Searcharxiv⌕ Search

subject

cs.CY

cs.CY: explore 271 source-linked works published from 2013 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: arxiv. Collection updated 2026-09-16. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

arXiv2026

Impact of introducing "Informatics I" to the common university entrance examination in Japan: a longitudinal study on students' perceptions of their information-related knowledge and skills from 2006 to 2026

Despite the recent intensive development of secondary education curricula and assessments in informatics, the impact of assessments has not been well studied in this field. Since informatics education covers a diverse range of content, from computer science knowledge to ICT skills, careful consideration is needed to prevent assessments from distorting education. This study investigates the impact of introducing ``Informatics I'' into the Common Test for University Admissions in Japan, as an example of a large-scale, standardized, high-stakes assessment in 2025. As the data source for this analysis, this study uses a questionnaire that has been administered every year from 2006 to 2026 to all first-year students at the University of Tokyo. The questionnaire asks students for their self-perceptions of the information-related knowledge and skills they studied and acquired in high school. Using these data, we conduct a longitudinal study of the 2013 curriculum reform, the 2022 reform, and the introduction of the new entrance examination. We attempt to isolate the impact of the entrance examination through two comparisons: between the 2013 curriculum reform and the 2022 reform; and between direct-entry and gap-year students among those entering in 2025, who followed different curricula but took the new examination. We use the theoretical framework of the washback effect as a lens for interpreting these differences. We found that (1) the 2013 curriculum reform produced no discontinuity in students' perceptions, whereas (2) the introduction of the new entrance examination in 2025 produced a sharp change, particularly in the proportion of students reporting acquisition of computer-science topics; and (3) this change is too large to be interpreted as a gain in proficiency, and is better understood as a shift in students' criteria for judging acquisition.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Energy and CO2 Footprint of Climate Model Intercomparison Projects

Earth System Models (ESMs) rely heavily on High-Performance Computing (HPC) resources to simulate global climate. As these models evolve, their computational demands continue to grow, driven by three factors: (1) finer spatial grid resolutions, (2) the integration of complex biogeochemical processes (e.g., atmospheric chemistry, interactive vegetation, land use, and ice sheets), and (3) larger climate ensembles to manage uncertainty. Historically, growth in peak computing performance (FLOP/s) has outpaced improvements in energy efficiency (FLOP/Watt), increasing total HPC power consumption. Despite the central role of Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs) in climate research, quantifying their computational and environmental costs has received limited systematic attention. This paper examines the evolution of climate model carbon accounting from voluntary post-hoc estimation in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) to standardized accounting under the newly established CMIP7 Task Team on Energy Consumption. Using high-resolution Destination Earth simulations on MareNostrum 5, we empirically evaluate how different accounting boundaries (operational, active-only, and embodied carbon) impact reported energy, carbon emissions, and financial costs. Finally, we outline key methodological considerations for standardizing energy and carbon accounting for Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs).

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Generative AI Alignment with Hinduism's Theological Plurality and Sacred Representation

Generative AI systems are increasingly used to answer personal questions and mediate everyday practices, including religion. However, existing discussions around AI alignment and ethics have largely centered secular, Western, and Abrahamic assumptions about religion, offering limited attention to other faith-based traditions. In this paper, we examine how Hindu users engage with generative AI systems in relation to their religious knowledge, belief, and practice. Drawing on 15 semi-structured interviews with Bangladeshi Hindu participants, we analyze how users interpret AI-generated religious representations, scriptural explanations, devotional interactions, and synthetic religious media. We found that AI can be both accessible and ethically troubling. While AI supported scriptural inquiry, devotional visualization, and religious storytelling, our study also identified concerns about theological flattening, cultural misrepresentation, devotional manipulation, and the simulation of sacred presence and authority. We conclude by arguing that religious alignment in generative AI requires interpretive alignment: systems that disclose their limits, preserve plurality, and avoid simulating sacred authority and sycophantic personalization.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

It Takes Three to Converse: Empirical Observations on How the Developer, the Convener and the Participant Shaped 119 Polis Conversations

Polis is a popular democratic innovation tool that allows asynchronous citizen engagement through atomic statements: short statements that together describe a complex question, inviting the citizen to vote Agree or Disagree on each. This paper uses 119 conversations with 100 or more participants and an extensive data export, drawn from a wider set of 271 collected processes. The paper asks what determines the output of such a process. Three parties shape the result. The developer of the platform has made important design choices that restrict the outcome: the number of groups the platform is able to report (restricted to 2--5) and which statements are prioritized. The convener defines the assignment: the initial statements that set the tone, the policy that accepts or rejects new statements and who can be invited. Finally, the participant works within these boundaries. With access to less than half of the generated statements, they end up responding to more statements when their conversation seems to have an achievable number of statements to complete, than when they are presented with more statements. Due to choices such as warm path clustering, the exported resulting clustering cannot be reproduced based on the voting data. Conveners may want to re-analyse their own conversations once the process is closed, to consider the data in its entirety, and make their own analysis priorities explicit.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

CultureConverse: A Multilingual Multi-turn Simulation Harness for Culturally Grounded Assistance in East and Southeast Asia

Current cultural evaluations for large language models (LLMs) often reduce culture to single-turn factual recall via MCQs, failing to capture a common use case: users seeking practical help over multiple turns in culturally grounded scenarios. We introduce CultureConverse, a scalable, multilingual simulation and evaluation harness for culturally grounded assistant dialogue that covers 10 East and Southeast Asian regions, 58 subgroup identities, and 7 domains. Each simulated and evaluated episode produces a scored interaction where the assistant assists the user and infers cultural constraints from partial information. The resulting CultureConverse-DS dataset contains 14,610 benchmark (evaluation) episodes and 274,295 oracle-guided (gold-mode) dialogues. In our benchmark evaluation of 18 models, GPT-5 mini achieves the highest assistance quality. Human annotation experiments suggest that our evaluation framework is a sufficient proxy for human judgment. Performance gains from fine-tuning on 27,860 high-quality CultureConverse-DS samples improve in-domain assistance and transfer out-of-domain to cultural MCQ and safety classification benchmarks. We release the harness, both splits, and judge prompts to support interactive evaluation of cultural competency.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

A Guided Inquiry Approach to Students Co-Designing Generative AI Course Policies

As generative AI (GenAI) use among students increases, educators face growing questions about how to support learning while addressing ethical and institutional concerns. This exploratory study examines a guided inquiry activity in which students co-designed a GenAI course policy. Students first developed individual policy proposals focused on appropriate and ethical use of GenAI, then collaboratively refined them by incorporating diverse stakeholder perspectives. The following research questions guided the study: 1) what practical factors do students prioritize in their GenAI use policies, and how do they justify these choices? and 2) how do participants reflect on the policy design process? Participants first completed readings, then used GenAI to brainstorm initial policy ideas. Next, they articulated their own perspectives through a written assignment and a course policy they designed individually. Finally, they incorporated diverse stakeholder perspectives by collaborating with peers to develop a collective policy. Analysis of student artifacts and group discussions showed that participants prioritized training for students and instructors, standardized procedures for disclosing AI use, and stronger institutional support. Participants also wanted greater involvement in GenAI-related decision-making. They described the policy design process as a way to engage with multiple perspectives and the inherent trade-offs involved in governing AI use. This study offers pedagogical insights into how policy co-design activities can surface student values, concerns, and sensemaking about GenAI in educational contexts.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Filling holes in science draws collective attention, but most higher-order holes remain unexplored

Most scientific discoveries justify their significance by filling holes between existing ideas and arguments. Representing knowledge as high-dimensional concept embeddings, we use persistent homology to detect scientific holes of increasing order, from lower-order gaps between disconnected ideas to higher-order cavities within unevenly connected ones; then we identify the research that fills them. Researchers who close holes draw outsized collective attention, staging novelty that the citing literature rewards, most strongly in discovery-oriented fields and least in design-oriented fields. Closing a hole is followed by persistent work on the same combinations of concepts at many times the rate of comparable holes left open. Yet as knowledge grows, higher-order holes explode while the fraction of research that fills them collapses, leaving most higher-order combinations unexplored. These results call for a richer science of holes and mark a frontier where contemporary AI might help fill the gaps human science opens.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Stress-testing university AI governance: A prospective method for locating policy breakpoints

Universities are producing AI principles and use policies faster than they are building decision pathways for unfamiliar forms of AI agency. This study develops Institutional AI Governance Stress Testing (IAGST), a prospective documentary method for locating where publicly documented governance ceases to yield an accountable response. IAGST adapts established policy stress-testing and wind-tunneling logic. Its originality lies in combining controlled capability escalation, a frozen documentary corpus, a six-dimensional governance response chain, non-compensatory decision rules, and case-level breakpoint diagnosis. The method was demonstrated using 133 substantive public documents from five Western Australian universities and 15 quality-screened scenarios, resulting in 75 university-scenario encounters. Six cases were resolved, 14 were resolved through structured discretion, and 55 were indeterminate. Governed pathways fell from 16 of 25 augmentation cases to four delegation cases and none at autonomous substitution. The dominant weakness was not the complete absence of responsible roles: all 50 authority-gap cases named a role at only a generic level but lacked sufficient decision criteria or process. The findings show how universities can move beyond policy inventories and principal statements by testing whether authority, procedures, safeguards, and reviews remain connected as AI capabilities evolve. IAGST is a reproducible diagnostic for policy learning, not a ranking or measure of implementation.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Comparing Apples to Oranges: A Taxonomy for Navigating the Global Landscape of AI Regulation

AI governance has transitioned from soft law, such as national AI strategies and voluntary guidelines, to binding regulation at an unprecedented pace. This evolution has produced a complex legislative landscape: blurred definitions of "AI regulation" mislead the public and create a false sense of safety; divergent regulatory frameworks risk fragmenting international cooperation; and uneven access to key information heightens the danger of regulatory capture. Clarifying the scope and substance of AI regulation is vital to uphold democratic rights and align international AI efforts. We present a taxonomy to map the global landscape of AI regulation. Our framework targets essential metrics-technology or application-focused rules, horizontal or sectoral regulatory coverage, ex ante or ex post interventions, maturity of the digital legal landscape, enforcement mechanisms, and level of stakeholder participation-to classify the breadth and depth of AI regulation. We apply this framework to five early movers: the European Union's AI Act, the United States' Executive Order 14110, Canada's AI and Data Act, China's Interim Measures for Generative AI Services, and Brazil's AI Bill 2338/2023. We further offer an interactive visualization that distills these dense legal texts into accessible insights, highlighting both commonalities and differences. By delineating what qualifies as AI regulation and clarifying each jurisdiction's approach, our taxonomy reduces legal uncertainty, supports evidence-based policymaking, and lays the groundwork for more inclusive, globally coordinated AI governance.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Integrating LLM and Diffusion-Based Agents for Social Simulation

Large language models (LLMs) offer strong semantic reasoning capabilities for user modeling, but applying LLM-based simulation to an entire social network is computationally expensive and often unreliable for users with sparse behavioral histories. Meanwhile, conventional information diffusion models efficiently exploit historical propagation patterns and social structures, but provide limited understanding of item content and user-item semantic compatibility. We propose HySID, a hybrid framework for individual-level information adoption prediction that combines semantic reasoning with structural diffusion. HySID first analyzes the historical user-relation graph to adaptively select a small set of structurally informative core users. It then applies LLM-based simulation to estimate the engagement of these users and converts the judgments into a diffusion-compatible seed. Finally, a plug-in diffusion backbone propagates this seed through historical interaction structures to rank potential adopters across the full user population. This design enables LLMs to focus on users for whom semantic reasoning is most informative while allowing neural diffusion models to generalize the evidence to users that are not explicitly simulated. Experiments on three real-world datasets from Weibo, Zhihu, and KuaiRand show that HySID consistently improves four diffusion backbones in Recall and NDCG, while outperforming full-population LLM simulation baselines. At the same time, selective simulation reduces LLM inference cost by approximately 83\% to 99.9\%, demonstrating that HySID provides an effective and computationally practical approach to scalable information adoption prediction.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Digital Engagement, Income Disparities, and Job Seeking in the United States since 2010

Surveys often record how frequently people use the internet without measuring the infrastructures, skills, and support systems that make digital participation possible. Using the U.S. National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 cohort, we study how internet-use frequency relates to labor income, employment attachment, and job seeking after 2010. The main digital-engagement analysis uses the comparable 2011, 2013, and 2015 waves, with 2017 retained as later labor-market context. Across repeated cross sections, daily internet use consistently marks higher income and stronger employment attachment. Relative to daily use, less-than-daily use is associated with roughly 11 to 20 percent lower income, while nonuse is associated with about 18 to 21 percent lower income in 2011 and 2013. Respondents reporting no internet use are also 13 to 23 percentage points less likely to report full-year work. Job-search estimates reveal a distinct mechanism: active search is governed by employment status, search intensity, and application support, so a frequency item sorts respondents more sharply on durable labor-market attachment than on short-window search. Education accounts for a substantial share of the raw digital gradient, and pooled lagged-outcome and doubly robust transition estimates separate durable stratification from positive adoption margins. The results establish internet-use frequency as an informative behavioral marker of digitally mediated labor-market stratification and clarify why routine use should not be treated as a simple measure of digital access.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

When Is an Agent Evaluation Over? Outcome Finality and Cross-Unit Separation

Agent evaluations commonly score the state observed when a run stops and count the run as one trial. Interpreting that score as a final result from a separate trial requires outcome finality and cross-unit separation. Outcome finality requires that later events cannot change the claimed result, while cross-unit separation requires that earlier runs cannot change the relevant conditions of later ones. The endpoint establishes neither condition by itself, and the two can hold independently. Waiting for a delayed outcome may settle the label even though its state remains available to another run. Isolation may prevent carryover even though the scored outcome remains unresolved. We develop a completion argument that identifies the evidence needed for each decision. A final success or failure label is justified only when every relevant effect is resolved or bounded tightly enough to fix the outcome. Any remaining uncertainty must be reported. First, in a controlled replay with fixed agent actions, we find that endpoint and terminal labels differ for every nonzero-delay operation and that a delayed write changes the next run's score under shared state but has no such effect after namespacing or verified reset. Second, in a review of ten public protocols, we find that reset or deliberate retention is documented explicitly more often than unfinished operations or evidence for separate scoring. Finally, we propose an open-effects record for operations and resources that may remain relevant after the endpoint, their status, and their possible effects on the scored outcome or another run.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Installed Base: Nordic Health Dataset Catalogues Against HealthDCAT-AP Release 7

The European Health Data Space requires member states to publish machine readable descriptions of the health datasets available for secondary use, and the European Commission publishes HealthDCAT-AP as the metadata profile those descriptions are meant to satisfy. The profile has been designed and validated against curated examples, never against the catalogues already live. We report that measurement for the Nordic region. On 25 August 2026 the 11 Nordic national catalogues harvested by the European data portal held 2,811 dataset descriptions carrying the EU health theme, and none satisfies all eight properties HealthDCAT-AP Release 7 makes mandatory on a dataset. Three of the eight are present on exactly zero records across five countries. Set beside the portal's own quality assessment, which validates DCAT-AP and never mentions the health profile, this is not a health extension skipped on top of sound generic practice: no Nordic catalogue reaches the assessment's top rating band, 5 of the 11 are reported at zero per cent DCAT-AP compliant, and the properties surviving in both layers are the ones a human types into a form, not the ones needing a value bound to a controlled vocabulary. Two further results follow. Finland contributes 2,259 descriptions to the European portal of which 1,146 carry a theme, and not one uses the EU theme authority vocabulary, so a European health filter returns no Finnish dataset at all. Separately, the authority namespace answers HTTP 200 with a well formed empty document for terms it never defined, letting 1,238 datasets across the wider portal carry theme IRIs that resolve to nothing while passing any status code check. We publish the vocabulary, the shapes and the harvesters, record every verdict as a dated observation rather than a property of the dataset, and report the five errors this discipline caught before publication.

cs.DL↗
arXiv2026

Diagnosing the Demographic Distributions of LLM-Based Synthetic Persona Data: Reference-Distribution Dependence and Post Hoc Adjustment

We examine how strongly demographic-distribution diagnostics of LLM-based synthetic persona data depend on the official statistics chosen as the reference. We compared the sex $\times$ age-group $\times$ province joint distribution of the 1,000,000 Nemotron-Personas-Korea (NPK) records with Korean official statistics using total variation distance (TVD). Against the resident-registration population for April 2026, the time of use, the upper bound on the share discrepancy of any subgroup defined by the three variables was 1.81 percentage points, the margin of error of a survey with about 2,900 respondents. This value, however, depended on the reference date and population definition of the official statistics. The closest candidate examined, the 2024 census distribution for Korean nationals, gave 0.56 percentage points; no monthly resident-registration reference was closer. The reference distributions themselves also moved: between January 2025, when NPK's distance was smallest, and April 2026, the resident-registration distribution moved by more than twice that minimum distance, as did the census Korean-national distribution between 2024 and 2025. Raking reduced the range of the distance across reference months to about one fifth. Cell poststratification was applicable because none of the 204 cells was empty, and neither scheme produced extreme weights. Demographic alignment is necessary but not sufficient for response validity, and even this basic diagnostic depends on the choice of reference distribution. Providers should therefore disclose the source, reference date, population definition, and joint-cell allocation procedure of the official statistics used for demographic attributes, and users should repeat the diagnosis and adjustment against statistics current at the time of use.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Evaluating GNNs for Success Prediction in Artist Collaboration Networks

As the music industry becomes an increasingly collaborative effort, understanding the underlying structures of the artist network has become a focal point in cultural data analytics. This study expands on the previous analyses of the Italian and Danish networks by introducing a novel dataset of the Polish music scene. By utilizing methodologies used in the prior studies, this work enables a direct comparison between three distinct European music landscapes and allows to merged the created networks into one. Furthermore, this research introduces a framework to test the efficacy of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for artist popularity predictions based on the metadata and the position in the network. The statistical analysis revealed that the Polish and tri-national network exhibit similar properties and clustering behaviours, consistent with prior models. An evaluation of the predictive architectures reveals that while GNN models achieve a comparable F1-macro scores to the Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) in specific cases however the MLP remains a superior model regarding the success metric. The results suggest that internal node features - such as genre and label affiliation might carry more predictive capabilities than the topology of the network. The higher performance of the GNN models in the tri-national network might also suggests that the relational features become more informative when the network spans multiple linguistic and geographic boundaries, with the GNNs potentially capturing complex 'bridge' structures between the merged networks.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Multi-dimensional Bias in Modeling Multi-dimensional Preferences: Evaluating the Ability of Synthetic Agents to Replace Human Participants in Conjoint Experiments

Despite growing interest in using LLMs to add robustness or reduce data-collection costs in survey experiments, their efficacy in conjoint design---an increasingly popular method in political science---remains underexplored. This paper addresses that gap by investigating whether synthetic agents can reproduce the multi-dimensional human preference patterns that conjoint is designed to capture. It replicates published conjoint studies and compares the results generated by synthetic agents with original human data along three dimensions: representational correspondence, inferential correspondence, and procedural stability. Our analysis evaluates the alignment of choice distributions as well as the statistical and substantive similarity of estimates, and the results are uneven across these dimensions and studies replicated. This implies that the validity of synthetic participants should be considered claim-dependent and hierarchical. Reproducing a figure or obtaining strong sign agreement is evidence of similar aggregate outputs, but not enough to support replacing human respondents. Our results suggest that the discipline as a whole must first map this innovation's boundaries across various levels before considering synthetic agents a robust substitute for human samples.

cs.MA↗
arXiv2026

Smart Enough to Go Extinct? An Evolutionary Challenge to the Value of General Intelligence and Its Ethical Implications for AGI

The pursuit of artificial general intelligence (AGI) rests on a seemingly self-evident premise: that general intelligence, the kind of flexible, domain-general cognitive capacity exemplified by Homo sapiens, is extraordinarily valuable. This paper subjects this premise to critical scrutiny. We first present the intuitive case for the value of general intelligence before mounting an evolutionary challenge. We argue that, on evolutionary timescales, its adaptive value is far from empirically established. Numerous taxa, from cyanobacteria to horseshoe crabs, have persisted for hundreds of millions or even billions of years without anything resembling general intelligence, while Homo sapiens has existed for roughly 300,000 years and already faces self-generated existential risks. Mass extinction events do not preferentially favour cognitively sophisticated species. We argue that general intelligence may be the only biological strategy that generates existential threats to the species possessing it, an existential risk paradox with no parallel among non-intelligent survival strategies. Unlike prevailing accounts of AI risk that trace the danger to misalignment, we locate it in structural features of general intelligence itself, implying that even well-aligned AGI would inherit this liability. If the long-term evolutionary value of general intelligence is uncertain or negative, this raises ethical questions about engineering AGI and, more urgently, creating artificial consciousness. Drawing on deontological ethics and the precautionary principle, we argue that this uncertainty imposes a duty of caution: if we create a new kind of intelligent being, we bear responsibility for ensuring the conditions under which it can flourish.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

PAUSE: Editable Strategy Artifacts for Long-Form Cultural Story Adaptation

Generative AI systems increasingly mediate cultural adaptation, but their cultural decisions are often hidden inside prompts, transient model plans, or final prose. We study PAUSE (Pause-And-Update Strategy Editing), an intervention that exposes an editable adaptation strategy as a human control surface for cultural decisions in long-form story adaptation. The strategy is a structured artifact that can be inspected, edited, and then projected through downstream character, entity, and chapter-localization stages. In two Chinese-source serialized novels, we test whether human edits to this strategy propagate into chapter-level prose. Across 9 edited-vs-control chapter comparisons, judges select the edited-strategy output in all 9; a marker audit shows target markers in 8/9 edited outputs and 0/9 controls, with forbidden markers absent from edited outputs and present in all controls. We frame these results as a smoke-scale edit-adherence study, not a claim that the outputs are culturally authoritative or literary-quality improvements. PAUSE offers one practical way to make AI-mediated cultural adaptation more inspectable and contestable before decisions propagate through long-form generation.

cs.CL↗
Compare source metadata on this page
WorkPublishedSource identifierSource
Impact of introducing "Informatics I" to the common university entrance examination in Japan: a longitudinal study on students' perceptions of their information-related knowledge and skills from 2006 to 20262026-08-282608.12924arxiv
Energy and CO2 Footprint of Climate Model Intercomparison Projects2026-08-282608.23509arxiv
Generative AI Alignment with Hinduism's Theological Plurality and Sacred Representation2026-08-282608.28228arxiv
It Takes Three to Converse: Empirical Observations on How the Developer, the Convener and the Participant Shaped 119 Polis Conversations2026-08-282608.28368arxiv
CultureConverse: A Multilingual Multi-turn Simulation Harness for Culturally Grounded Assistance in East and Southeast Asia2026-09-292608.28405arxiv
A Guided Inquiry Approach to Students Co-Designing Generative AI Course Policies2026-08-282608.28501arxiv
Filling holes in science draws collective attention, but most higher-order holes remain unexplored2026-10-142608.28822arxiv
Stress-testing university AI governance: A prospective method for locating policy breakpoints2026-08-282608.28925arxiv
Comparing Apples to Oranges: A Taxonomy for Navigating the Global Landscape of AI Regulation2026-08-272505.13673arxiv
Integrating LLM and Diffusion-Based Agents for Social Simulation2026-08-272510.16366arxiv
Digital Engagement, Income Disparities, and Job Seeking in the United States since 20102026-08-272511.05294arxiv
When Is an Agent Evaluation Over? Outcome Finality and Cross-Unit Separation2026-08-272608.14940arxiv
Measuring the Installed Base: Nordic Health Dataset Catalogues Against HealthDCAT-AP Release 72026-08-272608.27720arxiv
Diagnosing the Demographic Distributions of LLM-Based Synthetic Persona Data: Reference-Distribution Dependence and Post Hoc Adjustment2026-09-272608.28668arxiv
Evaluating GNNs for Success Prediction in Artist Collaboration Networks2026-08-202609.02920arxiv
Multi-dimensional Bias in Modeling Multi-dimensional Preferences: Evaluating the Ability of Synthetic Agents to Replace Human Participants in Conjoint Experiments2026-08-132609.04243arxiv
Smart Enough to Go Extinct? An Evolutionary Challenge to the Value of General Intelligence and Its Ethical Implications for AGI2026-08-112608.10730arxiv
PAUSE: Editable Strategy Artifacts for Long-Form Cultural Story Adaptation2026-08-072608.28633arxiv

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.