Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1404.1568

Geometric Random Edge

Friedrich Eisenbrand·Santosh Vempala
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We show that a variant of the random-edge pivoting rule results in a strongly polynomial time simplex algorithm for linear programs $\max\{c^Tx \colon Ax\leq b\}$, whose constraint matrix $A$ satisfies a geometric property introduced by Brunsch and Röglin: The sine of the angle of a row of $A$ to a hyperplane spanned by $n-1$ other rows of $A$ is at least $δ$. This property is a geometric generalization of $A$ being integral and all sub-determinants of $A$ being bounded by $Δ$ in absolute value (since $δ\geq 1/(Δ^2 n)$). In particular, linear programs defined by totally unimodular matrices are captured in this famework ($δ\geq 1/ n$) for which Dyer and Frieze previously described a strongly polynomial-time randomized algorithm. The number of pivots of the simplex algorithm is polynomial in the dimension and $1/δ$ and independent of the number of constraints of the linear program. Our main result can be viewed as an algorithmic realization of the proof of small diameter for such polytopes by Bonifas et al., using the ideas of Dyer and Frieze.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.CG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Friedrich Eisenbrand, Santosh Vempala. 2016-03-21. Geometric Random Edge. https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.1568

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗