SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2209.14502

Fast Inference for Quantile Regression with Tens of Millions of Observations

Abstract

Big data analytics has opened new avenues in economic research, but the challenge of analyzing datasets with tens of millions of observations is substantial. Conventional econometric methods based on extreme estimators require large amounts of computing resources and memory, which are often not readily available. In this paper, we focus on linear quantile regression applied to "ultra-large" datasets, such as U.S. decennial censuses. A fast inference framework is presented, utilizing stochastic subgradient descent (S-subGD) updates. The inference procedure handles cross-sectional data sequentially: (i) updating the parameter estimate with each incoming "new observation", (ii) aggregating it as a $\textit{Polyak-Ruppert}$ average, and (iii) computing a pivotal statistic for inference using only a solution path. The methodology draws from time-series regression to create an asymptotically pivotal statistic through random scaling. Our proposed test statistic is calculated in a fully online fashion and critical values are calculated without resampling. We conduct extensive numerical studies to showcase the computational merits of our proposed inference. For inference problems as large as $(n, d) \sim (10^7, 10^3)$, where $n$ is the sample size and $d$ is the number of regressors, our method generates new insights, surpassing current inference methods in computation. Our method specifically reveals trends in the gender gap in the U.S. college wage premium using millions of observations, while controlling over $10^3$ covariates to mitigate confounding effects.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sokbae Lee, Yuan Liao, Myung Hwan Seo, Youngki Shin. 2022-09-29. Fast Inference for Quantile Regression with Tens of Millions of Observations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.14502

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM