Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2005.14359

Unsupervised Feature Selection via Multi-step Markov Transition Probability

Yan Min·Mao Ye·Liang Tian·Yulin Jian·Ce Zhu·Shangming Yang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Feature selection is a widely used dimension reduction technique to select feature subsets because of its interpretability. Many methods have been proposed and achieved good results, in which the relationships between adjacent data points are mainly concerned. But the possible associations between data pairs that are may not adjacent are always neglected. Different from previous methods, we propose a novel and very simple approach for unsupervised feature selection, named MMFS (Multi-step Markov transition probability for Feature Selection). The idea is using multi-step Markov transition probability to describe the relation between any data pair. Two ways from the positive and negative viewpoints are employed respectively to keep the data structure after feature selection. From the positive viewpoint, the maximum transition probability that can be reached in a certain number of steps is used to describe the relation between two points. Then, the features which can keep the compact data structure are selected. From the viewpoint of negative, the minimum transition probability that can be reached in a certain number of steps is used to describe the relation between two points. On the contrary, the features that least maintain the loose data structure are selected. And the two ways can also be combined. Thus three algorithms are proposed. Our main contributions are a novel feature section approach which uses multi-step transition probability to characterize the data structure, and three algorithms proposed from the positive and negative aspects for keeping data structure. The performance of our approach is compared with the state-of-the-art methods on eight real-world data sets, and the experimental results show that the proposed MMFS is effective in unsupervised feature selection.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGstat.ML

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yan Min, Mao Ye, Liang Tian, Yulin Jian, Ce Zhu, Shangming Yang. 2020-05-29. Unsupervised Feature Selection via Multi-step Markov Transition Probability. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14359

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗