arXiv subjects

Stefan Kratsch

Publications and source records attributed to Stefan Kratsch.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

arXiv2017

The Minimum Feasible Tileset problem

We introduce and study the Minimum Feasible Tileset problem: Given a set of symbols and subsets of these symbols (scenarios), find a smallest possible number of pairs of symbols (tiles) such that each scenario can be formed by selecting at most one symbol from each tile. We show that this problem is APX-hard and that it is NP-hard even if each scenario contains at most three symbols. Our main result is a 4/3-approximation algorithm for the general case. In addition, we show that the Minimum Feasible Tileset problem is fixed-parameter tractable both when parameterized with the number of scenarios and with the number of symbols.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2017

Robust and adaptive search

Binary search finds a given element in a sorted array with an optimal number of $\log n$ queries. However, binary search fails even when the array is only slightly disordered or access to its elements is subject to errors. We study the worst-case query complexity of search algorithms that are robust to imprecise queries and that adapt to perturbations of the order of the elements. We give (almost) tight results for various parameters that quantify query errors and that measure array disorder. In particular, we exhibit settings where query complexities of $\log n + ck$, $(1+\varepsilon)\log n + ck$, and $\sqrt{cnk}+o(nk)$ are best-possible for parameter value $k$, any $\varepsilon>0$, and constant $c$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2016

A randomized polynomial kernelization for Vertex Cover with a smaller parameter

In the Vertex Cover problem we are given a graph $G=(V,E)$ and an integer $k$ and have to determine whether there is a set $X\subseteq V$ of size at most $k$ such that each edge in $E$ has at least one endpoint in $X$. The problem can be easily solved in time $O^*(2^k)$, making it fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) with respect to $k$. While the fastest known algorithm takes only time $O^*(1.2738^k)$, much stronger improvements have been obtained by studying parameters that are smaller than $k$. Apart from treewidth-related results, the arguably best algorithm for Vertex Cover runs in time $O^*(2.3146^p)$, where $p=k-LP(G)$ is only the excess of the solution size $k$ over the best fractional vertex cover (Lokshtanov et al.\ TALG 2014). Since $p\leq k$ but $k$ cannot be bounded in terms of $p$ alone, this strictly increases the range of tractable instances. Recently, Garg and Philip (SODA 2016) greatly contributed to understanding the parameterized complexity of the Vertex Cover problem. They prove that $2LP(G)-MM(G)$ is a lower bound for the vertex cover size of $G$, where $MM(G)$ is the size of a largest matching of $G$, and proceed to study parameter $\ell=k-(2LP(G)-MM(G))$. They give an algorithm of running time $O^*(3^\ell)$, proving that Vertex Cover is FPT in $\ell$. It can be easily observed that $\ell\leq p$ whereas $p$ cannot be bounded in terms of $\ell$ alone. We complement the work of Garg and Philip by proving that Vertex Cover admits a randomized polynomial kernelization in terms of $\ell$, i.e., an efficient preprocessing to size polynomial in $\ell$. This improves over parameter $p=k-LP(G)$ for which this was previously known (Kratsch and Wahlström FOCS 2012).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2016

On the complexity of the identifiable subgraph problem, revisited

A bipartite graph $G=(L,R;E)$ with at least one edge is said to be identifiable if for every vertex $v\in L$, the subgraph induced by its non-neighbors has a matching of cardinality $|L|-1$. An $\ell$-subgraph of $G$ is an induced subgraph of $G$ obtained by deleting from it some vertices in $L$ together with all their neighbors. The Identifiable Subgraph problem is the problem of determining whether a given bipartite graph contains an identifiable $\ell$-subgraph. We show that the Identifiable Subgraph problem is polynomially solvable, along with the version of the problem in which the task is to delete as few vertices from $L$ as possible together with all their neighbors so that the resulting $\ell$-subgraph is identifiable. We also complement a known APX-hardness result for the complementary problem in which the task is to minimize the number of remaining vertices in $L$, by showing that two parameterized variants of the problem are W[1]-hard.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2016

The Parameterized Complexity of the Minimum Shared Edges Problem

We study the NP-complete Minimum Shared Edges (MSE) problem. Given an undirected graph, a source and a sink vertex, and two integers p and k, the question is whether there are p paths in the graph connecting the source with the sink and sharing at most k edges. Herein, an edge is shared if it appears in at least two paths. We show that MSE is W[1]-hard when parameterized by the treewidth of the input graph and the number k of shared edges combined. We show that MSE is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to p, but does not admit a polynomial-size kernel (unless NP is contained in coNP/poly). In the proof of the fixed-parameter tractability of MSE parameterized by p, we employ the treewidth reduction technique due to Marx, O'Sullivan, and Razgon [ACM TALG 2013].

cs.CC↗

arXiv2015

A randomized polynomial kernel for Subset Feedback Vertex Set

The Subset Feedback Vertex Set problem generalizes the classical Feedback Vertex Set problem and asks, for a given undirected graph $G=(V,E)$, a set $S \subseteq V$, and an integer $k$, whether there exists a set $X$ of at most $k$ vertices such that no cycle in $G-X$ contains a vertex of $S$. It was independently shown by Cygan et al. (ICALP '11, SIDMA '13) and Kawarabayashi and Kobayashi (JCTB '12) that Subset Feedback Vertex Set is fixed-parameter tractable for parameter $k$. Cygan et al. asked whether the problem also admits a polynomial kernelization. We answer the question of Cygan et al. positively by giving a randomized polynomial kernelization for the equivalent version where $S$ is a set of edges. In a first step we show that Edge Subset Feedback Vertex Set has a randomized polynomial kernel parameterized by $|S|+k$ with $O(|S|^2k)$ vertices. For this we use the matroid-based tools of Kratsch and Wahlström (FOCS '12) that for example were used to obtain a polynomial kernel for $s$-Multiway Cut. Next we present a preprocessing that reduces the given instance $(G,S,k)$ to an equivalent instance $(G',S',k')$ where the size of $S'$ is bounded by $O(k^4)$. These two results lead to a polynomial kernel for Subset Feedback Vertex Set with $O(k^9)$ vertices.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2015

Preprocessing under uncertainty

In this work we study preprocessing for tractable problems when part of the input is unknown or uncertain. This comes up naturally if, e.g., the load of some machines or the congestion of some roads is not known far enough in advance, or if we have to regularly solve a problem over instances that are largely similar, e.g., daily airport scheduling with few charter flights. Unlike robust optimization, which also studies settings like this, our goal lies not in computing solutions that are (approximately) good for every instantiation. Rather, we seek to preprocess the known parts of the input, to speed up finding an optimal solution once the missing data is known. We present efficient algorithms that given an instance with partially uncertain input generate an instance of size polynomial in the amount of uncertain data that is equivalent for every instantiation of the unknown part. Concretely, we obtain such algorithms for Minimum Spanning Tree, Minimum Weight Matroid Basis, and Maximum Cardinality Bipartite Maxing, where respectively the weight of edges, weight of elements, and the availability of vertices is unknown for part of the input. Furthermore, we show that there are tractable problems, such as Small Connected Vertex Cover, for which one cannot hope to obtain similar results.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2015

Polynomial Kernels for Weighted Problems

Kernelization is a formalization of efficient preprocessing for NP-hard problems using the framework of parameterized complexity. Among open problems in kernelization it has been asked many times whether there are deterministic polynomial kernelizations for Subset Sum and Knapsack when parameterized by the number $n$ of items. We answer both questions affirmatively by using an algorithm for compressing numbers due to Frank and Tardos (Combinatorica 1987). This result had been first used by Marx and Végh (ICALP 2013) in the context of kernelization. We further illustrate its applicability by giving polynomial kernels also for weighted versions of several well-studied parameterized problems. Furthermore, when parameterized by the different item sizes we obtain a polynomial kernelization for Subset Sum and an exponential kernelization for Knapsack. Finally, we also obtain kernelization results for polynomial integer programs.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2015

A structural approach to kernels for ILPs: Treewidth and Total Unimodularity

Kernelization is a theoretical formalization of efficient preprocessing for NP-hard problems. Empirically, preprocessing is highly successful in practice, for example in state-of-the-art ILP-solvers like CPLEX. Motivated by this, previous work studied the existence of kernelizations for ILP related problems, e.g., for testing feasibility of Ax <= b. In contrast to the observed success of CPLEX, however, the results were largely negative. Intuitively, practical instances have far more useful structure than the worst-case instances used to prove these lower bounds. In the present paper, we study the effect that subsystems with (Gaifman graph of) bounded treewidth or totally unimodularity have on the kernelizability of the ILP feasibility problem. We show that, on the positive side, if these subsystems have a small number of variables on which they interact with the remaining instance, then we can efficiently replace them by smaller subsystems of size polynomial in the domain without changing feasibility. Thus, if large parts of an instance consist of such subsystems, then this yields a substantial size reduction. We complement this by proving that relaxations to the considered structures, e.g., larger boundaries of the subsystems, allow worst-case lower bounds against kernelization. Thus, these relaxed structures can be used to build instance families that cannot be efficiently reduced, by any approach.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2015

On Kernelization and Approximation for the Vector Connectivity Problem

In the Vector Connectivity problem we are given an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$, a demand function $ϕ\colon V\to\{0,\ldots,d\}$, and an integer $k$. The question is whether there exists a set $S$ of at most $k$ vertices such that every vertex $v\in V\setminus S$ has at least $ϕ(v)$ vertex-disjoint paths to $S$; this abstractly captures questions about placing servers or warehouses relative to demands. The problem is \NP-hard already for instances with $d=4$ (Cicalese et al., arXiv '14), admits a log-factor approximation (Boros et al., Networks '14), and is fixed-parameter tractable in terms of~$k$ (Lokshtanov, unpublished '14). We prove several results regarding kernelization and approximation for Vector Connectivity and the variant Vector $d$-Connectivity where the upper bound $d$ on demands is a fixed constant. For Vector $d$-Connectivity we give a factor $d$-approximation algorithm and construct a vertex-linear kernelization, i.e., an efficient reduction to an equivalent instance with $f(d)k=O(k)$ vertices. For Vector Connectivity we have a factor $\text{opt}$-approximation and we can show that it has no kernelization to size polynomial in $k$ or even $k+d$ unless $\mathsf{NP\subseteq coNP/poly}$, making $f(d)\operatorname{poly}(k)$ optimal for Vector $d$-Connectivity. Finally, we provide a write-up for fixed-parameter tractability of Vector Connectivity($k$) by giving an alternative FPT algorithm based on matroid intersection.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2015

A shortcut to (sun)flowers: Kernels in logarithmic space or linear time

We investigate whether kernelization results can be obtained if we restrict kernelization algorithms to run in logarithmic space. This restriction for kernelization is motivated by the question of what results are attainable for preprocessing via simple and/or local reduction rules. We find kernelizations for d-Hitting Set(k), d-Set Packing(k), Edge Dominating Set(k) and a number of hitting and packing problems in graphs, each running in logspace. Additionally, we return to the question of linear-time kernelization. For d-Hitting Set(k) a linear-time kernelization was given by van Bevern [Algorithmica (2014)]. We give a simpler procedure and save a large constant factor in the size bound. Furthermore, we show that we can obtain a linear-time kernel for d-Set Packing(k) as well.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2014

Finding Shortest Paths between Graph Colourings

The $k$-colouring reconfiguration problem asks whether, for a given graph $G$, two proper $k$-colourings $α$ and $β$ of $G$, and a positive integer $\ell$, there exists a sequence of at most $\ell+1$ proper $k$-colourings of $G$ which starts with $α$ and ends with $β$ and where successive colourings in the sequence differ on exactly one vertex of $G$. We give a complete picture of the parameterized complexity of the $k$-colouring reconfiguration problem for each fixed $k$ when parameterized by $\ell$. First we show that the $k$-colouring reconfiguration problem is polynomial-time solvable for $k=3$, settling an open problem of Cereceda, van den Heuvel and Johnson. Then, for all $k \geq 4$, we show that the $k$-colouring reconfiguration problem, when parameterized by $\ell$, is fixed-parameter tractable (addressing a question of Mouawad, Nishimura, Raman, Simjour and Suzuki) but that it has no polynomial kernel unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2014

Characterizing width two for variants of treewidth

In this paper, we consider the notion of \emph{special treewidth}, recently introduced by Courcelle\cite{Courcelle2012}. In a special tree decomposition, for each vertex $v$ in a given graph, the bags containing $v$ form a rooted path. We show that the class of graphs of special treewidth at most two is closed under taking minors, and give the complete list of the six minor obstructions. As an intermediate result, we prove that every connected graph of special treewidth at most two can be constructed by arranging blocks of special treewidth at most two in a specific tree-like fashion. Inspired from the notion of special treewidth, we introduce three natural variants of treewidth, namely \emph{spaghetti treewidth}, \emph{strongly chordal treewidth} and \emph{directed spaghetti treewidth}. All these parameters lie between pathwidth and treewidth, and we provide common structural properties on these parameters. For each parameter, we prove that the class of graphs having the parameter at most two is minor closed, and we characterize those classes in terms of a \emph{tree of cycles} with additional conditions. Finally, we show that for each $k\geq 3$, the class of graphs with special treewidth, spaghetti treewidth, directed spaghetti treewidth, or strongly chordal treewidth, respectively at most $k$, is not closed under taking minors.

math.CO↗

arXiv2014

Polynomial Kernels and User Reductions for the Workflow Satisfiability Problem

The Workflow Satisfiability Problem (WSP) is a problem of practical interest that arises whenever tasks need to be performed by authorized users, subject to constraints defined by business rules. We are required to decide whether there exists a plan -- an assignment of tasks to authorized users -- such that all constraints are satisfied. The WSP is, in fact, the conservative Constraint Satisfaction Problem (i.e., for each variable, here called task, we have a unary authorization constraint) and is, thus, NP-complete. It was observed by Wang and Li (2010) that the number k of tasks is often quite small and so can be used as a parameter, and several subsequent works have studied the parameterized complexity of WSP regarding parameter k. We take a more detailed look at the kernelization complexity of WSP(Γ) when Γ denotes a finite or infinite set of allowed constraints. Our main result is a dichotomy for the case that all constraints in Γ are regular: (1) We are able to reduce the number n of users to n' <= k. This entails a kernelization to size poly(k) for finite Γ, and, under mild technical conditions, to size poly(k+m) for infinite Γ, where m denotes the number of constraints. (2) Already WSP(R) for some R \in Γ allows no polynomial kernelization in k+m unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2014

Streaming Kernelization

Kernelization is a formalization of preprocessing for combinatorially hard problems. We modify the standard definition for kernelization, which allows any polynomial-time algorithm for the preprocessing, by requiring instead that the preprocessing runs in a streaming setting and uses $\mathcal{O}(poly(k)\log|x|)$ bits of memory on instances $(x,k)$. We obtain several results in this new setting, depending on the number of passes over the input that such a streaming kernelization is allowed to make. Edge Dominating Set turns out as an interesting example because it has no single-pass kernelization but two passes over the input suffice to match the bounds of the best standard kernelization.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2013

Data Reduction for Graph Coloring Problems

This paper studies the kernelization complexity of graph coloring problems with respect to certain structural parameterizations of the input instances. We are interested in how well polynomial-time data reduction can provably shrink instances of coloring problems, in terms of the chosen parameter. It is well known that deciding 3-colorability is already NP-complete, hence parameterizing by the requested number of colors is not fruitful. Instead, we pick up on a research thread initiated by Cai (DAM, 2003) who studied coloring problems parameterized by the modification distance of the input graph to a graph class on which coloring is polynomial-time solvable; for example parameterizing by the number k of vertex-deletions needed to make the graph chordal. We obtain various upper and lower bounds for kernels of such parameterizations of q-Coloring, complementing Cai's study of the time complexity with respect to these parameters. Our results show that the existence of polynomial kernels for q-Coloring parameterized by the vertex-deletion distance to a graph class F is strongly related to the existence of a function f(q) which bounds the number of vertices which are needed to preserve the NO-answer to an instance of q-List-Coloring on F.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2013

Preprocessing for Treewidth: A Combinatorial Analysis through Kernelization

The notion of treewidth plays an important role in theoretical and practical studies of graph problems. It has been recognized that, especially in practical environments, when computing the treewidth of a graph it is invaluable to first apply an array of preprocessing rules that simplify and shrink it. This work seeks to prove rigorous performance guarantees for such preprocessing rules, both known and new ones, by studying them in the framework of kernelization from parameterized complexity. It is known that the NP-complete problem of determining whether a given graph G has treewidth at most k admits no polynomial-time preprocessing algorithm that reduces any input instance to size polynomial in k, unless NP is in coNP/poly and the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its third level. In this paper we therefore consider structural graph measures larger than treewidth, and determine whether efficient preprocessing can shrink the instance size to a polynomial in such a parameter value. We prove that given an instance (G,k) of treewidth we can efficiently reduce its size to O(fvs(G)^4) vertices, where fvs(G) is the size of a minimum feedback vertex set in G. We can also prove a size reduction to O(vc(G)^3) vertices, where vc(G) is the size of a minimum vertex cover. Phrased in the language of parameterized complexity, we show that Treewidth has a polynomial kernel when parameterized by the size of a given feedback vertex set, and also by the size of a vertex cover. In contrast we show that Treewidth parameterized by the vertex-deletion distance to a single clique, and Weighted Treewidth parameterized by the size of a vertex cover, do not admit polynomial kernelizations unless NP is in coNP/poly.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2013

Point Line Cover: The Easy Kernel is Essentially Tight

The input to the NP-hard Point Line Cover problem (PLC) consists of a set $P$ of $n$ points on the plane and a positive integer $k$, and the question is whether there exists a set of at most $k$ lines which pass through all points in $P$. A simple polynomial-time reduction reduces any input to one with at most $k^2$ points. We show that this is essentially tight under standard assumptions. More precisely, unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its third level, there is no polynomial-time algorithm that reduces every instance $(P,k)$ of PLC to an equivalent instance with $O(k^{2-ε})$ points, for any $ε>0$. This answers, in the negative, an open problem posed by Lokshtanov (PhD Thesis, 2009). Our proof uses the machinery for deriving lower bounds on the size of kernels developed by Dell and van Melkebeek (STOC 2010). It has two main ingredients: We first show, by reduction from Vertex Cover, that PLC---conditionally---has no kernel of total size $O(k^{2-ε})$ bits. This does not directly imply the claimed lower bound on the number of points, since the best known polynomial-time encoding of a PLC instance with $n$ points requires $ω(n^{2})$ bits. To get around this we build on work of Goodman et al. (STOC 1989) and devise an oracle communication protocol of cost $O(n\log n)$ for PLC; its main building block is a bound of $O(n^{O(n)})$ for the order types of $n$ points that are not necessarily in general position, and an explicit algorithm that enumerates all possible order types of n points. This protocol and the lower bound on total size together yield the stated lower bound on the number of points. While a number of essentially tight polynomial lower bounds on total sizes of kernels are known, our result is---to the best of our knowledge---the first to show a nontrivial lower bound for structural/secondary parameters.

cs.DS↗