arXiv subjects

Saket Saurabh

Publications and source records attributed to Saket Saurabh.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources

arXiv2015

A faster FPT Algorithm and a smaller Kernel for Block Graph Vertex Deletion

A graph $G$ is called a \emph{block graph} if each maximal $2$-connected component of $G$ is a clique. In this paper we study the Block Graph Vertex Deletion from the perspective of fixed parameter tractable (FPT) and kernelization algorithm. In particular, an input to Block Graph Vertex Deletion consists of a graph $G$ and a positive integer $k$ and the objective to check whether there exists a subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ of size at most $k$ such that the graph induced on $V(G)\setminus S$ is a block graph. In this paper we give an FPT algorithm with running time $4^kn^{O(1)}$ and a polynomial kernel of size $O(k^4)$ for Block Graph Vertex Deletion. The running time of our FPT algorithm improves over the previous best algorithm for the problem that ran in time $10^kn^{O(1)}$ and the size of our kernel reduces over the previously known kernel of size $O(k^9)$. Our results are based on a novel connection between Block Graph Vertex Deletion and the classical {\sc Feedback Vertex Set} problem in graphs without induced $C_4$ and $K_4-e$. To achieve our results we also obtain an algorithm for {\sc Weighted Feedback Vertex Set} running in time $3.618^kn^{O(1)}$ and improving over the running time of previously known algorithm with running time $5^kn^{O(1)}$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2015

Simultaneous Feedback Vertex Set: A Parameterized Perspective

Given a family of graphs $\mathcal{F}$, a graph $G$, and a positive integer $k$, the $\mathcal{F}$-Deletion problem asks whether we can delete at most $k$ vertices from $G$ to obtain a graph in $\mathcal{F}$. $\mathcal{F}$-Deletion generalizes many classical graph problems such as Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set, and Odd Cycle Transversal. A graph $G = (V, \cup_{i=1}^α E_{i})$, where the edge set of $G$ is partitioned into $α$ color classes, is called an $α$-edge-colored graph. A natural extension of the $\mathcal{F}$-Deletion problem to edge-colored graphs is the $α$-Simultaneous $\mathcal{F}$-Deletion problem. In the latter problem, we are given an $α$-edge-colored graph $G$ and the goal is to find a set $S$ of at most $k$ vertices such that each graph $G_i \setminus S$, where $G_i = (V, E_i)$ and $1 \leq i \leq α$, is in $\mathcal{F}$. In this work, we study $α$-Simultaneous $\mathcal{F}$-Deletion for $\mathcal{F}$ being the family of forests. In other words, we focus on the $α$-Simultaneous Feedback Vertex Set ($α$-SimFVS) problem. Algorithmically, we show that, like its classical counterpart, $α$-SimFVS parameterized by $k$ is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) and admits a polynomial kernel, for any fixed constant $α$. In particular, we give an algorithm running in $2^{O(αk)}n^{O(1)}$ time and a kernel with $O(αk^{3(α+ 1)})$ vertices. The running time of our algorithm implies that $α$-SimFVS is FPT even when $α\in o(\log n)$. We complement this positive result by showing that for $α\in O(\log n)$, where $n$ is the number of vertices in the input graph, $α$-SimFVS becomes W[1]-hard. Our positive results answer one of the open problems posed by Cai and Ye (MFCS 2014).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2015

Kernelization and Sparseness: the case of Dominating Set

We prove that for every positive integer $r$ and for every graph class $\mathcal G$ of bounded expansion, the $r$-Dominating Set problem admits a linear kernel on graphs from $\mathcal G$. Moreover, when $\mathcal G$ is only assumed to be nowhere dense, then we give an almost linear kernel on $\mathcal G$ for the classic Dominating Set problem, i.e., for the case $r=1$. These results generalize a line of previous research on finding linear kernels for Dominating Set and $r$-Dominating Set. However, the approach taken in this work, which is based on the theory of sparse graphs, is radically different and conceptually much simpler than the previous approaches. We complement our findings by showing that for the closely related Connected Dominating Set problem, the existence of such kernelization algorithms is unlikely, even though the problem is known to admit a linear kernel on $H$-topological-minor-free graphs. Also, we prove that for any somewhere dense class $\mathcal G$, there is some $r$ for which $r$-Dominating Set is W[$2$]-hard on $\mathcal G$. Thus, our results fall short of proving a sharp dichotomy for the parameterized complexity of $r$-Dominating Set on subgraph-monotone graph classes: we conjecture that the border of tractability lies exactly between nowhere dense and somewhere dense graph classes.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2015

A Parameterized Algorithm for Mixed Cut

The classical Menger's theorem states that in any undirected (or directed) graph $G$, given a pair of vertices $s$ and $t$, the maximum number of vertex (edge) disjoint paths is equal to the minimum number of vertices (edges) needed to disconnect from $s$ and $t$. This min-max result can be turned into a polynomial time algorithm to find the maximum number of vertex (edge) disjoint paths as well as the minimum number of vertices (edges) needed to disconnect $s$ from $t$. In this paper we study a mixed version of this problem, called Mixed-Cut, where we are given an undirected graph $G$, vertices $s$ and $t$, positive integers $k$ and $l$ and the objective is to test whether there exist a $k$ sized vertex set $S \subseteq V(G)$ and an $l$ sized edge set $F \subseteq E(G)$ such that deletion of $S$ and $F$ from $G$ disconnects from $s$ and $t$. We start with a small observation that this problem is NP-complete and then study this problem, in fact a much stronger generalization of this, in the realm of parameterized complexity. In particular we study the Mixed-Multiway Cut-Uncut problem where along with a set of terminals $T$, we are also given an equivalence relation $\mathcal{R}$ on $T$, and the question is whether we can delete at most $k$ vertices and at most $l$ edges such that connectivity of the terminals in the resulting graph respects $\mathcal{R}$. Our main results is a fixed parameter algorithm for Mixed-Multiway Cut-Uncut using the method of recursive understanding introduced by Chitnis et al. (FOCS 2012).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2015

Lower bounds for approximation schemes for Closest String

In the Closest String problem one is given a family $\mathcal S$ of equal-length strings over some fixed alphabet, and the task is to find a string $y$ that minimizes the maximum Hamming distance between $y$ and a string from $\mathcal S$. While polynomial-time approximation schemes (PTASes) for this problem are known for a long time [Li et al., J. ACM'02], no efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme (EPTAS) has been proposed so far. In this paper, we prove that the existence of an EPTAS for Closest String is in fact unlikely, as it would imply that $\mathrm{FPT}=\mathrm{W}[1]$, a highly unexpected collapse in the hierarchy of parameterized complexity classes. Our proof also shows that the existence of a PTAS for Closest String with running time $f(\varepsilon)\cdot n^{o(1/\varepsilon)}$, for any computable function $f$, would contradict the Exponential Time Hypothesis.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2015

FO Model Checking on Posets of Bounded Width

Over the past two decades the main focus of research into first-order (FO) model checking algorithms have been sparse relational structures-culminating in the FPT-algorithm by Grohe, Kreutzer and Siebertz for FO model checking of nowhere dense classes of graphs [STOC'14], with dense structures starting to attract attention only recently. Bova, Ganian and Szeider [LICS'14] initiated the study of the complexity of FO model checking on partially ordered sets (posets). Bova, Ganian and Szeider showed that model checking existential FO logic is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) on posets of bounded width, where the width of a poset is the size of the largest antichain in the poset. The existence of an FPT algorithm for general FO model checking on posets of bounded width, however, remained open. We resolve this question in the positive by giving an algorithm that takes as its input an $n$-element poset $\cal P$ of width $w$ and an FO logic formula $ϕ$, and determines whether $ϕ$ holds on $\cal P$ in time $f(ϕ,w)\cdot n^2$.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2015

Reconfiguration on sparse graphs

A vertex-subset graph problem Q defines which subsets of the vertices of an input graph are feasible solutions. A reconfiguration variant of a vertex-subset problem asks, given two feasible solutions S and T of size k, whether it is possible to transform S into T by a sequence of vertex additions and deletions such that each intermediate set is also a feasible solution of size bounded by k. We study reconfiguration variants of two classical vertex-subset problems, namely Independent Set and Dominating Set. We denote the former by ISR and the latter by DSR. Both ISR and DSR are PSPACE-complete on graphs of bounded bandwidth and W[1]-hard parameterized by k on general graphs. We show that ISR is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by k when the input graph is of bounded degeneracy or nowhere-dense. As a corollary, we answer positively an open question concerning the parameterized complexity of the problem on graphs of bounded treewidth. Moreover, our techniques generalize recent results showing that ISR is fixed-parameter tractable on planar graphs and graphs of bounded degree. For DSR, we show the problem fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by k when the input graph does not contain large bicliques, a class of graphs which includes graphs of bounded degeneracy and nowhere-dense graphs.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2015

Uniform Kernelization Complexity of Hitting Forbidden Minors

The F-Minor-Free Deletion problem asks, for a fixed set F and an input consisting of a graph G and integer k, whether k vertices can be removed from G such that the resulting graph does not contain any member of F as a minor. This paper analyzes to what extent provably effective and efficient preprocessing is possible for F-Minor-Free Deletion. Fomin et al. (FOCS 2012) showed that the special case Planar F-Deletion (when F contains at least one planar graph) has a kernel of size f(F) * k^{g(F)} for some functions f and g. The degree g of the polynomial grows very quickly; it is not even known to be computable. Fomin et al. left open whether Planar F-Deletion has kernels whose size is uniformly polynomial, i.e., of the form f(F) * k^c for some universal constant c that does not depend on F. Our results in this paper are twofold. (1) We prove that some Planar F-Deletion problems do not have uniformly polynomial kernels (unless NP is in coNP/poly). In particular, we prove that Treewidth-Eta Deletion does not have a kernel with O(k^{eta/4} - eps) vertices for any eps > 0, unless NP is in coNP/poly. In fact, we even prove the kernelization lower bound for the larger parameter vertex cover number. This resolves an open problem of Cygan et al. (IPEC 2011). It is a natural question whether further restrictions on F lead to uniformly polynomial kernels. However, we prove that even when F contains a path, the degree of the polynomial must, in general, depend on the set F. (2) A canonical F-Minor-Free Deletion problem when F contains a path is Treedepth-eta Deletion: can k vertices be removed to obtain a graph of treedepth at most eta? We prove that Treedepth-eta Deletion admits uniformly polynomial kernels with O(k^6) vertices for every fixed eta. In order to develop the kernelization we prove several new results about the structure of optimal treedepth-decompositions.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2015

Parameterized Complexity of Superstring Problems

In the Shortest Superstring problem we are given a set of strings $S=\{s_1, \ldots, s_n\}$ and integer $\ell$ and the question is to decide whether there is a superstring $s$ of length at most $\ell$ containing all strings of $S$ as substrings. We obtain several parameterized algorithms and complexity results for this problem. In particular, we give an algorithm which in time $2^{O(k)} \operatorname{poly}(n)$ finds a superstring of length at most $\ell$ containing at least $k$ strings of $S$. We complement this by the lower bound showing that such a parameterization does not admit a polynomial kernel up to some complexity assumption. We also obtain several results about "below guaranteed values" parameterization of the problem. We show that parameterization by compression admits a polynomial kernel while parameterization "below matching" is hard.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2014

Fixed-parameter tractable canonization and isomorphism test for graphs of bounded treewidth

We give a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm that, given a parameter $k$ and two graphs $G_1,G_2$, either concludes that one of these graphs has treewidth at least $k$, or determines whether $G_1$ and $G_2$ are isomorphic. The running time of the algorithm on an $n$-vertex graph is $2^{O(k^5\log k)}\cdot n^5$, and this is the first fixed-parameter algorithm for Graph Isomorphism parameterized by treewidth. Our algorithm in fact solves the more general canonization problem. We namely design a procedure working in $2^{O(k^5\log k)}\cdot n^5$ time that, for a given graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, either concludes that the treewidth of $G$ is at least $k$, or: * finds in an isomorphic-invariant way a graph $\mathfrak{c}(G)$ that is isomorphic to $G$; * finds an isomorphism-invariant construction term --- an algebraic expression that encodes $G$ together with a tree decomposition of $G$ of width $O(k^4)$. Hence, the isomorphism test reduces to verifying whether the computed isomorphic copies or the construction terms for $G_1$ and $G_2$ are equal.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2014

Finding Even Subgraphs Even Faster

Problems of the following kind have been the focus of much recent research in the realm of parameterized complexity: Given an input graph (digraph) on $n$ vertices and a positive integer parameter $k$, find if there exist $k$ edges (arcs) whose deletion results in a graph that satisfies some specified parity constraints. In particular, when the objective is to obtain a connected graph in which all the vertices have even degrees---where the resulting graph is \emph{Eulerian}---the problem is called Undirected Eulerian Edge Deletion. The corresponding problem in digraphs where the resulting graph should be strongly connected and every vertex should have the same in-degree as its out-degree is called Directed Eulerian Edge Deletion. Cygan et al. [\emph{Algorithmica, 2014}] showed that these problems are fixed parameter tractable (FPT), and gave algorithms with the running time $2^{O(k \log k)}n^{O(1)}$. They also asked, as an open problem, whether there exist FPT algorithms which solve these problems in time $2^{O(k)}n^{O(1)}$. In this paper we answer their question in the affirmative: using the technique of computing \emph{representative families of co-graphic matroids} we design algorithms which solve these problems in time $2^{O(k)}n^{O(1)}$. The crucial insight we bring to these problems is to view the solution as an independent set of a co-graphic matroid. We believe that this view-point/approach will be useful in other problems where one of the constraints that need to be satisfied is that of connectivity.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2014

Deterministic Truncation of Linear Matroids

Let $M=(E,{\cal I})$ be a matroid. A {\em $k$-truncation} of $M$ is a matroid {$M'=(E,{\cal I}')$} such that for any $A\subseteq E$, $A\in {\cal I}'$ if and only if $|A|\leq k$ and $A\in {\cal I}$. Given a linear representation of $M$ we consider the problem of finding a linear representation of the $k$-truncation of this matroid. This problem can be abstracted out to the following problem on matrices. Let $M$ be a $n\times m$ matrix over a field $\mathbb{F}$. A {\em rank $k$-truncation} of the matrix $M$ is a $k\times m$ matrix $M_k$ (over $\mathbb{F}$ or a related field) such that for every subset $I\subseteq \{1,\ldots,m\}$ of size at most $k$, the set of columns corresponding to $I$ in $M$ has rank $|I|$ if and only of the corresponding set of columns in $M_k$ has rank $|I|$. Finding rank $k$-truncation of matrices is a common way to obtain a linear representation of $k$-truncation of linear matroids, which has many algorithmic applications. A common way to compute a rank $k$-truncation of a $n \times m$ matrix is to multiply the matrix with a random $k\times n$ matrix (with the entries from a field of an appropriate size), yielding a simple randomized algorithm. So a natural question is whether it possible to obtain a rank $k$-truncations of a matrix, {\em deterministically}. In this paper we settle this question for matrices over any finite field or the field of rationals ($\mathbb Q$). We show that given a matrix $M$ over a field $\mathbb{F}$ we can compute a $k$-truncation $M_k$ over the ring $\mathbb{F}[X]$ in deterministic polynomial time.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2014

On Problems as Hard as CNFSAT

The field of exact exponential time algorithms for NP-hard problems has thrived over the last decade. While exhaustive search remains asymptotically the fastest known algorithm for some basic problems, difficult and non-trivial exponential time algorithms have been found for a myriad of problems, including Graph Coloring, Hamiltonian Path, Dominating Set and 3-CNF-Sat. In some instances, improving these algorithms further seems to be out of reach. The CNF-Sat problem is the canonical example of a problem for which the trivial exhaustive search algorithm runs in time O(2^n), where n is the number of variables in the input formula. While there exist non-trivial algorithms for CNF-Sat that run in time o(2^n), no algorithm was able to improve the growth rate 2 to a smaller constant, and hence it is natural to conjecture that 2 is the optimal growth rate. The strong exponential time hypothesis (SETH) by Impagliazzo and Paturi [JCSS 2001] goes a little bit further and asserts that, for every epsilon<1, there is a (large) integer k such that that k-CNF-Sat cannot be computed in time 2^{epsilon n}. In this paper, we show that, for every epsilon < 1, the problems Hitting Set, Set Splitting, and NAE-Sat cannot be computed in time O(2^{epsilon n}) unless SETH fails. Here n is the number of elements or variables in the input. For these problems, we actually get an equivalence to SETH in a certain sense. We conjecture that SETH implies a similar statement for Set Cover, and prove that, under this assumption, the fastest known algorithms for Steinter Tree, Connected Vertex Cover, Set Partitioning, and the pseudo-polynomial time algorithm for Subset Sum cannot be significantly improved. Finally, we justify our assumption about the hardness of Set Cover by showing that the parity of the number of set covers cannot be computed in time O(2^{epsilon n}) for any epsilon<1 unless SETH fails.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2014

Minimum Bisection is fixed parameter tractable

In the classic Minimum Bisection problem we are given as input a graph $G$ and an integer $k$. The task is to determine whether there is a partition of $V(G)$ into two parts $A$ and $B$ such that $||A|-|B|| \leq 1$ and there are at most $k$ edges with one endpoint in $A$ and the other in $B$. In this paper we give an algorithm for Minimum Bisection with running time $O(2^{O(k^{3})}n^3 \log^3 n)$. This is the first fixed parameter tractable algorithm for Minimum Bisection. At the core of our algorithm lies a new decomposition theorem that states that every graph $G$ can be decomposed by small separators into parts where each part is "highly connected" in the following sense: any cut of bounded size can separate only a limited number of vertices from each part of the decomposition. Our techniques generalize to the weighted setting, where we seek for a bisection of minimum weight among solutions that contain at most $k$ edges.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2014

Representative Sets of Product Families

A subfamily ${\cal F}'$ of a set family ${\cal F}$ is said to $q$-{\em represent} ${\cal F}$ if for every $A \in {\cal F}$ and $B$ of size $q$ such that $A \cap B = \emptyset$ there exists a set $A' \in {\cal F}'$ such that $A' \cap B = \emptyset$. In this paper, we consider the efficient computation of $q$-representative sets for {\em product} families ${\cal F}$. A family ${\cal F}$ is a product family if there exist families ${\cal A}$ and ${\cal B}$ such that ${\cal F} = \{A \cup B~:~A \in {\cal A}, B \in {\cal B}, A \cap B = \emptyset\}$. Our main technical contribution is an algorithm which given ${\cal A}$, ${\cal B}$ and $q$ computes a $q$-representative family ${\cal F}'$ of ${\cal F}$. The running time of our algorithm is sublinear in $|{\cal F}|$ for many choices of ${\cal A}$, ${\cal B}$ and $q$ which occur naturally in several dynamic programming algorithms. We also give an algorithm for the computation of $q$-representative sets for product families ${\cal F}$ in the more general setting where $q$-representation also involves independence in a matroid in addition to disjointness. This algorithm considerably outperforms the naive approach where one first computes ${\cal F}$ from ${\cal A}$ and ${\cal B}$, and then computes the $q$-representative family ${\cal F}'$ from ${\cal F}$. We give two applications of our new algorithms for computing $q$-representative sets for product families. The first is a $3.8408^{k}n^{O(1)}$ deterministic algorithm for the Multilinear Monomial Detection ($k$-MlD) problem. The second is a significant improvement of deterministic dynamic programming algorithms for "connectivity problems" on graphs of bounded treewidth.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2013

Hitting and Harvesting Pumpkins

The "c-pumpkin" is the graph with two vertices linked by c>0 parallel edges. A c-pumpkin-model in a graph G is a pair A,B of disjoint subsets of vertices of G, each inducing a connected subgraph of G, such that there are at least c edges in G between A and B. We focus on covering and packing c-pumpkin-models in a given graph: On the one hand, we provide an FPT algorithm running in time 2^O(k) n^O(1) deciding, for any fixed c>0, whether all c-pumpkin-models can be covered by at most k vertices. This generalizes known single-exponential FPT algorithms for Vertex Cover and Feedback Vertex Set, which correspond to the cases c=1,2 respectively. On the other hand, we present a O(log n)-approximation algorithm for both the problems of covering all c-pumpkin-models with a smallest number of vertices, and packing a maximum number of vertex-disjoint c-pumpkin-models.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2013

Polynomial Kernels for λ-extendible Properties Parameterized Above the Poljak-Turzík Bound

Poljak and Turzik (Discrete Mathematics 1986) introduced the notion of λ-extendible properties of graphs as a generalization of the property of being bipartite. They showed that for any 0 < λ < 1 and λ-extendible property Π, any connected graph G on n vertices and m edges contains a spanning subgraph H in Π with at least λm + (1-λ)(n-1)/2 edges. The property of being bipartite is λ-extendible for λ = 1/2, and so the Poljak-Turzik bound generalizes the well-known Edwards-Erdos bound for Max-Cut. Other examples of λ-extendible properties include: being an acyclic oriented graph, a balanced signed graph, or a q-colorable graph for some integer q. Mnich et. al. (FSTTCS 2012) defined the closely related notion of strong λ-extendibility. They showed that the problem of finding a subgraph satisfying a given strongly λ-extendible property Π is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) when parameterized above the Poljak-Turzik bound - does there exist a spanning subgraph H of a connected graph G such that H in Π and H has at least λm + (1-λ)(n-1)/2 + k edges? - subject to the condition that the problem is FPT on a certain simple class of graphs called almost-forests of cliques. In this paper we settle the kernelization complexity of nearly all problems parameterized above Poljak-Turzik bounds, in the affirmative. We show that these problems admit quadratic kernels (cubic when λ = 1/2), without using the assumption that the problem is FPT on almost-forests of cliques. Thus our results not only remove the technical condition of being FPT on almost-forests of cliques from previous results, but also unify and extend previously known kernelization results in this direction. Our results add to the select list of generic kernelization results known in the literature.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2013

Tree Deletion Set has a Polynomial Kernel (but no OPT^O(1) approximation)

In the Tree Deletion Set problem the input is a graph G together with an integer k. The objective is to determine whether there exists a set S of at most k vertices such that G-S is a tree. The problem is NP-complete and even NP-hard to approximate within any factor of OPT^c for any constant c. In this paper we give a O(k^4) size kernel for the Tree Deletion Set problem. To the best of our knowledge our result is the first counterexample to the "conventional wisdom" that kernelization algorithms automatically provide approximation algorithms with approximation ratio close to the size of the kernel. An appealing feature of our kernelization algorithm is a new algebraic reduction rule that we use to handle the instances on which Tree Deletion Set is hard to approximate.

cs.DS↗