arXiv · 2210.00742
Comment on "Absence versus Presence of Dissipative Quantum Phase Transition in Josephson Junctions''
Abstract
In a recent Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 087001, (2022)], Masuki, Sudo, Oshikawa, and Ashida studied a Josephson junction, with Josephson energy $E_{\rm J}$ and charging energy $E_{\rm C}$, shunted by an ohmic transmission line with conductance $\alpha (2e)^2/h$. Their model includes a realistic high frequency cutoff of order $\alpha E_c$, that is typically smaller than the plasma frequency $W$. The authors present a phase diagram showing surprising features, not anticipated in the established literature [eg. Sch\"on and Zaikin, Phys. Reports 198, 237, (1990)]. For $E_{\rm J}/E_{\rm C}$ above a certain value, they find that the junction remains superconducting for all $\alpha$, while below this value, they find that the insulating phase leads to re-entrant superconductivity at small $\alpha$. In this Comment, we show that their Numerical Renormalization Group (NRG) implementation is uncontrolled, and that there is no evidence for the re-entrant superconductivity in the phase diagram presented in Fig. 1a of PRL 129, 087001.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Théo Sépulcre, Serge Florens, Izak Snyman. 2022-10-03. Comment on "Absence versus Presence of Dissipative Quantum Phase Transition in Josephson Junctions''. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.131.199701
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.