arXiv subjects

Yun Huang

Publications and source records attributed to Yun Huang.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

SeqLoc: Beyond the Single Frame for Cross-View Geo-Localization in Feature-Sparse Scenes

Cross-View Geo-Localization (CVGL) with OpenStreetMap (OSM) performs well in structure-rich urban environments but collapses in feature-sparse scenes such as rural roads. To study this failure mode, in this work, we introduce CV-FSS, a benchmark that pairs sequential panoramas from five rural regions with aligned OSM maps, on which single-frame methods degrade drastically. We then propose SeqLoc, an online test-time sequence aggregation mechanism that recursively maintains a log-belief volume with three key components: (1) Entropy-Tempered Uncertainty (ETU) tempers each incoming pose likelihood volume by its normalized entropy; (2) Map-Guided Relocalization (MGR) mixes a map-shaped recovery distribution into the belief so that a suppressed true pose can recover; (3) Peak-Anchored Smoothing (PAS) derives the final pose at sub-grid precision. Extensive experiments on CV-FSS and CV-RHO demonstrate that SeqLoc outperforms single-frame localization by a large margin, improving both position and orientation recall by over 50%. The benchmark and source code are publicly available at https://zhengjunwei.com/publications/SeqLoc/SeqLoc.html.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Physical probes expose and alleviate chemical-environment collapse in molecular representations

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy provides an experimental readout of local chemical environments, but its use in molecular representation learning has been constrained by heterogeneous data and incomplete atom-level assignments. Here we construct complementary high-fidelity experimental and computational 13C NMR resources, which reveal a recurrent form of representational collapse: atoms that are equivalent in molecular topology can remain experimentally distinct in their real chemical environments, whereas explicit 3D descriptions are further limited by static conformations in dynamic regimes. To alleviate this bottleneck, we develop CLAIM (Contrastive Learning for Atom-to-molecule Inference of Molecular NMR), a framework that aligns efficient topological molecular inputs with atom-resolved NMR observables. Through hierarchical chemical priors and cross-level contrastive learning, CLAIM restores lost chemical resolution and markedly improves atom-level molecule-spectrum retrieval. CLAIM remains robust in flexible and tautomeric systems for 13C NMR prediction, improves stereoisomer discrimination without explicit 3D modelling, and transfers to broader molecular property tasks including ADMET prediction and fluorescence estimation. These results establish physically grounded spectral alignment as an effective strategy for alleviating chemical-environment collapse and for guiding experimentally grounded molecular representation learning.

physics.chem-ph↗

arXiv2026

From Words to Widgets for Controllable LLM Generation

Natural language remains the predominant way people interact with large language models (LLMs). However, users often struggle to precisely express and control subjective preferences (e.g., tone, style, and emphasis) through prompting. We propose Malleable Prompting, a new interactive prompting technique for controllable LLM generation. It reifies preference expressions in natural language prompts into GUI widgets (e.g., sliders, dropdowns, and toggles) that users can directly configure to steer generation, while visualizing each control's influence on the output to support attribution and comparison across iterations. To enable this interaction, we introduce an LLM decoding algorithm that modulates the token probability distribution during generation based on preference expressions and their widget values. Through a user study, we show that Malleable Prompting helps participants achieve target preferences more precisely and is perceived as more controllable and transparent than natural language prompting alone.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

YT-Pilot: Turning YouTube into Structured Learning Pathways with Context-Aware AI Support

YouTube is widely used for informal learning, where learners explore lectures and tutorials without a predefined curriculum. However, learning across videos remains fragmented: learners must decide what to watch, how videos relate, and how knowledge builds. Existing tools provide partial support but treat planning and learning as separate activities, lacking a persistent interaction structure that connects them. Grounded in self-regulated learning theory (SRLT), we introduce YT-Pilot, a pathway-aware learning system that operationalizes the learning pathway as a persistent, user-facing interaction structure spanning planning and learning. The pathway coordinates goal setting, planning, navigation, progress tracking, and cross-video assistance. Through a within-subjects study ($N=20$), we show that YT-Pilot significantly improves perceived goal clarity, pathway coherence, and progress tracking, while shifting interaction toward pathway-level reasoning across multiple resources.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Copyright Detective: A Forensic System to Evidence LLMs Flickering Copyright Leakage Risks

We present Copyright Detective, the first interactive forensic system for detecting, analyzing, and visualizing potential copyright risks in LLM outputs. The system treats copyright infringement versus compliance as an evidence discovery process rather than a static classification task due to the complex nature of copyright law. It integrates multiple detection paradigms, including content recall testing, paraphrase-level similarity analysis, persuasive jailbreak probing, and unlearning verification, within a unified and extensible framework. Through interactive prompting, response collection, and iterative workflows, our system enables systematic auditing of verbatim memorization and paraphrase-level leakage, supporting responsible deployment and transparent evaluation of LLM copyright risks even with black-box access.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

The Social Gaze of LLMs: A Literature Review of Multimodal Approaches to Human Behavior Understanding

LLM-powered multimodal systems are increasingly used to interpret human behavior, yet how researchers apply the models' 'social competence' remains poorly understood. This paper presents a systematic literature review of 176 publications across different application domains (e.g., healthcare, education, and entertainment). Using a four-dimensional coding framework (application, technical, evaluative, and ethical), we find (1) frequent use of pattern recognition and information extraction from multimodal sources, but limited support for adaptive, interactive reasoning; (2) a dominant 'modality-to-text' pipeline that privileges language over rich audiovisual cues, striping away nuanced social cues; (3) evaluation practices reliant on static benchmarks, with socially grounded, human-centered assessments rare; and (4) Ethical discussions focused mainly on legal and rights-related risks (e.g., privacy), leaving societal risks (e.g., deception) overlooked--or at best acknowledged but left unaddressed. We outline a research agenda for evaluating socially competent, ethically informed, and interaction-aware multi-modal systems.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

ValueCompass: A Framework for Measuring Contextual Value Alignment Between Human and LLMs

As AI systems become more advanced, ensuring their alignment with a diverse range of individuals and societal values becomes increasingly critical. But how can we capture fundamental human values and assess the degree to which AI systems align with them? We introduce ValueCompass, a framework of fundamental values, grounded in psychological theory and a systematic review, to identify and evaluate human-AI alignment. We apply ValueCompass to measure the value alignment of humans and large language models (LLMs) across four real-world scenarios: collaborative writing, education, public sectors, and healthcare. Our findings reveal concerning misalignments between humans and LLMs, such as humans frequently endorse values like "National Security" which were largely rejected by LLMs. We also observe that values differ across scenarios, highlighting the need for context-aware AI alignment strategies. This work provides valuable insights into the design space of human-AI alignment, laying the foundations for developing AI systems that responsibly reflect societal values and ethics.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Scalable, Non-contact Determination of Electric Properties of Nanostructures via Electro-Rotation in Water Solution

Breakthroughs in nanotechnology have enabled the large-scale fabrication of nanoparticles with varied compositions and structures. Yet, evaluating their electrical conductivities remains challenging due to high volume and individual variability. We report a rapid, non-contact, and parallel method to characterize longitudinal nanostructures, including insulators, semiconductors, and conducting metal oxides by using MoO3, MoS2/MoO2, and MoS2 nanoribbons, produced at different fabrication stages, as a model system. Leveraging our semi-quantitative model based on Maxwell-Wagner and electrical double-layer polarization, electric conductivities of various nanoparticles are determined from their distinct electro-rotation behaviors in water, spanning six orders of magnitude. The results agree well with standard four-probe measurements. The technique, measuring multiple nanoparticles at once, without the use of electrical contact, can be easily scaled up for parallel determination of particles electric conductivities. These findings highlight a non-destructive, rapid, and simple characterization method promising to bring nanomaterials closer to practical applications in electronics, optics, sensing, catalysis, and robotics.

physics.app-ph↗

arXiv2025

LLM-Powered AI Tutors with Personas for d/Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Online Learners

Intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) using artificial intelligence (AI) technology have shown promise in supporting learners with diverse abilities. Large language models (LLMs) provide new opportunities to incorporate personas to AI-based tutors and support dynamic interactive dialogue. This paper explores how DHH learners interact with LLM-powered AI tutors with different experiences in DHH education as personas to identify their accessibility preferences. A user study with 16 DHH participants showed that they asked DHH-related questions based on background information and evaluated the AI tutors' cultural knowledge of the DHH communities in their responses. Participants suggested providing more transparency in each AI tutor's position within the DHH community. Participants also pointed out the lack of support in the multimodality of sign language in current LLMs. We discuss design implications to support the diverse needs in interaction between DHH users and the LLMs, such as offering supports in tuning language styles of LLMs.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Perspectra: Choosing Your Experts Enhances Critical Thinking in Multi-Agent Research Ideation

Recent advances in multi-agent systems (MAS) enable tools for information search and ideation by assigning personas to agents. However, how users can effectively control, steer, and critically evaluate collaboration among multiple domain-expert agents remains underexplored. We present Perspectra, an interactive MAS that visualizes and structures deliberation among LLM agents via a forum-style interface, supporting @-mention to invite targeted agents, threading for parallel exploration, with a real-time mind map for visualizing arguments and rationales. In a within-subjects study with 18 participants, we compared Perspectra to a group-chat baseline as they developed research proposals. Our findings show that Perspectra significantly increased the frequency and depth of critical-thinking behaviors, elicited more interdisciplinary replies, and led to more frequent proposal revisions than the group chat condition. We discuss implications for designing multi-agent tools that scaffold critical thinking by supporting user control over multi-agent adversarial discourse.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

YouthSafe: A Youth-Centric Safety Benchmark and Safeguard Model for Large Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used by teenagers and young adults in everyday life, ranging from emotional support and creative expression to educational assistance. However, their unique vulnerabilities and risk profiles remain under-examined in current safety benchmarks and moderation systems, leaving this population disproportionately exposed to harm. In this work, we present Youth AI Risk (YAIR), the first benchmark dataset designed to evaluate and improve the safety of youth LLM interactions. YAIR consists of 12,449 annotated conversation snippets spanning 78 fine grained risk types, grounded in a taxonomy of youth specific harms such as grooming, boundary violation, identity confusion, and emotional overreliance. We systematically evaluate widely adopted moderation models on YAIR and find that existing approaches substantially underperform in detecting youth centered risks, often missing contextually subtle yet developmentally harmful interactions. To address these gaps, we introduce YouthSafe, a real-time risk detection model optimized for youth GenAI contexts. YouthSafe significantly outperforms prior systems across multiple metrics on risk detection and classification, offering a concrete step toward safer and more developmentally appropriate AI interactions for young users.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

The Homework Wars: Exploring Emotions, Behaviours, and Conflicts in Parent-Child Homework Interactions

Parental involvement in homework is a crucial aspect of family education, but it often triggers emotional strain and conflicts. Despite growing concern over its impact on family well-being, prior research has lacked access to fine-grained, real-time dynamics of these interactions. To bridge this gap, we present a framework that leverages naturalistic parent-child interaction data and large language models (LLMs) to analyse homework conversations at scale. In a four-week in situ study with 78 Chinese families, we collected 475 hours of audio recordings and accompanying daily surveys, capturing 602 homework sessions in everyday home settings. Our LLM-based pipeline reliably extracted and categorised parental behaviours and conflict patterns from transcribed conversations, achieving high agreement with expert annotations. The analysis revealed significant emotional shifts in parents before and after homework, 18 recurring parental behaviours and seven common conflict types, with Knowledge Conflict being the most frequent. Notably, even well-intentioned behaviours were significantly positively correlated with specific conflicts. This work advances ubiquitous computing methods for studying complex family dynamics and offers empirical insights to enrich family education theory and inform more effective parenting strategies and interventions in the future.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Aligning AI with Public Values: Deliberation and Decision-Making for Governing Multimodal LLMs in Political Video Analysis

How AI models should deal with political topics has been discussed, but it remains challenging and requires better governance. This paper examines the governance of large language models through individual and collective deliberation, focusing on politically sensitive videos. We conducted a two-step study: interviews with 10 journalists established a baseline understanding of expert video interpretation; 114 individuals through deliberation using InclusiveAI, a platform that facilitates democratic decision-making through decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) mechanisms. Our findings reveal distinct differences in interpretative priorities: while experts emphasized emotion and narrative, the general public prioritized factual clarity, objectivity, and emotional neutrality. Furthermore, we examined how different governance mechanisms - quadratic vs. weighted voting and equal vs. 20/80 voting power - shape users' decision-making regarding AI behavior. Results indicate that voting methods significantly influence outcomes, with quadratic voting reinforcing perceptions of liberal democracy and political equality. Our study underscores the necessity of selecting appropriate governance mechanisms to better capture user perspectives and suggests decentralized AI governance as a potential way to facilitate broader public engagement in AI development, ensuring that varied perspectives meaningfully inform design decisions.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

PersonaFlow: Designing LLM-Simulated Expert Perspectives for Enhanced Research Ideation

Generating interdisciplinary research ideas requires diverse domain expertise, but access to timely feedback is often limited by the availability of experts. In this paper, we introduce PersonaFlow, a novel system designed to provide multiple perspectives by using LLMs to simulate domain-specific experts. Our user studies showed that the new design 1) increased the perceived relevance and creativity of ideated research directions, and 2) promoted users' critical thinking activities (e.g., interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and self-regulation), without increasing their perceived cognitive load. Moreover, users' ability to customize expert profiles significantly improved their sense of agency, which can potentially mitigate their over-reliance on AI. This work contributes to the design of intelligent systems that augment creativity and collaboration, and provides design implications of using customizable AI-simulated personas in domains within and beyond research ideation.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

EvAlignUX: Advancing UX Evaluation through LLM-Supported Metrics Exploration

Evaluating UX in the context of AI's complexity, unpredictability, and generative nature presents unique challenges. How can we support HCI researchers to create comprehensive UX evaluation plans? In this paper, we introduce EvAlignUX, a system powered by large language models and grounded in scientific literature, designed to help HCI researchers explore evaluation metrics and their relationship to research outcomes. A user study with 19 HCI scholars showed that EvAlignUX improved the perceived quality and confidence in UX evaluation plans while prompting deeper consideration of research impact and risks. The system enhanced participants' thought processes, leading to the creation of a ``UX Question Bank'' to guide UX evaluation development. Findings also highlight how researchers' backgrounds influence their inspiration and concerns about AI over-reliance, pointing to future research on AI's role in fostering critical thinking. In a world where experience defines impact, we discuss the importance of shifting UX evaluation from a ``method-centric'' to a ``mindset-centric'' approach as the key to meaningful and lasting design evaluation.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Motion Design Principles for Accessible Video-based Learning: Addressing Cognitive Challenges for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Learners

Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (DHH) learners face unique challenges in video-based learning due to the complex interplay between visual and auditory information in videos. Traditional approaches to making video content accessible primarily focus on captioning, but these solutions often neglect the cognitive demands of processing both visual and textual information simultaneously. This paper introduces a set of \textit{Motion} design guidelines, aimed at mitigating these cognitive challenges and improving video learning experiences for DHH learners. Through a two-phase research, we identified five key challenges, including misaligned content and visual overload. We proposed five design principles accordingly. User study with 16 DHH participants showed that improving visual-audio relevance and guiding visual attention significantly enhances the learning experience by reducing physical demand, alleviating temporal pressure, and improving learning satisfaction. Our findings highlight the potential of Motion design to transform educational content for DHH learners, and we discuss implications for inclusive video learning tools.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation across 285 Graduate Disciplines

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in mainstream academic disciplines such as mathematics, physics, and computer science. However, human knowledge encompasses over 200 specialized disciplines, far exceeding the scope of existing benchmarks. The capabilities of LLMs in many of these specialized fields-particularly in light industry, agriculture, and service-oriented disciplines-remain inadequately evaluated. To address this gap, we present SuperGPQA, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates graduate-level knowledge and reasoning capabilities across 285 disciplines. Our benchmark employs a novel Human-LLM collaborative filtering mechanism to eliminate trivial or ambiguous questions through iterative refinement based on both LLM responses and expert feedback. Our experimental results reveal significant room for improvement in the performance of current state-of-the-art LLMs across diverse knowledge domains (e.g., the reasoning-focused model DeepSeek-R1 achieved the highest accuracy of 61.82% on SuperGPQA), highlighting the considerable gap between current model capabilities and artificial general intelligence. Additionally, we present comprehensive insights from our management of a large-scale annotation process, involving over 80 expert annotators and an interactive Human-LLM collaborative system, offering valuable methodological guidance for future research initiatives of comparable scope.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

From Score-Driven to Value-Sharing: Understanding Chinese Family Use of AI to Support Decision Making of College Applications

This study investigates how 18-year-old students, parents, and experts in China utilize artificial intelligence (AI) tools to support decision-making in college applications during college entrance exam -- a highly competitive, score-driven, annual national exam. Through 32 interviews, we examine the use of Quark GaoKao, an AI tool that generates college application lists and acceptance probabilities based on exam scores, historical data, preferred locations, etc. Our findings show that AI tools are predominantly used by parents with limited involvement from students, and often focus on immediate exam results, failing to address long-term career goals. We also identify challenges such as misleading AI recommendations, and irresponsible use of AI by third-party consultant agencies. Finally, we offer design insights to better support multi-stakeholders' decision-making in families, especially in the Chinese context, and discuss how emerging AI tools create barriers for families with fewer resources.

cs.HC↗