SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2305.01892

On the Fine-Grained Complexity of Small-Size Geometric Set Cover and Discrete $k$-Center for Small $k$

Abstract

We study the time complexity of the discrete $k$-center problem and related (exact) geometric set cover problems when $k$ or the size of the cover is small. We obtain a plethora of new results: - We give the first subquadratic algorithm for rectilinear discrete 3-center in 2D, running in $\widetilde{O}(n^{3/2})$ time. - We prove a lower bound of $\Omega(n^{4/3-\delta})$ for rectilinear discrete 3-center in 4D, for any constant $\delta>0$, under a standard hypothesis about triangle detection in sparse graphs. - Given $n$ points and $n$ weighted axis-aligned unit squares in 2D, we give the first subquadratic algorithm for finding a minimum-weight cover of the points by 3 unit squares, running in $\widetilde{O}(n^{8/5})$ time. We also prove a lower bound of $\Omega(n^{3/2-\delta})$ for the same problem in 2D, under the well-known APSP Hypothesis. For arbitrary axis-aligned rectangles in 2D, our upper bound is $\widetilde{O}(n^{7/4})$. - We prove a lower bound of $\Omega(n^{2-\delta})$ for Euclidean discrete 2-center in 13D, under the Hyperclique Hypothesis. This lower bound nearly matches the straightforward upper bound of $\widetilde{O}(n^\omega)$, if the matrix multiplication exponent $\omega$ is equal to 2. - We similarly prove an $\Omega(n^{k-\delta})$ lower bound for Euclidean discrete $k$-center in $O(k)$ dimensions for any constant $k\ge 3$, under the Hyperclique Hypothesis. This lower bound again nearly matches known upper bounds if $\omega=2$. - We also prove an $\Omega(n^{2-\delta})$ lower bound for the problem of finding 2 boxes to cover the largest number of points, given $n$ points and $n$ boxes in 12D. This matches the straightforward near-quadratic upper bound.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Timothy M. Chan, Qizheng He, Yuancheng Yu. 2023-05-03. On the Fine-Grained Complexity of Small-Size Geometric Set Cover and Discrete $k$-Center for Small $k$. https://doi.org/10.4230/lipics.icalp.2023.89

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG