Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

YeongHyeon Park

Publications and source records attributed to YeongHyeon Park.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Anomaly Detection in Particulate Matter Sensor using Hypothesis Pruning Generative Adversarial Network

World Health Organization (WHO) provides the guideline for managing the Particulate Matter (PM) level because when the PM level is higher, it threats the human health. For managing PM level, the procedure for measuring PM value is needed firstly. We use Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM)-based PM measuring sensors because it shows higher cost-effectiveness than Beta Attenuation Monitor (BAM)-based sensor. However, TEOM-based sensor has higher probability of malfunctioning than BAM-based sensor. In this paper, we call the overall malfunction as an anomaly, and we aim to detect anomalies for the maintenance of PM measuring sensors. We propose a novel architecture for solving the above aim that named as Hypothesis Pruning Generative Adversarial Network (HP-GAN). We experimentally compare the several anomaly detection architectures to certify ours performing better.

cs.LG↗

The CNN-based Coronary Occlusion Site Localization with Effective Preprocessing Method

The Coronary Artery Occlusion (CAO) acutely comes to human, and it highly threats the human's life. When CAO detected, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) should be conducted timely. Before PCI, localizing the CAO is needed firstly, because the heart is covered with various arteries. We handle the three kinds of CAO in this paper and our purpose is not only localization of CAO but also improving the localizing performance via preprocessing method. We improve localization performance from a minimum of 0.150 to a maximum of 0.372 via our noise reduction and pulse extraction based method.

eess.IV↗

Comparison of RNN Encoder-Decoder Models for Anomaly Detection

In this paper, we compare different types of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) Encoder-Decoders in anomaly detection viewpoint. We focused on finding the model that can learn the same data more effectively. We compared multiple models under the same conditions, such as the number of parameters, optimizer, and learning rate. However, the difference is whether to predict the future sequence or restore the current sequence. We constructed the dataset with simple vectors and used them for the experiment. Finally, we experimentally confirmed that the model performs better when the model restores the current sequence, rather than predict the future sequence.

cs.LG↗