SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2410.10619

Partially exchangeable stochastic block models for (node-colored) multilayer networks

Abstract

Multilayer networks generalize single-layered connectivity data in several directions. These generalizations include, among others, settings where multiple types of edges are observed among the same set of nodes (edge-colored networks) or where a single notion of connectivity is measured between nodes belonging to different pre-specified layers (node-colored networks). While progress has been made in statistical modeling of edge-colored networks, principled approaches that flexibly account for both within and across layer block-connectivity structures while incorporating layer information through a rigorous probabilistic construction are still lacking for node-colored multilayer networks. We fill this gap by introducing a novel class of partially exchangeable stochastic block models specified in terms of a hierarchical random partition prior for the allocation of nodes to groups, whose number is learned by the model. This goal is achieved without jeopardizing probabilistic coherence, uncertainty quantification and derivation of closed-form predictive within- and across-layer co-clustering probabilities. Our approach facilitates prior elicitation, the understanding of theoretical properties and the development of yet-unexplored predictive strategies for both the connections and the allocations of future incoming nodes. Posterior inference proceeds via a tractable collapsed Gibbs sampler, while performance is illustrated in simulations and in a real-world criminal network application. The notable gains achieved over competitors clarify the importance of developing general stochastic block models based on suitable node-exchangeability structures coherent with the type of multilayer network being analyzed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daniele Durante, Francesco Gaffi, Antonio Lijoi, Igor Prünster. 2024-10-14. Partially exchangeable stochastic block models for (node-colored) multilayer networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10619

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME