizing the fixed-parameter tractability result for DFVS, our result also generalizes the recent results of Göke et al. [CIAC 2019] for the {\sc 1-Out-Regular Vertex Deletion} and {\sc Bounded Size Strong Component Vertex Deletion} problems. Moreover, we design algorithms for the two above mentioned problems, whose running times are better and match with the best bounds for {\sc DFVS}, without using the heavy machinery of shadow removal as is done by Göke et al. [CIAC 2019].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Efficient Graph Minors Theory and Parameterized Algorithms for (Planar) Disjoint Paths

In the Disjoint Paths problem, the input consists of an $n$-vertex graph $G$ and a collection of $k$ vertex pairs, $\{(s_i,t_i)\}_{i=1}^k$, and the objective is to determine whether there exists a collection $\{P_i\}_{i=1}^k$ of $k$ pairwise vertex-disjoint paths in $G$ where the end-vertices of $P_i$ are $s_i$ and $t_i$. This problem was shown to admit an $f(k)n^3$-time algorithm by Robertson and Seymour (Graph Minors XIII, The Disjoint Paths Problem, JCTB). In modern terminology, this means that Disjoint Paths is fixed parameter tractable (FPT) with respect to $k$. Remarkably, the above algorithm for Disjoint Paths is a cornerstone of the entire Graph Minors Theory, and conceptually vital to the $g(k)n^3$-time algorithm for Minor Testing (given two undirected graphs, $G$ and $H$ on $n$ and $k$ vertices, respectively, determine whether $G$ contains $H$ as a minor). In this semi-survey, we will first give an exposition of the Graph Minors Theory with emphasis on efficiency from the viewpoint of Parameterized Complexity. Secondly, we will review the state of the art with respect to the Disjoint Paths and Planar Disjoint Paths problems. Lastly, we will discuss the main ideas behind a new algorithm that combines treewidth reduction and an algebraic approach to solve Planar Disjoint Paths in time $2^{k^{O(1)}}n^{O(1)}$ (for undirected graphs).

cs.DS↗