arXiv subjects

Takeharu Shiraga

Publications and source records attributed to Takeharu Shiraga.

16 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Undecided State Dynamics with Many Opinions

We study the Undecided-State Dynamics (USD), a fundamental consensus process in which each vertex holds one of $k$ decided opinions or the undecided state. We consider both the gossip model and the population protocol model. Prior work established tight bounds on the consensus time of this process only for the regime $k = O(\sqrt{n}/(\log n)^2)$ (for the population protocol model) and $k = O((n/\log n)^{1/3})$ (for the gossip model), often under restrictive assumptions on the initial configuration. In this paper, we obtain the first consensus-time guarantees for USD that hold for \emph{arbitrary} $2\le k\le n$ and for \emph{arbitrary} initial configurations in both the gossip model and the population protocol model. In the gossip model, USD reaches consensus within $\widetilde O(\min\{k,\sqrt n\})$ synchronous rounds with probability $1-p_{\bot}-n^{-c}$, where $p_{\bot}$ is the gossip-specific probability of collapsing to the all-undecided state in the first round. In the population protocol model, USD reaches consensus within $\widetilde O(\min\{kn,n^{3/2}\})$ asynchronous interactions with high probability. We also present lower bounds that match the upper bounds up to polylogarithmic factors for a specific initial configuration and show that our upper bounds are essentially optimal.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

3-Majority and 2-Choices with Many Opinions

We present the first nearly-optimal bounds on the consensus time for the well-known synchronous consensus dynamics, specifically 3-Majority and 2-Choices, for an arbitrary number of opinions. In synchronous consensus dynamics, we consider an $n$-vertex complete graph with self-loops, where each vertex holds an opinion from $\{1,\dots,k\}$. At each discrete-time round, all vertices update their opinions simultaneously according to a given protocol. The goal is to reach a consensus, where all vertices support the same opinion. In 3-Majority, each vertex chooses three random neighbors with replacement and updates its opinion to match the majority, with ties broken randomly. In 2-Choices, each vertex chooses two random neighbors with replacement. If the selected vertices hold the same opinion, the vertex adopts that opinion. Otherwise, it retains its current opinion for that round. Improving upon a line of work [Becchetti et al., SPAA'14], [Becchetti et al., SODA'16], [Berenbrink et al., PODC'17], [Ghaffari and Lengler, PODC'18], we prove that, for every $2\le k \le n$, 3-Majority (resp.\ 2-Choices) reaches consensus within $\widetildeΘ(\min\{k,\sqrt{n}\})$ (resp.\ $\widetildeΘ(k)$) rounds with high probability. Prior to this work, the best known upper bound on the consensus time of 3-Majority was $\widetilde{O}(k)$ if $k \ll n^{1/3}$ and $\widetilde{O}(n^{2/3})$ otherwise, and for 2-Choices, the consensus time was known to be $\widetilde{O}(k)$ for $k\ll \sqrt{n}$.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Asynchronous 3-Majority Dynamics with Many Opinions

We consider 3-Majority, a probabilistic consensus dynamics on a complete graph with $n$ vertices, each vertex starting with one of $k$ initial opinions. At each discrete time step, a vertex $u$ is chosen uniformly at random. The selected vertex $u$ chooses three neighbors $v_1,v_2,v_3$ uniformly at random with replacement and takes the majority opinion held by the three, where ties are broken in favor of the opinion of $v_3$. The main quantity of interest is the consensus time, the number of steps required for all vertices to hold the same opinion. This asynchronous version turns out to be considerably harder to analyze than the synchronous version and so far results have only been obtained for $k=2$. Even in the synchronous version the results for large $k$ are far from tight. In this paper we prove that the consensus time is $\tildeΘ( \min(nk,n^{1.5}) )$ for all $k$. These are the first bounds for all $k$ that are tight up to a polylogarithmic factor.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2024

Discrete Incremental Voting on Expanders

Pull voting is a random process in which vertices of a connected graph have initial opinions chosen from a set of $k$ distinct opinions, and at each step a random vertex alters its opinion to that of a randomly chosen neighbour. If the system reaches a state where each vertex holds the same opinion, then this opinion will persist forthwith. In general the opinions are regarded as incommensurate, whereas in this paper we consider a type of pull voting suitable for integer opinions such as $\{1,2,\ldots,k\}$ which can be compared on a linear scale; for example, 1 ('disagree strongly'), 2 ('disagree'), $\ldots,$ 5 ('agree strongly'). On observing the opinion of a random neighbour, a vertex updates its opinion by a discrete change towards the value of the neighbour's opinion, if different. Discrete incremental voting is a pull voting process which mimics this behaviour. At each step a random vertex alters its opinion towards that of a randomly chosen neighbour; increasing its opinion by $+1$ if the opinion of the chosen neighbour is larger, or decreasing its opinion by $-1$, if the opinion of the neighbour is smaller. If initially there are only two adjacent integer opinions, for example $\{0,1\}$, incremental voting coincides with pull voting, but if initially there are more than two opinions this is not the case. For an $n$-vertex graph $G=(V,E)$, let $λ$ be the absolute second eigenvalue of the transition matrix $P$ of a simple random walk on $G$. Let the initial opinions of the vertices be chosen from $\{1,2,\ldots,k\}$. Let $c=\sum_{v \in V} π_v X_v$, where $X_v$ is the initial opinion of vertex $v$, and $π_v$ is the stationary distribution of the vertex. Then provided $λk=o(1)$ and $k=o(n/\log n)$, with high probability the final opinion is the initial weighted average $c$ suitably rounded to $\lfloor c \rfloor$ or $\lceil c\rceil$.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2023

Discrete Incremental Voting

We consider a type of pull voting suitable for discrete numeric opinions which can be compared on a linear scale, for example, 1 ('disagree strongly'), 2 ('disagree'), $\ldots,$ 5 ('agree strongly'). On observing the opinion of a random neighbour, a vertex changes its opinion incrementally towards the value of the neighbour's opinion, if different. For opinions drawn from a set $\{1,2,\ldots,k\}$, the opinion of the vertex would change by $+1$ if the opinion of the neighbour is larger, or by $-1$, if it is smaller. It is not clear how to predict the outcome of this process, but we observe that the total weight of the system, that is, the sum of the individual opinions of all vertices, is a martingale. This allows us analyse the outcome of the process on some classes of dense expanders such as clique graphs $K_n$ and random graphs $ G_{n,p}$ for suitably large $p$. If the average of the original opinions satisfies $i \le c \le i+1$ for some integer $i$, then the asymptotic probability that opinion $i$ wins is $i+1-c$, and the probability that opinion $i+1$ wins is $c-i$. With high probability, the winning opinion cannot be other than $i$ or $i+1$. To contrast this, we show that for a path and opinions $0,1,2$ arranged initially in non-decreasing order along the path, the outcome is very different. Any of the opinions can win with constant probability, provided that each of the two extreme opinions $0$ and $2$ is initially supported by a constant fraction of vertices.

math.PR↗

arXiv2022

An analysis of load-balancing algorithms on edge-Markovian evolving graphs

Analysis of algorithms on time-varying networks (often called evolving graphs) is a modern challenge in theoretical computer science. The edge-Markovian is a relatively simple and comprehensive model of evolving graphs: every pair of vertices which is not a current edge independently becomes an edge with probability $p$ at each time-step, as well as every edge disappears with probability $q$. Clearly, the edge-Markovian graph changes its shape depending on the current shape, and the dependency refuses some useful techniques for an independent sequence of random graphs which often behaves similarly to a static random graph. It motivates this paper to develop a new technique for analysis of algorithms on edge-Markovian evolving graphs. Specifically speaking, this paper is concerned with load-balancing, which is a popular subject in distributed computing, and we analyze the so-called random matching algorithms, which is a standard scheme for load-balancing. We prove that major random matching algorithms achieve nearly optimal load balance in $O(r \log (Δn))$ steps on edge-Markovian evolving graphs, where $r = \max\{p/(1-q), (1-q)/p\}$, $n$ is the number of vertices (i.e., processors) and $Δ$ denotes the initial gap of loads unbalance. We remark that the independent sequences of random graphs correspond to $r=1$. To avoid the difficulty of an analysis caused by a complex correlation with the history of an execution, we develop a simple proof technique based on history-independent bounds. As far as we know, this is the first theoretical analysis of load-balancing on randomly evolving graphs, not only for the edge-Markovian but also for the independent sequences of random graphs.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2022

Reversible Random Walks on Dynamic Graphs

Recently, random walks on dynamic graphs have been studied because of their adaptivity to the time-varying structure of real-world networks. In general, there is a tremendous gap between static and dynamic graph settings for the lazy simple random walk: Although $O(n^3)$ cover time was shown for any static graphs of $n$ vertices, there is an edge-changing dynamic graph with an exponential hitting time. On the other hand, previous works indicate that the random walk on a dynamic graph with a time-homogeneous stationary distribution behaves almost identically to that on a static graph. In this paper, we strengthen this insight by obtaining general and improved bounds. Specifically, we consider a random walk according to a sequence $(P_t)_{t\geq 1}$ of irreducible and reversible transition matrices such that all $P_t$ have the same stationary distribution. We bound the mixing, hitting, and cover times in terms of the hitting and relaxation times of the random walk according to the worst fixed $P_t$. Moreover, we obtain the first bounds of the hitting and cover times of multiple random walks and the coalescing time on dynamic graphs. These bounds can be seen as an extension of the well-known bounds of random walks on static graphs. Our results generalize the previous upper bounds for specific random walks on dynamic graphs, e.g., lazy simple random walks and $d_{\max}$-lazy walks, and give improved and tight upper bounds in various cases. As an interesting consequence of our generalization, we obtain tight bounds for the lazy Metropolis walk [Nonaka, Ono, Sadakane, and Yamashita, TCS10] on any dynamic graph: $O(n^2)$ mixing time, $O(n^2)$ hitting time, and $O(n^2\log n)$ cover time. Additionally, our coalescing time bound implies the consensus time bound of the pull voting on a dynamic graph.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2020

How Many Vertices Does a Random Walk Miss in a Network with Moderately Increasing the Number of Vertices?

Real networks are often dynamic. In response to it, analyses of algorithms on {\em dynamic networks} attract more and more attentions in network science and engineering. Random walks on dynamic graphs also have been investigated actively in more than a decade, where in most cases the edge set changes but the vertex set is static. The vertex sets are also dynamic in many real networks. Motivated by a new technology of the analysis of random walks on dynamic graphs, this paper introduces a simple model of graphs with increasing the number of vertices, and presents an analysis of random walks associated with the cover time on such graphs. In particular, we reveal that a random walk asymptotically covers the vertices all but a constant number if the vertex set grows {\em moderately}.

math.PR↗

arXiv2020

Quasi-majority Functional Voting on Expander Graphs

Consider a distributed graph where each vertex holds one of two distinct opinions. In this paper, we are interested in synchronous voting processes where each vertex updates its opinion according to a predefined common local updating rule. For example, each vertex adopts the majority opinion among 1) itself and two randomly picked neighbors in best-of-two or 2) three randomly picked neighbors in best-of-three. Previous works intensively studied specific rules including best-of-two and best-of-three individually. In this paper, we generalize and extend previous works of best-of-two and best-of-three on expander graphs by proposing a new model, quasi-majority functional voting. This new model contains best-of-two and best-of-three as special cases. We show that, on expander graphs with sufficiently large initial bias, any quasi-majority functional voting reaches consensus within $O(\log n)$ steps with high probability. Moreover, we show that, for any initial opinion configuration, any quasi-majority functional voting on expander graphs with higher expansion (e.g., Erdős-Rényi graph $G(n,p)$ with $p=Ω(1/\sqrt{n})$) reaches consensus within $O(\log n)$ with high probability. Furthermore, we show that the consensus time is $O(\log n/\log k)$ of best-of-$(2k+1)$ for $k=o(n/\log n)$.

math.PR↗

arXiv2019

Phase Transitions of Best-of-Two and Best-of-Three on Stochastic Block Models

This paper is concerned with voting processes on graphs where each vertex holds one of two different opinions. In particular, we study the \emph{Best-of-two} and the \emph{Best-of-three}. Here at each synchronous and discrete time step, each vertex updates its opinion to match the majority among the opinions of two random neighbors and itself (the Best-of-two) or the opinions of three random neighbors (the Best-of-three). Previous studies have explored these processes on complete graphs and expander graphs, but we understand significantly less about their properties on graphs with more complicated structures. In this paper, we study the Best-of-two and the Best-of-three on the stochastic block model $G(2n,p,q)$, which is a random graph consisting of two distinct Erdős-Rényi graphs $G(n,p)$ joined by random edges with density $q\leq p$. We obtain two main results. First, if $p=ω(\log n/n)$ and $r=q/p$ is a constant, we show that there is a phase transition in $r$ with threshold $r^*$ (specifically, $r^*=\sqrt{5}-2$ for the Best-of-two, and $r^*=1/7$ for the Best-of-three). If $r>r^*$, the process reaches consensus within $O(\log \log n+\log n/\log (np))$ steps for any initial opinion configuration with a bias of $Ω(n)$. By contrast, if $r r^*$, we show that, for any initial opinion configuration, the process reaches consensus within $O(\log n)$ steps. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result concerning multiple-choice voting for arbitrary initial opinion configurations on non-complete graphs.

math.PR↗

arXiv2018

Discrepancy Analysis of a New Randomized Diffusion Algorithm

For an arbitrary initial configuration of discrete loads over vertices of a distributed graph, we consider the problem of minimizing the {\em discrepancy} between the maximum and minimum loads among all vertices. For this problem, this paper is concerned with the ability of natural diffusion-based iterative algorithms: at each discrete and synchronous time step on an algorithm, each vertex is allowed to distribute its loads to each neighbor (including itself) without occurring negative loads or using the information of previous time steps. In this setting, this paper presents a new {\em randomized} diffusion algorithm like multiple random walks. Our algorithm archives $O(\sqrt{d \log N})$ discrepancy for any $d$-regular graph with $N$ vertices with high probability, while {\em deterministic} diffusion algorithms have $Ω(d)$ lower bound. Furthermore, we succeed in generalizing our algorithm to any symmetric round matrix. This yields that $O(\sqrt{ d_{\max} \log N})$ discrepancy for arbitrary graphs without using the information of maximum degree $d_{\max}$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2017

Dispersion processes

We study a synchronous dispersion process in which $M$ particles are initially placed at a distinguished origin vertex of a graph $G$. At each time step, at each vertex $v$ occupied by more than one particle at the beginning of this step, each of these particles moves to a neighbour of $v$ chosen independently and uniformly at random. The dispersion process ends once the particles have all stopped moving, i.e. at the first step at which each vertex is occupied by at most one particle. For the complete graph $K_n$ and star graph $S_n$, we show that for any constant $δ>1$, with high probability, if $M \le n/2(1-δ)$, then the process finishes in $O(\log n)$ steps, whereas if $M \ge n/2(1+δ)$, then the process needs $e^{Ω(n)}$ steps to complete (if ever). We also show that an analogous lazy variant of the process exhibits the same behaviour but for higher thresholds, allowing faster dispersion of more particles. For paths, trees, grids, hypercubes and Cayley graphs of large enough sizes (in terms of $M$) we give bounds on the time to finish and the maximum distance traveled from the origin as a function of the number of particles $M$.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2017

Fast plurality consensus in regular expanders

Pull voting is a classic method to reach consensus among $n$ vertices with differing opinions in a distributed network: each vertex at each step takes on the opinion of a random neighbour. This method, however, suffers from two drawbacks. Even if there are only two opposing opinions, the time taken for a single opinion to emerge can be slow and the final opinion is not necessarily the initially held majority. We refer to a protocol where 2 neighbours are contacted at each step as a 2-sample voting protocol. In the two-sample protocol a vertex updates its opinion only if both sampled opinions are the same. Not much was known about the performance of two-sample voting on general expanders in the case of three or more opinions. In this paper we show that the following performance can be achieved on a $d$-regular expander using two-sample voting. We suppose there are $k \ge 3$ opinions, and that the initial size of the largest and second largest opinions is $A_1, A_2$ respectively. We prove that, if $A_1 - A_2 \ge C n \max\{\sqrt{(\log n)/A_1}, λ\}$, where $λ$ is the absolute second eigenvalue of matrix $P=Adj(G)/d$ and $C$ is a suitable constant, then the largest opinion wins in $O((n \log n)/A_1)$ steps with high probability. For almost all $d$-regular graphs, we have $λ=c/\sqrt{d}$ for some constant $c>0$. This means that as $d$ increases we can separate an opinion whose majority is $o(n)$, whereas $Θ(n)$ majority is required for $d$ constant. This work generalizes the results of Becchetti et. al (SPAA 2014) for the complete graph $K_n$.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2016

The Cover Time of Deterministic Random Walks for General Transition Probabilities

The deterministic random walk is a deterministic process analogous to a random walk. While there are some results on the cover time of the rotor-router model, which is a deterministic random walk corresponding to a simple random walk, nothing is known about the cover time of deterministic random walks emulating general transition probabilities. This paper is concerned with the SRT-router model with multiple tokens, which is a deterministic process coping with general transition probabilities possibly containing irrational numbers. For the model, we give an upper bound of the cover time, which is the first result on the cover time of deterministic random walks for general transition probabilities. Our upper bound also improves the existing bounds for the rotor-router model in some cases.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2015

Total Variation Discrepancy of Deterministic Random Walks for Ergodic Markov Chains

Motivated by a derandomization of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), this paper investigates deterministic random walks, which is a deterministic process analogous to a random walk. While there are several progresses on the analysis of the vertex-wise discrepancy (i.e., $L_\infty$ discrepancy), little is known about the {\em total variation discrepancy} (i.e., $L_1$ discrepancy), which plays a significant role in the analysis of an FPRAS based on MCMC. This paper investigates upper bounds of the $L_1$ discrepancy between the expected number of tokens in a Markov chain and the number of tokens in its corresponding deterministic random walk. First, we give a simple but nontrivial upper bound ${\rm O}(mt^*)$ of the $L_1$ discrepancy for any ergodic Markov chains, where $m$ is the number of edges of the transition diagram and $t^*$ is the mixing time of the Markov chain. Then, we give a better upper bound ${\rm O}(m\sqrt{t^*\log t^*})$ for non-oblivious deterministic random walks, if the corresponding Markov chain is ergodic and lazy. We also present some lower bounds.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2015

Deterministic Random Walks for Rapidly Mixing Chains

The rotor-router model is a deterministic process analogous to a simple random walk on a graph. This paper is concerned with a generalized model, functional-router model, which imitates a Markov chain possibly containing irrational transition probabilities. We investigate the discrepancy of the number of tokens at a single vertex between the functional-router model and its corresponding Markov chain, and give an upper bound in terms of the mixing time of the Markov chain.

cs.DM↗