SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2304.11325

Deterministic identity testing paradigms for bounded top-fanin depth-4 circuits

Abstract

Polynomial Identity Testing (PIT) is a fundamental computational problem. The famous depth-$4$ reduction result by Agrawal and Vinay (FOCS 2008) has made PIT for depth-$4$ circuits an enticing pursuit. A restricted depth-4 circuit computing a $n$-variate degree-$d$ polynomial of the form $\sum_{i = 1}^{k} \prod_{j} g_{ij}$, where $\deg g_{ij} \leq \delta$ is called $\Sigma^{[k]}\Pi\Sigma\Pi^{[\delta]}$ circuit. On further restricting $g_{ij}$ to be sum of univariates we obtain $\Sigma^{[k]}\Pi\Sigma\wedge$ circuits. The largely open, special-cases of $\Sigma^{[k]}\Pi\Sigma\Pi^{[\delta]}$ for constant $k$ and $\delta$, and $\Sigma^{[k]}\Pi\Sigma\wedge$ have been a source of many great ideas in the last two decades. For eg. depth-$3$ ideas of Dvir and Shpilka (STOC 2005), Kayal and Saxena (CCC 2006), and Saxena and Seshadhri (FOCS 2010 and STOC 2011). Further, depth-$4$ ideas of Beecken, Mittmann and Saxena (ICALP 2011), Saha, Saxena and Saptharishi (Comput.Compl. 2013), Forbes (FOCS 2015), and Kumar and Saraf (CCC 2016). Additionally, geometric Sylvester-Gallai ideas of Kayal and Saraf (FOCS 2009), Shpilka (STOC 2019), and Peleg and Shpilka (CCC 2020, STOC 2021). Very recently, a subexponential-time blackbox PIT algorithm for constant-depth circuits was obtained via lower bound breakthrough of Limaye, Srinivasan, Tavenas (FOCS 2021). We solve two of the basic underlying open problems in this work. We give the first polynomial-time PIT for $\Sigma^{[k]}\Pi\Sigma\wedge$. We also give the first quasipolynomial time blackbox PIT for both $\Sigma^{[k]}\Pi\Sigma\wedge$ and $\Sigma^{[k]}\Pi\Sigma\Pi^{[\delta]}$. A key technical ingredient in all the three algorithms is how the logarithmic derivative, and its power-series, modify the top $\Pi$-gate to $\wedge$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Pranjal Dutta, Prateek Dwivedi, Nitin Saxena. 2023-04-22. Deterministic identity testing paradigms for bounded top-fanin depth-4 circuits. https://doi.org/10.4230/lipics.ccc.2021.11

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Computational Complexity of Holant Problems on 4-regular Graphs from the Stable Subgroup Sequence of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$

The Holant framework provides a general setting for studying counting problems and includes graph homomorphisms (\#GH) and counting constraint satisfaction problems (\#CSP) as special cases. Over the past twenty years, a series of computational complexity dichotomies have been established for Holant problems, but the classification for complex-valued signatures is still open. The main obstacle is the case in which all signatures have even arity. In this paper, we establish a dichotomy for Holant problems with a complex-valued 4-ary signature, which is a key base case for the full classification of Holant problems. We present a new strategy by introducing Schur's theorem, the classification of finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ and stable subgroup sequences into the proof. These new techniques are of independent interest.

cs.CC

Topology inside NC$^1$

We show that ACC$^0$ is precisely what can be computed with constant-width circuits of polynomial size and polylogarithmic genus. This extends a characterization given by Hansen, showing that planar constant-width circuits also characterize ACC$^0$. Thus polylogarithmic genus provides no additional computational power in this model. We consider other generalizations of planarity, including crossing number and thickness. We show that constant-width circuits of polynomial size and thickness two already suffice to capture all of NC$^1$.

cs.CC