arXiv subjects

Stefan Kratsch

Publications and source records attributed to Stefan Kratsch.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

arXiv2013

On Polynomial Kernels for Sparse Integer Linear Programs

Integer linear programs (ILPs) are a widely applied framework for dealing with combinatorial problems that arise in practice. It is known, e.g., by the success of CPLEX, that preprocessing and simplification can greatly speed up the process of optimizing an ILP. The present work seeks to further the theoretical understanding of preprocessing for ILPs by initiating a rigorous study within the framework of parameterized complexity and kernelization. A famous result of Lenstra (Mathematics of Operations Research, 1983) shows that feasibility of any ILP with n variables and m constraints can be decided in time O(c^{n^3} m^c'). Thus, by a folklore argument, any such ILP admits a kernelization to an equivalent instance of size O(c^{n^3}). It is known, that unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly and the polynomial hierarchy collapses, no kernelization with size bound polynomial in n is possible. However, this lower bound only applies for the case when constraints may include an arbitrary number of variables since it follows from lower bounds for Satisfiability and Hitting Set, whose bounded arity variants admit polynomial kernelizations. We consider the feasibility problem for ILPs Ax<= b where A is an r-row-sparse matrix parameterized by the number of variables. We show that the kernelizability of this problem depends strongly on the range of the variables. If the range is unbounded then this problem does not admit a polynomial kernelization unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly. If, on the other hand, the range of each variable is polynomially bounded in n then we do get a polynomial kernelization. Additionally, this holds also for the more general case when the maximum range d is an additional parameter, i.e., the size obtained is polynomial in n+d.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2013

On Polynomial Kernels for Integer Linear Programs: Covering, Packing and Feasibility

We study the existence of polynomial kernels for the problem of deciding feasibility of integer linear programs (ILPs), and for finding good solutions for covering and packing ILPs. Our main results are as follows: First, we show that the ILP Feasibility problem admits no polynomial kernelization when parameterized by both the number of variables and the number of constraints, unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly. This extends to the restricted cases of bounded variable degree and bounded number of variables per constraint, and to covering and packing ILPs. Second, we give a polynomial kernelization for the Cover ILP problem, asking for a solution to Ax >= b with c^Tx <= k, parameterized by k, when A is row-sparse; this generalizes a known polynomial kernelization for the special case with 0/1-variables and coefficients (d-Hitting Set).

cs.CC↗

arXiv2013

Subexponential fixed-parameter tractability of cluster editing

In the Correlation Clustering, also known as Cluster Editing, we are given an undirected n-vertex graph G and a positive integer k. The task is to decide if G can be transformed into a cluster graph, i.e., a disjoint union of cliques, by changing at most k adjacencies, i.e. by adding/deleting at most k edges. We give a subexponential algorithm that, in time 2^O(sqrt(pk)) + n^O(1) decides whether G can be transformed into a cluster graph with p cliques by changing at most k adjacencies. We complement our algorithmic findings by the following tight lower bounds on the asymptotic behaviour of our algorithm. We show that, unless ETH fails, for any constant 0 < s <= 1, there is p = Theta(k^s) such that there is no algorithm deciding in time 2^o(sqrt(pk)) n^O(1) whether G can be transformed into a cluster graph with p cliques by changing at most k adjacencies.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2012

Solving weighted and counting variants of connectivity problems parameterized by treewidth deterministically in single exponential time

It is well known that many local graph problems, like Vertex Cover and Dominating Set, can be solved in 2^{O(tw)}|V|^{O(1)} time for graphs G=(V,E) with a given tree decomposition of width tw. However, for nonlocal problems, like the fundamental class of connectivity problems, for a long time we did not know how to do this faster than tw^{O(tw)}|V|^{O(1)}. Recently, Cygan et al. (FOCS 2011) presented Monte Carlo algorithms for a wide range of connectivity problems running in time $c^{tw}|V|^{O(1)} for a small constant c, e.g., for Hamiltonian Cycle and Steiner tree. Naturally, this raises the question whether randomization is necessary to achieve this runtime; furthermore, it is desirable to also solve counting and weighted versions (the latter without incurring a pseudo-polynomial cost in terms of the weights). We present two new approaches rooted in linear algebra, based on matrix rank and determinants, which provide deterministic c^{tw}|V|^{O(1)} time algorithms, also for weighted and counting versions. For example, in this time we can solve the traveling salesman problem or count the number of Hamiltonian cycles. The rank-based ideas provide a rather general approach for speeding up even straightforward dynamic programming formulations by identifying "small" sets of representative partial solutions; we focus on the case of expressing connectivity via sets of partitions, but the essential ideas should have further applications. The determinant-based approach uses the matrix tree theorem for deriving closed formulas for counting versions of connectivity problems; we show how to evaluate those formulas via dynamic programming.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2012

Fast Hamiltonicity checking via bases of perfect matchings

For an even integer t \geq 2, the Matchings Connecivity matrix H_t is a matrix that has rows and columns both labeled by all perfect matchings of the complete graph K_t on t vertices; an entry H_t[M_1,M_2] is 1 if M_1\cup M_2 is a Hamiltonian cycle and 0 otherwise. Motivated by the computational study of the Hamiltonicity problem, we present three results on the structure of H_t: We first show that H_t has rank at most 2^{t/2-1} over GF(2) via an appropriate factorization that explicitly provides families of matchings X_t forming bases for H_t. Second, we show how to quickly change representation between such bases. Third, we notice that the sets of matchings X_t induce permutation matrices within H_t. Subsequently, we use the factorization to obtain an 1.888^n n^{O(1)} time Monte Carlo algorithm that solves the Hamiltonicity problem in directed bipartite graphs. Our algorithm as well counts the number of Hamiltonian cycles modulo two in directed bipartite or undirected graphs in the same time bound. Moreover, we use the fast basis change algorithm from the second result to present a Monte Carlo algorithm that given an undirected graph on n vertices along with a path decomposition of width at most pw decides Hamiltonicity in (2+\sqrt{2})^{pw}n^{O(1)} time. Finally, we use the third result to show that for every ε>0 this cannot be improved to (2+\sqrt{2}-ε)^{pw}n^{O(1)} time unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis fails, i.e., a faster algorithm for this problem would imply the breakthrough result of a (2-ε)^n time algorithm for CNF-Sat.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2012

Graph Isomorphism for Graph Classes Characterized by two Forbidden Induced Subgraphs

We study the complexity of the Graph Isomorphism problem on graph classes that are characterized by a finite number of forbidden induced subgraphs, focusing mostly on the case of two forbidden subgraphs. We show hardness results and develop techniques for the structural analysis of such graph classes, which applied to the case of two forbidden subgraphs give the following results: A dichotomy into isomorphism complete and polynomial-time solvable graph classes for all but finitely many cases, whenever neither of the forbidden graphs is a clique, a pan, or a complement of these graphs. Further reducing the remaining open cases we show that (with respect to graph isomorphism) forbidding a pan is equivalent to forbidding a clique of size three.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2012

Kernel Bounds for Structural Parameterizations of Pathwidth

Assuming the AND-distillation conjecture, the Pathwidth problem of determining whether a given graph G has pathwidth at most k admits no polynomial kernelization with respect to k. The present work studies the existence of polynomial kernels for Pathwidth with respect to other, structural, parameters. Our main result is that, unless NP is in coNP/poly, Pathwidth admits no polynomial kernelization even when parameterized by the vertex deletion distance to a clique, by giving a cross-composition from Cutwidth. The cross-composition works also for Treewidth, improving over previous lower bounds by the present authors. For Pathwidth, our result rules out polynomial kernels with respect to the distance to various classes of polynomial-time solvable inputs, like interval or cluster graphs. This leads to the question whether there are nontrivial structural parameters for which Pathwidth does admit a polynomial kernelization. To answer this, we give a collection of graph reduction rules that are safe for Pathwidth. We analyze the success of these results and obtain polynomial kernelizations with respect to the following parameters: the size of a vertex cover of the graph, the vertex deletion distance to a graph where each connected component is a star, and the vertex deletion distance to a graph where each connected component has at most c vertices.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2012

Representative sets and irrelevant vertices: New tools for kernelization

The existence of a polynomial kernel for Odd Cycle Transversal was a notorious open problem in parameterized complexity. Recently, this was settled by the present authors (Kratsch and Wahlström, SODA 2012), with a randomized polynomial kernel for the problem, using matroid theory to encode flow questions over a set of terminals in size polynomial in the number of terminals. In the current work we further establish the usefulness of matroid theory to kernelization by showing applications of a result on representative sets due to Lovász (Combinatorial Surveys 1977) and Marx (TCS 2009). We show how representative sets can be used to give a polynomial kernel for the elusive Almost 2-SAT problem. We further apply the representative sets tool to the problem of finding irrelevant vertices in graph cut problems, i.e., vertices which can be made undeletable without affecting the status of the problem. This gives the first significant progress towards a polynomial kernel for the Multiway Cut problem; in particular, we get a kernel of O(k^{s+1}) vertices for Multiway Cut instances with at most s terminals. Both these kernelization results have significant spin-off effects, producing the first polynomial kernels for a range of related problems. More generally, the irrelevant vertex results have implications for covering min-cuts in graphs. For a directed graph G=(V,E) and sets S, T \subseteq V, let r be the size of a minimum (S,T)-vertex cut (which may intersect S and T). We can find a set Z \subseteq V of size O(|S|*|T|*r) which contains a minimum (A,B)-vertex cut for every A \subseteq S, B \subseteq T. Similarly, for an undirected graph G=(V,E), a set of terminals X \subseteq V, and a constant s, we can find a set Z\subseteq V of size O(|X|^{s+1}) which contains a minimum multiway cut for any partition of X into at most s pairwise disjoint subsets.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2012

Kernelization Lower Bounds By Cross-Composition

We introduce the cross-composition framework for proving kernelization lower bounds. A classical problem L AND/OR-cross-composes into a parameterized problem Q if it is possible to efficiently construct an instance of Q with polynomially bounded parameter value that expresses the logical AND or OR of a sequence of instances of L. Building on work by Bodlaender et al. (ICALP 2008) and using a result by Fortnow and Santhanam (STOC 2008) with a refinement by Dell and van Melkebeek (STOC 2010), we show that if an NP-hard problem OR-cross-composes into a parameterized problem Q then Q does not admit a polynomial kernel unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly and the polynomial hierarchy collapses. Similarly, an AND-cross-composition for Q rules out polynomial kernels for Q under Bodlaender et al.'s AND-distillation conjecture. Our technique generalizes and strengthens the recent techniques of using composition algorithms and of transferring the lower bounds via polynomial parameter transformations. We show its applicability by proving kernelization lower bounds for a number of important graphs problems with structural (non-standard) parameterizations, e.g., Clique, Chromatic Number, Weighted Feedback Vertex Set, and Weighted Odd Cycle Transversal do not admit polynomial kernels with respect to the vertex cover number of the input graphs unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses, contrasting the fact that these problems are trivially fixed-parameter tractable for this parameter. After learning of our results, several teams of authors have successfully applied the cross-composition framework to different parameterized problems. For completeness, our presentation of the framework includes several extensions based on this follow-up work. For example, we show how a relaxed version of OR-cross-compositions may be used to give lower bounds on the degree of the polynomial in the kernel size.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2012

Fixed-parameter tractability of multicut in directed acyclic graphs

The MULTICUT problem, given a graph G, a set of terminal pairs T={(s_i,t_i) | 1 <= i <= r} and an integer p, asks whether one can find a cutset consisting of at most p non-terminal vertices that separates all the terminal pairs, i.e., after removing the cutset, t_i is not reachable from s_i for each 1 <= i <= r. The fixed-parameter tractability of MULTICUT in undirected graphs, parameterized by the size of the cutset only, has been recently proven by Marx and Razgon (STOC'11) and, independently, by Bousquet et al. (STOC'11), after resisting attacks as a long-standing open problem. In this paper we prove that MULTICUT is fixed-parameter tractable on directed acyclic graphs, when parameterized both by the size of the cutset and the number of terminal pairs. We complement this result by showing that this is implausible for parameterization by the size of the cutset only, as this version of the problem remains W[1]-hard.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2011

Polynomial Kernelizations for MIN F^+Pi_1 and MAX NP

It has been observed in many places that constant-factor approximable problems often admit polynomial or even linear problem kernels for their decision versions, e.g., Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set, and Triangle Packing. While there exist examples like Bin Packing, which does not admit any kernel unless P = NP, there apparently is a strong relation between these two polynomial-time techniques. We add to this picture by showing that the natural decision versions of all problems in two prominent classes of constant-factor approximable problems, namely MIN F^+Π_1 and MAX NP, admit polynomial problem kernels. Problems in MAX SNP, a subclass of MAX NP, are shown to admit kernels with a linear base set, e.g., the set of vertices of a graph. This extends results of Cai and Chen (JCSS 1997), stating that the standard parameterizations of problems in MAX SNP and MIN F^+Π_1 are fixed-parameter tractable, and complements recent research on problems that do not admit polynomial kernelizations (Bodlaender et al. JCSS 2009).

cs.CC↗

arXiv2011

Kernel Bounds for Path and Cycle Problems

Connectivity problems like k-Path and k-Disjoint Paths relate to many important milestones in parameterized complexity, namely the Graph Minors Project, color coding, and the recent development of techniques for obtaining kernelization lower bounds. This work explores the existence of polynomial kernels for various path and cycle problems, by considering nonstandard parameterizations. We show polynomial kernels when the parameters are a given vertex cover, a modulator to a cluster graph, or a (promised) max leaf number. We obtain lower bounds via cross-composition, e.g., for Hamiltonian Cycle and related problems when parameterized by a modulator to an outerplanar graph.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2011

Co-nondeterminism in compositions: A kernelization lower bound for a Ramsey-type problem

Until recently, techniques for obtaining lower bounds for kernelization were one of the most sought after tools in the field of parameterized complexity. Now, after a strong influx of techniques, we are in the fortunate situation of having tools available that are even stronger than what has been required in their applications so far. Based on a result of Fortnow and Santhanam (JCSS 2011), Bodlaender et al. (JCSS 2009) showed that, unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly, the existence of a deterministic polynomial-time composition algorithm, i.e., an algorithm which outputs an instance of bounded parameter value which is yes if and only if one of t input instances is yes, rules out the existence of polynomial kernels for a problem. Dell and van Melkebeek (STOC 2010) continued this line of research and, amongst others, were able to rule out kernels of size O(k^d-eps) for certain problems, assuming NP !\subseteq coNP/poly. Their work implies that even the existence of a co-nondeterministic composition rules out polynomial kernels. In this work we present the first example of how co-nondeterminism can help to make a composition algorithm. We study a Ramsey-type problem: Given a graph G and an integer k, the question is whether G contains an independent set or a clique of size at least k. It was asked by Rod Downey whether this problem admits a polynomial kernelization. We provide a co-nondeterministic composition based on embedding t instances into a single host graph H. The crux is that the host graph H needs to observe a bound of L \in O(log t) on both its maximum independent set and maximum clique size, while also having a cover of its vertex set by independent sets and cliques all of size L; the co-nondeterministic composition is build around the search for such graphs. Thus we show that, unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly, the problem does not admit a kernelization with polynomial size guarantee.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2011

Clique cover and graph separation: New incompressibility results

The field of kernelization studies polynomial-time preprocessing routines for hard problems in the framework of parameterized complexity. Although a framework for proving kernelization lower bounds has been discovered in 2008 and successfully applied multiple times over the last three years, establishing kernelization complexity of many important problems remains open. In this paper we show that, unless NP is a subset of coNP/poly and the polynomial hierarchy collapses up to its third level, the following parameterized problems do not admit a polynomial-time preprocessing algorithm that reduces the size of an instance to polynomial in the parameter: - EDGE CLIQUE COVER, parameterized by the number of cliques, - DIRECTED EDGE/VERTEX MULTIWAY CUT, parameterized by the size of the cutset, even in the case of two terminals, - EDGE/VERTEX MULTICUT, parameterized by the size of the cutset, and - k-WAY CUT, parameterized by the size of the cutset. The existence of a polynomial kernelization for EDGE CLIQUE COVER was a seasoned veteran in open problem sessions. Furthermore, our results complement very recent developments in designing parameterized algorithms for cut problems by Marx and Razgon [STOC'11], Bousquet et al. [STOC'11], Kawarabayashi and Thorup [FOCS'11] and Chitnis et al. [SODA'12].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2011

Compression via Matroids: A Randomized Polynomial Kernel for Odd Cycle Transversal

The Odd Cycle Transversal problem (OCT) asks whether a given graph can be made bipartite by deleting at most $k$ of its vertices. In a breakthrough result Reed, Smith, and Vetta (Operations Research Letters, 2004) gave a $\BigOh(4^kkmn)$ time algorithm for it, the first algorithm with polynomial runtime of uniform degree for every fixed $k$. It is known that this implies a polynomial-time compression algorithm that turns OCT instances into equivalent instances of size at most $\BigOh(4^k)$, a so-called kernelization. Since then the existence of a polynomial kernel for OCT, i.e., a kernelization with size bounded polynomially in $k$, has turned into one of the main open questions in the study of kernelization. This work provides the first (randomized) polynomial kernelization for OCT. We introduce a novel kernelization approach based on matroid theory, where we encode all relevant information about a problem instance into a matroid with a representation of size polynomial in $k$. For OCT, the matroid is built to allow us to simulate the computation of the iterative compression step of the algorithm of Reed, Smith, and Vetta, applied (for only one round) to an approximate odd cycle transversal which it is aiming to shrink to size $k$. The process is randomized with one-sided error exponentially small in $k$, where the result can contain false positives but no false negatives, and the size guarantee is cubic in the size of the approximate solution. Combined with an $\BigOh(\sqrt{\log n})$-approximation (Agarwal et al., STOC 2005), we get a reduction of the instance to size $\BigOh(k^{4.5})$, implying a randomized polynomial kernelization.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2011

Hierarchies of Inefficient Kernelizability

The framework of Bodlaender et al. (ICALP 2008) and Fortnow and Santhanam (STOC 2008) allows us to exclude the existence of polynomial kernels for a range of problems under reasonable complexity-theoretical assumptions. However, there are also some issues that are not addressed by this framework, including the existence of Turing kernels such as the "kernelization" of Leaf Out Branching(k) into a disjunction over n instances of size poly(k). Observing that Turing kernels are preserved by polynomial parametric transformations, we define a kernelization hardness hierarchy, akin to the M- and W-hierarchy of ordinary parameterized complexity, by the PPT-closure of problems that seem likely to be fundamentally hard for efficient Turing kernelization. We find that several previously considered problems are complete for our fundamental hardness class, including Min Ones d-SAT(k), Binary NDTM Halting(k), Connected Vertex Cover(k), and Clique(k log n), the clique problem parameterized by k log n.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2011

On Polynomial Kernels for Structural Parameterizations of Odd Cycle Transversal

The Odd Cycle Transversal problem (OCT) asks whether a given graph can be made bipartite (i.e., 2-colorable) by deleting at most l vertices. We study structural parameterizations of OCT with respect to their polynomial kernelizability, i.e., whether instances can be efficiently reduced to a size polynomial in the chosen parameter. It is a major open problem in parameterized complexity whether Odd Cycle Transversal admits a polynomial kernel when parameterized by l. On the positive side, we show a polynomial kernel for OCT when parameterized by the vertex deletion distance to the class of bipartite graphs of treewidth at most w (for any constant w); this generalizes the parameter feedback vertex set number (i.e., the distance to a forest). Complementing this, we exclude polynomial kernels for OCT parameterized by the distance to outerplanar graphs, conditioned on the assumption that NP \not \subseteq coNP/poly. Thus the bipartiteness requirement for the treewidth w graphs is necessary. Further lower bounds are given for parameterization by distance from cluster and co-cluster graphs respectively, as well as for Weighted OCT parameterized by the vertex cover number (i.e., the distance from an independent set).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2010

Cross-Composition: A New Technique for Kernelization Lower Bounds

We introduce a new technique for proving kernelization lower bounds, called cross-composition. A classical problem L cross-composes into a parameterized problem Q if an instance of Q with polynomially bounded parameter value can express the logical OR of a sequence of instances of L. Building on work by Bodlaender et al. (ICALP 2008) and using a result by Fortnow and Santhanam (STOC 2008) we show that if an NP-complete problem cross-composes into a parameterized problem Q then Q does not admit a polynomial kernel unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses. Our technique generalizes and strengthens the recent techniques of using OR-composition algorithms and of transferring the lower bounds via polynomial parameter transformations. We show its applicability by proving kernelization lower bounds for a number of important graphs problems with structural (non-standard) parameterizations, e.g., Chromatic Number, Clique, and Weighted Feedback Vertex Set do not admit polynomial kernels with respect to the vertex cover number of the input graphs unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses, contrasting the fact that these problems are trivially fixed-parameter tractable for this parameter. We have similar lower bounds for Feedback Vertex Set.

cs.CC↗