arXiv subjects

Tomer Ezra

Publications and source records attributed to Tomer Ezra.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2024

Choosing Behind the Veil: Tight Bounds for Identity-Blind Online Algorithms

In Bayesian online settings, every element has a value that is drawn from a known underlying distribution, which we refer to as the element's identity. The elements arrive sequentially. Upon the arrival of an element, its value is revealed, and the decision maker needs to decide, immediately and irrevocably, whether to accept it or not. While most previous work has assumed that the decision maker, upon observing the element's value, also becomes aware of its identity -- namely, its distribution -- practical scenarios frequently demand that decisions be made based solely on the element's value, without considering its identity. This necessity arises either from the algorithm's ignorance of the element's identity or due to the pursuit of fairness. We call such algorithms identity-blind algorithms, and propose the identity-blindness gap as a metric to evaluate the performance loss caused by identity-blindness. This gap is defined as the maximum ratio between the expected performance of an identity-blind online algorithm and an optimal online algorithm that knows the arrival order, thus also the identities. We study the identity-blindness gap in the paradigmatic prophet inequality problem, under the two objectives of maximizing the expected value, and maximizing the probability to obtain the highest value. For the max-expectation objective, the celebrated prophet inequality establishes a single-threshold algorithm that gives at least 1/2 of the offline optimum, thus also an identity-blindness gap of at least 1/2. We show that this bound is tight. For the max-probability objective, while the competitive ratio is tightly 1/e, we provide a deterministic single-threshold algorithm that gives an identity-blindness gap of $\sim 0.562$ under the assumption that there are no large point masses. Moreover, we show that this bound is tight with respect to deterministic algorithms.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

The Competition Complexity of Prophet Inequalities

We study the classic single-choice prophet inequality problem through a resource augmentation lens. Our goal is to bound the $(1-\varepsilon)$-competition complexity of different types of online algorithms. This metric asks for the smallest $k$ such that the expected value of the online algorithm on $k$ copies of the original instance, is at least a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation to the expected offline optimum on a single copy. We show that block threshold algorithms, which set one threshold per copy, are optimal and give a tight bound of $k = Θ(\log \log 1/\varepsilon)$. This shows that block threshold algorithms approach the offline optimum doubly-exponentially fast. For single threshold algorithms, we give a tight bound of $k = Θ(\log 1/\varepsilon)$, establishing an exponential gap between block threshold algorithms and single threshold algorithms. Our model and results pave the way for exploring resource-augmented prophet inequalities in combinatorial settings. In line with this, we present preliminary findings for bipartite matching with one-sided vertex arrivals, as well as in XOS combinatorial auctions. Our results have a natural competition complexity interpretation in mechanism design and pricing applications.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

On the (In)approximability of Combinatorial Contracts

We study two combinatorial contract design models -- multi-agent and multi-action -- where a principal delegates the execution of a costly project to others. In both settings, the principal cannot observe the choices of the agent(s), only the project's outcome (success or failure), and incentivizes the agent(s) using a contract, which is a payment scheme that specifies the payment to the agent(s) upon a project's success. In the multi-agent setting, the project is delegated to a team of agents, and every agent chooses whether or not to exert effort. A success probability function specifies the probability of success for every subset of agents exerting effort. For the family of submodular success probability functions, Duetting et al. [2023] established a poly-time constant-factor approximation to the optimal contract, and left open whether this problem admits a PTAS. We show that no poly-time algorithm guarantees a better than $0.7$-approximation to the optimal contract. For XOS functions, Duetting et al. [2023] give a poly-time constant approximation with value and demand queries. We show that with value queries only, one cannot get any constant approximation. In the multi-action setting, the project is delegated to a single agent, who can take any subset of a given set of actions. Here, a success probability function specifies the probability of success for any subset of actions. Duetting et al. [2021a] devised a poly-time algorithm for computing an optimal contract for gross substitutes success probability functions, and established NP-hardness with respect to submodular functions. We further strengthen this hardness result by showing that this problem does not admit any constant approximation either. For the broader class of XOS functions, we establish the hardness of obtaining a $n^{-1/2+\varepsilon}$-approximation for any $\varepsilon > 0$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Prophet Inequalities via the Expected Competitive Ratio

We consider prophet inequalities under downward-closed constraints. In this problem, a decision-maker makes immediate and irrevocable choices on arriving elements, subject to constraints. Traditionally, performance is compared to the expected offline optimum, called the \textit{Ratio of Expectations} (RoE). However, RoE has limitations as it only guarantees the average performance compared to the optimum, and might perform poorly against the realized ex-post optimal value. We study an alternative performance measure, the \textit{Expected Ratio} (EoR), namely the expectation of the ratio between algorithm's and prophet's value. EoR offers robust guarantees, e.g., a constant EoR implies achieving a constant fraction of the offline optimum with constant probability. For the special case of single-choice problems the EoR coincides with the well-studied notion of probability of selecting the maximum. However, the EoR naturally generalizes the probability of selecting the maximum for combinatorial constraints, which are the main focus of this paper. Specifically, we establish two reductions: for every constraint, RoE and the EoR are at most a constant factor apart. Additionally, we show that the EoR is a stronger benchmark than the RoE in that, for every instance (constraint and distribution), the RoE is at least a constant fraction of the EoR, but not vice versa. Both these reductions imply a wealth of EoR results in multiple settings where RoE results are known.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

The Importance of Knowing the Arrival Order in Combinatorial Bayesian Settings

We study the measure of order-competitive ratio introduced by Ezra et al. [2023] for online algorithms in Bayesian combinatorial settings. In our setting, a decision-maker observes a sequence of elements that are associated with stochastic rewards that are drawn from known priors, but revealed one by one in an online fashion. The decision-maker needs to decide upon the arrival of each element whether to select it or discard it (according to some feasibility constraint), and receives the associated rewards of the selected elements. The order-competitive ratio is defined as the worst-case ratio (over all distribution sequences) between the performance of the best order-unaware and order-aware algorithms, and quantifies the loss incurred due to the lack of knowledge of the arrival order. Ezra et al. [2023] showed how to design algorithms that achieve better approximations with respect to the new benchmark (order-competitive ratio) in the single-choice setting, which raises the natural question of whether the same can be achieved in combinatorial settings. In particular, whether it is possible to achieve a constant approximation with respect to the best online algorithm for downward-closed feasibility constraints, whether $ω(1/n)$-approximation is achievable for general (non-downward-closed) feasibility constraints, or whether a convergence rate to $1$ of $o(1/\sqrt{k})$ is achievable for the multi-unit setting. We show, by devising novel constructions that may be of independent interest, that for all three scenarios, the asymptotic lower bounds with respect to the old benchmark, also hold with respect to the new benchmark.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Fair Division with Interdependent Values

We introduce the study of designing allocation mechanisms for fairly allocating indivisible goods in settings with interdependent valuation functions. In our setting, there is a set of goods that needs to be allocated to a set of agents (without disposal). Each agent is given a private signal, and his valuation function depends on the signals of all agents. Without the use of payments, there are strong impossibility results for designing strategyproof allocation mechanisms even in settings without interdependent values. Therefore, we turn to design mechanisms that always admit equilibria that are fair with respect to their true signals, despite their potentially distorted perception. To do so, we first extend the definitions of pure Nash equilibrium and well-studied fairness notions in literature to the interdependent setting. We devise simple allocation mechanisms that always admit a fair equilibrium with respect to the true signals. We complement this result by showing that, even for very simple cases with binary additive interdependent valuation functions, no allocation mechanism that always admits an equilibrium, can guarantee that all equilibria are fair with respect to the true signals.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Pandora's Problem with Combinatorial Cost

Pandora's problem is a fundamental model in economics that studies optimal search strategies under costly inspection. In this paper we initiate the study of Pandora's problem with combinatorial costs, capturing many real-life scenarios where search cost is non-additive. Weitzman's celebrated algorithm [1979] establishes the remarkable result that, for additive costs, the optimal search strategy is non-adaptive and computationally feasible. We inquire to which extent this structural and computational simplicity extends beyond additive cost functions. Our main result is that the class of submodular cost functions admits an optimal strategy that follows a fixed, non-adaptive order, thus preserving the structural simplicity of additive cost functions. In contrast, for the more general class of subadditive (or even XOS) cost functions, the optimal strategy may already need to determine the search order adaptively. On the computational side, obtaining any approximation to the optimal utility requires super polynomially many queries to the cost function, even for a strict subclass of submodular cost functions.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

"Who Is Next in Line?'' On the Significance of Knowing the Arrival Order in Bayesian Online Settings

We introduce a new measure for the performance of online algorithms in Bayesian settings, where the input is drawn from a known prior, but the realizations are revealed one-by-one in an online fashion. Our new measure is called order-competitive ratio. It is defined as the worst case (over all distribution sequences) ratio between the performance of the best order-unaware and order-aware algorithms, and quantifies the loss that is incurred due to lack of knowledge of the arrival order. Despite the growing interest in the role of the arrival order on the performance of online algorithms, this loss has been overlooked thus far. We study the order-competitive ratio in the paradigmatic prophet inequality problem, for the two common objective functions of (i) maximizing the expected value, and (ii) maximizing the probability of obtaining the largest value; and with respect to two families of algorithms, namely (i) adaptive algorithms, and (ii) single-threshold algorithms. We provide tight bounds for all four combinations, with respect to deterministic algorithms. Our analysis requires new ideas and departs from standard techniques. In particular, our adaptive algorithms inevitably go beyond single-threshold algorithms. The results with respect to the order-competitive ratio measure capture the intuition that adaptive algorithms are stronger than single-threshold ones, and may lead to a better algorithmic advice than the classical competitive ratio measure.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Best-of-Both-Worlds Fair-Share Allocations

We consider the problem of fair allocation of indivisible items among $n$ agents with additive valuations, when agents have equal entitlements to the goods, and there are no transfers. Best-of-Both-Worlds (BoBW) fairness mechanisms aim to give all agents both an ex-ante guarantee (such as getting the proportional share in expectation) and an ex-post guarantee. Prior BoBW results have focused on ex-post guarantees that are based on the "up to one item" paradigm, such as envy-free up to one item (EF1). In this work we attempt to give every agent a high value ex-post, and specifically, a constant fraction of his maximin share (MMS). The up to one item paradigm fails to give such a guarantee, and it is not difficult to present examples in which previous BoBW mechanisms give agents only a $\frac{1}{n}$ fraction of their MMS. Our main result is a deterministic polynomial time algorithm that computes a distribution over allocations that is ex-ante proportional, and ex-post, every allocation gives every agent at least his proportional share up to one item, and more importantly, at least half of his MMS. Moreover, this last ex-post guarantee holds even with respect to a more demanding notion of a share, introduced in this paper, that we refer to as the truncated proportional share (TPS). Our guarantees are nearly best possible, in the sense that one cannot guarantee agents more than their proportional share ex-ante, and one cannot guarantee agents more than a $\frac{n}{2n-1}$ fraction of their TPS ex-post.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Fair-Share Allocations for Agents with Arbitrary Entitlements

We consider the problem of fair allocation of indivisible goods to $n$ agents, with no transfers. When agents have equal entitlements, the well established notion of the maximin share (MMS) serves as an attractive fairness criterion, where to qualify as fair, an allocation needs to give every agent at least a substantial fraction of her MMS. In this paper we consider the case of arbitrary (unequal) entitlements. We explain shortcomings in previous attempts that extend the MMS to unequal entitlements. Our conceptual contribution is the introduction of a new notion of a share, the AnyPrice share (APS), that is appropriate for settings with arbitrary entitlements. Even for the equal entitlements case, this notion is new, and satisfies $APS \ge MMS$, where the inequality is sometimes strict. We present two equivalent definitions for the APS (one as a minimization problem, the other as a maximization problem), and provide comparisons between the APS and previous notions of fairness. Our main result concerns additive valuations and arbitrary entitlements, for which we provide a polynomial-time algorithm that gives every agent at least a $\frac{3}{5}$-fraction of her APS. This algorithm can also be viewed as providing strategies in a certain natural bidding game, and these strategies secure each agent at least a $\frac{3}{5}$-fraction of her APS.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2021

Prophet Inequality with Competing Agents

We introduce a model of competing agents in a prophet setting, where rewards arrive online, and decisions are made immediately and irrevocably. The rewards are unknown from the outset, but they are drawn from a known probability distribution. In the standard prophet setting, a single agent makes selection decisions in an attempt to maximize her expected reward. The novelty of our model is the introduction of a competition setting, where multiple agents compete over the arriving rewards, and make online selection decisions simultaneously, as rewards arrive. If a given reward is selected by more than a single agent, ties are broken either randomly or by a fixed ranking of the agents. The consideration of competition turns the prophet setting from an online decision making scenario to a multi-agent game. For both random and ranked tie-breaking rules, we present simple threshold strategies for the agents that give them high guarantees, independent of the strategies taken by others. In particular, for random tie-breaking, every agent can guarantee herself at least $\frac{1}{k+1}$ of the highest reward, and at least $\frac{1}{2k}$ of the optimal social welfare. For ranked tie-breaking, the $i$th ranked agent can guarantee herself at least a half of the $i$th highest reward. We complement these results by matching upper bounds, even with respect to equilibrium profiles. For ranked tie-breaking rule, we also show a correspondence between the equilibrium of the $k$-agent game and the optimal strategy of a single decision maker who can select up to $k$ rewards.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2020

Fair and Truthful Mechanisms for Dichotomous Valuations

We consider the problem of allocating a set on indivisible items to players with private preferences in an efficient and fair way. We focus on valuations that have dichotomous marginals, in which the added value of any item to a set is either 0 or 1, and aim to design truthful allocation mechanisms (without money) that maximize welfare and are fair. For the case that players have submodular valuations with dichotomous marginals, we design such a deterministic truthful allocation mechanism. The allocation output by our mechanism is Lorenz dominating, and consequently satisfies many desired fairness properties, such as being envy-free up to any item (EFX), and maximizing the Nash Social Welfare (NSW). We then show that our mechanism with random priorities is envy-free ex-ante, while having all the above properties ex-post. Furthermore, we present several impossibility results precluding similar results for the larger class of XOS valuations. To gauge the robustness of our positive results, we also study $ε$-dichotomous valuations, in which the added value of any item to a set is either non-positive, or in the range $[1, 1 + ε]$. We show several impossibility results in this setting, and also a positive result: for players that have additive $ε$-dichotomous valuations with sufficiently small $ε$, we design a randomized truthful mechanism with strong ex-post guarantees. For $ρ= \frac{1}{1 + ε}$, the allocations that it produces generate at least a $ρ$-fraction of the maximum welfare, and enjoy $ρ$-approximations for various fairness properties, such as being envy-free up to one item (EF1), and giving each player at least her maximin share.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2020

Secretary Matching with General Arrivals

We provide online algorithms for secretary matching in general weighted graphs, under the well-studied models of vertex and edge arrivals. In both models, edges are associated with arbitrary weights that are unknown from the outset, and are revealed online. Under vertex arrival, vertices arrive online in a uniformly random order; upon the arrival of a vertex $v$, the weights of edges from $v$ to all previously arriving vertices are revealed, and the algorithm decides which of these edges, if any, to include in the matching. Under edge arrival, edges arrive online in a uniformly random order; upon the arrival of an edge $e$, its weight is revealed, and the algorithm decides whether to include it in the matching or not. We provide a $5/12$-competitive algorithm for vertex arrival, and show it is tight. For edge arrival, we provide a $1/4$-competitive algorithm. Both results improve upon state of the art bounds for the corresponding settings. Interestingly, for vertex arrival, secretary matching in general graphs outperforms secretary matching in bipartite graphs with 1-sided arrival, where $1/e$ is the best possible guarantee.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

On a Competitive Secretary Problem with Deferred Selections

We study secretary problems in settings with multiple agents. In the standard secretary problem, a sequence of arbitrary awards arrive online, in a random order, and a single decision maker makes an immediate and irrevocable decision whether to accept each award upon its arrival. The requirement to make immediate decisions arises in many cases due to an implicit assumption regarding competition. Namely, if the decision maker does not take the offered award immediately, it will be taken by someone else. The novelty in this paper is in introducing a multi-agent model in which the competition is endogenous. In our model, multiple agents compete over the arriving awards, but the decisions need not be immediate; instead, agents may select previous awards as long as they are available (i.e., not taken by another agent). If an award is selected by multiple agents, ties are broken either randomly or according to a global ranking. This induces a multi-agent game in which the time of selection is not enforced by the rules of the games, rather it is an important component of the agent's strategy. We study the structure and performance of equilibria in this game. For random tie breaking, we characterize the equilibria of the game, and show that the expected social welfare in equilibrium is nearly optimal, despite competition among the agents. For ranked tie breaking, we give a full characterization of equilibria in the 3-agent game, and show that as the number of agents grows, the winning probability of every agent under non-immediate selections approaches her winning probability under immediate selections.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2020

Online Stochastic Max-Weight Matching: prophet inequality for vertex and edge arrival models

We provide prophet inequality algorithms for online weighted matching in general (non-bipartite) graphs, under two well-studied arrival models, namely edge arrival and vertex arrival. The weight of each edge is drawn independently from an a-priori known probability distribution. Under edge arrival, the weight of each edge is revealed upon arrival, and the algorithm decides whether to include it in the matching or not. Under vertex arrival, the weights of all edges from the newly arriving vertex to all previously arrived vertices are revealed, and the algorithm decides which of these edges, if any, to include in the matching. To study these settings, we introduce a novel unified framework of batched prophet inequalities that captures online settings where elements arrive in batches; in particular it captures matching under the two aforementioned arrival models. Our algorithms rely on the construction of suitable online contention resolution scheme (OCRS). We first extend the framework of OCRS to batched-OCRS, we then establish a reduction from batched prophet inequality to batched OCRS, and finally we construct batched OCRSs with selectable ratios of 0.337 and 0.5 for edge and vertex arrival models, respectively. Both results improve the state of the art for the corresponding settings. For the vertex arrival, our result is tight. Interestingly, a pricing-based prophet inequality with comparable competitive ratios is unknown.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

A General Framework for Endowment Effects in Combinatorial Markets

The endowment effect, coined by Nobel Laureate Richard Thaler, posits that people tend to inflate the value of items they own. This bias was studied, both theoretically and empirically, with respect to a single item. Babaioff et al. [EC'18] took a first step at extending this study beyond a single item. They proposed a specific formulation of the endowment effect in combinatorial settings, and showed that equilibrium existence with respect to the endowed valuations extends from gross substitutes to submodular valuations, but provably fails to extend to XOS valuations. Extending the endowment effect to combinatorial settings can take different forms. In this work, we devise a framework that captures a space of endowment effects, upon which we impose a partial order, which preserves endowment equilibrium existence. Within this framework, we provide existence and welfare guarantees for endowment equilibria corresponding to various endowment effects. Our main results are the following: (1) For markets with XOS valuations, we introduce an endowment effect that is stronger than that of Babaioff et al., for which an endowment equilibrium is guaranteed to exist and gives at least half of the optimal welfare. Moreover, this equilibrium can be reached via a variant of the flexible ascent auction. (2) For markets with arbitrary valuations, we show that bundling leads to a sweeping positive result. In particular, if items can be prepacked into indivisible bundles, there always exists an endowment equilibrium with optimal welfare. Moreover, we provide a polynomial algorithm that given an arbitrary allocation $S$, computes an endowment equilibrium with the same welfare guarantee as in $S$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2019

Prophets and Secretaries with Overbooking

The prophet and secretary problems demonstrate online scenarios involving the optimal stopping theory. In a typical prophet or secretary problem, selection decisions are assumed to be immediate and irrevocable. However, many online settings accommodate some degree of revocability. To study such scenarios, we introduce the $\ell-out-of-k$ setting, where the decision maker can select up to $k$ elements immediately and irrevocably, but her performance is measured by the top $\ell$ elements in the selected set. Equivalently, the decision makes can hold up to $\ell$ elements at any given point in time, but can make up to $k-\ell$ returns as new elements arrive. We give upper and lower bounds on the competitive ratio of $\ell$-out-of-$k$ prophet and secretary scenarios. These include a single-sample prophet algorithm that gives a competitive ratio of $1-\ell\cdot e^{-Θ\left(\frac{\left(k-\ell\right)^2}{k}\right)}$, which is asymptotically tight for $k-\ell=Θ(\ell)$. For secretary settings, we devise an algorithm that obtains a competitive ratio of $1-\ell e^{-\frac{k-8\ell}{2+2\ln \ell}} - e^{-k/6}$, and show that no secretary algorithm obtains a better ratio than $1-e^{-k}$ (up to negligible terms). In passing, our results lead to an improvement of the results of Assaf et al. [2000] for $1-out-of-k$ prophet scenarios. Beyond the contribution to online algorithms and optimal stopping theory, our results have implications to mechanism design. In particular, we use our prophet algorithms to derive {\em overbooking} mechanisms with good welfare and revenue guarantees; these are mechanisms that sell more items than the seller's capacity, then allocate to the agents with the highest values among the selected agents.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2018

Complement-Free Couples Must Communicate: A Hardness Result for Two-Player Combinatorial Auctions

We study the communication complexity of welfare maximization in combinatorial auctions with $m$ items and two subadditive bidders. A $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation can be guaranteed by a trivial randomized protocol with zero communication, or a trivial deterministic protocol with $O(1)$ communication. We show that outperforming these trivial protocols requires exponential communication, settling an open question of [DobzinskiNS10, Feige09]. Specifically, we show that any (randomized) protocol guaranteeing a $(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{6}{\log_2 m})$-approximation requires communication exponential in $m$. This is tight even up to lower-order terms: we further present a $(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{O(\log m)})$-approximation in poly($m$) communication. To derive our results, we introduce a new class of subadditive functions that are "far from" fractionally subadditive functions, and may be of independent interest for future works. Beyond our main result, we consider the spectrum of valuations between fractionally-subadditive and subadditive via the MPH hierarchy. Finally, we discuss the implications of our results towards combinatorial auctions with strategic bidders.

cs.GT↗