Searcharxiv⌕ Search

subject

cs.CL

cs.CL: explore 1934 source-linked works published from 2017 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: arxiv. Collection updated 2026-09-16. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

arXiv2026

Translation Indeterminacy and the Distributional Fallacy

Large language models (LLMs) are commonly associated with the distributional hypothesis, according to which (1) semantic meaning is grounded in distributional patterns of linguistic context, and (2) knowledge of cross-linguistic distributional correspondences allows for successful translation. This paper rejects the first claim as a causal inversion: linguistic distributions reflect patterns arising from meaning-making practices rather than constituting their source. At the same time, it accepts the second claim, arguing that translation -human or machine - can succeed without requiring access to meaning or reference. Knowledge of interlingual distributional correspondence and their inferential organization may be sufficient for translation. The paper develops an ecological-enactivist perspective, according to which reference and meaning are grounded in agent-environment interaction and stabilized through action-grounded concepts, forms of world-involving cognition that current LLMs do not possess.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

The Hidden Frame: How Large Language Models Impact Democratic Society

Large language models are rapidly becoming an interface between citizens and political information. They are often regarded as "a better Google." While this analogy might work for some instances, it is unintuitively problematic for democratic politics. A search engine retrieves human-authored documents, while a language model generates novel text that necessarily embeds invisible framing decisions. Because conveying knowledge involves framing, a system that generates answers cannot serve as a neutral conduit to "all human knowledge." Instead, these systems are becoming a new kind of political intermediary. Mechanistic evidence shows that partisan identity is encoded as a locatable geometric direction inside the Llama 3.1 8B model, and that alignment training masks rather than removes this structure. Building on that evidence, we use the model's training cutoff in 2023 to make those frames visible. This cutpoint auspiciously falls just before a dramatic realignment in American politics marked by the second Trump administration and the MAHA transformation of health politics, providing us with a natural experiment. We find that the model presents temporally contingent partisan alignments as {\em knowledge}, with no reliable mechanism for distinguishing fact from opinion. Because citizens judge political claims by who made them and when, an answer that carries neither cue hampers the judgment on which self-governance depends. Large language models purporting to summarize "all human knowledge" are, in actuality, simply magnifying the cultural and partisan divides inherent in their training data.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

LLM Forensics: Where Do Backdoors Hide? Localizing and Controlling Trigger Mechanisms with Sparse Autoencoders

Even though backdoors in LLMs have been a growing concern, their inner workings are still under heavy scrutiny. Trigger-based backdoors are easy to define behaviorally, a rare input that makes the model switch to a chosen response pattern, but the mechanism between triggers and their responses is less clear. We study this mechanism in a controlled, harmless language-switching setting, where fixed trigger sequences make 1B and 8B language models continue English prompts in French or German. For this, we train sparse autoencoders (SAEs) across layers and transformer components, then compare triggered prompts with translation and pretraining controls to identify trigger-relevant feature directions. We show how SAE features separate triggered prompts from controls with near-perfect F1, but features that detect the trigger do not necessarily control the behavior. In intervention tests, attention and MLP features often fire reliably on triggered prompts, making them good detectors, but ablating them rarely suppresses the language switch and activating them rarely induces it. In contrast, residual-stream features can suppress triggered generation when ablated, and some selected features can induce target-language continuations without the trigger. In short, these token-trigger mechanisms decompose into distinct SAE feature directions, with separate features for trigger detection, residual-stream propagation, and later language tracking. This role-level decomposition is the part most likely to transfer to other trigger-based backdoors, even when the payload, layers, or circuit locations differ.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Bag of Tricks or Bag of Myths? Reducing Modeling Complexity with Task Knowledge in Explainable Suicide Risk Assessment

Assessing suicide risk from social media text is a small-data, high-stakes setting requiring not only severity prediction but also supporting evidence and clinically relevant risk and protective factors. Yet common NLP techniques, including model scaling, synthetic data, loss reweighting, ensembling, and threshold tuning, are often applied without testing whether their gains hold up under severe class imbalance, coupled outputs, and limited author-level data. We study 1,635 clinician-annotated posts and audit 31 pre-specified techniques from 7 methodological families through roughly 300 controlled experiments on author-disjoint partitions. We found no prior audit of this playbook in this regime. The findings guide a task-grounded system for three outputs: 4-level suicide risk, evidence spans, and 24 clinical risk and protective factors. Only 5 of 31 comparisons produced reliable gains. We reformulate factor prediction as entailment between each post and its codebook definitions, using an architecturally diverse ensemble with class-balanced training and score rescaling. Risk predictions condition a 7-model evidence tagger ensemble; evidence restricts symbolic risk rules; and a difficult risk class is routed separately. The factor predictor remains independent because risk evidence provides no additional factor signal. We also correct a mismatch between validation scores used for threshold fitting and test-time ensemble scores through deployment-consistent calibration, yielding the largest improvement to the factor system. The final system achieves 0.8203 for risk, 0.7953 for evidence, and 0.7045 macro-F1 for factors, with a 0.7781 composite, ranking third among 53 teams. We call the underlying principle task-conditioned technique selection: retain techniques only when task-specific knowledge, structure, or empirical evidence justifies them.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Signed Rescue Routing: Harm-Aware Cascades for Efficient LLM Inference

Large language model (LLM) cascades answer easy requests with a small model and escalate selected requests to a larger model. Most routers prioritize examples on which the small model appears uncertain or likely to be wrong. This proxy ignores a decisive fact: escalation is useful only when the large model corrects the small model, and it is harmful when the large model replaces a correct answer with an incorrect one. We introduce Signed Rescue Routing (SRR), a budgeted routing method that predicts these two events separately and ranks requests by their difference. We show that this signed conditional gain is the Bayes-optimal routing score under a fixed escalation budget. SRR requires only the small model's output statistics at deployment and adds a lightweight two-head router. We evaluate SRR with Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-8B on TBD examples from MMLU, HellaSwag, and ARC-Challenge. Across the accuracy-compute curve, SRR reaches an area of TBD, compared with TBD for a learned small-model error predictor and TBD for entropy routing. These results show that predicting incremental value, rather than model uncertainty, is a simple and effective objective for efficient LLM cascades.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

LLM Agents as Computational Typologists

Linguistic typology relies on expert analysis of reference grammars across languages, making large-scale crosslinguistic comparison labor-intensive and unscalable. We introduce AUTOTYPOLOGIST, an LLM agent for evidence-grounded typological analysis over reference grammars. The agent is capable of retrieving relevant grammar sections, analyzing interlinear glossed text (IGT), and iteratively reasoning over typological hypotheses using a ReAct-style workflow. We evaluate the system on TYPOLOGICAL FEATURE CODING against expert annotations and TYPOLOGICAL HYPOTHESIS TESTING with typological universals using 25 open-source reference grammars. Operating under different information constraints in TYPOLOGICAL FEATURE CODING, the agent can synthesize information from reference grammar prose but still faces challenges with only IGTs in the target language. In TYPOLOGICAL HYPOTHESIS TESTING, the agent can synthesize crosslinguistic evidence and identify both supporting cases and counterexamples. These findings suggest that LLM agents can support scalable and inspectable typological analysis, while still requiring expert validation.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Does Syntax Matter? A Graph-Augmented Variational Topic Model for Computational Social Sciences

Topic modeling is widely used in computational social sciences to identify latent themes in large text corpora. Traditional approaches rely on Bag-of-Words representations and generative models such as LDA, while recent methods like BERTopic operate on dense document embeddings. This paper introduces the Structural Contextual Probabilistic Topic Model (SCPTM), an architecture that incorporates syntactic dependency relations into topic inference. SCPTM represents a corpus as a heterogeneous graph of documents and words connected by lexical and syntactic edges, processed through a Graph Attention Network within a Variational Autoencoder to produce probabilistic, mixed-membership topic distributions. We evaluate seven topic modeling techniques (including four SCPTM ablations) across four corpora differing in register and discourse structure. Our framework combines coherence (C_V, C_NPMI), topic diversity, clustering-label alignment (NMI), and phrase-level diagnostics (complementarity and valence gap). Results show that SCPTM's neural architecture yields substantial gains in document-topic alignment over generative baselines, but these gains are attributable to the variational encoder rather than to syntax. Syntax contributes to topic diversity, where graph-augmented variants outperform the no-graph baseline across all corpora, and to descriptor quality: dependency paths capture predicate-argument structures and stance in deliberative registers, while proving redundant in technical and institutional corpora. The valence gap is positive across all variants, but driven primarily by phrase grouping rather than syntactic filtering. We conclude that syntactic encoding matters conditionally: it benefits action-oriented, argumentative texts, but introduces noise in informational or administrative registers.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Climate-ModernBERT: Revisiting Corpus Composition for Domain-Adaptive Continued Pretraining

Natural Language Processing (NLP) in the climate domain requires models to process heterogeneous text sources, including scientific literature, policy disclosures, and synthetic reports. However, how to effectively combine diverse domain corpora during continued pretraining (CPT) remains underexplored. We introduce Climate-ModernBERT, a family of climate-adapted encoder models obtained through continued pretraining of ModernBERT-Base on three climate corpora: academic climate text, climate-filtered web data, and synthetic climate documents. We systematically compare joint continued pretraining on corpus mixtures with parameter-space merging of independently specialized checkpoints. Across nine climate NLP benchmarks, our best model achieves 76.3 average F_1, improving significantly over a vanilla ModernBERT baseline by 2.8 points. Within the climate NLP setting, the results show that academic climate corpora provide the strongest adaptation signal among the evaluated sources, while parameter-space merging improves over joint multi-source training and better preserves complementary information from heterogeneous climate corpora. We release all Climate-ModernBERT variants and training checkpoints to support future research in climate NLP and domain-adaptive pretraining.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

You Can't Prefer Emotions You Don't Sample: Intensity Undershoot in DPO-Tuned LLMs

Ask a language model to respond "very excitedly," and its output is typically only mildly more energetic. We quantify this effect. We condition an instruction-tuned LLM on a continuous Valence-Arousal (VA) target, where valence measures how pleasant a state is and arousal how activated it is, measure the achieved affect with a frozen regressor, and sweep the requested target from -1 to +1. The response moves far less than asked: the gain, the slope of achieved against requested affect, is only 0.26 for valence and 0.13 for arousal on Llama-3.1-8B, where a faithful controller would score 1. The model systematically undershoots requested emotional intensity, which puts a number on the qualitative observation of Fazzi et al. (2025). Our experiments trace this to the preference-learning pipeline. Training targets from natural corpora such as EmoBank are neutral-heavy, and the sampled candidates themselves rarely reach extreme affect, so Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is left with no extreme exemplar to prefer. If instead we cover the target space uniformly and sample a hotter, larger candidate pool, valence gain rises from 0.26 to 0.40 +/- 0.02 (3 seeds) and extrapolation error drops, at only a modest in-distribution cost (EmoBank-test VA distance 0.092 to 0.107). The same recipe reproduces on Qwen3-8B (gain_v 0.44, with in-distribution accuracy preserved). Arousal is harder and less reliable: its gain barely moves on average and swings across seeds (0.14 +/- 0.07, against valence's tight +/- 0.02), because raising arousal needs candidates the base model is reluctant to generate. The evidence indicates that faithful intensity is bottlenecked by the extremity of the candidate pool rather than by the conditioning format.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

VoT: Vision-of-Thought for Unified Multimodal Representation Alignment

Current text-to-image systems typically employ a "text encoder plus diffusion decoder" paradigm, in which text semantics directly modulate continuous latent noise. Despite their success, these methods lack an explicit, interpretable intermediate representation that effectively bridges high-level linguistic semantics and low-level visual signals. In this paper, we propose Vision-of-Thought (VoT), a framework that introduces a discrete visual-thinking layer between vision-language models (VLMs) and diffusion transformers (DiTs). Instead of treating VLMs merely as text encoders, we use them as multimodal planners that generate discrete VoT tokens representing high-level visual plans, such as objects and layouts, before rendering pixels. We train a specialized VoT tokenizer in the VLM semantic space with a closed-loop objective that combines VLM alignment, feature reconstruction, and vector-quantization losses. These objectives make the tokens semantically readable by the VLM while preserving the visual information needed for generation. Experimental results demonstrate that VoT improves semantic alignment and provides a structured interface for interpretable and controllable generation.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

A*-Thought-V2: Efficient Latent Reasoning via Geometric Dynamics of LLM

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) improves the reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) but incurs substantial computation and context costs. Existing methods either lose intermediate information through hard pruning or lack a principled criterion for continuous compression. We present A*-Thought-V2, a geometric dynamics of LLM guided framework that models CoT as a hidden-state trajectory and replaces hard deletion with an explicit-implicit interleaved latent architecture. After projecting question, step, and solution representations into a 3D PCA space, it measures alignment between each local transition and global question-to-solution direction. Aligned steps remain explicit text, whereas deviating steps are compressed into continuous latent tokens. Directional angles capture both local semantics and reasoning dynamics: small angles indicate direct execution and answer formation, while large angles more frequently involve checking, correction, and branch exploration; their temporal variation reveals exploration, convergence, and refinement stages. To train this architecture, we introduce stepwise embedding forcing, which pools each redundant step into a single latent embedding, and label forcing, which supervises that latent token with a soft multi-modal vocabulary distribution instead of a hard one-hot label. Experiments on Qwen3.5-9B and Qwen3.6-27B across six in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks show that A*-Thought-V2 improves average accuracy by up to 2.6% while reducing response length by up to half, increasing Accuracy per Computation Unit by 2.29$\times$, and reducing preprocessing and training time by 94.6% and up to 80.3%, respectively. Representation analyses suggest that latent states form a compact region distinct from textual states, while higher entropy at latent-token positions reflects broader soft targets that encourage richer step-level feature learning.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

SAFIRE: Safety-Critical Benchmark for Fine-grained Fire and Smoke Understanding in Multimodal LLMs

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) show strong progress on vision-language tasks, yet their reliability in safety-critical settings remains underexplored. Fire-smoke understanding is central to public safety and disaster response, but most existing benchmarks lack diverse real-world scenarios and context-aware evaluation. We introduce SAFIRE, a large-scale benchmark for fire-smoke understanding in MLLMs, comprising 83K captioned images from 20 scenarios and 193K multiple-choice VQA (MCVQA) generated from a 9.7K-image subset, spanning 10 evaluation dimensions from basic perception to higher-order reasoning. A GPT-5.4-assisted multi-stage verification pipeline with MLLM majority voting ensures annotation quality. Evaluating ten open-source MLLMs (8B-38B) yields an average accuracy of 61.9%, exposing major gaps in safety-critical reasoning. We further show that adapting vision encoders with only 7% of our domain-specific data boosts fire-scene classification accuracy from 20.1% to 64.5%, indicating that carefully curated data can yield substantial gains even when data volume is limited. All datasets, models, and code are available at https://risys-lab.github.io/SAFIRE/.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

LLM Layers Immediately Correct Each Other

Recent methods in language model interpretability employ techniques such as sparse autoencoders to decompose residual stream contributions into linear, semantically meaningful features. Such methods are commonly interpreted as identifying features that persist in the residual stream and that subsequent layers build upon. We challenge this view by identifying the Transformer Layer Correction Mechanism (TLCM), wherein adjacent transformer layers systematically counteract portions of each other's contributions. TLCM appears in 5 out of 7 major open-source model families and activates across nearly all tokens in diverse texts. We show that TLCM emerges during pretraining, operates most strongly on contextually dependent tokens, and adaptively calibrates its correction strength based on the preceding layer's output. Using the layer Jacobian, we further show that TLCM selectively corrects specific subspaces while reinforcing others, which we interpret through a ``propose-and-reject'' framework in which layers propose candidate features and subsequent layers selectively remove inappropriate ones. This dynamic suggests that the residual stream at any layer contains transient proposals alongside persistent features, helping explain why SAE feature descriptions often have low specificity, why effective model steering requires extreme feature amplification, and why transcoders hold a theoretical advantage over SAEs.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Deadline-Aware Adaptive Prefill Chunking for Efficient Large Language Model Serving

Continuous batching improves large language model (LLM) serving throughput, but long prompt prefills can delay decode iterations and violate inter-token latency objectives. Chunked prefill mitigates this interference, yet its chunk size is normally fixed: small chunks protect decode latency but repeatedly pay launch overhead, while large chunks improve prefill efficiency but create latency spikes. We introduce SLOWeave, an online scheduling method that selects the largest prefill chunk predicted to finish before the earliest active decode deadline. The decision requires no workload-specific chunk-size tuning and is computed by a logarithmic-time search over a monotone iteration-cost model. We prove that, whenever a decode-only iteration is feasible and the cost predictor is accurate, SLOWeave maximizes immediate prefill progress among decisions that preserve every active request's next-token deadline. We evaluate the method in a reproducible event-driven simulator and an iteration-level GPU runtime across chat, mixed-context, long-context, and bursty workloads. Under a 25ms time-per-output-token objective, SLOWeave improves goodput over the strongest fixed-chunk baseline by 39% on mixed requests and 38% on long-context requests. Under a stricter 10ms objective, the gains rise to 3.3$\times$ and 2.4$\times$, respectively. These results isolate adaptive chunk sizing as a useful serving primitive and provide an implementation-ready controller for integration with iteration-level LLM runtimes.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

CausalVerify: End-to-End Verification of Causal Analyses by Language Models

Language models increasingly perform empirical analyses end to end, yet existing evaluations assess the written explanation or whether generated code executes, not whether the executed workflow recovers the intended causal estimand. We introduce CausalVerify, an execution-grounded benchmark for end-to-end causal analysis that follows a model from research-context interpretation to estimand recovery. It scores this workflow at four distinct layers: method recognition, design specification, executable implementation, and estimand recovery. It combines 259 real-paper contexts, 100 fixed-seed synthetic scenarios with executable reference estimates, and 23 paper-twin pairs in which a model commits to a design before seeing the data and its executed analysis is scored against a canonical estimator on the same realised dataset. Execution is not correctness. Among 426 model-written workflows that run without error, 15.5% fail verification, and a keyword score of the effect direction stated in the text is a poor proxy for recovery. In a 23-pair, nine-model paired study, replacing a model's committed design with the reference design and its execution conventions raises joint recovery of the point estimate and standard error from 15.0% to 51.5%; yet 48.5% of eligible seeds still fail under the reference design. The direction replicates on six pairs built afterwards under a frozen construction protocol, although on the two newest pairs the gain is confined to models from the family that built the references. Design specification is consequential but not sufficient: a plausible method and runnable code do not guarantee recovery, and even supplying the reference design and its conventions leaves substantial downstream failure. CausalVerify evaluates the executed workflow rather than its surface plausibility, and every reported number is recomputed from frozen artifacts by a single script.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Rethinking Sign Language Translation: The Impact of Signer Dependence on Model Evaluation

Sign Language Translation has advanced with deep learning, yet evaluations remain largely signer-dependent, with overlapping signers across train/dev/test. This raises concerns about whether models truly generalise or instead rely on signer-specific regularities. We conduct signer-fold cross-validation on GFSLT-VLP, GASLT, and SignCL, three leading, publicly available, gloss-free SLT models, on CSL-Daily and PHOENIX14T. Under signer-independent evaluation, performance drops sharply: on PHOENIX14T, GFSLT-VLP falls from BLEU-4 21.44 to 3.59 and ROUGE-L 42.49 to 11.89; GASLT from 15.74 to 8.26; and SignCL from 22.74 to 3.66. We also observe that in CSL-Daily many target sentences are performed by multiple signers, so common splits can place identical sentences in both training and test, inflating absolute scores by rewarding recall of recurring sentences rather than genuine generalisation. These findings indicate that signer-dependent evaluation can substantially overestimate SLT capability. We recommend: (1) adopting signer-independent protocols to ensure generalisation to unseen signers; (2) restructuring datasets to include explicit signer-independent, sentence-disjoint splits for consistent benchmarking; and (3) reporting both signer-dependent and signer-independent results together with train-test sentence overlap to improve transparency and comparability.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Reasoning Beyond Transcription: Audio Language Models on Child Stuttering Speech

Child speech differs from adult speech in acoustics, prosody, and linguistic structures. Speech disfluencies (such as repetitions) further challenge automatic understanding. While Audio Language Models (ALMs) show strong semantic reasoning from speech audio, their ability to reason about disfluent child speech in mixed-speaker settings remains unexplored. We investigate this through two tasks: child-focused semantic summarization and speech entailment. Experiments use recordings of children who stutter in mixed speaker interviews without explicit speaker separation. Models are instruction-guided to focus on the child, preserve clinically relevant disfluencies, and avoid adult-speech leakage. Evaluation combines LLM-based judges and reference-based metrics, anchored by transcript-oracle baselines to isolate errors. Results show that while ALMs extract high-level meaning from stuttered speech, reasoning degrades significantly with increased

cs.CL↗
Compare source metadata on this page
WorkPublishedSource identifierSource
Translation Indeterminacy and the Distributional Fallacy2026-09-072609.07717arxiv
The Hidden Frame: How Large Language Models Impact Democratic Society2026-10-032609.07735arxiv
LLM Forensics: Where Do Backdoors Hide? Localizing and Controlling Trigger Mechanisms with Sparse Autoencoders2026-09-232609.07746arxiv
Replicating a Disjoint-Set Union Experiment over Various Notions of Micro Units to assess Translation Effort2026-09-072609.07748arxiv
Bag of Tricks or Bag of Myths? Reducing Modeling Complexity with Task Knowledge in Explainable Suicide Risk Assessment2026-09-072609.07766arxiv
Signed Rescue Routing: Harm-Aware Cascades for Efficient LLM Inference2026-09-072609.07786arxiv
LLM Agents as Computational Typologists2026-09-072609.07791arxiv
Does Syntax Matter? A Graph-Augmented Variational Topic Model for Computational Social Sciences2026-09-072609.07797arxiv
Climate-ModernBERT: Revisiting Corpus Composition for Domain-Adaptive Continued Pretraining2026-09-072609.07798arxiv
You Can't Prefer Emotions You Don't Sample: Intensity Undershoot in DPO-Tuned LLMs2026-09-072609.07808arxiv
VoT: Vision-of-Thought for Unified Multimodal Representation Alignment2026-09-072609.07815arxiv
A*-Thought-V2: Efficient Latent Reasoning via Geometric Dynamics of LLM2026-09-072609.07821arxiv
SAFIRE: Safety-Critical Benchmark for Fine-grained Fire and Smoke Understanding in Multimodal LLMs2026-09-072609.07823arxiv
LLM Layers Immediately Correct Each Other2026-09-072609.07876arxiv
Deadline-Aware Adaptive Prefill Chunking for Efficient Large Language Model Serving2026-09-072609.07883arxiv
CausalVerify: End-to-End Verification of Causal Analyses by Language Models2026-09-262609.07944arxiv
Rethinking Sign Language Translation: The Impact of Signer Dependence on Model Evaluation2026-09-072609.07965arxiv
Reasoning Beyond Transcription: Audio Language Models on Child Stuttering Speech2026-09-072609.07968arxiv

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.