arXiv · 2205.08533
Consistent Human Evaluation of Machine Translation across Language Pairs
Abstract
Obtaining meaningful quality scores for machine translation systems through human evaluation remains a challenge given the high variability between human evaluators, partly due to subjective expectations for translation quality for different language pairs. We propose a new metric called XSTS that is more focused on semantic equivalence and a cross-lingual calibration method that enables more consistent assessment. We demonstrate the effectiveness of these novel contributions in large scale evaluation studies across up to 14 language pairs, with translation both into and out of English.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Daniel Licht, Cynthia Gao, Janice Lam, Francisco Guzman, Mona Diab, Philipp Koehn. 2022-05-17. Consistent Human Evaluation of Machine Translation across Language Pairs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.08533
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.