arXiv subjects

Yilin Jia

Publications and source records attributed to Yilin Jia.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Mind the Gap: Can Frontier LLMs Pass a Standardized Office Proficiency Exam?

The deployment of Large Language Model (LLM) agents for computer automation is accelerating, yet their ability to navigate complex, professional-grade productivity software is largely untested. We argue that Office automation is an ideal environment for benchmarking document-automation capability, as it requires long-horizon planning and reasoning, precise parameter configuration, and multi-application integration. To quantify this capability, we introduce an evaluation based on China's National Computer Rank Examination (NCRE), featuring 200 comprehensive practical-operation tasks across Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. Each task is scored on a 100-point rubric scale using 7,118 machine-gradable criteria, and Score Rate (SR) denotes the mean percentage of rubric points earned across these tasks. We benchmark 7 frontier LLMs and observe stark limitations: single-turn models score a maximum of 36.6%. A stronger agentic system with execution feedback, iterative repair, and broader Office automation access reaches 68.8%, but remains below the 95.5% community-reference score used as a scoring sanity check. Ultimately, our experiments demonstrate that despite recent advancements in code generation, achieving reliable fine-grained Office document automation remains a significant challenge for current code-generating LLM and agent systems.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

DocReward: A Document Reward Model for Structuring and Stylizing

Recent agentic workflows automate professional document generation but focus narrowly on textual quality, overlooking structural and stylistic professionalism, which is equally critical for readability. This gap stems mainly from a lack of effective reward models capable of guiding agents toward producing documents with high structural and stylistic professionalism. We introduce DocReward, a document reward model that evaluates documents based on their structure and style. To achieve this, we propose a textual-quality-agnostic framework that ensures assessments are not confounded by content quality, and construct DocPair, a dataset of 117K paired documents covering 32 domains and 267 types. Each pair shares identical content but differs in structural and stylistic professionalism. DocReward is trained using the Bradley-Terry loss. On a manually annotated benchmark, DocReward outperforms GPT-5 by 14.6 percentage points in the same setting. Reinforcement learning experiments further show that DocReward effectively guides agents toward generating documents with consistently higher structural and stylistic professionalism, highlighting its practical utility.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2024

KOSMOS-2.5: A Multimodal Literate Model

The automatic reading of text-intensive images represents a significant advancement toward achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). In this paper we present KOSMOS-2.5, a multimodal literate model for machine reading of text-intensive images. Pre-trained on a large-scale corpus of text-intensive images, KOSMOS-2.5 excels in two distinct yet complementary transcription tasks: (1) generating spatially-aware text blocks, where each block of text is assigned spatial coordinates within the image, and (2) producing structured text output that captures both style and structure in markdown format. This unified multimodal literate capability is achieved through a shared decoder-only autoregressive Transformer architecture and task-specific prompts. Building on this foundation, we fine-tune KOSMOS-2.5 for document understanding tasks, resulting in a document understanding generalist named KOSMOS-2.5-CHAT. Additionally, a large corpus of 357.4 million document pages spanning diverse domains was curated for pre-training. We evaluate KOSMOS-2.5 on two newly proposed benchmarks, OCREval and MarkdownEval, for document-level text recognition and image-to-markdown generation, demonstrating impressive literate capabilities comparable to GPT-4o. KOSMOS-2.5-CHAT achieves performance comparable to other state-of-the-art generalists that are five times larger (1.3B vs. 7B) across nine text-rich visual question answering benchmarks. Models and code have been available at \url{https://aka.ms/kosmos25}.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

Task-Adaptive Tokenization: Enhancing Long-Form Text Generation Efficacy in Mental Health and Beyond

We propose task-adaptive tokenization as a way to adapt the generation pipeline to the specifics of a downstream task and enhance long-form generation in mental health. Inspired by insights from cognitive science, our task-adaptive tokenizer samples variable segmentations from multiple outcomes, with sampling probabilities optimized based on task-specific data. We introduce a strategy for building a specialized vocabulary and introduce a vocabulary merging protocol that allows for the integration of task-specific tokens into the pre-trained model's tokenization step. Through extensive experiments on psychological question-answering tasks in both Chinese and English, we find that our task-adaptive tokenization approach brings a significant improvement in generation performance while using up to 60% fewer tokens. Preliminary experiments point to promising results when using our tokenization approach with very large language models.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

HI-TOM: A Benchmark for Evaluating Higher-Order Theory of Mind Reasoning in Large Language Models

Theory of Mind (ToM) is the ability to reason about one's own and others' mental states. ToM plays a critical role in the development of intelligence, language understanding, and cognitive processes. While previous work has primarily focused on first and second-order ToM, we explore higher-order ToM, which involves recursive reasoning on others' beliefs. We introduce HI-TOM, a Higher Order Theory of Mind benchmark. Our experimental evaluation using various Large Language Models (LLMs) indicates a decline in performance on higher-order ToM tasks, demonstrating the limitations of current LLMs. We conduct a thorough analysis of different failure cases of LLMs, and share our thoughts on the implications of our findings on the future of NLP.

cs.CL↗