SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1803.00283

Evolutionary Games for Correlation-Aware Clustering in Massive Machine-to-Machine Networks

Abstract

In this paper, the problem of self-organizing, correlation-aware clustering is studied for a dense network of machine-type devices (MTDs) deployed over a cellular network. In dense machine-to-machine networks, MTDs are typically located within close proximity and will gather correlated data, and, thus, clustering MTDs based on data correlation will lead to a decrease in the number of redundant bits transmitted to the base station. To analyze this clustering problem, a novel utility function that captures the average MTD transmission power per cluster is derived, as a function of the MTD location, cluster size, and inter-cluster interference. Then, the clustering problem is formulated as an evolutionary game, which models the interactions among the massive number of MTDs, in order to decrease MTD transmission power. To solve this game, a distributed algorithm is proposed to allow the infinite number of MTDs to autonomously form clusters. It is shown that the proposed distributed algorithm converges to an evolutionary stable strategy (ESS), that is robust to a small portion of MTDs deviating from the stable cluster formation at convergence. The maximum fraction of MTDs that can deviate from the ESS, while still maintaining a stable cluster formation is derived. Simulation results show that the proposed approach can effectively cluster MTDs with highly correlated data, which, in turn, enables those MTDs to eliminate a large number of redundant bits. The results show that, on average, using the proposed approach yields reductions of up to 23.4% and 9.6% in terms of the transmit power per cluster, compared to forming clusters with the maximum possible size and uniformly selecting a cluster size, respectively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nicole Sawyer, Mehdi Naderi Soorki, Walid Saad, David B. Smith. 2018-03-01. Evolutionary Games for Correlation-Aware Clustering in Massive Machine-to-Machine Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.00283

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT