SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2206.10485

Tight bounds for the learning of homotopy \`a la Niyogi, Smale, and Weinberger for subsets of Euclidean spaces and of Riemannian manifolds

Abstract

In this article we extend and strengthen the seminal work by Niyogi, Smale, and Weinberger on the learning of the homotopy type from a sample of an underlying space. In their work, Niyogi, Smale, and Weinberger studied samples of $C^2$ manifolds with positive reach embedded in $\mathbb{R}^d$. We extend their results in the following ways: In the first part of our paper we consider both manifolds of positive reach -- a more general setting than $C^2$ manifolds -- and sets of positive reach embedded in $\mathbb{R}^d$. The sample $P$ of such a set $\mathcal{S}$ does not have to lie directly on it. Instead, we assume that the two one-sided Hausdorff distances -- $\varepsilon$ and $\delta$ -- between $P$ and $\mathcal{S}$ are bounded. We provide explicit bounds in terms of $\varepsilon$ and $ \delta$, that guarantee that there exists a parameter $r$ such that the union of balls of radius $r$ centred at the sample $P$ deformation-retracts to $\mathcal{S}$. In the second part of our paper we study homotopy learning in a significantly more general setting -- we investigate sets of positive reach and submanifolds of positive reach embedded in a \emph{Riemannian manifold with bounded sectional curvature}. To this end we introduce a new version of the reach in the Riemannian setting inspired by the cut locus. Yet again, we provide tight bounds on $\varepsilon$ and $\delta$ for both cases (submanifolds as well as sets of positive reach), exhibiting the tightness by an explicit construction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dominique Attali, Hana Dal Poz Kouřimská, Christopher Fillmore, Ishika Ghosh, André Lieutier, Elizabeth Stephenson, Mathijs Wintraecken. 2022-06-21. Tight bounds for the learning of homotopy \`a la Niyogi, Smale, and Weinberger for subsets of Euclidean spaces and of Riemannian manifolds. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10485

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG