On The Parameterized Tractability of the Just-In-Time Flow-Shop Scheduling Problem

Danny Hermelin; Dvir Shabtay; Nimrod Talmon

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1709.04169

On The Parameterized Tractability of the Just-In-Time Flow-Shop Scheduling Problem

Danny Hermelin·Dvir Shabtay·Nimrod Talmon

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Since its development in the early 90's, parameterized complexity has been widely used to analyze the tractability of many NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems with respect to various types of problem parameters. While the generic nature of the framework allows the analysis of any combinatorial problem, the main focus along the years was on analyzing graph problems. In this paper we diverge from this trend by studying the parameterized complexity of Just-In-Time (JIT) flow-shop scheduling problems. Our analysis focuses on the case where the number of due dates is considerably smaller than the number of jobs, and can thus be considered as a parameter. We prove that the two-machine problem is W[1]-hard with respect to this parameter, even if all processing times on the second machine are of unit length, while the problem is in XP even for a parameterized number of machines. We then move on to study the tractability of the problem when combining the different number of due dates with either the number of different weights or the number of different processing times on the first machine. We prove that in both cases the problem is fixed-parameter tractable for the two machine case, and is W[1]-hard for three or more machines.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Danny Hermelin, Dvir Shabtay, Nimrod Talmon. 2017-09-13. On The Parameterized Tractability of the Just-In-Time Flow-Shop Scheduling Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.04169

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗